1
|
Romano R, Bucci C. Antisense therapy: a potential breakthrough in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res 2024; 19:1027-1035. [PMID: 37862205 PMCID: PMC10749614 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.385285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are a group of disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of neurons in the central or peripheral nervous system. Currently, there is no cure for neurodegenerative diseases and this means a heavy burden for patients and the health system worldwide. Therefore, it is necessary to find new therapeutic approaches, and antisense therapies offer this possibility, having the great advantage of not modifying cellular genome and potentially being safer. Many preclinical and clinical studies aim to test the safety and effectiveness of antisense therapies in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent advances in the development of these new technologies to treat the most common neurodegenerative diseases, with a focus on those antisense therapies that have already received the approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Romano
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
| | - Cecilia Bucci
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McLean A, Tchan M, Devery S, Smyth R, Shrestha R, Kumar KR, Tomlinson S, Tisch S, Wu KHC. Informing a value care model: lessons from an integrated adult neurogenomics clinic. Intern Med J 2023; 53:2198-2207. [PMID: 37092903 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in genomics provide improved opportunities for diagnosis of complex neurogenetic disorders, yet the optimal approach to translate these benefits to the outpatient clinic is unclear. AIMS We retrospectively reviewed referral indications and outcomes of an integrated multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinic pathway for adults with suspected neurogenetic disorders. The associated cost implications were estimated. METHODS Consecutive patients who attended the neurogenomics clinic from January 2017 to April 2020 were included. The clinic comprised neurologists, clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors, who assessed each patient concurrently. RESULTS Ninety-nine new patients were referred spanning 45 different clinical diagnoses. Following MDT clinical assessment, 23% (23/99) of referral diagnoses were revised prior to molecular testing. Eighty-one patients (82%) underwent genetic testing, including 43 exome-based panels, 15 whole-genome sequencing, 14 single gene tests, 27 repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction testing and two chromosomal microarrays. Overall, 33/99 patients (33%) received a diagnosis, either a molecular diagnosis (n = 24, of which 22 were diagnostic and two were predictive) or a clinical diagnosis (n = 9). Of the clinical diagnosis cohort, five patients received a diagnosis without molecular testing and four patients whose negative testing (one diagnostic and three predictive) allowed exclusion of genetic differentials and, hence, confirmation of clinical diagnoses. The diagnostic rate following MDT and diagnostic testing was 30% (28/94), excluding the five predictive testing cases. MDT assessment aligned with eventual molecular diagnoses in 96% of cases. The estimated average costs were AU$1386 per patient undergoing MDT assessment and AU$4159 per diagnosis achieved. CONCLUSIONS We present an integrated multidisciplinary neurogenomics clinic pathway providing a diagnostic yield of 33% (30% excluding predictive testing cases), with costing implications. The relatively high diagnostic yield may be attributed to multidisciplinary input integrating accurate phenotyping of complex disorders and interpretation of genomic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison McLean
- St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michel Tchan
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Genetic Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sophie Devery
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Renee Smyth
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rupendra Shrestha
- Centre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kishore R Kumar
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Molecular Medicine in Neurology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Tomlinson
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Tisch
- St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kathy H C Wu
- St Vincent's Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical Genomics, St Vincent's Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Genetic Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brunet de Courssou JB, Durr A, Adams D, Corvol JC, Mariani LL. Antisense therapies in neurological diseases. Brain 2021; 145:816-831. [PMID: 35286370 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in targeted regulation of gene expression allowed new therapeutic approaches for monogenic neurological diseases. Molecular diagnosis has paved the way to personalized medicine targeting the pathogenic roots: DNA or its RNA transcript. These antisense therapies rely on modified nucleotides sequences (single-strand DNA or RNA, both belonging to the antisense oligonucleotides family, or double-strand interfering RNA) to act specifically on pathogenic target nucleic acids, thanks to complementary base pairing. Depending on the type of molecule, chemical modifications and target, base pairing will lead alternatively to splicing modifications of primary transcript RNA or transient messenger RNA degradation or non-translation. The key to success for neurodegenerative diseases also depends on the ability to reach target cells. The most advanced antisense therapies under development in neurological disorders are presented here, at the clinical stage of development, either at phase 3 or market authorization stage, such as in spinal amyotrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, transthyretin-related hereditary amyloidosis, porphyria and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; or in earlier clinical phase 1 B, for Huntington disease, synucleinopathies and tauopathies. We also discuss antisense therapies at the preclinical stage, such as in some tauopathies, spinocerebellar ataxias or other rare neurological disorders. Each subtype of antisense therapy, antisense oligonucleotides or interfering RNA, has proved target engagement or even clinical efficacy in patients; undisputable recent advances for severe and previously untreatable neurological disorders. Antisense therapies show great promise, but many unknowns remain. Expanding the initial successes achieved in orphan or rare diseases to other disorders will be the next challenge, as shown by the recent failure in Huntington disease or due to long-term preclinical toxicity in multiple system atrophy and cystic fibrosis. This will be critical in the perspective of new planned applications to premanifest mutation carriers, or other non-genetic degenerative disorders such as multiple system atrophy or Parkinson disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Baptiste Brunet de Courssou
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Neurology, CIC Neurosciences, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Durr
- Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - David Adams
- Department of Neurology, Bicêtre hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre de Référence National des Neuropathies Périphériques Rares, Paris Saclay University, INSERM U 1195, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Corvol
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Neurology, CIC Neurosciences, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Louise-Laure Mariani
