Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with "porcelain" aorta (from a Multicenter Real World Registry)

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: 2023 Update

This document discusses preprocedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, evaluating the imaging modalities used in initial imaging for preprocedure planning under two variants 1) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic root; and 2) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. US echocardiography transesophageal, MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast and CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of aortic root. CTA chest with IV contrast, CTA abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast, CTA chest abdomen pelvis with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Choosing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in porcelain aorta: outcomes versus surgical replacement

OBJECTIVES

Porcelain aorta complicates aortic valve replacement and is an indication for transcatheter approaches. No study has compared surgical and transcatheter valve replacement in the setting of porcelain aorta. We characterize porcelain aorta patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and the association of aortic calcification and outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with porcelain aorta were identified. Aortic calcium volume was determined using 3D computed tomography thresholding techniques. Propensity scoring was performed to assess the effect of surgical versus transcatheter approaches. Risk factors for composite major hospital complications (death, stroke and dialysis) were identified using random forest machine learning.

RESULTS

From January 2006 to January 2015, 164 patients with porcelain aorta underwent aortic valve replacement [105 (64%) surgical replacement, 59 (36%) transcatheter replacement]. Propensity scoring matched 29 pairs (49% of transcatheter patients). Before matching, 5-year survival was 41% [(43% surgical, 35% transcatheter, P(log-rank) = 0.9]. After matching, mortality for surgical versus transcatheter replacement was 3.4% (n = 1) vs 10% (n = 3), stroke 14% (n = 4) vs 3.4% (n = 1) and dialysis 6.9% (n = 2) versus 11% (n = 3). Matched 5-year survival was 40% after surgical replacement and 29% after transcatheter replacement [P(log-rank) = 0.4]. Total aortic calcium volume was greater in transcatheter than surgical patients [18 (8.0) vs 17 (7.7) ml] and was associated with more major hospital complications after either approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and transcatheter approaches are complementary options for aortic stenosis with porcelain aorta. Surgical valve replacement remains an effective treatment for patients requiring concomitant procedures. Quantifying aortic calcium volume is a helpful risk predictor in all patients with porcelain aorta.

Procedural Outcomes of a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve in Patients with Porcelain Aorta

BACKGROUND

Severe calcification of the ascending aorta increases the peri-operative risk for neurological complications in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) seems to be an optimal treatment option in these patients. However, the impact of the extent of aortic calcification on procedural and neurological outcomes during TAVI is unclear.

METHODS

Data from 3010 patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis treated with ACURATE neo/neo2 from May 2012 to July 2022 were evaluated and matched by 2-to-1 nearest-neighbor matching to identify one patient with porcelain aorta (PA) (n = 492) compared with two patients without PA (n = 984). PA was additionally subdivided into circumferential (classic PA) (n = 89; 3.0%) and non-circumferential (partial PA) (n = 403; 13.4%) calcification. We compared outcomes according to VARC-3 criteria among patients with and without PA and identified predictors for occurrence of stroke in the overall population.

RESULTS

Technical success (88.5% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.589) and device success at 30 days (82.3% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.755) after transcatheter ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation according to VARC-3 definition was high and did not differ between non-calcified aortas or PA. The rate of in-hospital complications according to VARC-3-definitions was low in both groups. Rates of all stroke (3.2% (n = 31) vs. 2.6% (n = 13), p = 0.705) or transitory ischemic attacks (1.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 1.000) did not differ significantly. Thirty-day all-cause mortality did not differ (3.0% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.1; p = 0.775). Overall device migration/embolization (OR 5.0 [2.10;11.87]), severe bleeding (OR 1.79 [1.11;2.89]), and major structural cardiac complications (OR 3.37 [1.32;8.57]) were identified as independent predictors for in-hospital stroke in a multivariate analysis after implantation of ACURATE neo/neo2.

CONCLUSION

A porcelain aorta does not increase the risk of neurological complications after transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation. Based on these findings, transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation is safe in these particularly vulnerable patients.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

There is a concern that resheathing/repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may lead to an increased risk of periprocedural complications. We aimed to evaluate the short‐ and long‐term impact on clinical outcomes of resheathing for repositioning of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI procedures.

