Effects of the nitric oxide donor nitroprusside on no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction

Techniques to Treat Slow-Flow/No-Reflow During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare TIMI flow after administering intracoronary (IC) medications through various routes for the treatment of slow flow/no-reflow during primary PCI.

METHODS

Two independent parallel cohorts of the patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI and developed slow/no-reflow were recruited. Selection of cohort was based on the route of administration of IC medications as proximal or distal. Post administration TIMI follow was compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in both, proximal and distal, cohort. Distribution of angiographic, clinical and demographic characteristics was not significant between the two cohorts except prevalence of hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Frequency of hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were 45 % vs.70 %; p < 0.001 and 28 % vs. 44 %; p = 0.018 among patients in distal and proximal cohort respectively. Final TIMI III flow was achieved in significantly higher number of patients in distal cohort with the frequency of 88 % vs. 76 %; p = 0.027 as compared to proximal cohort.

CONCLUSION

Administration of IC medication via distal route is observed to be more effective for the treatment of slow flow/no-reflow during primary PCI. Distal route via export catheter or perforated balloon technique should be preferred wherever feasible.

Comparison of Intracoronary Epinephrine and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (COAR Trial)

Background:

Intracoronary epinephrine has been effectively used in treating refractory no-reflow, but there is a dearth of data on its use as a first-line drug in normotensive patients in comparison to the widely used adenosine.

Methods:

In this open-labeled randomized clinical trial, 201 patients with no-reflow were randomized 1:1 into intracoronary epinephrine as the treatment group and intracoronary adenosine as the control group and followed for 1 month. The primary end points were improvement in coronary flow, as assessed by TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow, frame counts, and myocardial blush. Secondary end points were in-hospital and short-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events.

Results:

In all, 101 patients received intracoronary epinephrine and 100 patients received adenosine. Epinephrine was generally well tolerated with no immediate table death or ventricular fibrillation. No-reflow was more effectively improved with epinephrine with final TIMI III flow (90.1% versus 78%, P=0.019) and final corrected TIMI frame count (24±8.43 versus 26.63±9.22, P=0.036). However, no significant difference was observed in final grade III myocardial blush (55.4% versus 45%, P=0.139), mean reduction of corrected TIMI frame count (−25.71±11.79 versus −26.08±11.71, P=0.825), in-hospital and short-term mortality, and major adverse cardiac events.

Conclusions:

Epinephrine is relatively safe to use in no-reflow in normotensive patients. A significantly higher frequency of post-treatment TIMI III flow grade and lower final corrected TIMI frame count with relatively better achievement of myocardial blush grade III translate into it displaying relatively better efficacy than adenosine.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04699110.

Predictors of no- reflow during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, from Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum

Background

Primary angioplasty (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction is associated with no-reflow phenomenon, in about 5–25% of cases. Here we analysed the factors predicting no reflow .

Methods

This was a case control study of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent Primary PCI from August 2014 to February 2015.

Results

Of 181 patients who underwent primary PCI, 47 (25.9%) showed an angiographic no-reflow phenomenon. The mean age was 59.19 ± 10.25 years and females were 11%.

Univariate predictors of no reflow were age >60 years (OR = 6.146, 95%CI 2.937–12.86, P = 0<0.001), reperfusion time >6 h (OR = 21.94, 95%CI 9.402–51.2, P = < 0.001), low initial TIMI flow (≤1) (OR = 12.12, 95%CI 4.117–35.65, P < 0.001), low initial TMPG flow (≤1) (OR = 36.19, 95%CI 4.847–270.2, P < 0.001) a high thrombus burden (OR = 11.04,95%CI 5.124–23.8, P < 0.001), a long target lesion (OR = 8.54, 95%CI 3.794–19.23, P < 0.001), Killip Class III/IV(OR = 2.937,95%CI 1.112–7.756,P = 0.025) and overlap stenting(OR = 3.733,95%CI 1.186–11.75,P = 0.017).

Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis predictors were: longer reperfusion time > 6 h (OR = 13.844, 95%CI 3.214–59.636, P = <0.001), age >60 years (OR = 8.886, 95%CI 2.145–36.80, P = 0.003), a long target lesion (OR = 8.637, 95%CI 1.975–37.768, P = 0.004), low initial TIMI flow (≤1) (OR = 20.861, 95%CI 1.739–250.290, P = 0.017).

Conclusions

It is important to minimize trauma to the vessel, avoid repetitive balloon dilatations use direct stenting and use the shortest stent if possible.

Early Administration of Intracoronary Nitroprusside Compared with Thrombus Aspiration in Myocardial Perfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary nitroprusside and thrombus aspiration have been demonstrated to improve myocardial perfusion during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) However, no long-term clinical studies have been performed comparing these approaches.

