The effect of handedness and laterality in a microlaryngeal surgery simulator

Left-handedness in otolaryngology, who is right?

Objectives

This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of left-handedness (LH) among otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (ORLHN) practitioners, investigate dexterity's impact on LH trainees, and identify common patterns in their training to improve the training experience.

Methods

A web-based survey was distributed anonymously via email to members of the Saudi Otorhinolaryngology Society. The survey targeted ORLHN attending consultants, board-certified registrars, and current residents. It consisted of three sections: the first focused on the experience of attending consultants in training LH individuals, the second investigated common maneuvers employed by rhinologists, and the third explored the experiences and impacts reported by LH trainees.

Results

The study included 174 participants, and found a 13.2% LH prevalence among them. Rhinologists showed disparities, with 50% advising trainees to stand on the left side of the bed and use their left hand for the scope, whereas the other half asked otherwise. Additionally, 94.4% of the participants had not encountered any courses specifically tailored for LH trainees. Among LH trainees, 57% and 41% reported difficulties in learning and performing side-specific procedures such as functional endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic septoplasty, respectively, often attempting to switch to their nondominant hand, and feeling disadvantaged due to their laterality.

Conclusions

Left-handedness presents challenges for both LH trainees and their trainers in surgical specialties, particularly in ORLHN, in which specific positioning and instruments are crucial to gain access to the desired surgical field. Despite these challenges, there is insufficient support for LH individuals. We recommend encouraging LH trainees to openly disclose and discuss their left-handedness, provide them with mentors, establish standardized operating room setups and techniques, supply appropriate instruments, and demonstrate flexibility in accommodating their needs.

Level of evidence

Level 5.

Laterality and otorhinolaryngology: a review

BACKGROUND

Laterality of paired organs involves the function of the eyes, ears, hands and feet. Whilst most people have a right-handed preference, about 10 per cent are left-handed. Similarly, the right eye is usually preferred to the left. Medicine is both taught and practised for those with right hand and eye preference, and left-handed medical students and doctors must negotiate the right-handed world.

OBJECTIVE

This brief review looks at society's attitudes, medical training and the practice of otolaryngology in the UK towards laterality and handedness.

METHOD

Literature review.

RESULTS

Studies suggest that left-handers are more versatile and so are more ambidextrous. Conversely, this may result in problems when a right-hander tries to undertake a procedure with the non-dominant hand.

CONCLUSION

Cultures and attitudes are changing towards those who are left-handed. Left-handed surgeons may encounter difficulties in the clinical environment throughout their training.

Development and Validation of a Laryngeal Microsurgery Simulation Training System for Otolaryngology Residents

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to create a synthetic laryngeal microsurgery simulation model and training program; to assess its face, content, and construct validity; and to review the available phonomicrosurgery simulation models in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomly assigned control study.

SETTING

Simulation training course for the otolaryngology residency program at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

METHODS

Resident (postgraduate year 1 [PGY1]/PGY2) and expert groups were recruited. A laryngeal microsurgery synthetic model was developed. Nine tasks were designed and assessed through a set of programmed exercises with increasing difficulty, to fulfill 5 surgical competencies. Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device sensors applied to the participants' hands measured time and movements. The activities were video-recorded and blindly assessed by 2 laryngologists using a specific and global rating scale (SRS and GRS). A 5-point Likert survey assessing validity was completed by experts.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants were recruited (14 residents and 4 experts). Experts performed significantly better than residents in the SRS (p = .003), and GRS (p = .004). Internal consistency was demonstrated for the SRS (α = .972, p < .001). Experts had a shorter execution time (p = .007), and path length with the right hand (p = .04). The left hand did not show significant differences. The survey assessing validity resulted in a median 36 out of 40 points score for face validity; and 43 out of 45 points score, for global content validity. The literature review revealed 20 available phonomicrosurgery simulation models, only 6 with construct validity.

CONCLUSION

The face, content, and construct validity of the laryngeal microsurgery simulation training program were established. It could be replicated and incorporated into residents' curricula.

An Arduous Road to Learning Otorhinolaryngology Surgeries by a Left-Handed Surgeon

The skilfulness required for learning ENT surgeries makes it a long learning curve, and more so in case of left-handed surgeons due to lack of specific mentoring and tailored training programme. This letter is intended to highlight the need for affording adequate instructional and teaching modules for budding left-handed ENT surgeons.

Stress and Strain During Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Not Impacted by Hand Dominance or Operative Laterality in Orthopedic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic surgeons experience significant musculoskeletal pain and work-related injuries while performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We sought to investigate the impact of operative extremity and surgeon limb dominance on surgeon physiologic stress and energy expenditure during TJA.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary academic practice. Cardiorespiratory data was recorded continuously in 3 high-volume arthroplasty surgeons using a smart garment that measured heart rate (HR), HR variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and energy expenditure (calories) during conventional total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Surgeon 1 and 2 (right-handed) performed 21 right TKAs, 10 left TKAs, 13 right THAs, and 10 left THAs. Surgeon 3 (left-handed) performed 6 right TKAs, 9 left TKAs, 16 right THAs, and 10 left THAs. While performing TKA or THA, limb laterality had no significant impact on operative time and no significant differences existed in HR, HR variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, or energy expenditure for any right-handed or left-handed surgeons, regardless of the operative limb laterality. While performing TKA, consistently standing on the side of hand dominance was associated with decreased strain and stress, compared to always standing on the operative side.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that surgeon hand dominance and operative limb laterality do not impact energy expenditure or physiologic strain during TJA. However, consistently standing on the side of hand dominance in TKA may lead to decreased physiologic strain and stress during surgery. Further study utilizing wearable technology during TJA may provide orthopedic surgeons with information about modifiable factors that contribute to differences in physiological parameters during surgery.

