Adverse events associated with the Inspire implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator: A MAUDE database review

Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon

OBJECTIVE

Upper airway stimulation effectively treats patients with obstructive sleep apnea, especially among those with low long-term compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Traditional methods to implant the hypoglossal nerve stimulator involve retraction of the digastric tendon to identify the nerve and improve exposure for stimulator implantation. Transient submental pain and discomfort are known side effects of the procedure. Placement without retraction provides an alternative approach to minimize postoperative pain. This study compares post-operative pain outcomes of patients in whom the digastric tendon was and was not retracted.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who received the hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. A combination of descriptive and qualitative data, including age, gender, comorbidities, and postoperative symptoms are analyzed to characterize patient outcomes resulting from this intraoperative technique. The categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-squared tests and independent t-tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients report overall satisfaction after implantation and titration. A total of 108 patients underwent HGNS implantation between September 2017 and January 2021 using the aforementioned techniques. 1.69 % of patients experienced postoperative submental pain as compared to 18.37 % prior to the change in technique (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of digastric tendon retraction in the implantation of the stimulating lead is a safe and effective technique that reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. Our institution has demonstrated an alternative technique for hypoglossal stimulator implantation which improves perioperative outcomes.

LAY SUMMARY

Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. During surgery, the digastric tendon is often moved to identify the nerve and improve access. This study shows that avoiding digastric tendon movement safely reduces postoperative pain and discomfort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant.

METHODS

Postmarket surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the postmarket surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation.

RESULTS

Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with 3-year postimplantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology.

CITATION

Moroco AE, Wei Z, Byrd I, et al. Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(9):1497-1503.

Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to assess the reproducibility of Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) data-driven studies by analyzing the data queries used in their research processes.

METHODS

Studies using MAUDE data were sourced from PubMed by searching for "MAUDE" or "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" in titles or abstracts. We manually chose articles with executable queries. The reproducibility of each query was assessed by replicating it in the MAUDE Application Programming Interface. The reproducibility of a query is determined by a reproducibility coefficient that ranges from 0.95 to 1.05. This coefficient is calculated by comparing the number of medical device reports (MDRs) returned by the reproduced queries to the number of reported MDRs in the original studies. We also computed the reproducibility ratio, which is the fraction of reproducible queries in subgroups divided by the query complexity, the device category, and the presence of a data processing flow.

RESULTS

As of August 8, 2022, we identified 523 articles from which 336 contained queries, and 60 of these were executable. Among these, 14 queries were reproducible. Queries using a single field like product code, product class, or brand name showed higher reproducibility (50%, 33.3%, 31.3%) compared with other fields (8.3%, P = 0.037). Single-category device queries exhibited a higher reproducibility ratio than multicategory ones, but without statistical significance (27.1% versus 8.3%, P = 0.321). Studies including a data processing flow had a higher reproducibility ratio than those without, although this difference was not statistically significant (42.9% versus 17.4%, P = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the reproducibility of queries in MAUDE data-driven studies is limited. Enhancing this requires the development of more effective MAUDE data query strategies and improved application programming interfaces.

Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulators: Insights From the MAUDE Database

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the adverse events associated with hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) implantation for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), drawing data from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. We aim to provide a comprehensive and updated account of these adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

MAUDE Database review.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the MAUDE database to collect all HNS-related reports from May 2014 to December 2023. Variables collected included date of event, event description, nature of event, iatrogenic injuries, required interventions, and, if available, root causes. Each event description was analyzed to classify the adverse event, the postevent intervention, and device model number.

RESULTS

Out of 1178 reports fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 1312 adverse events were identified. Common adverse events included infection (24.0%), pain (19.7%), and hematoma/seroma (10.2%). Approximately 83.1% of these adverse events necessitated medical and/or surgical intervention. The most frequent procedures included explantation (29.4%) and device repositioning (15.8%). Pneumothorax was reported in 50 cases, with 41 (82.0%) requiring a chest tube to be inserted. Three adverse events described overstimulation in the setting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) despite the implantation of MRI-compatible second-generation internal pulse generators.

CONCLUSION

While HNS implantation has been established as a reliable intervention for OSA in cases of continuous positive airway pressure failure or intolerance, this study highlights several perioperative and postoperative difficulties and complications. Understanding these challenges is essential for refining surgical practices and enhancing patient consent processes, ultimately aiming to improve therapeutic outcomes.