METHODS

A single medical center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effects of intracoronary nitroprusside administration before slow/no-reflow phenomena versus thrombus aspiration during primary PCI. Forty-three consecutive patients with STEMI were enrolled in the intracoronary nitroprusside treatment group. One hundred twenty-four consecutive STEMI patients who received thrombus aspiration were enrolled; ninety-seven consecutive STEMI patients who did not receive either thrombus aspiration or intracoronary nitroprusside treatment were enrolled and served as control subjects. Patients with cardiogenic shock, who had received platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or intra-aortic balloon pump insertion were excluded. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, corrected TIMI frame count and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) were assessed prior to and following PCI by two independent cardiologists blinded to the procedures. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years after study enrollment as a composite of recurrent myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and cardiac death were recorded.

RESULTS

The control group had a significantly lower pre-PCI TIMI flow (≤ 1; 49.5% vs. 69.8% vs. 77.4%; p = < 0.001) compared with the nitroprusside and thrombus aspiration groups. The thrombus aspiration group had a significantly higher pre-PCI thrombus score (> 4; 98.4% vs. 88.4% vs. 74.3%; p = < 0.001) and post-PCI TMPG (3; 39.5% vs. 16.3% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.001) compared with the nitroprusside and control groups. No significant differences were noted in the post-PCI thrombus score, 30-day, 1-year and 3-year MACE rate, and Kaplan-Meier curve among 3 groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although thrombus aspiration provided improved TMPG compared with early administration of intracoronary nitroprusside and neither of both during primary PCI, it did not have a significant impact on 30-day, 1-year and 3-year MACE rate.

KEY WORDS

Acute myocardial infarction; Intracoronary nitroprusside; Thrombus aspiration.

No-Reflow Phoenomenon by Intracoronary Thrombus in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Recently, percutaneous coronary intervention has been the treatment of choice in most acute myocardial infarction cases. Although the results of percutaneous coronary interventions have ben good, the no-reflow phenomenon and distal embolization of intracoronary thrombus are still major problems even after successful interventions. In this article, we will briefly review the deleterious effects of no-reflow and distal embolization of intracoronary thrombus during percutaneous coronary interventions. The current trials focused on the prevention and treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon and intracoronary thrombus.

Mechanisms of myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury and the cytoprotective role of minocycline: scope and limitations

ABSTRACT 

Deep insight into the complex mechanisms of myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury has been attained in the past years. Minocycline is a second-generation tetracycline with US FDA approval for clinical use in various infections. Lately, several noninfectious cytoprotective activities of minocycline have been discovered as well. There now exists encouraging evidence of its protective role in cardiovascular pathology and its activity against myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury. In this article, an overview of the major mechanisms involved in myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury is presented. This is followed by an analysis of the mechanisms by which minocycline exerts its cytoprotective role and of studies that have been conducted in order to analyze minocycline, along with a review of the scope and limitations of its role as a cytoprotective agent.

Sodium nitroprusside in 2014: A clinical concepts review

Sodium nitroprusside has been used in clinical practice as an arterial and venous vasodilator for 40 years. This prodrug reacts with physiologic sulfhydryl groups to release nitric oxide, causing rapid vasodilation, and acutely lowering blood pressure. It is used clinically in cardiac surgery, hypertensive crises, heart failure, vascular surgery, pediatric surgery, and other acute hemodynamic applications. In some practices, newer agents have replaced nitroprusside, either because they are more effective or because they have a more favorable side-effect profile. However, valid and adequately-powered efficacy studies are sparse and do not identify a superior agent for all indications. The cyanide anion release concurrent with nitroprusside administration is associated with potential cyanide accumulation and severe toxicity. Agents to ameliorate the untoward effects of cyanide are limited by various problems in their practicality and effectiveness. A new orally bioavailable antidote is sodium sulfanegen, which shows promise in reversing this toxicity. The unique effectiveness of nitroprusside as a titratable agent capable of rapid blood pressure control will likely maintain its utilization in clinical practice for the foreseeable future. Additional research will refine and perhaps expand indications for nitroprusside, while parallel investigation continues to develop effective antidotes for cyanide poisoning.

The REFLO-STEMI trial comparing intracoronary adenosine, sodium nitroprusside and standard therapy for the attenuation of infarct size and microvascular obstruction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) secondary to ischaemic-reperfusion injury is an important but underappreciated determinant of short- and longer-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Several small studies have demonstrated a reduction in the degree of MVO utilising a variety of vasoactive agents, with adenosine and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) being most evaluated. However, the evidence base remains weak as the trials have had variable endpoints, differing drug doses and delivery. As such, the results regarding benefit are conflicting.

