1
|
Maness SB, Kershner SH, George TP, Pozsik JT, Gibson M, Marcano D. Evaluation of a media literacy education program for sexual health promotion in older adolescents implemented in Southern universities. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2024; 72:1561-1567. [PMID: 35728071 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2083917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated a media literacy education program designed for sexual health promotion, Media Aware, in southeastern universities. PARTICIPANTS Participants included college students from four universities in the southeastern United States (n = 457). METHODS Media Aware was implemented on college campuses either in a group setting, one-on-one setting, at a student event, or online only. Media Aware contains four sections on sexual health promotion including on how media messages influence sexual health, gender stereotypes and representations of romantic relationships, sexual violence, substance use, consent, sexual risk behaviors, contraception, STIs, and partner communication. RESULTS Results indicated significant changes in intention to visit a healthcare provider for sexual health services, intention to use condoms and other forms of birth control, and awareness of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives after participation in Media Aware. CONCLUSION Future research should explore how to extend program impacts and use an experimental study design to assess between group differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Maness
- Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah H Kershner
- School of Health Sciences, Francis Marion University, Florence, South Carolina, USA
| | - Tracy P George
- School of Health Sciences, Francis Marion University, Florence, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer T Pozsik
- South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, STD/HIV & Viral Hepatitis Division, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | | | - Denise Marcano
- Fact Forward, Research and Evaluation Team, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kulkarni AD, Tepper N, Patel CG, Monsour M, Tevendale HD, Brittain AW, Whiteman M, Koumans EH. Claims for Contraceptive Services and Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Among Insured Adolescent and Young Adult Females in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:916-925. [PMID: 38629470 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: To examine claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among commercially and Medicaid-insured adolescent and young adult (AYA) females in the United States. Methods: Using IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified sexually active, nonpregnant AYA (15- to 24-year-old) females enrolled in 2018. We examined claims for reversible prescription contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, using drug names and diagnosis/procedure codes, by age-group in commercially and Medicaid-insured separately and by race/ethnicity in Medicaid-insured. Results: Among 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old females, 67.2% and 67.9% of commercially insured and 57.3% and 54.0% of Medicaid-insured, respectively, had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives in 2018. Across insurance types among both age-groups, the most common claim for contraceptives was prescription for combined oral contraceptives. Among Medicaid-insured 15- to 19-year-olds, claims for contraceptives ranged from 42.6% for Hispanic females to 63.4% for non-Hispanic White females; among Medicaid-insured 20- to 24-year-olds, claims ranged from 50.4% for non-Hispanic Black females to 57.0% for non-Hispanic White females. Approximately half of the commercially and Medicaid-insured females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Non-Hispanic Black females had the highest percentages of claims for chlamydia testing (56.3% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 61.1% among 20- to 24-year-olds) and gonorrhea testing (61.6% among 15- to 19-year-olds and 64.9% among 20- to 24-year-olds). Conclusion: Approximately, two-thirds of commercially insured and more than half of Medicaid-insured, sexually active, nonpregnant AYA females had claims for reversible prescription contraceptives. Race/ethnicity data were available for Medicaid-insured females, and there were differences in claims for contraceptives and chlamydia and gonorrhea testing by race/ethnicity. Half of the AYA females had claims for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing suggesting missed opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniket D Kulkarni
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Naomi Tepper
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chirag G Patel
- Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Monsour
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Heather D Tevendale
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anna W Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Maura Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emilia H Koumans
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fuentes L, Douglas-Hall A, Geddes CE, Kavanaugh ML. Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285825. [PMID: 37224157 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Public funding plays a key role in reducing cost barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care in the United States. In this analysis, we examine sociodemographic and healthcare seeking profiles of individuals in three states where public funding for health services has recently changed: Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin. In addition, we examine associations between individuals' health insurance status and whether they experienced delays or had trouble in obtaining their preferred contraception. This descriptive study draws on data collected between 2018 to 2021 in two distinct cross-sectional surveys in each state, one among a representative sample of female residents aged 18-44 and the other among a representative sample of female patients ages eighteen and older seeking family planning services at healthcare sites that receive public funding to deliver this care. The majority of reproductive-aged women and female family planning patients across states reported having a personal healthcare provider, had received at least one SRH service in the preceding 12 months, and were using a method of birth control. Between 49-81% across groups reported receiving recent person-centered contraceptive care. At least one-fifth of each group reported wanting healthcare in the past year but not getting it, and between 10-19% reported a delay or trouble getting birth control in the past 12 months. Common reasons for these outcomes involved cost and insurance-related issues, as well as logistical ones. Among all populations except Wisconsin family planning clinic patients, those with no health insurance had greater odds of being delayed or having trouble getting desired birth control in the past 12 months than those with health insurance. These data serve as a baseline to monitor access and use of SRH services in Arizona, Wisconsin, Iowa in the wake of drastic family planning funding shifts that changed the availability and capacity of the family planning service infrastructure across the country. Continuing to monitor these SRH metrics is critical to understand the potential effect of current political shifts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza Fuentes
