Usefulness of radiofrequency ablation of supraventricular tachycardia to decrease inappropriate shocks from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Managing arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Arrhythmia is an extremely common finding in patients receiving cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Despite this, in the majority of randomised trials testing CRT efficacy, patients with a recent history of arrhythmia were excluded. Most of our knowledge into the management of arrhythmia in CRT is therefore based on arrhythmia trials in the heart failure (HF) population, rather than from trials dedicated to the CRT population. However, unique to CRT patients is the aim to reach as close to 100% biventricular pacing (BVP) as possible, with HF outcomes greatly influenced by relatively small changes in pacing percentage. Thus, in comparison to the average HF patient, there is an even greater incentive for controlling arrhythmia, to achieve minimal interference with the effective delivery of BVP. In this review, we examine both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, addressing their impact on CRT, and discuss the available evidence regarding optimal arrhythmia management in this patient group. We review pharmacological and procedural-based approaches, and lastly explore novel ways of harnessing device data to guide treatment of arrhythmia in CRT.

Catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias causing inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks

AIMS

Inappropriate shocks have been an important issue post-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Moreover, inappropriate ICD shocks are associated with increased mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of catheter ablation therapy for atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATa) responsible for inappropriate ICD shocks.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 108 consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantations, 22, 5, and 3 experienced inappropriate ICD shocks due to ATa, sinus tachycardia, and T-wave oversensing, respectively. Among the 22 patients with ATa, 18 patients (55 ± 10 years, 15 men, structural heart disease in 9) underwent catheter ablation of ATa causing inappropriate shocks. The median duration between the ICD implantation and first inappropriate shock was 10.0 (3.0-24.5) months. The ATa were atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in 14, 2, and 2 patients, respectively. One patient underwent an atrioventricular nodal ablation for persistent AF associated with a venous anomaly. Among 13 patients who underwent pulmonary vein antrum isolation, 10 (76.9%) were free from AF for a median of 21.0 (13-37.3) months after an average of 1.3 ± 0.5 procedures. In four patients with AFL or a supraventricular tachycardia, none had any arrhythmia recurrence for a median of 6.0 (3.3-93.5) months after a cavotricuspid isthmus or slow pathway ablation, respectively. There were no procedural complications. During the median follow-up of 19.0 (9.5-37.3) months after the last procedure, no patients experienced any inappropriate shocks.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation is a feasible therapeutic option for treating ATa responsible for inappropriate shock(s) in patients with ICD.