METHODS

The REperfusion Facilitated by LOcal adjunctive therapy in STEMI (REFLO-STEMI) trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, open label, study with blinded endpoint analysis: Patients presenting within 6 h of onset of STEMI and undergoing planned primary PCI (P-PCI) with TIMI 0/1 flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) and no significant bystander coronary artery disease on angiography, are randomised into one of three groups: PCI with adjunctive pharmacotherapy (intracoronary adenosine or SNP) or control (standard PCI). All receive Bivalirudin anticoagulation and thrombus aspiration. The primary outcome is infarct size (IS) (determined as a percentage of total left ventricular mass) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) undertaken at 48 to 72 h post P-PCI. Secondary outcome measures include MVO (hypoenhancement within infarct core) on CMRI, angiographic markers of microvascular perfusion and MACE during 1-month follow-up. The study aims to recruit 240 patients (powered at 80% to detect a 5% absolute reduction in IS).

DISCUSSION

The REFLO-STEMI study has been designed to address the weaknesses of previous trials, which have collectively failed to demonstrate whether adjunctive pharmacotherapy with adenosine and/or SNP can reduce measures of myocardial injury (infarct size and MVO) and improve clinical outcome, despite good basic evidence that they have the potential to attenuate this process. The REFLO-STEMI study will be the most scientifically robust trial to date evaluating whether adjunctive therapy (intracoronary adenosine or SNP following thrombus aspiration) reduces CMRI measured IS and MVO in patients undergoing P-PCI within 6 h of onset of STEMI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registered 20th November 2012: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01747174.

Safety and effectiveness of nitroprusside in preventing no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of nitroprusside injection for preventing the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2011), PubMed, EMbase, and Google Scholar for data. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 319 patients were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that intracoronary nitroprusside is beneficial in preventing no-reflow/slow-flow, in reducing corrected TIMI frame count, and in improving left ventricular ejection fraction. It also likely reduces adverse reactions in patients after PCI and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular events. However, we must caution that in this review, there is a moderate possibility of bias with regard to patient selection, performance, and publication because of the small number of included studies. A larger sample size and high-quality RCTs are needed for a more reassuring analysis.

Beneficial effects of intracoronary nicorandil on microvascular dysfunction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: demonstration of its superiority to nitroglycerin in a cross-over study

PURPOSE

In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis. Coronary microvascular resistance is predominantly regulated by ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels. The aim of this study was to clarify whether nicorandil, a hybrid KATP channel opener and nitric oxide donor, may be a good candidate for improving microvascular dysfunction even when administered after primary PCI.

METHODS

We compared the beneficial effects of nicorandil and nitroglycerin on microvascular function in 60 consecutive patients with STEMI. After primary PCI, all patients received single intracoronary administrations of nitroglycerin (250 μg) and nicorandil (2 mg) in a randomized order; 30 received nicorandil first, while the other 30 received nitroglycerin first. Microvascular dysfunction was evaluated with the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), defined as the distal coronary pressure multiplied by the hyperemic mean transit time.

RESULTS

As a first administration, nicorandil decreased IMR significantly more than did nitroglycerin (median [interquartile ranges]: 10.8[5.2-20.7] U vs. 2.1[1.0-6.0] U, p=0.0002).As a second administration, nicorandil further decreased IMR, while nitroglycerin did not (median [interquartile ranges]: 6.0[1.3-12.7] U vs. -1.4[-2.6 to 1.3] U, p<0.0001). The IMR after the second administration was significantly associated with myocardial blush grade, angiographic TIMI frame count after the procedure, and peak creatine kinase level.

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary nicorandil reduced microvascular dysfunction after primary PCI more effectively than did nitroglycerin in patients with STEMI, probably via its KATP channel-opening effect.

Link between aortic valve sclerosis and myocardial no-reflow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

The"no-reflow" phenomenon is associated with a worse prognosis at follow-up for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Predicting and preventing no-reflow is therefore a crucial step in improving the prognosis of STEMI patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) and myocardial no-reflow in patients with STEMI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a first-time diagnosis of STEMI were enrolled consecutively. No-reflow was defined as a final TIMI 3 flow with a myocardial blush of grade < 2, temporary epicardial coronary no-reflow, and distal coronary occlusion. AVS was defined by echocardiography as thickening and calcification of the normal trileaflet aortic valve without obstruction to the left ventricular outflow.

RESULTS

No-reflow developed in 41 patients. In univariate analysis, age, male gender, smoking, culprit lesion Syntax score (SX score), and hypertension were significantly associated with no-reflow. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses demonstrated age [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.024-1.096; p=0.001), AVS (95 % CI, 1.002-1.100; p=0.039], culprit lesion SX score (95 % CI, 1.08-1.021 p=0.008), and symptom-to-balloon time (95 % CI, 1.020-1.097; p=0.002) as independent determinants of myocardial no-reflow.

CONCLUSION

AVS was significantly and independently associated with myocardial no-reflow in STEMI patients.

