Should simultaneous exercise become the standard for adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging?

Prognostic implications of stress modality on mortality risk and cause of death in patients undergoing office-based SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Patients requiring vasodilator single-photon emission computed-tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) have a higher mortality risk than those selected for exercise or vasodilator with low-level exercise SPECT-MPI. However, it is unknown whether the increased mortality is driven by cardiac deaths alone or cardiac and non-cardiac deaths.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort of 1,511 consecutive patients referred for SPECT-MPI, patients were classified according to stress test modality: exercise, adenosine with low-level exercise (AdenoEx), and adenosine. Subjects were followed for events of all-cause mortality and cause of death. Survival analyses using multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching methods were performed.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 4.9 ± 0.9 years, a total of 68 (4.5%) deaths occurred: 50 non-cardiac and 18 cardiac. The adenosine group had the highest annual mortality (all-cause 3.65%, non-cardiac 2.36%, cardiac 1.29%), while exercise stress had the lowest mortality (all-cause 0.42%, non-cardiac 0.37%, cardiac 0.05%) and AdenoEx had an intermediate mortality (all-cause 1.3%, non-cardiac 0.91%, cardiac 0.39%); all P values <0.001. The majority of non-cardiac deaths were attributed to cancer. Using exercise stress as a reference standard, multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that adenosine stress was independently predictive of all-cause mortality [HR 3.23 (CI 1.77-5.88); P < 0.001], non-cardiac death [HR 2.67 (CI 1.34-5.31); P = 0.005], and cardiac death [HR 6.30 (CI 1.55-25.56); P = 0.010] after adjusting for univariate predictors of mortality. These findings were consistent in the subgroups of patients with normal and abnormal MPI. AdenoEx was predictive of all-cause, non-cardiac, and cardiac deaths in univariate analysis, but it was not predictive by multivariate analysis. Propensity score matched cohort analysis showed that the adenosine stress group had the highest all-cause (P < 0.001), non-cardiac (P = 0.013), and cardiac deaths (P < 0.001), while the exercise stress group had the lowest mortality of any cause.

CONCLUSIONS

The inability to perform any level of exercise during a SPECT-MPI stress is associated with high mortality risk, which is derived from both cardiac and non-cardiac deaths.

Regadenoson use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the state of current knowledge

Stress testing is challenging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Functional capacity is generally decreased in this patient population, limiting patients’ ability to achieve physiologic stress through exercise. Additionally, due to emphysematous changes, COPD patients tend to have poor acoustic windows that impair the quality and therefore diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography techniques. Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) testing is also problematic, particularly due to the concern for adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction with conventional vasodilator stress agents. Regadenoson, a selective A_2A adenosine receptor agonist, has gained popularity due to its ease of administration and improved patient experience in the general population. The literature describing the experience with regadenoson in COPD patients, though limited, is rapidly growing and reassuring. This review summarizes the pharmacology and clinical application of this novel stress agent and presents the available data on the safety and tolerability of its use in COPD patients.

Comparison of hemodynamic and stress testing variables in patients undergoing regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging to regadenoson with adjunctive low-level exercise myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Regadenoson (REG), a selective adenosine A2a receptor agonist, is becoming the preferred pharmacologic agent for stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Hemodynamic and stress variables, immediate safety and use of aminophylline when using REG combined with low-level exercise (REG WALK MPI) compared with REG MPI, have not been well studied and formed the basis of our study.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent REG MPI (n = 887) was compared to patients undergoing REG WALK MPI (n = 485) from January to November 2009. Patient demographics, hemodynamic parameters, REG MPI data, side effects, immediate major clinical events, and use of aminophylline were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in REG WALK MPI group tended to be younger, male and obese compared to patients in REG MPI group. REG WALK MPI patients had higher stress heart rate (103 ± 20.5 vs 84 ± 19 bpm, P = .001), higher heart rate reserve (36.3 ± 19 vs 14.7 ± 15.5 bpm, P < .001), and greater systolic blood pressure rise (4.8 ± 21.3 vs -8.9 ± 19.8 mm Hg, P < .001), compared to REG MPI patients. No major adverse events were reported immediately after REG WALK MPI. There were no differences in drug-related side effects in between the two groups; however, the use of aminophylline was lower in REG WALK MPI Group (5.6% vs 11.4%, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

REG WALK MPI gives more favorable hemodynamic response with lesser use of aminophylline and no increase in adverse events when compared with REG MPI.

The impact of adenosine pharmacologic stress combined with low-level exercise in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (BIWAKO adenosine-Ex trial)

BACKGROUND

The combination of adenosine infusion with low-level exercise has become a common approach for inducing stress during stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We investigated stress MPI performed by combined low-level exercise and adenosine infusion. This combined protocol can decrease adverse reactions and reduce the effect of scattered rays from the liver.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects were clinically referred for a 53-min rest-stress Tc-99m Sestamibi MPI procedure using BIWAKO PROTOCOL. Ninety-eight patients (44.5%) underwent adenosine infusion with ergometer exercise testing and 122 patients (55.5%) underwent adenosine infusion without exercise testing. We evaluated the liver/heart (L/H) uptake ratio, background activity in the upper mediastinum, and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

The L/H ratio and background activity were lower in the adenosine-exercise group than in the adenosine-non-exercise group (1.8 ± 0.54 vs. 2.1 ± 0.62, P < 0.0056; 43.1 ± 12.2 vs. 61.5 ± 15.4, P < 0.0001). The adenosine-exercise group had fewer adverse reactions than the adenosine-non-exercise group (11.2 vs. 19.7%). All of the adverse reactions were minor, with the exception of severe back pain in one case. The incidence of adverse reactions in our study was lower than that in previous studies for unknown reason.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine infusion in combination with low-level exercise seems to result in higher-quality images and fewer adverse reactions than adenosine infusion without exercise. The combined protocol decreases adverse reactions and improves the quality of myocardial perfusion images by decreasing background activity.

