1
|
Cullen MW, Damp JB, Soukoulis V, Keating FK, Abudayyeh I, Yang EH, Kondapaneni M, Polk DM, Rose-Jones LJ, Theriot P, Weissman G. Program Directors Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Fellowship Training. JACC. ADVANCES 2024; 3:101008. [PMID: 39130007 PMCID: PMC11312764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed unprecedented changes to medical education, including CV fellowship programs. CV fellowship PDs offer a unique perspective regarding the impact of the pandemic on CV medical education. Objectives The 4th annual Cardiovascular Diseases (CV) Fellowship Program Directors (PDs) Survey sought to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellows and fellowship programs. Methods The survey contained 31 items examining the clinical, educational, and academic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CV fellowship programs. Results Survey response rate was 54%. Most respondents (58%) represented university-based programs. Most PDs felt that changes to clinical practice during the COVID-19 negatively impacted fellow education in cardiac catheterization (66%), outpatient cardiology (52%), nuclear imaging (51%), and echocardiography (50%). Despite improving attendance, 75% of PDs felt that virtual educational conferences adversely impacted interaction between participants. Only 22% felt they improved fellow education. Most PDs (85%) reported a negative impact of the pandemic on fellow well-being and burnout, and 57% reported a decrease in research productivity among fellows. Even though virtual recruitment allowed programs to interview more competitive candidates, most PDs felt that virtual interviews adversely impacted interactions between their fellows and candidates (71%) and their ability to convey the culture of their program (60%). Conclusions Most CV fellowship PDs felt the COVID-19 pandemic brought changes that negatively impacted the clinical training, didactic learning, academic productivity, and well-being among cardiology fellows. The implications of these changes on the competency of cardiologists that trained during the COVID-19 pandemic deserve future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W. Cullen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Julie B. Damp
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Victor Soukoulis
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Friederike K. Keating
- Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Islam Abudayyeh
- Department of Medicine, Charles Drew Univ. Loma Linda Veterans Healthcare, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Eric H. Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meera Kondapaneni
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Donna M. Polk
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lisa J. Rose-Jones
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul Theriot
- American College of Cardiology, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Gaby Weissman
- Department of Cardiology, Medstar Heart and Vascular Institute and Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wininger DA, Luther VP, Sweet M, Raj JM, Harper W, Amin AN, Lewis K, Harris L, Lai CJ. Optimizing the Internal Medicine Residency Recruitment Process: A National Survey of Program Directors and Next Steps. Am J Med 2024; 137:370-376. [PMID: 38151143 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vera P Luther
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Jaya M Raj
- Department of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine-Phoenix, St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center, Phoenix, Ariz
| | | | | | | | - Linda Harris
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pa
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hampshire K, Huang L, Shirley H, Kahkejian V, Yates E, Weiser SD, Rosenbach M, Liang K, Teherani A. The mitigated carbon emissions of transitioning to virtual medical school and residency interviews: A survey-based study. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 58:216-224. [PMID: 37551919 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prior to COVID, thousands of medical school and residency applicants traversed their countries for in-person interviews each year. However, data on the greenhouse gas emissions from in-person interviews is limited. This study estimated greenhouse gas emissions associated with in-person medical school and residency interviews and explored applicant interview structure preferences. METHODS From March to June 2022, we developed and distributed a nine-question, website-based survey to collect information on applicant virtual interview schedule, demographics and preference for future interview format. We calculated theoretical emissions for all interviews requiring air travel and performed a content analysis of interview preference explanations. RESULTS We received responses from 258 first-year and 253 fourth-year medical students at 26 allopathic US medical schools who interviewed virtually in 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, respectively. Residency applicants participating in the study were interviewed at a mean of 15.3 programs (SD 5.4) and had mean theoretical emissions of 4.31 tons CO2 eq. Medical school applicants participating in the study were interviewed at a mean of 6.9 programs and had mean theoretical emissions of 2.19 tons CO2 eq. Ninety percent of medical school applicants and 91% of residency applicants participating in the study expressed a preference for hybrid or virtual interviews going forward. CONCLUSION In-person medical training interviews have significant greenhouse gas emissions. Virtual and hybrid alternatives have a high degree of acceptability among applicants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karly Hampshire
- New York Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lawrence Huang
