Implications of Initial Recorded Rhythm on Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion and Subsequent All-Cause Mortality in Sudden Cardiac Arrest Survivors

Temporal Trends in Incidence and Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Manifesting With Shockable and Nonshockable Rhythms: A 16-Year Prospective Study in a Large US Community

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The proportion of nonshockable sudden cardiac arrests (pulseless electrical activity and asystole) continues to rise. Survival is lower than shockable (ventricular fibrillation [VF]) sudden cardiac arrests, but there is little community-based information on temporal trends in the incidence and survival from sudden cardiac arrests based on presenting rhythms. We investigated community-based temporal trends in sudden cardiac arrest incidence and survival by presenting rhythm.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the incidence of each presenting sudden cardiac arrest rhythm and survival outcomes for out-of-hospital events in the Portland, Oregon metro area (population of approximately 1 million, 2002 to 2017). We limited inclusion to cases of likely cardiac cause with resuscitation attempted by emergency medical services.

RESULTS

Out of 3,723 overall sudden cardiac arrest cases, 908 (24%) presented with pulseless electrical activity, 1,513 (41%) with VF, and 1,302 (35%) with asystole. The incidence of pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest remained stable over 4-year periods (9.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 7.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 5.7/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 8.3/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted beta [β] -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.98 to 2.85). The incidence of VF-sudden cardiac arrests decreased over time (14.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 13.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 12.0/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 11.6/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted β -1.05; 95% CI, -1.68 to -0.42) and asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (8.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 9.0/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 10.3/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 15.7/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted β 2.25; 95% CI -1.24 to 5.73) did not change significantly over time. Survival increased over time for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests (5.7%, 4.3%, 9.6%, 13.6%; unadjusted β 2.8%; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.4) and VF-sudden cardiac arrests (27.5%, 29.8%, 37.9%, 36.6%; unadjusted β 3.5%; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6), but not for asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (1.7%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 2.4%; unadjusted β 0.3%; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.1). Enhancements in the emergency medical services system's pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest management were temporally associated with the increasing pulseless electrical activity survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 16-year period, the incidence of VF/ventricular tachycardia decreased over time, but pulseless electrical activity incidence remained stable. Survival from both VF-sudden cardiac arrests and pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests increased over time with a more than 2-fold increase for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests.

Survivors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Presenting With Pulseless Electrical Activity: Clinical Substrate, Triggers, Long-Term Prognosis

BACKGROUND

The proportion of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) presenting as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is rising, and survival remains low. The pathophysiology of PEA-SCA is poorly understood, and current clinical practice lacks specific options for the management of survivors.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate clinical profile, triggers, and long-term prognosis in survivors of SCA presenting with PEA.

METHODS

The community-based Oregon SUDS (Sudden Unexpected Death Study) (since 2002) and Ventura PRESTO (Prediction of Sudden Death in Multi-ethnic Communities) (since 2015) studies prospectively ascertain all out-of-hospital SCAs of likely cardiac etiology. Lifetime clinical history and detailed evaluation of SCA events is available. We evaluated all SCA survivors with PEA as the presenting rhythm.

RESULTS

The study population included 201 PEA-SCA survivors. Of these, 97 could be contacted for access to their clinical records. Among the latter, the mean age was 67 ± 17 years and 58 (60%) were male. After in-hospital examinations, 29 events (30%) were associated with acute myocardial infarction, and 5 (5%) had bradyarrhythmias. Among the remaining 63 patients (65%), specific triggers remained undetermined, although 31 (49%) had a previous history of heart failure. Of the 201 overall survivors, 91 (45%) were deceased after a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 4.0 years. Survivors under the age of 40 years had an excellent long-term prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of PEA-SCA are a heterogeneous group with high prevalence of multiple comorbidities, especially heart failure. Surprisingly good long-term survival was observed in young individuals. Acute myocardial infarction as the precipitating event was common, but triggers remained undetermined in the majority. Provision of individualized care to PEA survivors requires a renewed investigative focus on PEA-SCA.