[Ten years of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic literature review]

OBJECTIVE

To show the importance of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) as a treatment method for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the German healthcare context and to better assess the way patients who do not receive adequate care could benefit from HGNS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in the Medline and Cochrane Library literature database was conducted, including publications using different stimulation technologies for HGNS. The efficacy of HGNS was assessed based on patient-relevant outcomes (daytime sleepiness, quality of life), treatment adherence and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). The safety of the treatment method was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Inclusion and analysis of 33 publications: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, level Ib), 1 level IIb trial (n = 1) and 30 level IV trials with a study duration of up to 60 months. The RCTs showed better values for daytime sleepiness and quality of life when using HGNS than in the control group. AHI and ODI showed a deterioration under placebo stimulation or therapy withdrawal in the RCTs. Consistently high adherence was also reported in the long-term course. Severe AEs under HGNS were rare and could usually be resolved by repositioning electrodes or replacing device components. Other AEs were mostly transient or could be resolved by non-invasive measures. All investigated parameters showed similar results in the evaluated studies. The results of different stimulation systems are comparable in type and extent.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive review of the literature shows consistent data that highlight the importance of HGNS as an effective and safe treatment for OSA after unsuccessful CPAP treatment. The evaluation also shows that the different stimulation systems make it possible to better tailor the therapy to the patient's individual requirements. A future systematic evaluation of real-world data on the use of HGNS would help gain additional insights into the relevance of the method in routine clinical practice.

Are There Hidden Adverse Events in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation: Comparing Social Media and a Federal Database

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) can be an effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) intolerant patients. To better understand patient experiences with HNS therapy, we explored reported events from HNS-related Facebook groups and the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of HNS-related Facebook posts from three groups pertaining to HNS therapy, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, was performed. Posts were analyzed for patient-reported adverse events. Concurrently, the MAUDE database was reviewed for HNS-related events during the same timeframe.

RESULTS

From 737 Facebook posts, 132 (17.55%) adverse events were identified. Adverse events included pain (34.85%), stimulation discomfort (14.39%), lip weakness (6.82%) and issues related to lead tethering or tight leads around the neck (3.79%). Analysis of the MAUDE database found 428 adverse events, including pain (24.07%), lip weakness (0.44%), and lead tethering (1.64%).

CONCLUSION

Facebook group members reported higher rates of lip weakness and lead tethering than recorded in the MAUDE database. These findings illustrate how diverse data sources, such as social media, can enhance our understanding of patient experiences and identify gaps in patient education with HNS therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Turicella otitidis hypoglossal nerve stimulator device associated infection

71-year-old male with history of obstructive sleep apnea presented with persistent drainage from the surgical incision site over the recently implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulator. Wound cultures from device pocket identified the pathogen as Turicella otitidis. Clinical course included treatment with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and device explantation. This case is the first known T. otitidis device associated infection.

Respiratory Sensing Lead Malfunction in Upper Airway Stimulation: A Single Institution Report

OBJECTIVES

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an effective treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The device consists of a stimulating electrode, an internal pulse generator, and a respiratory sensing lead. The purpose of this study is to characterize the incidence of sensing lead malfunction necessitating revision surgery in a high-volume center in conjunction with a review of the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database reports on adverse events associated with the sensing lead component.

METHODS

Patients age ≥18 implanted with the device were reviewed between July 2017 and June 2022. Those determined to have sensing lead malfunction were analyzed. The FDA MAUDE database was reviewed for reports associated with "Inspire Model 4323 Respiratory" and "Inspire Model 4340 Respiratory" between January 2014 and September 2022.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients underwent UAS at our institution during the study period and four (2.1%) patients were found to have sensing lead malfunction. Analysis of the MAUDE database revealed 122 reports of adverse events associated with the sensing lead component, with 72% (88/122) of these requiring revision surgery. The most frequently reported adverse event was sensing lead tip separation from lead body, noted in 46% of these reports (56/122).

CONCLUSION

The functionality of the sensing lead component is vital to the integrity of the UAS device and is measurable through waveform analysis. To provide optimal care after device implantation, it is essential to have a comprehensive understanding of the scenarios in which this component fails, the incidence of such events, and appropriate management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:1479-1484, 2024.