Methods and Results

We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify studies comparing outcomes between patients requiring resheathing/repositioning during TAVI and those who did not. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were used to estimate the association of resheathing compared with no resheathing with clinical outcomes after TAVI. Seven studies including 4501 participants (pooled mean age, 80.9±7.4 years; 54% women; and 1374 [30.5%] patients requiring resheathing/repositioning) were included in this study. No significant differences between the 2 groups were identified with regards to safety: 30‐day mortality (n=3125; odds ratio [OR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.33]; I²=0%), stroke (n=4121; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74–1.62]; I²=0%), coronary obstruction (n=3000; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 0.17–33.47]; I²=75%), major vascular complications (n=3125; OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.66–1.33]; I²=0%), major bleeding (n=3125; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.94–2.01]; I²=39%), acute kidney injury (n=3495; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.64–2.62]; I²=44%), and efficacy outcomes: device success (n=1196; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51–1.14]; I²=0%), need for a second valve (n=3170; OR, 2.86 [95% CI, 0.96–8.48]; I²=62%), significant (moderate or higher) paravalvular leak (n=1151; OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.83–2.80]; I²=0%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (n=1908; OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.68–1.57]; I²=58%). One‐year mortality was similar between groups (n=1972; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68–1.47]; I²=0%).

Conclusions

Resheathing of transcatheter heart valves during TAVI is associated with similar periprocedural risk compared with no resheathing in several patient‐important outcomes. These data support the safety of current self‐expanding transcatheter heart valves with resheathing features.

Registration

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273715.

Clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with porcelain aorta

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines favor transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) over surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with porcelain aorta (PAo). The clinical relevance of PAo in patients undergoing TAVI is however incompletely understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcome of patients with PAo undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled in a prospective single-center registry. Presence of PAo was evaluated by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography prior to the intervention. The primary endpoint was disabling stroke.

RESULTS

Among 2199 patients (mean age, 82.0 ​± ​6.3 years; 1135 females [51.6%]) undergoing TAVI between August 2007 and December 2019, 114 patients (5.2%) met VARC-2 criteria for PAo. Compared to individuals without PAo, patients with PAo were younger (79.4 ​± ​7.4 years vs. 82.1 ​± ​6.2 years; p ​< ​0.001), had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (51.8 ​± ​14.9% vs. 55.3 ​± ​14.2%; p ​= ​0.009) and higher STS-PROM Scores (6.5 ​± ​4.3% vs. 4.9 ​± ​3.4%; p ​< ​0.001). At 1 year, disabling stroke occurred more often in patients with PAo (7.2%) than in those without (3.0%) (HR_adj, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.55). The risk difference emerged within 30 days after TAVI (HR_adj, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.52-9.03), and was driven by a high PAo-associated risk of disabling stroke in patients with alternative access (HR_adj, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.38-24.3), not in those with transfemoral (HR_adj, 1.47; 95% CI 0.45-4.85).

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI patients with PAo had a more than three-fold increased risk of periprocedural disabling stroke compared to patients with no PAo. The difference was driven by a higher risk of stroke in patients treated by alternative access.

How to reduce uncommon but severe transcatheter aortic valve implantation complications: stroke, thrombosis, endocarditis, cognitive decline?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become a valid alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, regardless of baseline surgical risk. The incidence of periprocedural complications has steadily declined over the years, thanks to technical advancement of transcatheter heart valves, delivery systems, and increased operators' experience. Beyond the most common periprocedural complications, there are a few uncommon but potentially severe complications that more often occur during follow-up, although they may also arise in the periprocedural phase. Stroke, infective endocarditis, valve thrombosis, and cognitive decline are among them. In this brief review, we describe the incidence, predictive factors, and potential preventive measures for those events.

A hybrid approach for a case with a high risk of not only surgical but transcatheter aortic valve replacement

An 86-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis was thought to be at a high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement and inoperability due to old age and porcelain aorta. Furthermore, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was considered difficult due to high risk of coronary obstruction secondary to the aortic root anatomy and poor vascular access associated with marked atherosclerotic lesions on the distal aortic arch with peripheral artery disease. We successfully treated her with TAVR via the brachiocephalic artery in combination with prophylactic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Thromboembolic complications in transfemoral aortic valve implantation due to aortic wall thrombus and shaggy aorta syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Aortic wall thrombus (AWT) can affect suitability to endovascular repair, while its most aggressive entity is better known as shaggy aorta syndrome. Primary objective was to study the procedural and clinical outcome with regard to atherothrombotic AWT in transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

In a retrospective, single-centre analysis, a qualitative 0-10 AWT score classification system was used. The most severely affected aortic area in computed tomography angiography cross-section was assessed for the number of affected segments, thrombus type, thickness, area and circumference. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, neurologic, renal and pulmonary events and signs of solid organ infarction.

