Acute aortic dissection with tear in ascending aorta not diagnosed until necropsy or operation (for another condition) and comparison to similar cases receiving proper operative therapy

Cardiac Findings at Necropsy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Described herein are necropsy findings in 97 patients aged 22 to 82 years (mean 55), 37 women, 60 men, studied at necropsy with acute aortic dissection (AD) with the intimal-medial tear in the ascending aorta. The cases were studied from 1966 to 1989, a period when echocardiography and computed tomography were relatively infrequently available for diagnosis of AD. Arteriography was the method for diagnosis in most cases. Of the 97 cases, 30(31%) had operative intervention and 67 did not. Most appeared to have had systemic hypertension before the acute AD; only 4 had previous heart failure; only 8 had considerable atherosclerotic coronary disease; only 4 had a left ventricular (LV) scar and in each it was small; most (96%) had a normal-sized LV cavity (suggesting normal cardiac indices in them), and the other 4 had only a mildly dilated cavity; the heart weight in all 97 patients was increased; the quantity of subepicardial adipose tissue was increased in most patients, and the frequency of a congenitally malformed aortic valve was much higher than in the general population (6% - vs- 1%), but still uncommon. Thus, in > 90% of patients with acute Type A AD, coronary atherosclerosis was insignificant, myocardial fibrosis is absent, and the aortic valve has 3 cusps without stenosis.

Combined Cardiovascular Syphilis and Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

The occurrence of acute aortic dissection with the initiating tear in the ascending aorta superimposed on cardiovascular syphilis is an exceedingly rare occurrence. Such was the case, however, in a recently seen patient who presented with typical features of acute dissection (type A). Operative repair yielded the entire ascending aorta to examine both grossly and histologically and classic features of both conditions were observed.

Incidence and Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Aortic Dissection and Risk Factor Control

Background and Aims: The contradiction of management modality between acute myocardial infarction(AMI) and aortic dissection(AD) may result in clinical catastrophe. Data on risk factors, incidence, and outcome of AD and AMI are limited, and there have been no studies on the long-term outcomes of AMI in patients with AD. So we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes after AMI in patients with AD, and propose a useful diagnostic paradigm.

Methods: Consecutively enrolled patients with AD and AMI who were referred to our center from 2010 to 2017. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, all medical treatments, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory data, and treatment were recorded. All patients were followed up from the first hospitalization until a first heart event, death, or 17 March, 2018.

Results: 0.13% in AMI and 7.49% in AD patients had a concomitant diagnosis of AD and AMI. The average patient age was 53.3 ± 12.1 years and 84.6% were male. The most prevalent vascular risk factors were hypertension (69.2%) and current smoker (64.1%). Of all the 39 patients, 66.7% were managed surgically. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10.3%. The 30-day and 5-year fatality rates were 23.1% and 35.9%, but were higher for female than for male (66.7 vs. 30.3%, log-rank P = 0.045) on 5-year mortality. The overall survival of females was inferior to the males (log-rank P = 0.045).

Conclusions: Patients with AMI and AD exhibit high 5-year fatality rates. For these patients, surgical management tends to have lower mortality. Improved management of hypertension and smoking, may reduce future incidence rates.

Clinical and pathologic findings of aortic dissection at autopsy: Review of 336 cases over nearly 6 decades

BACKGROUND

We aimed to characterize the clinical and pathologic findings of aortic dissection (AD) over a nearly 60-year period.

METHODS

The Jesse E. Edwards Registry of Cardiovascular Disease database was queried for cardiac specimens from autopsies with AD as a diagnosis and compared 2 cohorts: early (1956-1992) and current (1993-2015).

RESULTS

From 1956 to 2015, 338 cases (166 early, 170 current) with AD were included (mean age: 60; 62% male). The AD was 86% type A and 14% type B. Sixty-two percent of cases were under medical care at time of death (61% early, 62% current, P = not significant). Of those under medical care, 63% were not diagnosed prior to death (64% early, 62% current, P = not significant). Risks for dissection did not differ between time intervals and include left ventricular hypertrophy, suggestive of hypertension (84%), prior cardiovascular surgery (38%), bicuspid valve (14%), and connective tissue disease (9%). An intimal tear was identified in the ascending aorta in the majority (68%), followed by descending (14%), root (9.5%), and arch (7%). Aortic rupture occurred in 58%, most frequently in the ascending aorta (41%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cardiovascular registry, >60% of cases of AD were not detected clinically and first identified at autopsy. Although diagnostic techniques have significantly improved over the time interval, the percentage of AD discovered at autopsy did not differ from the early to the current era. The most prevalent risk factors for dissection including hypertension and prior cardiovascular surgery remain similar in both time periods. AD death is related to rupture of the aorta in the majority of cases.