Intracoronary fixed dose of nitroprusside via thrombus aspiration catheter for the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have shown that intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside (NTP) injection is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of no-reflow (NR) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The present study tested the hypothesis that, on the basis of thrombus aspiration for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the selective IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban is a safe and superior treatment method compared with the IC administration of tirofiban alone for the prevention of NR during primary PCI. A total of 162 consecutive patients with STEMI, who underwent primary PCI within 12 h of onset, were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A, IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban (10 μg/kg) and group B, IC administration of tirofiban (10 μg/kg) alone (n=80 and n=82, respectively). The drugs were selectively injected into the infarct-related artery (IRA) via a thrombus aspiration catheter advanced into the IRA. The primary end-point was post-procedural corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (CTFC). The proportion of complete (>70%) ST-segment resolution (STR); the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 2–3 ratio following PCI; the peak value of creatine kinase (CK)-MB; the TIMI flow grade; the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 months of follow-up were observed as the secondary end-points. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between the two groups. Compared with group B, group A had i) a lower CTFC (23±7 versus 29±11, P=0.000); ii) a higher proportion of complete STR (72.5 versus 55.9%, P=0.040); iii) an enhanced TMPG 2–3 ratio (71.3 versus 53.7%, P=0.030) and iv) a lower peak CK-MB value (170±56 versus 210±48 U/l, P=0.010). There were no statistically significant differences in the final TIMI grade-3 flow between the two groups (92.5 versus 91.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P=0.956). The LVEF at 6 months was higher in group A than group B (63±9 versus 53±11%, respectively; P=0.001); however, the incidence of MACEs was not statistically different between the two groups, although there was a trend indicating improvement in group A (log rank χ²=0.953, P=0.489). The selective IC administration of a fixed dose of NTP (100 μg) plus tirofiban via a thrombus aspiration catheter advanced into the IRA is a safe and superior treatment method compared with tirofiban alone in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. This novel therapeutic strategy improves the myocardial level perfusion, in addition to reducing the infarct size. Furthermore, it may improve the postoperative clinical prognosis following PCI.

Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside after thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prevention of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction: the REOPEN-AMI study (Intracoronary Nitroprusside Versus Adenosine in Acute Myocardial Infarction)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess whether intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside following thrombus aspiration (TA) is superior to TA alone for the prevention of microvascular obstruction (MVO) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

MVO, due to its multifactorial pathogenesis, still occurs after TA in a sizeable portion of patients.

METHODS

We performed a placebo-controlled, randomized, open-label, blind-examination, multicenter trial. A total of 240 STEMI patients with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to receive adenosine (n = 80), nitroprusside (n = 80), or saline (n = 80) given distal to the occluded site after TA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ST-segment resolution (STR) >70% on surface electrocardiogram at 90 min after PCI. Secondary endpoints were angiographic MVO incidence (TIMI flow grade ≤2 or 3 with a myocardial blush grade <2) and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate at 30 days as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and heart failure requiring hospitalization.

RESULTS

STR >70% occurred in in 71% of adenosine-treated patients, in 54% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 51% of saline-treated patients (p = 0.009 and p = 0.75, respectively, vs. saline). Angiographic MVO occurred in 18% of adenosine-treated patients, in 24% of nitroprusside-treated patients, and in 30% of saline-treated patients (p = 0.06 and p = 0.37, respectively, vs. saline). MACE occurred in 10%, 14%, and 20% of patients, respectively (p = 0.08 and p = 0.29 vs. saline).

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients treated by PCI and TA, the additional intracoronary administration of adenosine, but not that of nitroprusside, results in a significant improvement of MVO, as assessed by STR.

Pharmacological and physical prevention and treatment of no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

After successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, adequate myocardial reperfusion is not achieved in up to 50% of patients. This phenomenon of no-reflow is associated with a poor in-hospital and long-term prognosis. Four main factors are thought to contribute to the occurrence of no-reflow: ischaemic injury; reperfusion injury; distal embolization; susceptibility of the microcirculation to injury. This review evaluates the literature, and in particular the clinical trials, concerned with pharmacological and physical methods for prevention and treatment of no-reflow. A number of drugs may improve no-reflow experimentally and clinically, but some have not yet been associated with conclusive improvements in clinical outcome. The complex interacting factors in no-reflow make it unlikely that any single agent will be effective for all patients. Confirmed methods known to be beneficial in the prevention of no-reflow (such as aspirin therapy, chronic statin therapy, blood glucose control, thrombus aspiration in patients with a high thrombus burden and ischaemic preconditioning) should be offered to patients as often as possible, to prevent and treat no-reflow.