RESULTS

Between November 2017 and September 2019, 604 patients underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in our institution. Computed tomography-guided analysis revealed AWT in 11.3% and shaggy aorta syndrome in 6 patients (1.0% with 83.3% male). AWT was mainly present in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta and was associated with acute renal failure (11.8% vs 3.2%, P ≤ 0.001) and a seven-fold increased rate of disabling peri-interventional stroke (4.4% vs 0.6%, P ≤ 0.001). In all patients with disabling peri-interventional stroke a balloon-expandable prosthesis was used (P ≤ 0.001). In case of shaggy aorta, mortality was more than six-fold increased (2.8% vs 16.7%, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe and irregular thrombus of the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta has been strongly associated with acute respiratory failure and peri-interventional stroke in transfemoral aortic valve implantation, being more likely using balloon-expandable devices. Our results imply important changes with regard to device design and present international transcatheter aortic valve implantation guidelines.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic diseases

OBJECTIVES

Patients scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) treatment frequently present with concomitant aortic diseases, in which case they are usually considered to be at high interventional risk and, in particular, unable to undergo the transfemoral TAVI approach. Since the establishment of the 'transfemoral first' strategy for TAVI, there has been an evidence gap with regard to the outcomes of such patients. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes after transapical TAVI in patients with diverse aortic diseases.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive elderly patients (78.4 years; standard deviation: 8.6 years) at intermediate surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis and aortic diseases (porcelain aorta 36%, ascending aneurysm 15%, descending aneurysm 26%, type-B dissection 4%, aortic thrombus 7%, Leriche syndrome 4%, aortic kinking 11%, aortic ulcer 2%, previous aortic operation 20%, aortic elongation/tortuosity 4%) underwent transapical TAVI treatment between January 2011 and November 2019 at our institution. We used the second-and third-generation self- and balloon-expanding valves. The follow-up time was 92.6 patient-years.

RESULTS

The Society of Thoracic Surgery-Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 7% (standard deviation: 4%). The 30-day mortality and all-stroke rates were 6% and 4%, respectively. The median survival time was 24.9 months (95% confidence interval 17.6-32.3). The median time of freedom from a composite of death and cardio-cerebral adverse events was 24.3 months (95% confidence interval 11.9-36.8). The rate of moderate/severe paravalvular leakage was 2%. The pacemaker rate was 10%. No early or late aortic syndrome occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Transapical TAVI is a safe method and shows very promising early and mid-term outcomes, without early/late aortic syndrome, in patients with aortic diseases for whom transfemoral TAVI as the first-line transcatheter method might be contraindicated or not feasible.

Impact of diverse aortic pathologies on outcomes after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

Some patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have a concomitant diverse aortic pathologies (AP). They are usually considered high-risk candidates for the procedure and require further assessment to determine the best vascular approach. The impact of these AP on TAVR is not well known as the information is scarce. We aimed to evaluate midterm clinical impact of different AP after transapical (TA)-TAVR.

METHODS

Twenty patients with atherosclerotic/occluding aortic diseases (A/OAD) (porcelain aorta, Leriche Syndrome, penetrating aortic ulcer, and aortic thrombus), 24 patients with aortic morphologic diseases (AMD) (thoracic/abdominal aortic aneurysms, aortic kinking, aortic type B dissection, aortic elongation/tortuosity, and previous aortic intervention), and 11 patients with combined aortic diseases (CAD) underwent TA-TAVR treatment between January 2011 and November 2019 at our center. We conducted up to 5-years clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were classified in the heart team as a high interventional risk. The 30-day mortality and stroke were 5% and 10% in the A/OAD, 8.3% and 0% in the AMD, and 0% and 0% in the CAD, respectively. The median time of freedom from a composite of death and cardio-cerebral adverse events was 22.1 months [95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9-34.3] in A/OAD versus 34.3 months [95% CI: 15.6-53] in AMD versus 17 months [95% CI: 0-39.4] in CAD; p = .525. We registered neither procedural aortic injury nor aortic syndrome at follow-up. The moderate/severe paravalvular leakage rates were 5%, 0% and 0% in the A/OAD, AMD and CAD, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Independent of underlying AP, the TA-TAVR is a safe method and shows very promising early and midterm outcomes in patients with various AP.

