Comparisons among vestibular examinations and symptoms of vertigo in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients

Clinical characteristics and analysis of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss in different ages

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have found that patients experiencing sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL), with or without accompanying vertigo, often show impaired vestibular function. However, there is a dearth of studies analyzing vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in SSHL patients across various age groups.

AIM

To investigate vestibular condition in SSHL patients across various age demographics.

METHODS

Clinical data of 84 SSHL patients were investigated retrospectively. Audiometry, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMPs), and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (o-VEMPs) were conducted on these patients. Parameters assessed included the latencies of P1 and N1 waves, as well as the amplitudes of P1-N1 waves. Moreover, the study evaluated the influence of factors such as sex, affected side, configuration of hearing loss, and presence of accompanying vertigo.

RESULTS

Among the 84 SSHL patients, no significant differences were observed among the three groups in terms of gender, affected side, and the presence or absence of vertigo. Group II (aged 41-60 years) had the highest number of SSHL cases. The rates of absent o-VEMPs in the affected ears were 20.83%, 31.58%, and 22.72% for the three age groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference among them. The rates of absent c-VEMPs in the affected ears were 8.3%, 34.21%, and 18.18% for the three age groups, respectively, with significant differences. In the unaffected ears, there were differences observed in the extraction rates of o-VEMPs in the unaffected ears among the age groups. In the three age groups, no significant differences were noted in the three age groups in the latencies of P1 and N1 waves or in the amplitude of N1-P1 waves for c-VEMPs and o-VEMPs, either on the affected side or on the unaffected side, across the three age groups.

CONCLUSION

The extraction rate of VEMPs is more valuable than parameters. Regardless of the presence of vertigo, vestibular organs are involved in SSHL. Notably, SSHL patients aged 41-60 appear more susceptible to damage to the inferior vestibular nerve and saccule.

Predicting Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Recovery with Patient-Personalized Seigel's Criteria Using Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Accurate prognostic prediction is crucial for managing Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSHL). Previous studies developing ISSHL prognosis models often overlooked individual variability in hearing damage by relying on fixed frequency domains. This study aims to develop models predicting ISSHL prognosis one month after treatment, focusing on patient-specific hearing impairments.

METHODS

Patient-Personalized Seigel's Criteria (PPSC) were developed considering patient-specific hearing impairment related to ISSHL criteria. We performed a statistical test to assess the shift in the recovery assessment when applying PPSC. The utilized dataset of 581 patients comprised demographic information, health records, laboratory testing, onset and treatment, and hearing levels. To reduce the model's reliance on hearing level features, we used only the averages of hearing levels of the impaired frequencies. Then, model development, evaluation, and interpretation proceeded.

RESULTS

The chi-square test (p-value: 0.106) indicated that the shift in recovery assessment is not statistically significant. The soft-voting ensemble model was most effective, achieving an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.801-0.927), with model interpretation based on the SHapley Additive exPlanations value.

CONCLUSIONS

With PPSC, providing a hearing assessment comparable to traditional Seigel's criteria, the developed models successfully predicted ISSHL recovery one month post-treatment by considering patient-specific impairments.

Relationship between clinical measures of hearing and clinical measures of vestibular function

PURPOSE

Patients often have basic audiometry (BA) but not objective diagnostic tests of the vestibular system (VNG) when complaining of symptoms of a vestibular disorder. The relationship of BA results to VNG results is unknown. This study sought to determine if BA scores are related to impaired VNG scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed electronic medical records at a tertiary care center, for patients seen between 2015 and 2021 who had had both a BA and a VNG (n = 651). BA subtests were pure tone averages, word recognition, and tympanogram. VNG subtests were cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, Dix-Hallpike maneuvers, and bi-thermal caloric tests. All tests were summarized as normal/abnormal.

RESULTS

More subjects had abnormal BA than abnormal VNG scores. Age but not sex was significantly related to abnormal scores. High BP was a significant comorbidity in 15 % of the sample, more in patients with abnormal than normal VNG scores. Although the abnormal BA and abnormal VNG were significantly related, pure tone averages and tympanogram scores were not related to VNG subtests. Abnormal word recognition with both ears combined was significantly related to normal and abnormal bi-thermal caloric tests.