Pharmacotherapy During Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention

Coronary revascularization using saphenous vein grafts is an important treatment modality for patients with severe coronary artery disease. Percutaneous intervention of these grafts is often the best option for patients who develop severe stenosis of the vein grafts. Use of adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors does not confer added benefit with ischemic endpoints as compared with heparin alone, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Bivalirudin used as the primary anticoagulant lowers the risk of bleeding. No-reflow frequently complicates vein graft interventions but can be treated with vasoactive agents such as calcium channel blockers, adenosine, and nitroprusside.

Closed versus open cell stent for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: the Closed versus Open Cells stent for High risk percutaneous coronary Interventions in ST-Elevation acute myocardial infarction (COCHISE) pilot study

BACKGROUND

Stent deployment may be associated with distal embolization and slow flow in coronary thrombotic lesions. There are no data on the risk of distal thrombus embolization according to the stent design. The aim was to evaluate coronary flow after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction according to the employed stent (closed versus open cell design).

METHODS

From March 2010 to December 2011, 223 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to primary PCI either with an open cell (112 patients, 88 men) or with a closed cell stent design (111 patients, 92 men). The primary endpoint was the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) after the procedure.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in procedural success nor in-stent deployment in the 2 groups. At baseline, there were no significant differences in cTFC between the 2 groups (70 ± 37 and 67 ± 39, P = .65, respectively). After the procedure, the open cell group showed significantly higher cTFC compared to the closed cell group (18 ± 11 and 15 ± 5, P = .003 respectively). This difference was associated with a significant lower rate of TIMI 3 flow (87% and 95%, P = .037) and myocardial blush grade 3 (65% and 87%, P = .001) in the open compared to the closed cell group. There were 2 cases of death in the open cell and 1 case in the closed cell group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a closed cell stent design rather than an open cell during PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with better coronary angiographic flow after PCI.

Acute effect of sodium nitroprusside on microvascular dysfunction in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Even in the era of thrombus aspiration and distal protection for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), microvascular dysfunction does exist and improvement of microvascular dysfunction can improve the prognosis and/or left ventricular dysfunction. We evaluated the acute effects of nitroprusside (NTP) on coronary microvascular injury that occurred after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI in 18 patients. The final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial (TIMI) flow grade after PCI was 3 in 17 patients and 2 in 1 patient. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was improved significantly from 76 ± 42 to 45 ± 37 (P = 0.0006) by intracoronary NTP administration. IMR improved to the normal range (IMR < 30) in 9 patients (50%). Higher TIMI flow grade and lower IMR at baseline were observed more frequently in patients whose IMR recovered to normal range after NTP administration. NTP improved the microcirculatory dysfunction at the acute phase in patients who underwent PCI for STEMI and had final TIMI 3 flow in almost all cases.

Lessons from human coronary aspirate

The interventional implantation of a stent into an atherosclerotic coronary artery is a unique and paradigmatic scenario of plaque rupture in humans. The use of protection devices not only prevents the released plaque particles and the superimposed thrombotic material from being washed and embolized into the coronary microcirculation of the individual patient, but permits also the retrieval and ex vivo analysis of particulate plaque debris and soluble substances. The particulate debris comprises typical cholesterol crystals, foam cells, hyalin material and calcium deposits from the atheroma as well as platelets and coagulation material; soluble substances include vasoconstrictors, such as serotonin and thromboxane, as well as inflammatory mediators, such as TNFα which amplifies vasoconstriction by inducing endothelial dysfunction. The vasoconstriction observed in a bioassay ex vivo correlates to clinical symptoms, angiographic stenosis and plaque burden, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound. The release of TNFα into the aspirate correlates to restenosis. Detailed analysis of the human coronary aspirate may promote a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and help to better antagonize the microvascular consequences of coronary microembolization, including the no reflow phenomenon. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Coronary Blood Flow."

Management of the no-reflow phenomenon

The lack of reperfusion of myocardium after prolonged ischaemia that may occur despite opening of the infarct-related artery is termed "no reflow". No reflow or slow flow occurs in 3-4% of all percutaneous coronary interventions, and is most common after emergency revascularization for acute myocardial infarction. In this setting no reflow is reported to occur in 30% to 40% of interventions when defined by myocardial perfusion techniques such as myocardial contrast echocardiography. No reflow is clinically important as it is independently associated with increased occurrence of malignant arrhythmias, cardiac failure, as well as in-hospital and long-term mortality. Previously the no-reflow phenomenon has been difficult to treat effectively, but recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of no reflow have led to several novel treatment strategies. These include prophylactic use of vasodilator therapies, mechanical devices, ischaemic postconditioning and potent platelet inhibitors. As no reflow is a multifactorial process, a combination of these treatments is more likely to be effective than any of these alone. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of no reflow and present the numerous recent advances in therapy for this important clinical problem.

Vasoconstrictor Potential of Coronary Aspirate From Patients Undergoing Stenting of Saphenous Vein Aortocoronary Bypass Grafts and Its Pharmacological Attenuation

Rationale:

Stent implantation into atherosclerotic plaques releases, apart from particulate debris, soluble substances that contribute to impaired microvascular perfusion.