Snaring the Transcatheter Heart Valve Delivery System During Aortic Valve Replacement: When and Why

None of the commercially available self-expanding (SE)-trans-catheter heart valve (THVs) used for trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has a deflectable delivery system. This aspect can represent a shortcoming, especially in some anatomical scenario where THV advancement is challenging. The use of a snare catheter (SC), applying an external traction force, can increase THV trackability. We describe three different TAVR cases, in which a SE-THV was the only available option and where the THV delivery system advancement in the aortic arch was not feasible, if not with the combined use of a SC.

Plaster pipes and crystalized graphite: Open transventricular transcatheter aortic valve replacement for failed mechanical aortic valve prostheses in the porcelain aorta

Patients with a true porcelain aorta and a failed mechanical aortic valve prosthesis have limited treatment options. Using a hybrid of an open trans-ventricular approach with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass and integration of transcatheter techniques this challenge can be overcome. Trans-ventricular mechanical valve extraction (with transcatheter endovascular occlusion and cardioplegia) followed by direct ante-grade transcatheter heart valve implantation offers a potential solution to this conundrum. The procedure described is a novel technique that allows for the effective treatment of patients with failed mechanical surgical aortic valve prostheses in the setting of an inoperable porcelain aorta. In addition, a collaborative integrated multi-disciplinary heart team environment is required for the management of these complex patients.

Direct Abdominal Aortic Access for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in a Patient with Severe Aortic and Arterial Calcification

Aortic and arterial calcification is a complication of advanced atherosclerosis and is a critical intraoperative issue that can reduce the ability to achieve safe and adequate access for stent graft introduction. Different vascular access sites are used to deliver stent grafts when a standard transfemoral or iliac access is not feasible. We report a challenging case of a direct transabdominal aortic thoracic endovascular aortic repair for a thoracic aortic aneurysm complicated with severe aortic and arterial calcification, in which the noncalcified area of the infrarenal abdominal aorta was extremely limited. This may be a reasonable access site, especially for patients with severe aortic and arterial calcification.

Aortic endarterectomy: a useful technique to utilize for aortic valve replacements in hostile aorta

Calcified aorta poses a significant technical challenge in the performance of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Aortic endarterectomy is a less utilized approach and is suitable in select cases for aortic decalcification during AVR. Here, we report a case of calcified ascending aorta who underwent ascending aortic endarterectomy and AVR with the technical details of the procedure.

Novel Perspective for Antithrombotic Therapy in TAVI

:

While surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was for years the only available treatment for symptomatic aortic stenosis, the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in 2002 and the improvement of its technical aspects in the following years, has holistically changed the synchronous therapeutic approach of aortic valve stenosis. Recent evidence has expanded the indication of TAVI from high to lower surgical risk populations with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The administration of antithrombotic therapy periprocedurally and its maintenance after a successful TAVI is crucial for the prevention of complications and affects postprocedural survival. Randomized controlled trials investigating the appropriate combination and the duration of antithrombotic treatment after TAVI are for the moment scarce. This review article sheds light on the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms contributing in periprocedural TAVI thrombotic complications and discuss the efficacy of current antithrombotic policies as evaluated in randomized trials.

Mid-Term Outcomes after Transapical and Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis and Porcelain Aorta with a Systematic Review of Transfemoral versus Transapical Approach

Background We have aimed to analyze early and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing transapical/transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-/TF-TAVI) for aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta (PAo) in our institution. Additionally, we postulated that the TA approach may be associated with a more favorable neurological outcome than the TF approach; hence, a systematic literature review was conducted.

Methods Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients with PAo underwent TA-TAVI and 4 patients with PAo TF-TAVI at our institution. The assessment of PAo was done either intraoperatively after aborted sternotomy or via computed tomography for elective TAVI. We conducted mid-term follow-up. Furthermore, a systematic review was performed to compare the mortality and neurological outcomes of TF and TA-TAVI approaches.

Results TA/TF-TAVIs were performed with 100% device success, without paravalvular leakage ≥ 2 and without procedural death. The 30-day mortality/stroke rates were 6.6%/0% in TA-TAVI and 0%/25% in TF-TAVI, respectively. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were in TA/TF-TAVI 93%/75%, 82%/66.6%, and 50%/0%, respectively.