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Hugh Shirley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Valerie Kahkejian
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Yates
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of General Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sheri D Weiser
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California Center for Climate, Health and Equity, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Misha Rosenbach
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Liang
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Arianne Teherani
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California Center for Climate, Health and Equity, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goglin S, Kolfenbach J. The Impact of COVID-19 on Education and Training in Rheumatology: A Narrative Review. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2024; 76:32-39. [PMID: 37849427 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
|
5
|
Alexandraki I, Ismail N, Lai CJ, Duca NS, Ratcliffe T, Kisielewski M, Pincavage AT. Medical student advising during virtual residency recruitment: results of a national survey of internal medicine clerkship and sub-internship directors. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE 2023; 28:2143926. [PMID: 36351170 PMCID: PMC9662014 DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2143926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The residency application process is a critical time for medical students. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted changes to the residency recruitment procedures with the conversion of interviews to a virtual format. For medical school advisors guiding students on an all-virtual residency application process brought uncertainty to their advising practices. Thus, this study aimed to identify advising practices during the 2021 virtual application cycle. METHODS We administered an IRB-exempt national survey through the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine to 186 internal medicine core/co-/associate/assistant clerkship directors and sub-internship directors representing 140 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S./U.S.-territory-based medical schools in spring 2021. The 23-question survey was designed and pilot-tested by faculty-educators and leaders with expertise in undergraduate medical education. Data analysis included paired t- and z-tests and thematic analysis of open-ended questions. RESULTS The institutional response rate was 67% (93/140) and individual rate 55% (103/186). Half of the respondents felt prepared/very prepared (40% and 13% respectively) for their advising roles. Compared to pre-pandemic cycles, respondents advised a typical student in the middle-third of their class at their institution to apply to more residency programs (mean 24 programs vs 20, p < 0.001) and accept more interviews (mean 14 interviews vs 12, p < 0.001). Sixty-three percent (64/101) of respondents spent more time on student advising; 51% (51/101) reported more students asked them for informal advice. Fifty-nine percent (60/101) of respondents reported their advisees were able to assess a residency program 'somewhat well;' 31% (31/101) expressed that residency recruitment should remain entirely virtual in the future. CONCLUSION The transition to virtual residency recruitment due to COVID-19 prompted advising practices that may have contributed to application inflation and increased advising workload. Future studies should explore longitudinal outcomes of virtual interviews on student success to guide best practices in how to advise students during residency recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Alexandraki
- Department of Academic Affairs, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Nadia Ismail
- Department of Medicine and Department of Education, Innovation and Technology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cindy J Lai
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas S Duca
- Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Temple Ratcliffe
- Department of Medicine, Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Michael Kisielewski
- Surveys and Research, Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Amber T. Pincavage
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O’Connor AB, Blatt AE, Fletcher KE, Martin SK, Rasnake MS, Uthlaut BS, Williams DM. Multicenter Study of Optional In-Person Visits to Residency Programs After Virtual Interviews. J Grad Med Educ 2023; 15:692-701. [PMID: 38045944 PMCID: PMC10686638 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-23-00370.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Compared to in-person recruitment, virtual interviewing reduces costs and promotes equity. However, many residency applicants believe that visiting programs helps inform their rank decisions. Objective We assessed the feasibility of and stakeholder opinions about optional in-person visits after virtual interviewing and program rank list finalization. Methods Six internal medicine residency programs conducted virtual recruitment in 2022-2023 and finalized their rank lists 4 weeks before the deadline. Applicants were invited for optional in-person visits after program rank list finalization. Interviewed applicants, program directors, and program administrators were given surveys that included 7-17 questions and employed "skip logic," discrete answers (eg, "yes/no/unsure" or multiple choice), and open-ended questions. Survey questions assessed stakeholders' opinions about the value, equity, and potential downsides of this recruitment process. Results Participating programs interviewed an average of 379 applicants (range 205-534) with 39 (10.3% [39 of 379], range 7.9%-12.8% [33 of 420-51 of 397]) applicants completing in-person visits. Of 1808 interviewed applicants, 464 responded to the survey (26%); 88% (407 of 464) believe a similar optional in-person visit should be offered next year, 75% (347 of 464) found this process equitable, but only 56% (258 of 464) trusted programs not to change their rank lists. Nearly all who attended an in-person visit (96.5%, 109 of 113) found it valuable. All program directors liked the optional in-person visit and believe future applicants should be offered similar in-person visits. Conclusions A large majority of participating applicants and program directors believe that in-person visits should be offered after program rank list finalization. The majority of respondents felt this recruitment process was equitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec B. O’Connor
