1
|
Nguyen A, Fastenau J, Mehta J, Kovac E, Weiss RE. National Trends in PSA Cancer Screening With Parallel Investigation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Analysis of the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System From 2012 to 2022. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102178. [PMID: 39241312 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND From 2012 to 2022 there have been numerous revisions in the United States Preventative Task Force guidelines for prostate cancer screening, including advising against PSA testing to allowing shared-decision making for men aged 55 to 69. We sought to observe trends in PSA testing rates in relation to the changing guidelines. Conversely, colorectal cancer screening recommendations remained consistent for patients aged 50-75 and we sought to use this as a comparison to observe the effect of differing guidelines. METHODS The Centers for Disease Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is a national database of surveys on health-related behaviors and preventive medical services. We extracted responses from 2012 to 2022 regarding both prostate and colorectal cancer screening. Our primary variable of interest was prostate cancer screening while colorectal cancer screening served as a positive control. RESULTS Prostate cancer screening decreased among respondents from 70.1% in 2012 to 59.7% in 2022. However, there was a significant rebound in prostate cancer screening prevalence in 2022. In contrast, colorectal cancer screening rates steadily increased from 70.7% in 2012 to 78% in 2022. The annual percentage of men who had received prostate cancer screening was statistically different year to year. CONCLUSIONS Trends in the rate of screening for prostate and colorectal cancer appeared to adapt to the updated recommendations. However, further investigation regarding lower income levels, minority groups, and uninsured men are essential to address the social and racial disparities seen in prostate cancer screening. Efforts to promote shared-decision making may improve effective cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anh Nguyen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.
| | | | | | - Evan Kovac
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Newark, NJ
| | - Robert E Weiss
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Newark, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wangen M, Escoffery C, Fernandez ME, Friedman DB, Hannon P, Ko LK, Maxwell AE, Petagna C, Risendal B, Rohweder C, Leeman J. Twenty years of capacity building across the cancer prevention and control research network. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:45-56. [PMID: 37067700 PMCID: PMC10106885 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01690-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve population health, community members need capacity (i.e., knowledge, skills, and tools) to select and implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to fit the needs of their local settings. Since 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has funded the national Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) to accelerate the implementation of cancer prevention and control EBIs in communities. The CPCRN has developed multiple strategies to build community members' capacity to implement EBIs. This paper describes the history of CPCRN's experience developing and lessons learned through the use of five capacity-building strategies: (1) mini-grant programs, (2) training, (3) online tools, (4) evidence academies, and (5) evaluation support for partners' capacity-building initiatives. METHODS We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed publications and grey literature reports on CPCRN capacity-building activities. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework, we developed histories, case studies, and lessons learned for each strategy. Lessons were organized into themes. RESULTS Three themes emerged: the importance of (1) community-engagement prior to and during implementation of capacity-building strategies, (2) establishing and sustaining partnerships, and (3) co-learning at the levels of centers, networks, and beyond. CONCLUSION CPCRN activities have increased the ability of community organizations to compete for external funds to support implementation, increased the use of evidence in real-world settings, and promoted the broad-scale implementation of cancer control interventions across more than eight states. Lessons from this narrative review highlight the value of long-term thematic networks and provide useful guidance to other research networks and future capacity-building efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Peggy Hannon
- School of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- School of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Annette E Maxwell
- Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Health Policy and Management, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Courtney Petagna
- Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Betsy Risendal
- Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Community & Behavioral Health, The University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Catherine Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watson KS, Tossas KY, San Miguel Y, Gastala N, San Miguel LG, Grumeretz S, Henderson V, Winn R, Jimbo M, Naylor KB, Gregory ME, Molina Y, Hughes AM. Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:7049. [PMID: 37998280 PMCID: PMC10671818 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20227049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have been developed to improve the completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and other safety net settings in marginalized communities. Little effort has been made, however, to evaluate their relative effectiveness across different clinical contexts and populations. To this end, we tested the relative effectiveness of three EBIs (mailed birthday cards, lay navigation, and provider-delivered education) among a convenience sample of 1252 patients (aged 50-75 years old, who were due for CRC screening and scheduled for a visit at one of three clinics within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in the United States. To be eligible for the study, patients had to identify as African American (AA) or Latino American (LA). We compared the effects of the three EBIs on CRC screening completion using logistic regression. Overall, 20% of the study population, an increase from a baseline of 13%, completed CRC screening. Clinical demographics appeared to influence the effectiveness of the EBIs. Mailed birthday reminders appeared to be the most effective within the multi-ethnic clinic (p = 0.03), provider-delivered education within the predominantly LA clinic (p = 0.02), and lay navigation within the predominantly AA clinic (p = 0.03). These findings highlight the importance of understanding clinical context when selecting which evidence-based interventions to deploy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karriem S. Watson
- National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;
| | - Katherine Y. Tossas
- VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, 417 N 11th St., Richmond, VA 23219, USA; (K.Y.T.); (R.W.)
| | - Yazmin San Miguel
- Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA;
| | - Nicole Gastala
- Hospital & Health Sciences Systems Mile Square Health Center, University of Illinois, 1220 S Wood St. M/C 698; Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Liliana G. San Miguel
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (L.G.S.M.); (Y.M.)
| | - Scott Grumeretz
- Cancer Center, University of Illinois, SRH MC 709, 818 South Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Vida Henderson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N. M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109, USA;
| | - Robert Winn
- VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, 417 N 11th St., Richmond, VA 23219, USA; (K.Y.T.); (R.W.)
| | - Masahito Jimbo
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street, MC 663, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Keith B. Naylor
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., 718E CSB (MC 716), Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Megan E. Gregory
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA;
| | - Yamilé Molina
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, 1603 W Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (L.G.S.M.); (Y.M.)