CONCLUSIONS

If the clinician needs to know of any VNG impairment, in general, then performing a BA without a VNG might suffice. If the clinician needs information about the details of possible vestibular impairment, then a VNG should be performed.

Prognosis of vestibular dysfunction in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 28%-57% of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) have an acute vertigo attack and probable vestibular dysfunction; however, the prognosis of vestibular function in these patients remains unclear.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients with ISSNHL and vertigo was conducted to evaluate the prognosis of vestibular function, especially the roles of peripheral vestibular restoration and central compensation, in patients with ISSNHL and vertigo. Clinical data were recorded at baseline and at 60 days from onset in participants with unilateral ISSNHL with vertigo. Enrolment occurred from May 1, 2019 to May 1, 2022 in the outpatient clinics and inpatient departments of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai. The primary outcome measure was the recovery rate of vestibular function 60 days after onset as assessed by vestibular function tests, including caloric tests, cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential tests (cVEMP, oVEMP), video head impulse tests (vHIT), and sensory organization tests (SOT). The secondary outcome measure was the recovery of subjective evaluations in vestibular dysfunction (the dizziness handicap inventory [DHI], and the visual analogue scale for vertigo [VAS-V]) and hearing assessments (pure-tone audiometry [PTA]).

RESULTS

Overall, 86 patients were recruited, with an average duration of disease of 11.7 days and follow-up time of 60.7 days. Vestibular function was significantly improved (p < 0.05) after 60 days. The recovery rates were 100% for anterior semicircular canal (ASC), 56% for posterior semicircular canal (PSC), 41% for horizontal semicircular canal (HSC), 28% for saccule, and 23% for utricle. The recovery of vestibular function was not significantly related to changes in DHI (p = 0.245), VAS-V score (p = 0.509), or hearing outcome (p = 0.390).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of peripheral vestibular sensory input and central vestibular compensation can occur during the course of ISSNHL with vertigo. The otolith organs are at a higher risk of being affected and have worse recovery than the semicircular canals. Incomplete and in-process restoration of vestibular dysfunction may perturb and delay the establishment of central compensation for balance. Neither hearing outcomes nor subjective vestibular symptoms are related to recovery from vestibular dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03951584).

Differences in vestibulo-ocular reflexes between vestibular neuritis and labyrinthitis

Objective

To expand our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying vestibular neuritis and labyrinthitis by identifying any difference in the vestibulo-ocular reflex for each semicircular canal.

Study Design

Retrospective analysis.

Setting

The Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University Hospital, from January 2015 to December 2021.

Methods

We included 23 vestibular neuritis and 27 labyrinthitis patients who had been hospitalized. Pure-tone audiometry, a bithermal caloric test, and a video head-impulse test were performed within 5 days of symptom onset.

Results

In the vestibular neuritis group, mean vestibulo-ocular reflex gains were decreased to 0.51 in the ipsilesional horizontal canal and 0.55 in anterior canal, leading to marked asymmetry, whereas the gain of the ipsilesional posterior canal was relatively preserved at 0.85. In the labyrinthitis group, the mean vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was 0.72 in the ipsilesional horizontal canal, 0.73 in the ipsilesional anterior canal, and 0.55 in the ipsilesional posterior canal. We observed statistical differences in the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and incidence of corrective saccades on the ipsilesional side in three semicircular canals between the groups (p = .002 for horizontal canal, p = .003 for anterior canal, and p < .001 for posterior canal). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that pure-tone audiometry, ipsilesional posterior canal gain, and gain asymmetry of posterior canal were excellent parameters for distinguishing labyrinthitis from vestibular neuritis.

Conclusion

Vestibular neuritis and labyrinthitis patients have different degrees and patterns of video head-impulse test involvement in the three semicircular canals, suggesting that the two distinct disorders may have different etiologies.

