Patient "Activation" of Patients Referred for Advanced Heart Failure Therapy

Self-Efficacy, Patient Activation, and the Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Patients' Daily Lives

BACKGROUND

The effective management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requires complex self-management behaviors. Both patient activation (the degree to which patients are willing and able to engage in care) and self-efficacy (one's confidence in performing certain behaviors) are thought to play an important role in chronic disease self-management, but patient activation is a broad concept that can be more difficult to precisely target than self-efficacy. We aimed to describe the relationship between patient activation, self-efficacy, and the burden of IBD on patients' daily lives.

METHODS

Patients with IBD were recruited from a single center to complete a survey including the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13®), the IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES), and an IBD-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined the relationship between IBD burden, self-efficacy, and patient activation, adjusting a priori for age, gender, IBD type, IBD medications, active corticosteroid use, anxiety, and depression. We performed a post-hoc mediation analysis to examine self-efficacy as a potential mediator in the relationship between patient activation and the burden of IBD on patient's daily lives.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients with IBD completed the survey (59% Crohn's disease, 41% ulcerative colitis, 52% female). Higher levels of patient activation and higher levels of self-efficacy were each associated with lower IBD burden (patient activation: ß = - 1.9, p < 0.001, self-efficacy: ß = - 2.6, p < 0.001). Post hoc mediation analysis confirmed that the relationship between patient activation and daily IBD burden was mediated by self-efficacy (Average Causal Mediation Effect = - 1.00, p < 0.001, proportion mediated = 0.62, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The relationship between patient activation and IBD burden is highly mediated by self-efficacy, suggesting that self-efficacy could be a more precise target for intervention. Future studies could focus on targeting self-efficacy to build individuals' confidence in IBD self-management and testing of IBD-tailored self-management programs to ultimately improve disease outcomes.

Patient activation and medication adherence in adults

BACKGROUND

Patients' level of medication adherence provides conflicting results in its relationship to patient activation. Multiple factors may be contributing to these mixed results.

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose was to assess the association of patient activation to medication adherence in adults with chronic health conditions and low health literacy (HL). Secondary objectives were to determine whether age, education, gender, and race were associated with activation.

METHODS

Participants completed self-report questionnaires regarding chronic disease self-management. Patient activation was measured using Hibbard's Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Self-report of medication adherence was determined using the Gonzalez-Lu adherence questionnaire. Block regressions first assessed the relation of demographic variables and education to adherence and then the added relation of patient activation in a second model.

RESULTS

The analyses included 301 participants (mean age 58 years; 53% female; mean chronic conditions of 6.6). Some of the most common chronic conditions included hypertension (60%), arthritis (51%), depression (49%), and hyperlipidemia (43%). The relation of older age to greater medication adherence was significant (P < 0.05) in both models. The addition of PAM was significantly related to better adherence (P < 0.001) and also increased the R squared value from 0.04 to 0.09. This change resulted in a moderate effect size (d = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

Evaluating patient activation at baseline may predict those more likely to be medication adherent in patients with low HL.

Trust and activation in defining patient-clinician interactions for chronic disease management

OBJECTIVE

Patient-clinician relationship quality and patient activation can both improve patient health outcomes, but prior work has primarily examined these factors independently. We examine how these two factors shape patient behavior in the setting of ambulatory heart failure care, where serial intensification of multiple medications is central to chronic care delivery.

METHODS

We used content analysis to analyze 22 in-depth patient interviews and 32 audio-recorded clinic visits collected for the EPIC-HF Trial. This was a secondary analysis providing qualitative depth to the parent RCT.

RESULTS

We identified a typology of patient activation and patient-clinician relationship quality, with four types: Supported, Skeptical, Deferential, and Unempowered. Types were sensitive to time and context; a given patient might occupy multiple types throughout the course of a single clinic visit. The effects of patient-activation and the patient-clinician relationship appeared to be bidirectional, with each influencing the other.

CONCLUSION

Patient-clinician relationship quality and patient activation are dominant in shaping clinical interactions and disease management. This interaction is dynamic, and patients may change types depending on time, place, or context.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that both patient activation and high relationship quality work together to create a supportive environment for chronic care, where intermittent skepticism, deference or empowerment may be useful at particular times or in certain situations.

The effect of self-management support program on patient activation and inner strength in patients with cardiovascular disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a self-management program on activation and inner strength in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

METHODS

This study assigned 86 patients with CVDs to an experimental and a comparison group utilizing alternate allocation based on a quasi-experimental design. The experimental group participated in a self-management program based on a theoretical framework in three stages, i.e. orientation-recognition, reinforcing-engaging and monitoring-follow-up; whereas the comparison group received routine care. The supportive program was administered through holding five individual face-to-face sessions, providing educational booklets and performing four phone-call follow-ups during three months after discharge. The outcomes were measured using the patient activation measure (PAM) and the inner strength scale (ISS).

RESULTS

The between group analysis indicated a statistically-significant difference in the mean score of patient activation (P < 0.001) in the two groups. Nevertheless, there was not a statistically-insignificant difference in the mean score of inner strength between the two groups (P < 0.104).

CONCLUSION

Although a three-month nurse-led self-management support program was found to improve patient activation levels, it was ineffective in promoting inner strength.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Psychosocial dynamics should be integrated in providing self-management program by nurses. To promote patient activation, tailored consultations is recommended.

Preoperative patient activation is predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is an association between preoperative 10-Item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-10) scores and clinical outcomes following MIS LD.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a primary MIS LD were retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to their preoperative PAM-10 scores: "low PAM," "moderate PAM," and "high PAM." Preoperative PAM score cohorts were tested for improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain using multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included: 29 had a low PAM score, 32 had a moderate PAM score, and 28 had a high PAM score. Cohorts experienced similar preoperative VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, and SF-12 PCS. Patients with low PAM scores experienced a trend of higher pain scores throughout 6 months with VAS back pain being significant at 3 months and VAS leg pain being significant at 6-week and 3-month follow-up. Patients with lower PAM scores experienced a worse improvement in ODI at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month timepoints. Lastly, patients with lower PAM scores demonstrated less improvement in SF-12 PCS at 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative PAM scores were associated with worse improvement in clinical outcomes following MIS LD. Patients with lower PAM scores had diminished improvement in long-term patient-reported outcomes including ODI, SF-12, and VAS back and leg pain. Our investigation suggests that preoperative PAM assessments may be an effective tool to predict postoperative outcomes following MIS LD.

Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study

Purpose

We examined the association between sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants and referral to a new model of health care that uses patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures for remote outpatient follow-up (PRO-based follow-up).

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study among outpatients with epilepsy at the Department of Neurology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Included were all persons aged ≥ 15 years visiting the department for the first time during the period from May 2016 to May 2018. Patients received a questionnaire containing questions about health literacy, self-efficacy, patient activation, well-being, and general health. We also collected data regarding sociodemographic status, labour market affiliation, and co-morbidity from nationwide registers. Associations were analysed as time-to-event using the pseudo-value approach. Missing data were handled using multiple imputations.

Results

A total of 802 eligible patients were included in the register-based analyses and 411 patients (51%) responded to the questionnaire. The results based on data from registers indicated that patients were less likely to be referred to PRO-based follow-up if they lived alone, had low education or household income, received temporary or permanent social benefits, or if they had a psychiatric diagnosis. The results based on data from the questionnaire indicated that patients were less likely to be referred to PRO-based follow-up if they reported low levels of health literacy, self-efficacy, patient activation, well-being, or general health.

Conclusion

Both self-reported and register-based analyses indicated that socioeconomically advantaged patients were referred more often to PRO-based follow-up than socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-019-02407-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.