The pooled results derived from the literature review were as follows: The prevalence of PAo in the TAVI population is 9.74%; the mean logistic EuroSCORE is 41.9% in TA-TAVI versus 16.2% in TF-TAVI; the mean 30-day mortality is 5.9% in TA-TAVI versus 6.3% in TF-TAVI, and the mean stroke is 0.8% in TA-TAVI versus 9% in TF-TAVI.

Conclusion TA-TAVI shows promising early and mid-term outcomes in patients with PAo. TF-TAVI performed in patients with PAo is likely to be associated with higher rates of stroke than TA-TAVI.

Cerebrovascular Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative less invasive treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Despite the technological development and knowledge improvement in recent years, neurological complications remain a concern, especially with the expansion of the technique toward younger and lower risk patients. Clinical cerebrovascular events have an important impact on patients' morbidity and mortality with a multifactorial origin. While cerebral microembolizations during TAVI is a universal phenomenon and embolic protection devices have been developed in an attempt to reduce them, their clinical utility remains unclear. We review the current evidence on cerebrovascular events associated with TAVI and potential preventive strategies.

Effectiveness and Safety of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With "Porcelain" Aorta

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with porcelain aorta is considered a high-risk procedure. Hence, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is emerging as the intervention of choice. However, there is a paucity of data directly comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with porcelain aorta. We compared outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR in high-risk patients with porcelain between March 2012 and June 2015. The TAVI group included 54 patients, whereas 130 SAVR patients with porcelain aorta were identified (operated on between 2004 and 2015). Both groups were matched 1:1 based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score with a 0.5% a priori caliper, resulting in 52 matched pairs. The mean STS-PROM was 7.3 ± 3.9 for both groups (p = 0.98), whereas mean age was 77.5 years for TAVI and 78.8 years for SAVR (p = 0.46). Compared with SAVR, TAVI patients had lower operative mortality (3.8% vs 17.3%; p = 0.052), significantly shorter median intensive care unit (40 vs 107 hours; p < 0.001) and hospital (5 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001) length of stay (LOS), but similar postoperative stroke rates (7.7% vs 11.5%; p = 0.74). One-year unadjusted survival was 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.8% to 93.5%) in the TAVI group versus 71.2% (95% CI: 61.0% to 85.1%) in the SAVR group, p = 0.093. Cox proportional hazard modeling identified preoperative chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio: 2.63 [95% CI: 1.03 to 6.70]; p = 0.043) and SAVR (hazard ratio: 2.641 [95% CI: 1.07 to 6.51]; p = 0.035) as significant predictors for decreased survival. Overall, TAVI was associated with reduced operative mortality, increased survival, and shorter intensive care unit and hospital length of stay compared with SAVR in patients with porcelain aorta. This study demonstrates that TAVI is a safe intervention in this high-risk population.

Role of CMR in TAVR

Multimodality imaging plays a critical role in planning, performing, and evaluating transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been underutilized in this patient population to date, but there is increasing evidence that it can offer equivalent or even superior information to more commonly used imaging modalities, such as echocardiography or computed tomography for specific applications. In addition, CMR can provide incremental information, including advanced tissue characterization with late gadolinium enhancement and T1 mapping. In this paper, we review the evidence for CMR in TAVR and explore whether CMR should still be considered a research tool, or whether it is now ready for implementation into clinical practice.

Sutureless aortic valve implantation in patient with porcelain aorta via unclamped aorta and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Severe atherosclerotic calcification of the ascending aorta, the so-called porcelain aorta, precludes cardiac surgeons from placing an aortic cross-clamp and direct aortic cannulation due to the increased risk of systemic embolism and stroke. In the present report, we support the option of sutureless valve implantation in a case of a porcelain ascending aorta, with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and also without aortic cross-clamp.

Therapeutic alternatives after aborted sternotomy at the time of surgical aortic valve replacement in the TAVI Era-Five centre experience and systematic review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze causes, management, and outcomes of the unexpected need to abort sternotomy in aortic stenosis (AS) patients accepted for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era.