| | - Ashley M. Hughes
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, School of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor Street MC 530, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
- Center for Innovation for Chronic, Complex Healthcare, Edward Hines JR VA Hospital, 5000 South 5th Avenue, Bldg 1, Hines, IL 60141, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zheng HC, Zhou J, Chen YC, Yu Y, Dai W, Han Y, Li XP, Jiang SF. The burden and trend of liver metastases in Shanghai, China: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:517-524. [PMID: 37401477 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on the epidemiology of liver metastases (LM)-related mortality are rare. we aimed to describe the burden and trend of liver metastases in Pudong of Shanghai, which could be beneficial to cancer prevention. METHODS We performed a retrospective population-based analysis of cancer mortality data with liver metastases in Shanghai Pudong from 2005 to 2021. Long-term trends in crude mortality rates (CMRs), age-standardized mortality rates worldwide, and rate of years of life lost (YLL) were analyzed by the Join-point regression model. In addition, we evaluate the impact of the demographic and nondemographic factors on the mortality of disease by the decomposition method. RESULTS Cancer with liver metastases accounted for 26.68% of all metastases. The CMR and age-standardized mortality rates by Segi's world population (ASMRW) of cancer with liver metastases were 15.12/105 person-years and 6.33/105 person-years, respectively. The YLL from cancer with liver metastases was 84 959.87 years, with the age group of 60-69 years having the highest YLL of 26 956.40 years. The top three cancer types in liver metastases are colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. The long-term trend of ASMRW significantly decreased by 2.31% per year ( P <0.05). The ASMRW and YLL rates of those over 45 decreased year by year. Particularly striking was the 70-79 age group. Although the overall mortality of cancer with liver metastases decreased, there was still a significant upward trend toward an increased mortality rate caused by cancer with liver metastases in aging patients. CONCLUSION Liver metastases were a common site of metastases in patients with cancers originating from the digestive system. The disease burden caused by cancer with liver metastases provides valuable evidence for cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Chao Zheng
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
- Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Jing Zhou
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Yi-Chen Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University
- Department of Scientific Research and Information Management, Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine and
- Department of Scientific Research and Information Management, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pudong New Area
| | - Ying Yu
- Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Wei Dai
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Yan Han
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| | - Xiao-Pan Li
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
- Department of Scientific Research and Information Management, Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine and
| | - Sun-Fang Jiang
- Department of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
- Department of General Practice, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watanabe-Galloway S, Kim J, LaCrete F, Samson K, Foster J, Farazi E, LeVan T, Napit K. Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use. J Rural Health 2022; 38:845-854. [PMID: 34784067 PMCID: PMC9108125 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine differences between urban and rural primary care clinics in the use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening methods and evidence-based interventions to promote CRC screening. METHODS This was a cross-sectional survey of primary care clinics in Nebraska. Surveys in paper form were sent out and followed up with telephone interviews to nonrespondents. Of the 375 facilities, 263 (70.1%) responded to the survey. FINDINGS Over 30% of urban clinics indicated that 80% or more of their patients were meeting the CRC guidelines compared to 18.3% of rural clinics (P = .03). Rural clinics were more likely than urban clinics to prefer the use of colonoscopy alone or in combination with stool tests (P = .02). The most common interventions for CRC screening included one-on-one patient education and use of computer-based pop-ups to remind providers. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we found some important differences between rural and urban primary care clinics in the implementation of CRC screening. Given that there is evidence for differences in preference for CRC screening methods (colonoscopy vs stool-based tests) between rural and urban community members, it is important to assess the effectiveness of different types of CRC screening interventions by comparing rural and urban primary care clinic patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jungyoon Kim
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Frantzlee LaCrete
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kaeli Samson
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Jason Foster
- College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Evi Farazi
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Tricia LeVan
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Krishtee Napit
- College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maxwell AE, DeGroff A, Hohl SD, Sharma KP, Sun J, Escoffery C, Hannon PA. Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018. Prev Chronic Dis 2022; 19:E26. [PMID: 35588522 PMCID: PMC9165474 DOI: 10.5888/pcd19.210258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer screening rates remain suboptimal in the US. The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seeks to increase screening in health system clinics through implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and supporting activities (SAs). This program provided an opportunity to assess the uptake of EBIs and SAs in 355 clinics that participated from 2015 to 2018. INTERVENTION APPROACH The 30 funded awardees of CRCCP partnered with clinics to implement at least 2 of 4 EBIs that CDC prioritized (patient reminders, provider reminders, reducing structural barriers, provider assessment and feedback) and 4 optional strategies that CDC identified as SAs (small media, professional development and provider education, patient navigation, and community health workers). EVALUATION METHODS Clinics completed 3 annual surveys to report uptake, implementation, and integration and perceived sustainability of the priority EBIs and SAs. RESULTS In our sample of 355 clinics, uptake of 4 EBIs and 2 SAs significantly increased over time. By year 3, 82% of clinics implemented patient reminder systems, 88% implemented provider reminder systems, 82% implemented provider assessment and feedback, 76% implemented activities to reduce structural barriers, 51% implemented provider education, and 84% used small media. Most clinics that implemented these strategies (>90%) considered them fully integrated into the health system or clinic operations and sustainable by year 3. Fewer clinics used patient navigation (30%) and community health workers (19%), with no increase over the years of the study. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH Clinics participating in the CRCCP reported high uptake and perceived sustainability of EBIs that can be integrated into electronic medical record systems but limited uptake of patient navigation and community health workers, which are uniquely suited to reduce cancer disparities. Future research should determine how to promote uptake and assess cost-effectiveness of CRCCP interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette E Maxwell
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Dr South, A2-125 CHS, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900. E-mail:
| | - Amy DeGroff
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Juzhong Sun
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|