Objective:

To quantify the release of vasoconstrictors and to determine the efficacy of coronary dilators to attenuate their action.

Methods and Results:

Using a distal protection/aspiration device, coronary arterial blood was retrieved before and during stenting in 22 patients with severe saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass stenoses. The release of catecholamines, endothelin, serotonin, thromboxane B 2 , and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α was measured. The response of rat mesenteric arteries with intact (+E) and denuded (−E) endothelium to aspirate plasma was normalized to that by KCl. Responses to selective receptor blockade, adenosine, nitroprusside, and verapamil against the aspirate-induced constriction were determined. The coronary arterial plasma withdrawn before stenting induced 21±5% and the aspirate plasma after stenting induced 95±8% of maximum KCl-induced vasoconstriction. Serotonin, thromboxane B 2 , and TNFα release into aspirate plasma increased by 1.9±0.2 μmol/L, 25.6±3.1 pg/mL, and 19.7±6.1 pg/mL, respectively, during stenting. The aspirate-induced vasoconstriction was largely antagonized by selective serotonin receptor blockade, with little further antagonism by additional thromboxane receptor blockade. TNFα did not induce constriction per se but potentiated the constriction with serotonin and the thromboxane-analog U-46619 in arteries +E. The concentrations to induce half-maximal vasodilation were comparable for nitroprusside (+E, 3.3×10 −8 ; −E, 1.9×10 −8 mol/L) and verapamil (+E, 8.3×10 −8 ; −E, 7.8×10 −8 mol/L), and the vasoconstriction was eventually eliminated. The vasodilator response to adenosine was dependent on functional endothelium and weaker.

Conclusion:

Serotonin is the main coronary vasoconstrictor after stenting, and thromboxane and TNFα somewhat potentiate the serotonin response. Nitroprusside and verapamil are more potent than adenosine to attenuate the aspirate plasma-induced vasoconstriction, and they are not dependent on functional endothelium.

Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction

Although slow/no-reflow is a serious problem complicating primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is associated with a poor prognosis, its efficacious treatment remains problematic. We compared the acute, in-hospital and long-term (1 year) effects of nitroprusside (NTP) with those of nicorandil (NC) on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon. Forty-nine of 442 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent primary PCI complicated by slow/no-reflow and who received intracoronary NTP (n = 25) or NC (n = 24) administration were studied. Both NTP and NC induced significant improvements in coronary flow, with increases in TIMI flow grade from 1.64 ± 0.62 to 2.74 ± 0.36 (p < 0.001) and 1.60 ± 0.86 to 2.23 ± 0.91 (p < 0.001), and in corrected TIMI frame count from 37.8 ± 15.1 to 13.7 ± 7.1 (p < 0.001) and 30.8 ± 20.7 to 19.3 ± 17.9 (p < 0.001), respectively. The degree of improvement in TIMI flow grade (post-pre/pre) and TIMI frame count (pre-post/pre) showed that NTP was more effective than NC (NTP vs. NC: 0.88 ± 0.79, 0.37 ± 0.37, p = 0.008; 0.59 ± 0.23, 0.36 ± 0.27, p = 0.003, respectively). Congestive heart failure did not tend to last beyond 3 days after onset in the NTP group, which was more than in the NC group, during hospitalization (1/25, 4/24, p = 0.143, respectively). At the 1-year follow-up, the NTP group tended to show more improvement than the NC group in MACE (5/25, 9/24, p = 0.175, respectively). NTP is a more effective treatment for slow/no-reflow associated with PCI in patients with AMI and may improve long-term clinical outcomes compared with NC.

Prevention and treatment of microvascular obstruction-related myocardial injury and coronary no-reflow following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic approach

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) commonly occurs following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), may lead to myocardial injury, and is an independent predictor of adverse outcome. Severe MVO may manifest angiographically as reduced flow in the patent upstream epicardial arteries, a situation that is termed "no-reflow." Microvascular obstruction can be broadly categorized according to the duration of myocardial ischemia preceding PCI. In "interventional MVO" (e.g., elective PCI), obstruction typically involves myocardium that was not exposed to acute ischemia before PCI. Conversely "reperfusion MVO" (e.g., primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction) occurs within a myocardial territory that was ischemic before the coronary intervention. Interventional and reperfusion MVO have distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and may require individualized therapeutic approaches. Interventional MVO is triggered predominantly by downstream embolization of atherosclerotic material from the epicardial vessel wall into the distal microvasculature. Reperfusion MVO results from both distal embolization and ischemia-reperfusion injury within the subtended ischemic tissue. Management of MVO and no-reflow may be targeted at different levels: the epicardial artery, microvasculature, and tissue. The aim of the present report is to advocate a systematic approach to prevention and treatment of MVO in different clinical settings. Randomized clinical trials have studied strategies for prevention of MVO and no-reflow; however, the efficacy of measures for reversing MVO once no-reflow has been demonstrated angiographically is unclear. New approaches for prevention and treatment of MVO will require a better understanding of intracellular cardioprotective pathways such as the blockade of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore.

Pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and rationale for therapy

Since the initial description of the phenomenon by Jennings et al 50 years ago, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of reperfusion injury has grown significantly. Its pathogenesis reflects the confluence of multiple pathways, including ion channels, reactive oxygen species, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. The purposes of this review are to examine the current state of understanding of ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as to highlight recent interventions aimed at this heretofore elusive target. In conclusion, despite its complexity our ongoing efforts to mitigate this form of injury should not be deterred, because nearly 2 million patients annually undergo either spontaneous (in the form of acute myocardial infarction) or iatrogenic (in the context of cardioplegic arrest) ischemia-reperfusion.

Predicting the no-reflow phenomenon following successful percutaneous coronary intervention

In the setting of acute myocardial infarction, early and adequate reopening of an infarct-related artery is not necessarily followed by a complete restoration of myocardial perfusion. This condition is usually defined as ‘no-reflow’. The pathophysiology of no-reflow is multifactorial since extravascular compression, microvascular vasoconstriction, embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention, and platelet and neutrophil aggregates are involved. In the clinical arena, angiographic findings and easily available clinical parameters can predict the risk of no-reflow. More recently, several studies have demonstrated that biomarkers, especially those related to the pathogenetic components of no-reflow, could also have a prognostic role in the prediction and in the full understanding of the multiple mechanisms of this phenomenon. Thus, in this article, we investigate the role of several biomarkers on admission in predicting the occurrence of no-reflow following successful percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive Pharmacologic Agents and Mechanical Devices in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been shown to be superior to thrombolysis in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) in reducing death, stroke and re-infarction. However, bleeding and thrombotic complications can occur despite successful PPCI and slow flow/no-reflow or poor microvascular reperfusion can occur in a significant minority despite a technically successful procedure. Bleeding or need for peri-procedural transfusion has been shown to increase short- and long-term mortality. Newer anticoagulants appear to reduce the bleeding risk and improve overall clinical outcomes. A novel combination of antiplatelet agents also appears to further improve the outcomes after PPCI. Although PPCI can achieve high rates of epicardial artery patency, some patients experience suboptimal microvascular perfusion, which affects long-term prognosis. Several pharmacologic agents have been shown to improve microvascular perfusion and left ventricular function, although none impacts on clinical outcomes. Of the mechanical devices available to reduce distal embolisation, the simple aspiration catheter holds the most promise in reducing clinical adverse events. Additional research and well designed studies are needed to further enhance the outcomes after PPCI. Key words: Anticoagulant, Antiplatelet agents, Distal protection devices, Myocardial infarction, Pharmacotherapy, Primary angioplasty, Thrombectomy

Emerging drugs for acute myocardial infarction

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The present review is aimed at going over the pharmacological profile (and the clinical impact) of the emerging drugs involved in the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in order to provide the cardiologists who deal with these patients in the early phase with the most recent evidence on this topic.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are the main cornerstones of therapy in the treatment of STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The main issues that clinicians have to deal with are represented by balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks. In tailoring therapy, variables such as age, sex and previous disease should be taken into account, as well as ongoing complications (such as acute renal failure) that could affect hemostasis. Despite the well-established clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents, questions remain, mainly surrounding potential for variable platelet response, which are strictly related to non-genetic (i.e., diet, drug-drug interaction, clinical factors such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and inflammation) and genetic determinants.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

In their daily practice, cardiologists cannot abstract from the knowledge and updating on the ongoing research fields as well as the newly developed drugs, which they should frame in the very patient in the attempt to the develop a personalized medical strategy. These include also the pharmacological option(s) in the treatment of the reperfusion injury, the metabolic aspects and the stem cell therapy. TAKE HOME MASSAGE: In our opinion, the goal of ongoing research on the pharmacological approach to STEMI patients is a personalized medical strategy that relies on critical clinicians who merge newly developed acquisitions on this topic and a more complete, systemic and critical approach to the patient.