Using Intraoperative Recordings to Evaluate Surgical Technique and Performance in Mastoidectomy

Importance

Otolaryngology residency programs currently lack rigorous methods for assessing surgical skill and often rely on biased tools of evaluation.

Objectives

To evaluate which techniques used in mastoidectomy can serve as indicators of surgeon level (defined as the level of training) and whether these determinations of technique can be made based solely on the movement of the drill head or suction.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this prospective, observational study conducted from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, at a single tertiary care institution, 3 independent observers made blinded evaluations on 24 intraoperative recordings of surgeons (6 junior residents, 4 senior residents, and 2 attending surgeons) performing mastoidectomies.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Observers assessed drill stroke count, drilling efficiency, stroke pattern, use of suction and irrigation, and estimated surgeon level. Assessments were made on both original videos and animated videos that show only the path of the burr head or suction as dots against a white background.

Results

Among the 24 recorded mastoidectomies performed by the 12 study surgeons, intraclass correlation was excellent for original video assessment of drill stroke count (0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-1.00]), use of suction (0.75 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89]), use of irrigation (0.83 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]), and estimated surgeon level (0.82 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]) and fair for drilling efficiency (0.54 [95% CI, 0.09-0.79]) and stroke pattern (0.49 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.76]). Intraclass correlation was excellent for animated video assessment of drill stroke count per unit time (0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and drilling efficiency (0.80 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]), good for stroke pattern (0.68 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85]) and estimated surgeon level (based on path of drill) (0.69 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85]), and fair for use of suction (0.58 [95% CI, 0.16-0.80]) and estimated surgeon level (based on path of suction) (0.58 [95% CI, 0.17-0.80]). On evaluation of original videos, junior residents had lower drill stroke count compared with senior residents and attending surgeons (6.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 3.0-8.0] vs 9.5 [IQR, 5.0-13.0] vs 10.5 [IQR, 5.0-17.8]; η2 = 0.14 [95% CI, 0.01-0.28]). On evaluation of animated videos, junior residents also had lower drill stroke count compared with senior residents and attending surgeons (6.0 [IQR, 4.0-9.0] vs 10.5 [IQR, 10.0-13.8] vs 10.5 [IQR, 4.3-21.0]; η2 = 0.19 [95% CI, 0.04-0.33]). Compared with junior and senior residents, attending surgeons had higher median ratings of drilling efficiency (original videos: junior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.0]; senior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.8]; attending surgeons, 5.0 [IQR, 4.3-5.0]; η2 = 0.23 [95% CI, 0.06-0.37]; animated videos: junior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.0]; senior residents, 3.0 [IQR, 2.0-4.0]; attending surgeons, 5.0 [IQR, 4.0-5.0]; η2 = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.08-0.39]) and stroke pattern (original videos: junior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.0]; senior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.8]; attending surgeons, 5.0 [IQR, 5.0-5.0]; η2 = 0.17 [95% CI, 0.03-0.31]; animated videos: junior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 3.0-4.0]; senior residents, 4.0 [IQR, 2.0-4.0]; attending surgeons, 5.0 [IQR, 5.0-5.0]; η2 = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.02-0.29]).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that observation of intraoperative mastoidectomy recordings is a feasible method of evaluating surgeon level. Reasonable indicators of surgeon level include the drill stroke count, drilling efficiency, stroke pattern, and use of the suction irrigator. Observing the path of the drill alone is sufficient to appreciate differences in drilling technique but not sufficient to accurately determine surgeon level. Intraoperative recordings can serve as a useful addition to resident education and evaluation.

Does surgeon handedness or experience predict immediate complications after mastectomy? A critical examination of outcomes in a single health system

Surgeons often seek to perfect their technical dexterity, and hand dominance of the surgeon is an important factor given the constraints of operative field laterality. However, experience often dictates how surgeons are able to compensate. While surgeons have experienced preference for the ipsilateral breast, the impact of surgeon handedness, experience, and volume has not been directly examined in a single study. A retrospective chart review of five breast surgeons (2 LHD) at a single institution identified 365 mastectomy patients, totaling 594 breasts, between January 2015 and June 2018. The breasts were identified as ipsilateral or contralateral based on the surgeons' handedness. Surgeons were grouped based on length of surgical experience, three with ≥15 years and two with <15 years. Surgeons with greater experience were the highest volume surgeons in this series. Data included patient demographics, breast and oncologic history, surgical techniques, and surgical outcomes including complications. A total of 270 nonprophylactic and 324 prophylactic mastectomies were identified, of which 529 were performed by surgeons with greater than 15 years of experience and 65 by surgeons with less than 15 years. The overall complication rate was 33.5% (n = 199), of which 18.0% (n = 107) were on the ipsilateral breast and 15.5% (n = 92) were on the contralateral breast. 9.1% of complications required re-operation (n = 54). The odds of any complication on the ipsilateral breast were 2.9 times higher than complications on the contralateral breast when looking exclusively at surgeons with <15 years of experience (P = .0353, OR = 2.92, 1.06-8.03). Surgeons with <15 years of experience have a 2.71 (P = .05, OR 2.71, 1.361-5.373) increase in any ischemic complication and a 16 times (P < .0001, OR = 16.01, 5.038-50.933) increase in major operative ischemic complications. Our study finds that surgeons with less than 15 years of surgical experience have a 2.9 times higher rate of overall complication when operating on the ipsilateral breast. However, years of experience and surgeon volume have a much greater impact on any and ischemic complications after mastectomy.