Mitigating Infection Risk in Upper Airway Stimulation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to define the incidence of infection with upper airway stimulation (UAS) devices requiring explantation in a single academic center and identify factors that may influence the risk of infection.

METHODS

A database of patients who underwent UAS at a single tertiary referral academic center from 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who developed surgical site infections, with and without subsequent explantation. Additional data for cases complicated by infection was extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) and included: demographic information, medical history, complications and management, and overall outcomes. In March 2021, 2 modifications to infection control protocols were implemented: double skin preparation with Betadine and chlorhexidine, and MRSA decolonization. Statistical analysis was performed to compare infectious risk before and after these protocol changes.

RESULTS

In the study period, 215 patients underwent UAS in the specified time period and 3 cases (1.4%) of postoperative infections were identified, all of which required explantation. The infection rate did not significantly change after modifications to the surgical prep protocol (P = .52).

CONCLUSIONS

While no significant difference in infection risk was noted after modifying infection control protocols, additional longer-term study is warranted to elucidate effective infection reduction strategies.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Effects on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGS) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

Five databases were reviewed to identify relevant studies that measured polysomnography parameters such as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index, as well as quality of life and functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire scores, before and after HGS.

RESULTS

In total, 44 studies involving 8670 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months after treatment, approximately 47%, 72%, and 82% of patients achieved AHI values of <5, < 10, and <15, respectively. The reported clinical success rates according to Sher criteria were 80% within 12 months and 73% between 12 and 36 months. While the favorable effects exhibited a gradual reduction up to 12 months postimplantation, they generally maintained a consistent level between the 12th and 36th months, as assessed by AHI < 5, <15, and success rate according to Sher criteria.

CONCLUSION

HGS can enhance quality of life scores and polysomnography outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Although the positive effects gradually decreased until 12 months after implantation, they generally remained consistent between 12 and 36 months.

Comparing adverse events associated with LigaSure and Harmonic devices in head and neck surgery

OBJECTIVE

To characterize adverse events, provide a safety profile, and understand patient outcomes after complications arising from LigaSure and Harmonic use in the head and neck region.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of adverse events from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) between January 2013 and 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 158 LigaSure and 159 Harmonic events were extracted. There were significantly more reports of Harmonic device overheating (6.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.003) and spontaneous self-activation (4.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.032). Although intra-operative and post-operative complications were similar among both groups, there were significantly more intra-operative bleeding events for LigaSure as compared to Harmonic (8.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Understanding technical complications and adverse events attributable to LigaSure and Harmonic devices enables the development of clinically relevant risk mitigation strategies. Surgeons should avoid improper use by remaining vigilant of device functionality and temperature changes.

Airway fires in otolaryngologic surgery: A database review

PURPOSE

An estimated 34 % of reported operating room fires involve the airway. Despite the inherent risks in otolaryngologic surgery, education regarding prevention and management of airway fires is limited in graduate medical training. One contributing factor is a lack of reporting of such rare events in our literature.

METHODS

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for reports of adverse events related to fires occurring during surgical procedures of the airway from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020.

RESULTS

3687 reports were identified and 49 unique reports of airway fire were included. Sustained fires were described in 16 (32.7 %) reports and 33 (67.3 %) described transient flares. 2 fires extended beyond the airway and 9 (18.4 %) were noted to have occurred at the start of the case. Fires were reported most commonly during tonsillectomy (n = 22 [44.9 %]), vocal fold excision (n = 5 [10.2 %]), and adenoidectomy (n = 4 [8.2 %]). 46 reports attributed flare initiation to a specific element of the fire triangle. 16 patient and 2 operator injuries were reported. Saline washing was utilized in 7 (14.3 %) cases overall. Patients were extubated immediately in 2 (12.5 %) of the 16 reports of sustained fires. 0 mortalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

Airway fires were reported in a variety of upper airway procedures performed regularly by otolaryngologists. The triggering factor that led to fire was identified as a spark or char in about half of the reported cases, and only 2 reports described immediate removal of the endotracheal tube.