Sudden Death Due to Thoracic Aortic Dissection in Young People: A Multicenter Forensic Study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) is infrequent in young people and its characteristics differ from those in the adult population. This study aimed to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of sudden death due to TAD in people aged 1 to 35 years.

METHODS

Multicenter population-based study based on forensic autopsies conducted in the provinces of Biscay (1991-2016), Valencia (2000-2016), and Seville (2004-2016).

RESULTS

We identified 35 individuals with sudden death due to TAD (80% males), with a mean age of 29±5 years. The incidence was 0.09/100 000 inhabitants/y. Eighteen persons had at least 1 risk factor for TAD, and this figure increased to 29 when postmortem findings were included: congenital heart disease (n=16), suspicion of familial TAD (n=11), cocaine use (n=6), and hypertension (n=5). Twenty-four individuals, 12 with at least 1 risk factor, had prodromal symptoms, and 16 of them visited their physician, but TAD was not suspected in any of them. The most frequent symptom was chest pain (n=12). The main autopsy findings were cystic degeneration of the media (n=27), dilatation of the ascending aorta (n=21), cardiac hypertrophy (n=20), and bicuspid aortic valve (n=14).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of sudden death due to TAD in young people was very low. The most frequent risk factors were congenital heart disease followed by suspicion of familial TAD and cocaine use. TAD should be included in the differential diagnosis of chest pain in young people, mainly male patients with at least 1 risk factor.

Clinical recognition of acute aortic dissections: insights from a large single-centre cohort study

Aims

Acute aortic dissection (AD) requires immediate treatment, but is a diagnostic challenge. We studied how often AD was missed initially, which patients were more likely to be missed and how this influenced patient management and outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study including 200 consecutive patients with AD as the final diagnosis, admitted to a tertiary hospital between 1998 and 2008. The first differential diagnosis was identified and patients with and without AD included were compared. Characteristics associated with a lower level of suspicion were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and Cox regression was used for survival analyses. Missing data were imputed.

Results

Mean age was 63 years, 39% were female and 76% had Stanford type A dissection. In 69% of patients, AD was included in the first differential diagnosis; this was less likely in women (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44–0.99), in the absence of back pain (aRR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30–0.84), and in patients with extracardiac atherosclerosis (aRR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.96). Absence of AD in the differential diagnosis was associated with the use of more imaging tests (1.8 vs. 2.3, p = 0.01) and increased time from admission to surgery (1.8 vs. 10.1 h, p < 0.01), but not with a difference in the adjusted long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.46–1.27).

Conclusion

Acute aortic dissection was initially not suspected in almost one-third of patients, this was more likely in women, in the absence of back pain and in patients with extracardiac atherosclerosis. Although the number of imaging tests was higher and time to surgery longer, patient outcomes were similar in both groups.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12471-016-0921-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection: 17-Year Trends From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection (AAS) are changing.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined 17-year trends in the presentation, diagnosis, and hospital outcomes of AAD from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

METHODS

Data from 4,428 patients enrolled at 28 IRAD centers between December 26, 1995, and February 6, 2013, were analyzed. Patients were divided according to enrollment date into 6 equal groups and by AAD type: A (n = 2,952) or B (n = 1,476).

RESULTS

There was no change in the presenting complaints of severe or worst-ever pain for type A and type B AAD (93% and 94%, respectively), nor in the incidence of chest pain (83% and 71%, respectively). Use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of type A increased from 46% to 73% (p < 0.001). Surgical management for type A increased from 79% to 90% (p < 0.001). Endovascular management of type B increased from 7% to 31% (p < 0.001). Type A in-hospital mortality decreased significantly (31% to 22%; p < 0.001), as surgical mortality (25% to 18%; p = 0.003). There was no significant trend in in-hospital mortality in type B (from 12% to 14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Presenting symptoms and physical findings of AAD have not changed significantly. Use of chest CT increased for type A. More patients in both groups were managed with interventional procedures: surgery in type A and endovascular therapy in type B. A significant decrease in overall in-hospital mortality was seen for type A but not for type B.