Adverse events after coronary revascularization procedures in California 2000 to 2010

The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods

During the last decades, the increased number of percutaneous interventions procedures causes a significant change in the profile of patients referred to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to study changes in patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients referred to CABG in a community hospital during the first 15 years of the millennium.A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent CABG in Cape Cod Hospital was performed. The period was divided into 2 sub-periods, 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014. Patients' characteristics and procedure outcomes were compared. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, Society of Thoracic Surgery risk scores and surgical adverse outcomes (stroke, coma, and 30-days mortality) were collected.During the study period, 1108 patients underwent CABG; 612 were operated before 2009 and 496 after. Age and sex were similar in the 2 periods. The patients in the later period presented lower risk for mortality and stroke (P <.001). Diabetes (DM) was more common in the later period (P <.001) while peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (P <.001) and left main disease (LM) (P = .017) were more common in the earlier period. Mortality rates were similar between the 2 periods. Post-operative stroke (1.8%) and coma (0.8%) were presented only in the later period. In conclusion, a significant change in CABG patients' characteristics was observed.In conclusion, patients in the later period had lower risk score and were more likely to present with DM and less with PVD and LM. Despite the lower risk, the mortality rate was similar.

Intermediate-Term Risk of Stroke Following Cardiac Procedures in a Nationally Representative Data Set

Background

Studies on stroke risk following cardiac procedures addressed only perioperative and long‐term risk following limited higher‐risk procedures, were poorly generalizable, and often failed to stratify by stroke type. We calculated stroke risk in the intermediate risk period following cardiac procedures compared with common noncardiac surgeries and medical admissions.

Methods and Results

The Nationwide Readmissions Database contains readmission data for 49% of US admissions in 2013. We compared age‐adjusted stroke readmission rates up to 90 days postdischarge. We used Cox regression to calculate hazard ratios, up to 1 year, of stroke risk comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention. Procedures and diagnoses were identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. After cardiac procedures, 90‐day ischemic stroke readmission rate was highest after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (2.05%); 90‐day hemorrhagic stroke rate was highest after left ventricular assist device placement (0.09%). The hazard ratio for ischemic stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, in fully adjusted Cox models was 1.86 (95% confidence interval, 1.12–3.08; P=0.016) and 6.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.97–19.33; P=0.0018) for hemorrhagic stroke. There was no difference between coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conclusions

We demonstrated elevated readmission rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the intermediate 30‐, 60‐, and 90‐day risk periods following common cardiac procedures. Furthermore, we found an elevated risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement up to 1 year.

Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan

INTRODUCTION

Public reporting (PR) is a policy mechanism that may improve clinical outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, prior studies have shown that PR may have an adverse impact on patient selection. It is unclear whether alternatives to PR, such as collaborative quality improvement (CQI), may drive improvements in quality of care and outcomes for patients receiving PCI without the unintended consequences seen with PR.

METHODS

Using National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry data from January 2011 through September 2012, we evaluated patients who underwent PCI in New York (NY), a state with PR (N = 51,983), to Michigan, a state with CQI (N = 53,528). We compared patient characteristics, the quality of care delivered, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing PCI in NY had a lower-risk profile, with a lower proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or cardiogenic shock, compared with Michigan. Quality of care was broadly similar in the 2 states; however, outcomes were better in NY. In a propensity-matched analysis, patients in NY were less likely to be referred for emergent, urgent, or salvage coronary artery bypass surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, P < .0001) and to receive blood transfusion (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.61-0.82, P < .0001), and had lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.83, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Public reporting of PCI data is associated with fewer high-risk patients undergoing PCI compared with CQI. However, in comparable samples of patients, PR is also associated with a lower risk of mortality and adverse events. The optimal quality improvement method may involve combining these 2 strategies to protect access to care while still driving improvements in patient outcomes.

Cause and effects of decreasing coronary revascularization procedures in California hospitals, 2006 to 2010

Coronary revascularization procedures decreased markedly in California after the introduction of drug-eluting stents and the initiation of public reporting in 2003, resulting in a large number of low-volume heart programs. California hospital discharge data were analyzed from 2006 to 2010 to study the impact of this change. In-hospital mortality and hospital readmission for major adverse events at 90 days and 365 days were determined for patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) either with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or PCI without acute coronary syndrome (PCI-noACS). Three terciles were chosen by case volume as follows: high-volume (747 ± 336 [SD]/yr total PCI, 210 ± 130 isolated CABG), intermediate volume (362 ± 47 PCI, 106 ± 27 CABG), and low-volume (211 ± 6 PCI, 53 ± 17 CABG) terciles were studied. PCI-noACS procedures decreased 33% and CABG 20%, whereas PCI-ACS procedures increased slightly. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was slightly better in high-volume compared with low-volume terciles for CABG (2.0% vs 2.6%) and PCI-noACS (0.64% vs 0.85%). There was no difference in major adverse events at 90 days or 365 days among volume terciles within procedure groups, and no change in event rates was noted over the 5-year period. Wide variation in outcomes, associated with low volume, contributed to poor statistical discrimination among providers. In conclusion, lower volume hospitals had similar overall outcomes with wider variation. Conservative treatment strategies apparently contributed to decreased procedure volume. Collaboration among hospitals of similar structure and case volume may be the most appropriate performance improvement model to reduce variability among providers.