- Formerly of the Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Ayana Douglas-Hall
- Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Christina E Geddes
- Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Megan L Kavanaugh
- Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehus CJ, Gewirtz O'Brien JR, Gower AL, Klein JD, Santelli JS, Sieving RE, McRee AL. Opportunities to Improve Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Primary Care Clinics. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2022:99228221142691. [PMID: 36475405 DOI: 10.1177/00099228221142691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Primary care providers are well positioned to address the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of adolescents; however, gaps often exist in the delivery of quality SRH services in primary care. Our objective was to identify specific opportunities to improve the delivery of adolescent SRH services in primary care. We conducted in-depth interviews with 25 primary care providers from various disciplines across rural and urban areas of Minnesota and conducted thematic analysis of transcribed data. Participants identified salient opportunities in three areas: (1) training and resources for providers (e.g., related to minor consent laws or addressing sensitive subjects), (2) practices and procedures (e.g., time-alone procedures and policies for confidential screening and sharing test results), and (3) education for adolescents (e.g., knowing their rights and accessing confidential SRH services). Study findings provide actionable opportunities to improve delivery of adolescent SRH services in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Mehus
- Department of Family Social Science and Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Amy L Gower
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan D Klein
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John S Santelli
- Department of Population & Family Health and Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renee E Sieving
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brittain AW, Steiner RJ, Fasula AM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Kulkarni A, Koumans EH. Improving Access to and Quality of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2022; 31:7-12. [PMID: 35023768 PMCID: PMC10961097 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Equitable access to high quality adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) services can help reduce unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, and disparities in these outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Reproductive Health, has a long history of working to improve access to and quality of ASRH services through applied research and public health practice. This report from CDC summarizes the evolution of these efforts from more than a decade of work-from community-based demonstration projects to an initiative to support wide-scale implementation. We describe a community-wide teen pregnancy prevention program model that includes a component addressing ASRH services (2010-2015), focused efforts related to quality improvement (QI) of and community-clinic linkages to ASRH services (2015-2020), and the development of a QI package that collates implementation strategies and tools to improve ASRH services (2020-2022). We conclude by discussing future directions. In disseminating key strategies and resources from this work, we aim to support broader public health and clinical efforts to strengthen ASRH care in the United States in ways that promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna W Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Riley J Steiner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amy M Fasula
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Aniket Kulkarni
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emilia H Koumans
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janis JA, Ahrens KA, Kozhimannil KB, Ziller EC. Contraceptive Method Use by Rural-Urban Residence among Women and Men in the United States, 2006 to 2017. Womens Health Issues 2021; 31:277-285. [PMID: 33531190 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Policy and reproductive health practice changes in the past decade have affected use of different contraceptive methods, but no study has assessed contraceptive method use over this time by rural-urban residence in the United States. METHODS We used female and male respondent data (2006-2017) from the National Survey of Family Growth (n = 29,133 women and n = 24,364 men) to estimate contraceptive method use by rural-urban residence over time and contraceptive method use by age, marital status, and parity/number of children. RESULTS From 2006-2010 to 2013-2017, among urban women, we found increased use of two or more methods (11% to 14%); increased use of intrauterine devices (5% to 11%), implants (0 to 2%), and withdrawal (5 to 8%); and decreased use of sterilization (28% to 22%) and pills (26% to 22%). Among rural women, we found increased use of intrauterine devices (5% to 9%) and implants (1% to 5%). We found increased withdrawal use for urban men, but otherwise no differences among men across time. In data pooled across all survey periods (2006-2017), contraceptive method use varied by rural-urban residence across age, marital status, and parity/number of children. CONCLUSIONS In a nationally representative sample of reproductive age women and men, we found rural-urban differences in contraceptive method use from 2006-2010 to 2013-2017. Describing contraceptive use differences by rural-urban residence is necessary for tailoring reproductive health services to populations appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn A Janis
- Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, Maine; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine.