- Alec B. O’Connor, MD, MPH, is Internal Medicine Residency Associate Director and Professor of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Amy E. Blatt
- Amy E. Blatt, MD, is Internal Medicine Residency Director and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kathlyn E. Fletcher
- Kathlyn E. Fletcher, MD, MA, is Internal Medicine Residency Director and Professor of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Shannon K. Martin
- Shannon K. Martin, MD, MS, is Internal Medicine Residency Associate Director and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark S. Rasnake
- Mark S. Rasnake, MD, is Internal Medicine Residency Director, NCH Healthcare System, and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Brian S. Uthlaut
- Brian S. Uthlaut, MD, is Internal Medicine Residency Director and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; and
| | - Donna M. Williams
- Donna M. Williams, MD, is Internal Medicine Residency Director and Associate Professor of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O’Connor AB, McGarry K, Finn KM, Harris L, Zaas AK. Internal Medicine Resident Perspectives on Virtual Recruitment. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:619-621. [PMID: 37093587 PMCID: PMC10126937 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
This survey study describes the perceived implications of virtual-only recruitment and the preferred application process for residents and fellows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec B. O’Connor
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Kelly McGarry
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kathleen M. Finn
- Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Harris
- Research and CME Compliance, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aimee K. Zaas
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hampshire K, Shirley H, Teherani A. Interview Without Harm: Reimagining Medical Training's Financially and Environmentally Costly Interview Practices. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2023; 98:171-174. [PMID: 36696296 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The looming threat of climate change urgently calls for reimagining unsustainable systems and practices, including academia's culture of emissions-intensive travel. Given that medical educators are uniquely invested in the future of the trainees they represent, this reimagination can and should begin with medical education. Making significant reforms to the application process has historically been challenging, but the COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed an abrupt shift from in-person to virtual interviews for medical school, residency, and fellowship. Programs and applicants alike demonstrated resilience, innovation, and satisfaction in adapting to virtual interviews during 2 full application cycles. This restructuring has prompted consideration of the necessity of environmentally costly, expensive, and time-consuming cross-country travel for single-day interviews. However, evolving conversations about the future of medical training interviews have not prioritized environmental impact, despite the sizeable historical emissions generated by interview-related travel and the incompatibility between ecological damage and population health. Beyond environmental impact, virtual interviews are more equitable, with significantly fewer financial costs, and they are more efficient, requiring less time off from school or work. Many concerns associated with virtual interviews, including interview inflation and limited applicant exposure to programs and their surrounding areas, can be addressed via creative and structural solutions, such as interview caps and in-person second-look programs. The medical training interview process underwent a forced restructuring due to the unprecedented disruption caused by COVID-19. This moment presents a strategic inflection point for medical education leadership to build on the momentum and permanently transform the process by focusing on sustainability and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karly Hampshire
- K. Hampshire is a medical student, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5655-5094
| | - Hugh Shirley
- H. Shirley is a medical student, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-665X
| | - Arianne Teherani
- A. Teherani is professor of medicine, founding codirector of the University of California Center for Climate, Health, and Equity, director for Program Evaluation and Education Continuous Quality Improvement, and education scientist in the Center for Faculty Educators, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-9832
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dao AT, Garcia MM, Correa R, Gay LJ, Wininger DA, Sweet M, Luther VP, Chow TM, Harper W, Lai CJ. AAIM Recommendations to Promote Equity and Inclusion in the Internal Medicine Residency Interview Process. Am J Med 2022; 135:1509-1516.e1. [PMID: 35981650 PMCID: PMC9376147 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony T Dao
- School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo.