Comparing nationally reported adverse events associated with coblation vs. PlasmaBlade for tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE(S)

Coblation, or radiofrequency ablation, and pulsed-electron avalanche knife (PEAK) plasmablade are newer approaches for tonsillectomy that reduce exposure to thermal heat. This study aims to describe and compare adverse events related to these devices for tonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacture and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

METHODS

The MAUDE database was queried for reports involving coblation devices and the PEAK plasmablade from 2011 to 2021. Data were extracted from reports pertaining to tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy.

RESULTS

There were 331 reported adverse events for coblation and 207 for the plasmablade. For coblation, 53 (16.0 %) of these involved patients and 278 (84.0 %) were device malfunctions. Similarly for the plasmablade, 22 (10.6 %) involved patients and 185 (89.4 %) were device malfunctions. The most frequent patient-related adverse event was burn injury, which was significantly more common with the plasmablade compared to coblation (77.3 % vs. 50.9 %, respectively, p = 0.042). For both the coblator and plasmablade, the most common device malfunction was intraoperative tip or wire damage (16.9 % vs. 27.0 %, respectively, p = 0.010). The Plasmablade tip caught fire in five reports (2.7 %) with one causing burn injury.

CONCLUSIONS

While coblation devices and the plasmablade have demonstrated utility in tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, they are associated with adverse events. Plasmablade use may require greater caution for intraoperative fires and patient burn injuries compared to coblation use. Interventions to improve physician comfort with these devices may help reduce adverse events and inform preoperative discussions with patients.

Novel Outcome Analysis Tool for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Sensor Lead Function and Comparison by Incision Type (2 Versus 3)

OBJECTIVE

No reported outcome measures have been established to evaluate sensor lead function in the hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS). This study describes the development of novel functional outcome measures for intraoperative sensor electrode function and compares 2-incision and 3-incision outcomes for HNS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent HNS between June 2019 and September 2021. Demographic information, intraoperative findings, and immediate postoperative outcomes were recorded. Structured parameters were developed to compare intraoperative waveforms with six outcome measures utilized: waveform syncing, waveform amplitude, sensory current leakage, shark-fin morphology, cardiac artifact, and overall impression. Two sleep surgeons and two sleep medicine specialists compared all waveforms in a blinded fashion and assigned scores on the Likert Scale.

RESULTS

The cohort included 50 three-incision and 50 two-incision patients. Age, gender, average body mass index, comorbidity profiles, and sleep endoscopy findings did not significantly differ between the two groups. No major complications occurred. The interclass-correlation-coefficient was greater than 0.7 for all comparisons (good to very good interrater reliability). There was no difference in waveform amplitude, cardiac artifact, sensory current leakage, or shark-fin morphology between the two groups. Waveform syncing and overall impression were statistically better in the 2-incision cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to define a structured method of HNS sensor electrode outcome measurement and showed consistent measures by surgeons and sleep medicine specialists. This article supports the transition to the 2-incision technique among surgeons for placement of the sensor lead. Consideration should be given to utilizing this novel tool in the clinical/research setting and validating these measures moving forward.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:423-430, 2023.

Personalized multimodal management for severe obstructive sleep apnea in a patient intolerant of positive airway pressure with hypoglossal nerve stimulator and mandibular advancement device

Treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea poses clinical challenges in persons with intolerance or inadequate response to traditional treatment modalities, including positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a new treatment option, but few management guidelines exist when it is intolerable or ineffective. Combining several treatment modalities has been an effective strategy for improving symptoms, tolerance, and efficacy. We describe a patient intolerant to positive airway pressure therapy who had continued sleepiness, morning headaches, and snoring with a mandibular advancement device. He underwent hypoglossal nerve stimulation implantation but was intolerant of the voltages required to adequately control his obstructive sleep apnea. Multimodal management with hypoglossal nerve stimulation, mandibular advancement device, and positional therapy was successfully implemented to improve sleepiness, nocturnal symptoms, and the apnea-hypopnea index. This case highlights the personalization and adaptability of combination therapy to suit patient needs while effectively controlling obstructive sleep apnea.

CITATION

Lowery MM, Rundo JV, Walia HK, Shah V. Personalized multimodal management for severe obstructive sleep apnea in a patient intolerant of positive airway pressure with hypoglossal nerve stimulator and mandibular advancement device. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):403-408.