METHODS

Cases of aborted sternotomy (AbS) were gathered from 5 centers between 2009 and 2014. A systematic review of all published cases in the same period was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients (71% males, 74±8years, LogEuroSCORE 11.9±7.4%) suffered an AbS (0.19% of all sternotomies). Main reasons for Abs included previously unknown porcelain aorta (PAo) in 83.9%, mediastinal fibrosis due to radiotherapy in 12.9%, and chronic mediastinitis in 3.2%. Median time between AbS and next intervention was 2.3months (IQR: 0.7-5.8) with no mortality within this period. Only a case was managed with open surgery. In 30 patients (96.8%) TAVI was performed with a rate of success of 86.7%. Three patients (9.7%) presented in-hospital death and 17 (54.8%) had in-hospital complications including heart failure (9.6%), major bleeding (6.9%), and acute kidney injury (9.6%). Older patients (76±8 vs. 70±8years, p=0.045), previous cardiac surgery (60% vs. 15.4%, p=0.029), and shorter time from AbS to next intervention (5.1±5 vs. 1±0.7months, p=0.001) were related to higher six-month mortality (22.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The main reason for AbS was PAo. This entity was associated to a higher rate of complications and mortality, especially in older patients and with prior cardiac surgery. A preventive strategy in these subgroups might be based on imaging evaluation. TAVI was the most extended therapy.

Efficacy and follow-up of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with radiation-induced aortic stenosis

Objective

To investigate transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) feasibility, effectiveness and safety in radiation-induced aortic valve stenosis cases.

Methods

198 consecutive patients referred for TAVI were prospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups: patients with a history of chest radiation therapy with suspected radiation-induced valvular disease (RXT) and others with suspected degenerative aortic valve stenosis (NRXT). Procedural, early and mid-term clinical outcomes were compared.

Results

Of the 198 patients enrolled in our study, 9.6% qualified for inclusion in the RXT group. A comparison of baseline characteristics revealed that patients with RXT were younger than patients with NRXT (68.3 vs 82.5 years; p<0.05) and exhibited a lower surgical risk score (Euroscore: 7.1% vs 21.8%; p<0.05) and a higher frequency of hostile thorax and porcelain aorta (52.6% vs 28.5%; p<0.05; 63.2% vs 10.6%; p<0.05, respectively). In both groups, the implantation success rate was high and the 30-day safety end point acceptable (RXT: 94.7% and 83.3%; NRXT: 93.9% and 75.6%, respectively). At 6 months, overall mortality was significantly lower in the RXT group (0% vs 18%; p=0.048).

Conclusions

In patients suffering from radiation-induced aortic valve stenosis and contraindicated for surgery, TAVI is a promising approach, with high feasibility, acceptable risk, low mortality and high clinical effectiveness at mid-term follow-up.

Usefulness and validation of the survival posT TAVI score for survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis

Surgical risk scores fail to accurately predict mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a dedicated risk score for accurate estimation of mortality risk in these patients. All consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at 6 international institutions were enrolled. Predictors for 1-year all-cause mortality were identified by means of Cox multivariate analysis and incorporated in a prediction score. Accuracy of the score was derived and externally validated for 30-day and 1-year mortality. The net classification improvement compared with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was appraised. A total of 1,064 patients constituted the derivation cohort and 180 patients constituted the external validation cohort. A total of 165 patients (15%) died at 1-year follow-up. Previous stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 1.4 to 3), inverse of renal clearance (OR 8, 6 to 14), and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure ≥50 mm Hg (OR 2.10, 1.5 to 3) were independently related to 1-year mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) of the survival post TAVI (STT) for 1-year mortality was 0.68 (0.62 to 0.71). At 30 days, 65 patients (7%) had died and the AUC for the STT at this time point was 0.66 (0.64 to 0.75). In the external validation cohorts, the AUC of the STT were 0.66 (0.56 to 0.7) for 30-day and 0.67 (0.62 to 0.71) for 1-year mortality. Net reclassification improvement for STT compared with STS was 31% (p <0.001) for 30-day mortality and 14% (p <0.001) for 1-year mortality. In conclusion, the STT score represents an easy and accurate tool to assess the risk of short-term and mid-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI.

Percutaneous closure of a poorly tolerated post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation ventricular septal defect

We report the case of a 78-year-old woman with severe aortic valve stenosis that was successfully treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, with initial good hemodynamic results and clinical improvement of the patient. After 3 weeks, her clinical condition worsened, with progressive heart failure. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed an iatrogenic large subaortic ventricular septal defect with important left-to right shunt (Qp/Qs 3:1). The patient underwent successful transcatheter closure of the ventricular septal defect with a 14-mm Amplatzer mVSD Occluder (AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN), resulting in dramatic clinical improvement.