Myocardial no-reflow in humans

In a variable proportion of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ranging from 5% to 50%, primary percutaneous coronary intervention achieves epicardial coronary artery reperfusion but not myocardial reperfusion, a condition known as no-reflow. Of note, no-reflow is associated with a worse prognosis at follow-up. The phenomenon has a multifactorial pathogenesis including: distal embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and individual predisposition of coronary microcirculation to injury. Moreover, it is spontaneously reversible in some patients, thus suggesting that it might be amenable to treatment also when we fail to prevent it. Several recent studies have shown that biomarkers and other easily available clinical parameters can predict the risk of no-reflow and can help in the assessment of the multiple mechanisms of the phenomenon. Several therapeutic strategies have been tested for the prevention and treatment of no-reflow. In particular, thrombus aspiration before stent implantation prevents distal embolization and has been recently shown to improve myocardial perfusion and clinical outcome as compared with the standard procedure. However, it is conceivable that the relevance of each pathogenetic component of no-reflow is different in different patients, thus explaining the occurrence of no-reflow despite the use of mechanical thrombus aspiration. Thus, in this review article, for the first time, we propose a personalized management of no-reflow on the basis of the assessment of the prevailing mechanisms of no-reflow operating in each patient.

Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Coronary no-reflow occurs commonly during acute percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly in patients with acute myocardial infarction and those with degenerated vein grafts. It is associated with a guarded prognosis, and thus needs to be recognized and treated promptly. The pathophysiology originates during the ischemic phase and is characterized by localized and diffuse capillary swelling and arteriolar endothelial dysfunction. In addition, leukocytes become activated and are attracted to the lumen of the capillaries, exhibit diapedesis and may contribute to cellular and intracellular edema and clogging of vessels. At the moment of perfusion, the sudden rush of leukocytes and distal atheroemboli further contributes to impaired tissue perfusion. Shortening the door-to-balloon time, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitors and distal protection devices are predicted to limit the development of no-reflow during percutaneous interventions. Distal intracoronary injection of verapamil, nicardipine, adenosine, and nitroprusside may improve coronary flow in the majority of patients. Hemodynamic support of the patient may be needed in some cases until coronary flow improves.

The pathogenesis and treatment of no-reflow occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention

No-reflow is one of the major causes of postinterventional rise of cardiac enzyme and myocardial infarction (MI). This complication is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). During and after a no-reflow episode, the patient can suffer from severe chest pain, hypotension, bradycardia, hemodynamic collapse, MI, congestive heart failure, and death. Every effort should be taken to reduce the incidence of this complication. The distal embolic protection device has been shown to decrease this risk in saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions but not in native coronaries. On the other hand, the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists have been effective in reducing the occurrence of no-reflow during PCI of native coronaries but not during SVG interventions. The treatment of no-reflow is based on the intracoronary administrations of medications that induce maximal vasodilatation in small distal coronary vasculature. The most commonly used drugs in this setting are adenosine, nitroprusside, and verapamil. The goal of this study was to review the pathogenesis and treatment of no-reflow in patients undergoing PCI.

Role of coronary vasoconstriction in ischemic heart disease and search for novel therapeutic targets

Atherothrombosis has long been recognized as an important mechanism of cardiac events in ischemic heart disease, and large multicenter clinical studies have shown the benefit of antiplatelet agents, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing these events. However, more recent studies have been less successful at showing incremental gains in targeting these mechanisms, suggesting that the limits of this strategy have been exploited. Coronary vasoconstriction is another important mechanism in ischemic heart disease but has received little attention and yet is a potential therapeutic target. In the current review, the reasons why coronary vasconstriction has received insufficient consideration are explored. In particular, we need to change our approach from lumping heterogeneous clinical entities together to focusing on clinically-discrete homogeneous groups with a common mechanism and thus therapeutic target. The role of coronary vasoconstriction is examined in the various ischemic syndromes (variant angina, chronic stable angina, acute coronary syndromes and syndrome X) and the underlying mechanisms discussed. Finally, in order to advance studies in this field, an innovative research strategy is proposed, including: (1) selection of paradigmatic cases for the various ischemic syndromes; (2) candidate therapeutic targets; and (3) approaches in assessing the clinical efficacy of these potential therapies.

Management of 'no-reflow' complicating reperfusion therapy

No-reflow phenomenon, defined as inadequate myocardial perfusion of the adequately dilated target vessel without evidence of angiographic mechanical obstruction. It is a multifactorial, well-recognised, secondary phenomenon following reperfusion therapy such as thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The pathophysiological mechanisms leading to the no-reflow state are incompletely understood. Embolization of the atheromatous material to the distal vasculature and intense arteriole vasospasm caused by microembolization of platelet-rich thrombi that release vasoactive agents resulting in microvascular obstructions are likely mechanisms. Current prophylaxis and management strategies are derived from limited clinical data. Intracoronary verapamil, adenosine and nitroprusside have been most frequently studied and administered for angiographic no-reflow during PCI for acute myocardial infarction or saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions and have been shown to improve epicardial flow and microvascular perfusion. The use of distal embolic protection devices in SVG interventions also provide microvascular protection and improve clinical outcomes. However, by far the most important measures are prevention and anticipation during PCI as once no-reflow established, complete reversal of the situation may not be possible.