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Neurology, CIC Neurosciences, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barp A, Mosca L, Sansone VA. Facilitations and Hurdles of Genetic Testing in Neuromuscular Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040701. [PMID: 33919863 PMCID: PMC8070835 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders that affect about one in every thousand individuals worldwide. The vast majority of NMDs has a genetic cause, with about 600 genes already identified. Application of genetic testing in NMDs can be useful for several reasons: correct diagnostic definition of a proband, extensive familial counselling to identify subjects at risk, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent the recurrence of the disease; furthermore, identification of specific genetic mutations still remains mandatory in some cases for clinical trial enrollment where new gene therapies are now approaching. Even though genetic analysis is catching on in the neuromuscular field, pitfalls and hurdles still remain and they should be taken into account by clinicians, as for example the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) where many single nucleotide variants of “unknown significance” can emerge, complicating the correct interpretation of genotype-phenotype relationship. Finally, when all efforts in terms of molecular analysis have been carried on, a portion of patients affected by NMDs still remain “not genetically defined”. In the present review we analyze the evolution of genetic techniques, from Sanger sequencing to NGS, and we discuss “facilitations and hurdles” of genetic testing which must always be balanced by clinicians, in order to ensure a correct diagnostic definition, but taking always into account the benefit that the patient could obtain especially in terms of “therapeutic offer”.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Barp
- The NEMO Clinical Center in Milan, Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Lorena Mosca
- Medical Genetics Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy;
| | - Valeria Ada Sansone
- The NEMO Clinical Center in Milan, Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders that affect about one in every thousand individuals worldwide. The vast majority of NMDs has a genetic cause, with about 600 genes already identified. Application of genetic testing in NMDs can be useful for several reasons: correct diagnostic definition of a proband, extensive familial counselling to identify subjects at risk, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent the recurrence of the disease; furthermore, identification of specific genetic mutations still remains mandatory in some cases for clinical trial enrollment where new gene therapies are now approaching. Even though genetic analysis is catching on in the neuromuscular field, pitfalls and hurdles still remain and they should be taken into account by clinicians, as for example the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) where many single nucleotide variants of "unknown significance" can emerge, complicating the correct interpretation of genotype-phenotype relationship. Finally, when all efforts in terms of molecular analysis have been carried on, a portion of patients affected by NMDs still remain "not genetically defined". In the present review we analyze the evolution of genetic techniques, from Sanger sequencing to NGS, and we discuss "facilitations and hurdles" of genetic testing which must always be balanced by clinicians, in order to ensure a correct diagnostic definition, but taking always into account the benefit that the patient could obtain especially in terms of "therapeutic offer".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Barp
- The NEMO Clinical Center in Milan, Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy
| | - Lorena Mosca
- Medical Genetics Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy
| | - Valeria Ada Sansone
- The NEMO Clinical Center in Milan, Neurorehabilitation Unit, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ravi B, Chan-Cortés MH, Sumner CJ. Gene-Targeting Therapeutics for Neurological Disease: Lessons Learned from Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Annu Rev Med 2021; 72:1-14. [PMID: 33502897 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-070119-115459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The last few decades have seen an explosion in identification of genes that cause monogenetic neurological diseases, as well as advances in gene-targeting therapeutics. Neurological conditions that were once considered incurable are now increasingly tractable. At the forefront is the motor neuron disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), historically the leading inherited cause of infant mortality. In the last 5 years, three SMA treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): intrathecally delivered splice-switching antisense oligonucleotide (nusinersen), systemically delivered AAV9-based gene replacement therapy (onasemnogene abeparvovec), and an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, splice-switching drug (risdiplam). Despite this remarkable progress, clinical outcomes in patients are variable. Therapeutic optimization will require improved understanding of drug pharmacokinetics and target engagement in neurons, potential toxicities, and long-term effects. We review current progress in SMA therapeutics, clinical trials, shortcomings of current treatments, and implications for the treatment of other neurogenetic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavya Ravi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA;
| | | | - Charlotte J Sumner
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA; .,Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Resta C, Pipitone GB, Carrera P, Ferrari M. Current scenario of the genetic testing for rare neurological disorders exploiting next generation sequencing. Neural Regen Res 2021; 16:475-481. [PMID: 32985468 PMCID: PMC7996035 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.293135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Next generation sequencing is currently a cornerstone of genetic testing in routine diagnostics, allowing for the detection of sequence variants with so far unprecedented large scale, mainly in genetically heterogenous diseases, such as neurological disorders. It is a fast-moving field, where new wet enrichment protocols and bioinformatics tools are constantly being developed to overcome initial limitations. Despite the as yet undiscussed advantages, however, there are still some challenges in data analysis and the interpretation of variants. In this review, we address the current state of next generation sequencing diagnostic testing for inherited human disorders, particularly giving an overview of the available high-throughput sequencing approaches; including targeted, whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing; and discussing the main critical aspects of the bioinformatic process, from raw data analysis to molecular diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Di Resta
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Unit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola Carrera
- Unit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Clinical Molecular Biology Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Ferrari
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Unit of Genomics for Human Disease Diagnosis, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Clinical Molecular Biology Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|