The functional status of vestibular otolith and conductive pathway in patients with unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Background

The cause of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) remains unknown. It has been found that the functional status of the vestibular otolith is relevant to its prognosis; however, the evaluation of the vestibular otolith (intra-labyrinth) and superior and inferior vestibular nerve pathways (retro-labyrinth) in ISSNHL patients is not well-documented.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the functional status of the vestibular otolith and conductive pathway in patients with unilateral ISSNHL and analyze the correlations between vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and hearing improvement after treatment.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with unilateral ISSNHL underwent a battery of audio-vestibular evaluations, including pure tone audiometry, middle ear function, air-conducted sound-cervical VEMP (ACS-cVEMP), ACS-ocular VEMP (ACS-oVEMP), galvanic vestibular stimulation-cervical VEMP (GVS-cVEMP), and GVS-ocular VEMP (GVS-oVEMP). The results of auditory and VEMPs were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The abnormal rates of ACS-cVEMP, ACS-oVEMP, GVS-cVEMP, and GVS-oVEMP in affected ears were 30, 52, 8, and 16%, respectively. In affected ears, the abnormal rate of ACS-oVEMP was significantly higher than that of ACS-cVEMP (p = 0.025), while it was similar between GVS-cVEMP and GVS-oVEMP (p = 0.218). Compared with GVS-cVEMP, affected ears presented with a significantly higher abnormal rate of ACS-cVEMP (p = 0.005), and the abnormal rate of ACS-oVEMP was significantly higher than that of GVS-oVEMP (p < 0.001). No significant difference existed in latency and amplitude between affected and unaffected ears in ACS-VEMPs or GVS-VEMPs (p > 0.05). The abnormal rate of VEMPs in the poor recovery group was significantly higher than that of the good recovery group (p = 0.040). The abnormality percentages of ACS-oVEMP and GVS-oVEMP in the poor recovery group were significantly higher than that of the good recovery group (p = 0.004 and 0.039, respectively). The good hearing recovery rates were 76.47% in the normal VEMPs group, 58.33% in the intra-labyrinth lesion group, and 22.22% in the retro-labyrinth lesion group. Hearing recovery worsened as a greater number of abnormal VEMPs was presented.

Conclusion

Besides Corti's organ, the impairment of otolithic organs was prominent in patients with ISSNHL. The normal VEMPs group had the highest rate of good recovery, followed by the intra-labyrinth lesion group and the retro-labyrinth lesion group presented with the lowest recovery rate. Abnormalities in ACS-oVEMP and/or GVS-oVEMP were indicators of a poor prognosis.

Hearing recovery prediction and prognostic factors of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a retrospective analysis with a deep neural network model

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSHL) is an otologic emergency, and an early prediction of prognosis may facilitate proper treatment. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic factors for predicting the recovery in patients with ISSHL treated with combined treatment method using machine learning models.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 298 patients with ISSHL at a tertiary medical institution between January 2015 and September 2020. Fifty-two variables were analyzed to predict hearing recovery. Recovery was defined using Siegel's criteria, and the patients were categorized into recovery and non-recovery groups. Recovery was predicted by various machine learning models. In addition, the prognostic factors were analyzed using the difference in the loss function.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in variables including age, hypertension, previous hearing loss, ear fullness, duration of hospital admission, initial hearing level of the affected and unaffected ears, and post-treatment hearing level between recovery and non-recovery groups. The deep neural network model showed the highest predictive performance (accuracy, 88.81%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.9448). In addition, initial hearing level of affected and non-affected ear, post-treatment (2-weeks) hearing level of affected ear were significant factors for predicting the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The deep neural network model showed the highest predictive performance for recovery in patients with ISSHL. Some factors with prognostic value were identified. Further studies using a larger patient population are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Significance of Baseline Inferior Vestibular Function on the Prognosis of Patients with Labyrinthitis

OBJECTIVE

Acute spontaneous vertigo with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) can be diagnosed as labyrinthitis, which has a poorer prognosis than ISSNHL without vertigo. Thus, we aimed to identify the effect of the baseline vestibular function on the prognosis of labyrinthitis.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with labyrinthitis was retrospectively divided into the recovered group (complete recovery, partial recovery) and the nonrecovered group (slight improvement, no improvement). Differences in caloric weakness and gain in the video head impulse test (vHIT) between the two groups were compared. In addition, the prognostic value of the vHIT on each of the three semicircular canals in predicting hearing recovery was analyzed using a linear regression model.

