Safwat E, Salah M, Hussein H. Faecal calprotectin levels after rifaximin treatment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: A single-center prospective study.
Arab J Gastroenterol 2020;
21:273-277. [PMID:
32928705 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajg.2020.08.003]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS
Although unclear, the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is considered to be multifactorial. Recent studies have suggested that IBS is a low-grade inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Rifaximin is a potential therapeutic agent for IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) due to its ability to decrease FC levels. This study evaluated the role of FC as a follow-up marker of IBS-D after short-course rifaximin treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Ninety-six patients with chronic diarrhoea who fulfilled the Rome IV criteria for IBS-D were enrolled in this study from outpatient clinics. After excluding 18 patients who did not complete the study due to treatment noncompliance or missing follow-up visits, 78 patients (mean age, 39.2 ± 6.9 years) with IBS-D and elevated baseline FC levels were included. An FC level of <50 μg/g was considered normal. Abdominal symptoms were assessed using a Likert scale. All patients received oral rifaximin (550 mg three times daily) for 2 weeks, followed by assessment for abdominal symptoms and FC levels; the treatment was extended to 4 weeks if FC levels remained elevated after 2 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS
FC levels normalised in 66 (84.6%) patients, including 60 and 6 patients treated for 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The remaining 12 (15.4%) patients with persistently elevated FC levels despite 4 weeks of treatment also showed a significant decline in their final FC levels compared with the baseline, accompanied with a significant improvement in abdominal symptoms (p = 0.001). A cutoff baseline FC value of 148.5 μg/g could predict non-responders with 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity.
CONCLUSION
Short-course oral rifaximin treatment results in FC normalisation in IBS-D patients with high baseline FC values. Therefore, FC should be considered as a biomarker of follow-up after rifaximin treatment for IBS-D.
Collapse