Is detection of hibernating myocardium necessary in deciding revascularization in systolic heart failure?

Physician preferences for revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: Defining equipoise from web-based surveys

Background

The optimal revascularization approach in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ischemic heart disease ("ischemic cardiomyopathy") is unknown. Physician preferences regarding clinical equipoise for mode of revascularization and their willingness to consider offering enrollment in a randomized trial to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy have not been characterized.

Methods

We conducted two anonymous online surveys: 1) a clinical case scenario-based survey to assess willingness to offer clinical trial enrollment for a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (overall response rate to email invitation 0.45 %), and 2) a Delphi consensus-building survey to identify specific areas of clinical equipoise (overall response rate to email invitation 37 %).

Results

Among 304 physicians responding to the clinical case scenario-based survey, the majority were willing to offer the opportunity for clinical trial enrollment to a prototypical patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (92 %), and felt that a finding of non-inferiority for PCI vs. CABG would influence their clinical practice (78 %). Among 53 physicians responding to the Delphi consensus-building survey, the median appropriateness rating for CABG was significantly higher than that of PCI (p < 0.0001). In 17 scenarios (11.8 %), there was no difference in CABG or PCI appropriateness ratings, suggesting clinical equipoise in these settings.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate willingness to consider offering enrollment in a randomized clinical trial and areas of clinical equipoise, two factors that support the feasibility of a randomized trial to compare clinical outcomes after revascularization with CABG vs. PCI in selected patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, suitable coronary anatomy and co-morbidity profile.

A single-center observational study on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention for ischemic heart failure: A cohort study

The effects of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in patients with confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF), on the basis of the optimal medical treatment recommended by current guidelines, remain to be determined.A cohort study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of PCI on the basis of optimal medical treatment in patients with CAD and HF. Patients who received PCI were subsequently grouped according to partial and complete revascularization (CR) depending on the PCI outcome. The primary outcome was defined as a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) also were compared.A total of 69 patients (12 who received medical treatment and 57 who received PCI) were included. Patients in the PCI group showed significantly improved LVEF (P < .001), but patients in the medical treatment group did not (P > .05) after 3 months of follow-up. MACEs occurred in 50% patients in the medical treatment group and 19.3% patients of the PCI group, with this difference almost reaching statistical significance (P = .06). Compared with patients who received medical therapy only, patients who received PCI experienced better survival (P = .02). Moreover, survival seemed to be better in patients who achieved CR with PCI of the coronary arteries than in those who had partial revascularization of the coronary arteries (P = .06).PCI may be effective for improving survival in patients with CAD and HF.

Targeted metabolic imaging to improve the management of heart disease

Tracer techniques are powerful methods for assessing rates of biological processes in vivo. A case in point is intermediary metabolism of energy providing substrates, a central feature of every living cell. In the heart, the tight coupling between metabolism and contractile function offers an opportunity for the simultaneous assessment of cardiac performance at different levels in vivo: coronary flow, myocardial perfusion, oxygen delivery, metabolism, and contraction. Noninvasive imaging techniques used to identify the metabolic footprints of either normal or perturbed cardiac function are discussed.

A Turkish perspective on coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary artery intervention in chronic heart failure patients

The impact of coronary revascularization methods (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery and stent implantation) on clinical outcome has not been determined yet in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). We examined outcomes in patients discharged from our hospital after hospitalization for decompensated SHF. Of 637 patients with SHF (mean age, 64 ± 13 years; mean ejection fraction, 26.5% ± 9%), 402 patients (63%) had coronary artery disease (CAD) and 235 patients (37%) had no CAD; 223 patients (35%) died because of cardiovascular reasons during follow-up. Patients who had stenting alone and patients who had CABG surgery and stenting had better prognosis than patients with CAD but no revascularization procedure (P < .001 and P = .013, respectively). In the patients with SHF having CAD who had stenting and CABG surgery + stenting may have better prognosis compared with patients with CAD who had no revascularization procedure in their past.