RESULTS

In final pure-tone audiometry, 2 patients (8.70%) exhibited complete recovery, 4 patients (17.39%) had partial recovery, and 17 patients (73.91%) had slight or no improvement. The initial ipsilesional posterior canal (iPC) gain and the contralesional anterior canal (cAC) gain were significantly decreased in the nonrecovered group (p < 0.013 for iPC and p < 0.007 for cAC, Mann-Whitney U test). The mean hearing gain was positively correlated with the iPC gain (R2 = 0.36, p = 0.003, Spearman correlation analysis).

CONCLUSION

An abnormal iPC gain may be a poor prognostic factor for hearing recovery. Additionally, the vHIT on the three semicircular canals can provide prognosis and insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms in patients with labyrinthitis.

Vestibular assessment in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Role in the prediction of hearing outcome and in the early detection of vascular and hydropic pathomechanisms

Introduction

Predicting hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is challenging, as well as detecting the underlying pathomechanisms. SSNHL could be associated with vestibular damage since cochleo-vestibular structures share the same vascularization, along with being in close anatomical proximity. Whereas viral inflammations and autoimmune/vascular disorders most likely represent the involved aetiologies, early-stage Menière's disease (MD) can also present with SSNHL. Since an early treatment could beneficially influence hearing outcome, understanding the possible etiology plays a pivotal role in orienting the most appropriate treatment. We aimed to evaluate the extent of vestibular damage in patients presenting with SSNHL with or without vertigo, investigate the prognostic role of vestibular dysfunctions on hearing recovery and detect specific lesion patterns related to the underlying pathomechanisms.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated 86 patients with SSNHL. Audio-vestibular investigation included pure-tone/speech/impedance audiometry, cervical/ocular-VEMPs, vHIT and video-Frenzel examination. White matter lesions (WML) were evaluated on brain-MRI. Patients were followed-up and divided into "SSNHL-no-vertigo," "SSNHL+vertigo" and "MD" subgroups.

Results

Hearing was more impaired in "SSNHL+vertigo" patients who exhibited either down-sloping or flat-type audiograms, and was less impaired in "MD" where low frequencies were mostly impaired (p < 0.001). Otolith receptors were more frequently involved than semicircular canals (SCs). Although the "SSNHL-no-vertigo" subgroup exhibited the lowest vestibular impairment (p < 0.001), 52% of patients developed otolith dysfunctions and 72% developed nystagmus. Only "MD" subjects showed anterior SC impairment and upbeating spontaneous/positional nystagmus. They more frequently exhibited cervical-VEMPs frequency tuning (p = 0.036) and ipsilesional spontaneous nystagmus (p < 0.001). "SSNHL+vertigo" subjects presented with more frequently impaired cervical-VEMPs and posterior SC and with higher number of impaired receptors (p < 0.001). They mainly exhibited contralesional spontaneous and vibration-induced nystagmus (p < 0.05) and only they showed the highest WML score and "vascular" lesion patterns (p < 0.001). Concerning the outcomes, hearing was better in "MD" and worse in "SSNHL+vertigo" (p < 0.001). Hearing recovery was mostly affected by cervical-VEMPs impairment and the number of involved receptors (p < 0.05). Patients with "vascular" lesion patterns presented with the highest HL degree and WML score (p ≤ 0.001), while none of them exhibited a complete hearing recovery (p = 0.026).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that vestibular evaluation in SSNHL can provide useful information on hearing recovery and underlying aetiologies.