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in obstructive sleep apnoea: current developments and concepts of the TESLA-home programme

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition affecting about 1 billion people worldwide. The first line therapy for most patients with OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. However, there are significant limitations with long-term adherence to CPAP therapy, which may be as low as 30-60%.

RECENT FINDING

Electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has been studied in recent years. It achieves upper airway patency by causing a contraction of the genioglossus muscle, the strongest dilator of the upper airway, and by maintaining its neuromuscular tone in the asleep patient with OSA. Electrical stimulation can be delivered invasively, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS), and noninvasively, transcutaneous electrical stimulation in OSA (TESLA). However, randomised controlled trials, the STAR and the TESLA trial, have provided promising results on efficacy and safety of the methods.

SUMMARY

Patient and public involvement underlines the interest in TESLA and HNS and highlights the need to provide non-CPAP therapeutic options to those who may find it difficult to cope with first line therapies. The relatively low costs and the favourable safety profile of the TESLA approach provide the chance to offer this treatment to patients with OSA following further development of the evidence.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Explantation: A Case Series

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has emerged as a successful surgical treatment strategy for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in patients failing first-line positive airway pressure therapy. HGNS explantation due to adverse events such as pain and infection is rare and has yet to be well described. Here, our correspondence describes the first case series of patients who have undergone explantation of the Inspire HGNS system. Five patients were identified who underwent HGNS explantation. Three patients underwent explantation due to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) incompatibility. One patient underwent explantation due to poor cosmesis. One patient underwent explantation due to surgical site infection. Average operative explant time was 163 minutes. MRI incompatibility, poor cosmesis, and device-related infection are reasons for HGNS explantation. Future need for MRI or chest wall surgery should be considered in patients being evaluated for HGNS implants.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to be a safe alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A recent meta-analysis of 12 studies by Costantino et al. indicated the surgical success rates at 55-75%, a reduction of the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 18 events/h, and a reduction of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) of 2.9-5.3. After animal studies in the 1970s, the first trial on humans to decrease upper airway resistance by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the genioglossus was reported in 1989. A separate stimulation of protruding and retracting muscles was realized in 1995 by fine-wire electrodes that were placed into the tongue transoral. Over the next years, several companies developed implantable devices for hypoglossal stimulation in OSA. Initially, devices were developed that used unilateral stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. In 2014, a device for unilateral respiratory frequency-controlled hypoglossal stimulation finally received FDA approval after a successful phase III trial. In recent years, a device for bilateral breath rate-independent stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve has been added to these approaches as a new development. Accordingly, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, on the one hand, is now an established tool for patients with OSA when standard treatments are not satisfactory. Beyond that, hypoglossal stimulation is undergoing a continuous and impressive development like hardly any other field of surgical therapy for OSA.

Complications Associated with PROPEL Mometasone Furoate Bioabsorbable Drug-eluting Sinus Stents From 2012 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Till date, there have been no studies that have analyzed a database to examine postmarket adverse events associated with PROPEL mometasone furoate bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus stents.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the postmarket complications associated with PROPEL mometasone furoate bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus stents.

METHODS

The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was searched for adverse events associated with PROPEL bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus stents between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2020. Data were extracted and analyzed from medical device reports (MDRs) that involved sinus stents.

RESULTS

After 47 MDRs were identified, 25 reports involving PROPEL bioabsorbable drug-eluting sinus stents were reviewed, from which 40 adverse events were recorded. Of these, there were 32 adverse events to patients and 8 device malfunctions. The most common adverse events to patients included infection (21.8%), oropharyngeal obstruction (15.6%), and headache/pain (12.5%). The most common device malfunction reported was migration and expulsion of the stent (87.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

PROPEL sinus stents have been shown to be effective in preventing sinus outflow obstruction after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Both adverse events to patients and device malfunctions are reported infrequently. A more comprehensive understanding of rare postmarket complications seen with PROPEL sinus stents may further aid informed decision-making regarding their usage.

FDA MAUDE database analysis of titanium middle ear prosthesis

Purpose

Partial ossicular replacement (PORP) and total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP) are used to restore ossicular chain function. Despite favorable auditory outcomes, these interventions have associated risks and complications. This study examines the FDA MAUDE database for ossicular chain prosthesis adverse events to highlight complications, interventions, and root cause analysis (RCA) findings.