| | - Maria M Garcia
- Chan Medical School, University of Massachusetts, Boston
| | | | | | | | | | - Vera P Luther
- School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Timothy M Chow
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa
| | | | - Cindy J Lai
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Daniel M, Gottlieb M, Wooten D, Stojan J, Haas MRC, Bailey J, Evans S, Lee D, Goldberg C, Fernandez J, Jassal SK, Rudolf F, Guluma K, Lander L, Pott E, Goldhaber NH, Thammasitboon S, Uraiby H, Grafton-Clarke C, Gordon M, Pawlikowska T, Corral J, Partha I, Kolman KB, Westrick J, Dolmans D. Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. MEDICAL TEACHER 2022; 44:1313-1331. [PMID: 36369939 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2022.2130038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic caused graduate medical education (GME) programs to pivot to virtual interviews (VIs) for recruitment and selection. This systematic review synthesizes the rapidly expanding evidence base on VIs, providing insights into preferred formats, strengths, and weaknesses. METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, MedEdPublish, and Google Scholar were searched from 1 January 2012 to 21 February 2022. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument. Findings were reported according to Best Evidence in Medical Education guidance. RESULTS One hundred ten studies were included. The majority (97%) were from North America. Fourteen were conducted before COVID-19 and 96 during the pandemic. Studies involved both medical students applying to residencies (61%) and residents applying to fellowships (39%). Surgical specialties were more represented than other specialties. Applicants preferred VI days that lasted 4-6 h, with three to five individual interviews (15-20 min each), with virtual tours and opportunities to connect with current faculty and trainees. Satisfaction with VIs was high, though both applicants and programs found VIs inferior to in-person interviews for assessing 'fit.' Confidence in ranking applicants and programs was decreased. Stakeholders universally noted significant cost and time savings with VIs, as well as equity gains and reduced carbon footprint due to eliminating travel. CONCLUSIONS The use of VIs for GME recruitment and selection has accelerated rapidly. The findings of this review offer early insights that can guide future practice, policy, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Daniel
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Darcy Wooten
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Mary R C Haas
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jacob Bailey
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sean Evans
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Lee
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Charles Goldberg
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jorge Fernandez
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Simerjot K Jassal
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Frances Rudolf
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kama Guluma
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lina Lander
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Emily Pott
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Nicole H Goldhaber
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Hussain Uraiby
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Morris Gordon
- Biomedical Evidence Synthesis and Translation to Practice (BEST) Unit, School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Teresa Pawlikowska
- Health Professions Education Centre (HPEC), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, IE
| | - Janet Corral
- University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA
| | - Indu Partha
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tuscon, AZ, USA
| | - Karyn B Kolman
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tuscon, AZ, USA
| | | | - Diana Dolmans
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luther VP, Wininger DA, Lai CJ, Dao A, Garcia MM, Harper W, Chow TM, Correa R, Gay LJ, Fettig L, Dalal B, Vassallo P, Barczi S, Sweet M. Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards. Am J Med 2022; 135:1267-1272. [PMID: 35820460 PMCID: PMC9513141 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vera P Luther
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
| | - David A Wininger
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Cindy J Lai
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Anthony Dao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Mo
| | - Maria M Garcia
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester
| | - Whitney Harper
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Timothy M Chow
- Department of Medicine, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa
| | - Ricardo Correa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Lindsey J Gay
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Lyle Fettig
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Bhavin Dalal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care Sleep Medicine, Beaumont Health and William Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, Minn
| | - Patricia Vassallo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
| | - Steven Barczi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Michelle Sweet
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, Ill
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Estime SR, McDonald EK, Twiss M, Podczerwinski J, Blanchard AK. Using Graduate Medical Education Institutional Data to Enhance Diverse Recruitment Strategies. J Grad Med Educ 2022; 14:270-273. [PMID: 35754648 PMCID: PMC9200250 DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-21-01098.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Estime
- All authors are with the University of Chicago
- Stephen R. Estime, MD, is Associate Program Director, Anesthesia & Critical Care, Co-Director of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, Graduate Medical Education, and Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology & Critical Care
| | - Edwin K. McDonald
- All authors are with the University of Chicago
- Edwin K. McDonald, MD, is Co-Director of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, Graduate Medical Education, Associate Director of Adult Clinical Nutrition, and Assistant Professor of Medicine
| | - Megham Twiss
- All authors are with the University of Chicago
- Megham Twiss, MA, MDiv, is GME Director for Operations, Accreditation, and Innovation
| | - Jeremy Podczerwinski
- All authors are with the University of Chicago
- Jeremy Podczerwinski, BS, is Data Integrity Analyst, Office of Graduate Medical Education
| | - Anita K. Blanchard
- All authors are with the University of Chicago
- Anita K. Blanchard, MD, is Emeritus Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Designated Institutional Official, and Retired Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology
| |
Collapse
|