Assessing the risk of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in the transcatheter valve era

Surgical aortic valve replacement had been the only definitive treatment of severe aortic stenosis before the availability of transcatheter valve technology. Historically, many patients with severe aortic stenosis had not been offered surgery, largely related to professional and patient perception regarding the risks of operation relative to anticipated benefits. Such patients have been labeled as "high risk" or "inoperable" with respect to their suitability for surgery. The availability of transcatheter aortic valve replacement affords a new treatment option for patients previously not felt to be optimal candidates for surgical valve replacement and allows for the opportunity to reexamine the methods for assessing operative risk in the context of more than 1 available treatment. Standardized risk assessment can be challenging because of both the imprecision of current risk scoring methods and the variability in ascertaining risk related to operator experience as well as local factors and practice patterns at treating facilities. Operative risk in actuality is not an absolute but represents a spectrum from very low to extreme, and the conventional labels of high risk and inoperable are incomplete with respect to their utility in clinical decision making. Moving forward, the emphasis should be on developing an individual assessment that takes into account procedure risk as well as long-term outcomes evaluated in a multidisciplinary fashion, and incorporating patient preferences and goals in a model of shared decision making.

Replacement of the heavily calcified ascending aorta in aortic valve replacement

A totally calcified ascending aorta prevents aortic crossclamping and aortotomy during aortic valve replacement, and replacement of the ascending aorta is a valid option in these cases. We describe a simple technique for calcified ascending aorta replacement using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator. This can be used in aortic endarterectomy for removal of the calcified plaque in the anastomotic part.

Worldwide TAVI registries: what have we learned?

With a rapidly aging society, the number of patients with cardiovascular disease-in particular aortic stenosis-is progressively increasing. Although conventional aortic valve replacement remains the only treatment known to improve prognosis and symptoms in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis, about one-third are still withhold from the life-saving therapy. Based on the compelling evidence of the randomized Placement of Aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) A and B cohort, TAVI is now considered standard of care for extreme risk and inoperable patients and is an alternative to surgery for high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, these patients were super-selected, which does not reflect a clinical real-world situation. TAVI registries represent a real-world scenario, and therefore provide the evidence for the treatment of high-risk patients (regarding comorbidities and anatomical factors) in daily clinical life. The review will focus on the recently published Edwards SAPIEN, Medtronic CoreValve and mixed (national) registries with the focus on short- and midterm outcome. These registries suggest that the growing experience of the operators with regard to patient selection, prevention, recognition and treatment of procedural complications together with the developments in valve design will improve the short-term results of TAVI. However, randomized trials in intermediate risk patients and data on long-term valve durability are a prerequisite before indications can be expanded to younger and lower risk patient population.

Bad aorta

As its outcomes improve, cardiac surgery has been performed on more and more cases which were previously considered to be difficult to deal with. However, there are still a number of problems to be solved regarding surgery on patients with severe sclerotic lesions in the ascending aorta, which we collectively call "bad aorta". Concerning a preoperative assessment of the ascending aorta, our report revealed no relationship between the severity of calcification detected with a preoperative non-enhanced CT and the aortic lesion found during the surgery. Meanwhile, an intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound enables us to make high-quality evaluations of the aorta without imposing much burden on the patient. This modality may be essential for cardiac surgery. As for surgical management for bad aorta, quite a few methods have been reported to this point, but the overall operative mortality rate and cerebrovascular accident rate are relatively high, at a little <10 %, respectively. With the recent cross-clamping method under short-term total circulatory arrest (TCA), however, the results are much better; these rates total around 5 %. Further improvement is expected in the outcome of cardiac surgery on bad aorta cases by establishing a modality to evaluate sclerotic lesions in the ascending aorta with epiaortic ultrasound and by selecting a proper procedure for each case.

Aortic valve replacement within an unexpected porcelain aorta: the sutureless valve option

Four patients referred for surgical treatment of aortic stenosis presented an unexpected extremely calcified (porcelain) ascending aorta at the intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonography scanning. In each patient, replacement of the aortic valve was successfully performed using a sutureless implantable bioprosthesis during a short period of hypothermic circulatory arrest. In the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures, the sutureless valve may be a valuable option for surgical units that do not dispose of transcatheter technology or a hybrid operative theatre.