Materials and methods

The MAUDE database was searched for Medical Device Reports (MDRs) relating to PORPs and TORPs from 2010 to 2020. MDR event descriptions were reviewed, and adverse events were identified as a device issue, patient issue, and/or packaging issue that occurred intraoperatively or postoperatively.

Results

Our search identified 70 MDRs which included 110 reported adverse events. Events consisted of 63 device issues, often due to device breaks and displacements, 39 patient issues, including common complaints of hearing loss and erosion, and 8 packaging issues. When comparing PORPs and TORPs, TORPs had more reported device issues whereas PORPs had more packaging issues. Intraoperative device issues were commonly resolved by completing the procedure with a backup device and most postoperative device issues required additional surgery. For devices returned to the manufacturer, RCA determined that most breaks were caused by modification and/or mishandling or that the product met specifications with an undetermined cause for the break.

Conclusion

Device issues were the most common adverse events and frequently required subsequent intervention. Displacement occurred more often with TORPs and was associated with changes in hearing or erosion. The findings of this study are purely descriptive and may not have direct clinical relevance.

Complications associated with energy-based devices during thyroidectomy from 2010–2020

Objective

Harmonic Focus (Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Cincinnati, OH, USA), LigaSure Small Jaw (Medtronic, Covidien Products, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and Thunderbeat Open Fine Jaw (Olympus, Japan) are electrosurgical instruments used widely in head and neck surgery. The study aims to compare device malfunctions, adverse events to patients, operative injuries, and interventions related to Harmonic, LigaSure, and Thunderbeat use during thyroidectomy.

Methods

The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacture and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for adverse events associated with Harmonic, LigaSure, and Thunderbeat from January 2005 to August 2020. Data were extracted from reports pertaining to thyroidectomy.

Results

Of the 620 adverse events extracted, 394 (63.5%) involved Harmonic, 134 (21.6%) LigaSure, and 92 (14.8%) Thunderbeat. The reported device malfunctions most frequently associated with Harmonic was damage to the blade (110 (27.9%)), LigaSure was inappropriate function (47 (43.1%)), Thunderbeat was damage to the tissue or Teflon pad (27 (30.7%)), respectively. Burn injury and incomplete hemostasis were the most commonly reported adverse events. The operative injury reported most frequently when using Harmonic and LigaSure was burn injury. No operator injuries were reported with Thunderbeat use.

Conclusion

The most frequently reported device malfunctions were damage to the blade, inappropriate function, and damage to the tissue or Teflon pad. The most frequently reported adverse events to patients was a burn injury and incomplete hemostasis. Interventions aimed at improving physician education may help reduce adverse events attributed to improper use.

The Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation as a Novel Therapy for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea-A Literature Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder that affects all age groups and is associated with many co-morbid diseases (especially cardiovascular diseases). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard for treating OSA. However, adherence to PAP therapy has been a major challenge with an estimated adherence between 20% and 80%. Mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are a good alternative option if used in the appropriate patient. MAD are most effective in mild and moderate OSA but not severe OSA. Surgical options are invasive, not appropriate for severe OSA, and associated with pain and long healing time. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), or upper airway stimulation (UAS), is a novel therapy in treating moderate and severe degrees of OSA in patients who cannot tolerate CPAP therapy. We reviewed the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. The search process yielded 303 articles; 31 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included. We concluded that hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a very effective and novel alternative therapy for moderate and severe OSA in patients who cannot tolerate CPAP therapy. Adherence to HGNS is superior to CPAP. However, more developments are needed to ensure the highest safety profile.

Adverse Events Associated With ClariFix Posterior Nasal Nerve Cryoablation: A MAUDE Database Analysis

Posterior nasal nerve (PNN) cryoablation is a novel surgical technique used to address chronic rhinitis. The purpose of this study is to review the medical device reports (MDRs) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Device Facility Experience (MAUDE) database to identify adverse events related to the use of ClariFix, a device designed for office-based cryosurgical ablation of the PNN. A total of 12 adverse events associated with ClariFix from January 2017 to August 2020 were identified and analyzed. The most common adverse events associated with ClariFix PNN cryoablation include epistaxis and nasal swelling. Further studies are needed to clarify whether PNN cryoablation is associated with epistaxis in certain populations.