Prediction of hearing recovery in unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss using artificial intelligence

Despite the significance of predicting the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), no predictive models have been established. This study used artificial intelligence to develop prognosis models to predict recovery from ISSNHL. We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of 453 patients with ISSNHL (men, 220; women, 233; mean age, 50.3 years) who underwent treatment at a tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2019 and were followed up after 1 month. According to Siegel's criteria, 203 patients recovered in 1 month. Demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, and pure-tone audiometry were analyzed. Logistic regression (baseline), a support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, a light gradient boosting machine, and multilayer perceptron were used. The outcomes were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) primarily, area under the precision-recall curve, Brier score, balanced accuracy, and F1 score. The light gradient boosting machine model had the best AUROC and balanced accuracy. Together with multilayer perceptron, it was also significantly superior to logistic regression in terms of AUROC. Using the SHapley Additive exPlanation method, we found that the initial audiogram shape is the most important prognostic factor. Machine/deep learning methods were successfully established to predict the prognosis of ISSNHL.

Vestibular function of pediatric patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss: based on vertigo symptom and vestibular function testing

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between vestibular and auditory functions in pediatric patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL).

METHODS

A total of 30 pediatric patients experiencing unilateral SSHL between 5.9 and 13.0 years of age were enrolled in this study. Pure tone audiometry was evaluated prior to treatment initiation and again after one month of treatment. Prior to treatment initiation, vertigo symptoms were noted; then several vestibular function tests were conducted including caloric testing, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (o-VEMPs) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMPs). Associations between pre and post-treatment vestibular function and hearing threshold levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

Initial hearing thresholds of children with vertigo were higher than thresholds of children without vertigo (92 dB vs 79 dB, P = 0.033), while initial hearing thresholds of children with abnormal caloric test findings were higher than thresholds of children with normal caloric test findings (93 dB vs 67 dB, P = 0.014). Cutoff values of hearing thresholds for those with vertigo symptoms and abnormal vestibular test results were 86.000- and 89.583-dB HL, respectively. Regarding prognosis, children with vertigo exhibited lower recovery rates than children without vertigo (33% vs 75%, P = 0.025); recovery rates of children with abnormal caloric test results were lower than the overall recovery rate (25% vs 73%, respectively, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Assessments of vertigo symptoms and vestibular function are useful tools in predicting pediatric SSHL patient disease severity and prognosis.

Contribution of Audiogram Classification in Evaluating Vestibular Dysfunction in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Vertigo

Object: We aimed to identify the relationship between vertigo symptoms and the involvement of vestibular dysfunction in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and the contribution of audiogram classification.

Methods: A total of 50 patients with unilateral SSNHL were retrospectively divided into the vertigo group and non-vertigo group depending on the presence of vertigo. The involved vestibular end organs (VEOs) were verified by a battery of vestibular function tests including video head impulse test (vHIT), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), and ocular VEMP (oVEMP). The correlations of audiogram configurations, initial pure-tone average (PTA), number of involved VEOs, prognosis (complete recovery rate), and vestibular functions were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the vestibular functions in a subgroup of profound SSNHL patients were further compared within groups with or without vertigo.

Results: Significant differences in the initial audiogram configurations (p = 0.033) and the abnormal rates of the posterior semicircular canal (PSC) (p = 0.035) and oVEMP (p = 0.046) were found between the two groups. The number of involved VEOs was related to the initial PTA in the vertigo group (p = 0.002, r = 0.541) and non-vertigo group (p = 0.042, r = 0.446). The prognosis was related to the abnormal rate of cVEMP and the number of involved VEOs in both vertigo group (p = 0.008, r = 0.482; p = 0.039, r = 0.385, respectively) and non-vertigo group (p = 0.016, r = 0.520; p = 0.022, r = 0.495, respectively), and it was especially related to the audiogram configurations in the vertigo group (p < 0.001, r = 0.692). However, after classification by audiogram configurations, there was no statistical difference in the abnormal rates of all vestibular function tests or the number of involved VEOs between the profound SSNHL patients with or without vertigo.

Conclusion: The relationship between the involvement of vestibular dysfunction and vertigo symptoms in patients with SSNHL was significantly different before and after audiogram classification. When evaluating the vestibular dysfunction in SSNHL patients, more attention should be paid to the audiogram configuration.