[Study of efficacy and safety of pharmacological stress tests in nuclear cardiology]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Many patients who cannot adequately perform exercise stress testing may nevertheless undergo pharmacological tests, most commonly with the vasodilator agents (adenosine and dipyridamole), as well as the positive inotropic agent dobutamine. Patients undergoing vasodilators stress testing with either dipyridamole or adenosine also perform simultaneous low-intensity exercise. The aim of this study was to compare various pharmacological stress tests alone or in combination with low intensity exercise as preparation for MPS in regard to incidence of adverse effects, quality of diagnostic image and the acquisition initial time.

METHODS

A total of 2 205 patients underwent pharmacological stress tests. Pharmacological stress test with adenosine was applied in 493 patients. In 405 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (AdenoEX). In 88 of them we performed adenosine abbreviated protocol (AdenoSCAN). In 1 526 patients we performed pharmacological stress test with dipyridamole. In 871 of them we performed concomitant low level exercise (50 W) by bicycle ergometar (DipyEX), and in 775 we used only dipyridamole protocol (DipySCAN). In 186 patients we used pharmacological stress test with dobutamine. We followed side effects of adenosine, dipyiridamole and dobutamine, compared results between protocols with concomitant low level exercise and vasodilatators only. We also compared image quality, and suggested time of acquisition after stress test.

RESULTS

We found numerous side effects especially with adenosine, but these effects were short-lived and not required active interventions. Benefit with concomitant exercise in booth AdenoEX and DipyEX included decreased side effects (AdenoEX vs AdenoSCAN 620% vs 87%, respectively, and DipyEX vs DipySCAN 37% vs 59%, respectively) improved safety and patients tolerance, improved target-to-background ratios because of less subdiaphragmal activity, and earlier acquisition time. Because of producing a lot of arrhythmias (in 49% of patients) dobutamin was considered a last choice for pharmacological stress testing.

CONCLUSION

Safety and efficacy of vasodilatators (adenosine, dipyridamole) pharmacological stress tests are good, but with concomitant exercise even better. The safety and efficacy of adenosin are better than those of dipyridamole. AdenoEX protocol provides good safety and patients tolerancy. In light of these benefits we recommend AdenoEX whenever possible. Dobutamine is the last pharmacological toll for MPS.

The RegEx trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled pilot study combining regadenoson, a selective A(2A) adenosine agonist, with low-level exercise, in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Although vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is increasingly performed with exercise, adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists have not been studied with exercise.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety of administering regadenoson during exercise and, secondarily, to evaluate image quality, patient acceptance, and detection of perfusion defects.

METHODS

Patients requiring pharmacologic MPI received a standard adenosine-supine protocol (AdenoSup, n = 60) and were then randomized (2:1) in a double-blind manner to low-level exercise with bolus intravenous injection of regadenoson (RegEx, n = 39) or placebo (PlcEx, n = 21).

RESULTS

Adverse events occurred in 95%, 77%, and 33% of patients receiving AdenoSup, RegEx, and PlcEx, respectively. Peak heart rate was 13 beats per minute (bpm) and 21 bpm greater following RegEx compared to that following PlcEx and AdenoSup, respectively (P = .006 and <.001). Change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), change from baseline to nadir SBP, and percentage of patients with a decline in SBP by > or = 20 mm Hg showed no important differences between RegEx and PlcEx. No occurrences of 2nd degree or higher AV block were observed following RegEx or PlcEx; one patient developed 2nd degree AV block following AdenoSup. The mean heart-to-liver and heart-to-gut ratios were improved on RegEx vs AdenoSup: 0.85 (0.34) vs 0.65 (0.26), P < .001 and 1.1 (0.36) vs 0.97 (0.34), P < .001, respectively. Compared to AdenoSup, 70% of patients felt RegEx was much or somewhat better.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining regadenoson with low-level exercise is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with fewer side effects compared to AdenoSup.

[Adenosine stress protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease. There are many patients, however, who may not be able to undergo treadmill test. Such patients would benefit from pharmacological stress procedures combined with MPS. The most commonly used pharmacological agents for cardiac stress are coronary vasodilatators (adenosine, dipyridamol) and catecholamines. Concomitant low-level treadmill exercise with adenosine pharma cologic stress (AdenoEX) during MPS has become commonly used in recent years. A number of studies have demonstrated a beneficial impact of AdenoEX protocol. The aim of the study was, besides introducing into practice the two types of protocols of pharmatological stress test with adenosine, as a preparation for MPS, to compare and monitor the frequency of their side effects to quality, acquisition, as well as to standardize the onset time of acquisition (diagnostic imaging) for both protocols.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients underwent pharmacological stress test with adenosine (vasodilatator). In 108 of the patients we performed concomitant exercise (AdenoEX) of low level (50W) by a bicycle ergometar. In 28 of the patients we performed Adenosine ab breviated protocol (AdenoSCAN). Side effects of adenosine were followed and compared between the two kinds of protocols AdenoEX and AdenoSCAN. Also compared were image quality and suggested time of acquisition after the stress test.

RESULTS

Numerous side effects were found, but being short lived they did not require any active interventions. The benefit of AdenoEX versus AdenoSCAN included decreased side effects (62% vs 87%), improved safety and patients tolerance, improved target-to-background ratios because of less subdiaphragmatic activity, earlier acquisition, and improved sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of adenosine pharmacological stress is even better with concomitant exercise. In the light of these benefits we recommend AdenoEX whenever possible.