| | - Katherine A Ahrens
- Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, Maine
| | - Katy B Kozhimannil
- University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erika C Ziller
- Maine Rural Health Research Center, University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Portland, Maine
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gibbs SE, Harvey SM, Larson A, Yoon J, Luck J. Contraceptive Services After Medicaid Expansion in a State with a Medicaid Family Planning Waiver Program. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2020; 30:750-757. [PMID: 33085917 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Medicaid family planning programs provide coverage for contraceptive services to low-income women who otherwise do not meet eligibility criteria for Medicaid. In some states that expanded Medicaid eligibility following the Affordable Care Act (ACA), women who were previously eligible only for family planning services became eligible for full-scope Medicaid. The objective of this study was to provide context for the impact of the ACA Medicaid expansion on contraceptive service provision to women in Oregon who were newly enrolled in Medicaid following the expansion. Materials and Methods: We used Medicaid eligibility data to identify women ages 15-44 years who were newly enrolled in Oregon's Medicaid program following the ACA expansion (n = 305,042). Using Medicaid claims data, we described contraceptive services and other preventive reproductive care received in 2014-2017. Results: Overall, 20% of women newly enrolled in Medicaid received contraceptive counseling and 31% received at least one method. The most frequently received methods were the pill (38% of women who received any method), intrauterine device (28%), implant (15%), and injectable (12%). Community health centers played a significant role in contraceptive service provision, particularly for the implant and injectable. Nine of 10 women (89%) who received contraceptive services also received other preventive reproductive services. Conclusions: This study provides insight regarding receipt of contraceptive services and preventive reproductive care following Medicaid expansion in a state with a Medicaid family planning program. These findings underscore the importance of Medicaid expansion for reproductive health even in states with preexisting Medicaid family planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah E Gibbs
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - S Marie Harvey
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jangho Yoon
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeff Luck
- College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kavanaugh ML, Pliskin E. Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016. F S Rep 2020; 1:83-93. [PMID: 34223223 PMCID: PMC8244260 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine current levels, correlates of, and changes in contraceptive use among reproductive-age women in the United States between 2014 and 2016. Design We conducted simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between user characteristics and contraceptive use, with specific attention to methods requiring a visit to a health care provider. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) All self-identified female respondents to the surveys. Secondary analysis of two rounds of the National Survey of Family Growth, an in-home, nationally representative survey of people ages 15–44 years (2013–2015) and 15–49 years (2015–2017). Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Current use of a contraceptive method, including use of individual methods and grouped method use in 2016, and change in use from 2014. Result(s) Contraceptive use remained steady between 2014 and 2016 among sexually active females not seeking pregnancy (88%). Among users, use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods increased from 14% to 18%, as use of short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods fell from 32% to 28%. Implant use among 15- to 19-year-olds rose from 6% to 16% and represents one of the largest increases observed. Access to sexual and reproductive health care was strongly associated with use of all LARC and SARC methods except for the implant (adjusted odds ratios ranged from 3.21 to 13.53). Conclusion(s) Contraceptive users are shifting primarily among the most and moderately effective method groups, and not from contraceptive nonuse to use. Reductions in access to sexual and reproductive health care could have implications for individuals’ ability to use their preferred contraceptive methods. Contraceptive use in the United States remained steady between 2014 and 2016. Increases in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods paralleled a decrease in use of short-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraceptive users are shifting primarily among the most and moderately effective method groups and not from contraceptive nonuse to use. Access to sexual and reproductive health care is strongly associated with use of most long- and short-acting reversible contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Pliskin
- Guttmacher Institute, Research Division, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lindberg LD, Bell DL, Kantor LM. The Sexual and Reproductive Health of Adolescents and Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2020; 52:75-79. [PMID: 32537858 PMCID: PMC7323157 DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - David L. Bell
- Department of Pediatrics and Department of Population and Family HealthColumbia University Medical CenterNew York
| | - Leslie M. Kantor
- Department of Urban—Global Public HealthRutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers UniversityNew YarkNJ
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|