1
|
Dhumal T, Kelly KM, Khadka S, Kelley GA, Kamal KM, Scott VG, Hogan TF, Harper FWK. Tobacco Cessation Interventions in Non-Respiratory Cancers: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Behav Med 2024; 58:579-593. [PMID: 38985846 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the high rates of persistent tobacco use, effective cessation interventions are needed for cancer patients and caregivers. Despite the need, there is a significant lack of research on tobacco cessation, especially for non-respiratory cancers (breast, prostate, colorectal, cervical, and bladder cancer). PURPOSE The objective was to evaluate tobacco use and tobacco cessation interventions among patients and caregivers for non-respiratory cancers. METHODS Randomized controlled trials assessing tobacco cessation interventions were identified. Five electronic databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines through July 2023. Studies exclusive to lung, oral, thoracic, and head and neck cancers were excluded. Effect sizes were estimated; risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS Of 3,304 studies, 17 were included. Interventions included behavioral (n = 6), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), and a combination (n = 9) treatment. Eight studies included a health behavior model; mean behavioral change techniques were 5.57. Pooled magnitude of the odds of cessation was positive and significant (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval [Lower Limit 1.02, Upper Limit 1.51]) relative to usual care/placebo. Cumulative meta-analysis examined the accumulation of results over-time and demonstrated that studies have been significant since 2020. Two studies included caregivers' who were involved in the provision of social support. CONCLUSIONS Current interventions have the potential to reduce tobacco use in non-respiratory cancers. Results may be beneficial for promoting tobacco cessation among non-respiratory cancers. There is a considerable lack of dyadic interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers; researchers are encouraged to explore dyadic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trupti Dhumal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Kimberly M Kelly
- Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Safalta Khadka
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - George A Kelley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
- School of Public and Population Health and Department of Kinesiology, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Khalid M Kamal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Virginia G Scott
- Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Thomas F Hogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Felicity W K Harper
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang J, Chan SC, Ko S, Lok V, Zhang L, Lin X, Lucero-Prisno DE, Xu W, Zheng ZJ, Elcarte E, Withers M, Wong MCS. Updated disease distributions, risk factors, and trends of laryngeal cancer: a global analysis of cancer registries. Int J Surg 2024; 110:810-819. [PMID: 38000050 PMCID: PMC10871644 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though the laryngeal cancer only has 1% of the total cancer cases and related deaths, it is a type of head and neck cancers with the highest prevalence. This study aims to investigate the epidemiological trend of laryngeal cancer with updated data on the global distribution of the disease burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS The incidence and mortality rate of laryngeal cancer was extracted from GLOBOCAN (2020), Cancer Incidence in Five Continents series I-X, WHO mortality database , the Nordic Cancer Registries , and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The Global Health data exchanges for the prevalence of its associated risk factors. A Joinpoint regression analysis was used to calculate Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC). RESULTS The age-standardised rate (ASR) of laryngeal cancer incidence and mortality were 2.0 and 1.0 per 100 000 worldwide. The Caribbean (ASR=4.0) and Central and Eastern Europe (ASR=3.6) had the highest incidence and mortality rate. Incidence and risk factors associated with laryngeal cancer included tobacco usage, alcohol consumption, poor diet, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disorders. There was an overall decreasing trend in incidence, especially for males, but an increasing incidence was observed in female populations and younger subjects. CONCLUSIONS As overall global trends of laryngeal cancer have been decreasing, especially for the male population, this could possibly be attributed to reduced tobacco use and alcohol consumption. Decrease in mortality may be due to improved diagnostic methods and accessibility to treatment, yet disparity in trend remains potentially because of differences in the level of access to surgical care. Disparities in temporal trends across countries may require further research and exploration to determine other underlying factors influencing this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Huang
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care
- Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| | - Sze Chai Chan
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care
| | - Samantha Ko
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care
| | - Veeleah Lok
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lin Zhang
- Suzhou Industrial Park Monash Research Institute of Science and Technology, Suzhou
- The School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Xu Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang
| | - Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wanghong Xu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai
| | - Zhi-Jie Zheng
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Edmar Elcarte
- University of the Philippines, Manila, The Philippines
| | - Mellissa Withers
- Department of Population and Health Sciences, Institute for Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Martin CS Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care
- Centre for Health Education and Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frazer K, Bhardwaj N, Fox P, Stokes D, Niranjan V, Quinn S, Kelleher CC, Fitzpatrick P. Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions for Smokers Diagnosed with Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192417010. [PMID: 36554894 PMCID: PMC9779002 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192417010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The detrimental impact of smoking on health and wellbeing are irrefutable. Additionally, smoking is associated with the development of cancer, a reduction treatment outcomes and poorer health outcomes. Nevertheless, a significant number of people continue to smoke following a cancer diagnosis. Little is understood of the smoking cessation services provided to smokers with cancer or their engagement with them. This systematic review aimed to identify existing smoking cessation interventions for this cohort diagnosed with breast, head and neck, lung and cervical cancers (linked to risk). Systematic searches of Pubmed, Embase, Psych Info and CINAHL from 1 January 2015 to 15 December 2020 were conducted. Included studies examined the characteristics of smoking cessation interventions and impact on referrals and quit attempts. The impact on healthcare professionals was included if reported. Included studies were restricted to adults with a cancer diagnosis and published in English. No restriction was placed on study designs, and narrative data synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity. A review protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD 42020214204, and reporting adheres to PRISMA reporting guidelines. Data were screened, extracted in duplicate and an assessment of the quality of evidence undertaken using Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing USA, Canada, England, Lebanon, Australia and including randomized controlled trials (9), observational studies (10), quality improvement (3), and one qualitative study. Hospital and cancer clinics [including a dental clinic] were the settings for all studies. 43% (10/23) of studies reported interventions for smokers diagnosed with head and neck cancer, 13% (3/23) for smokers diagnosed with lung cancer, one study provides evidence for breast cancer, and the remaining nine studies (39%) report on multiple cancers including the ones specified in this review. Methodological quality was variable. There were limited data to identify one optimal intervention for this cohort. Key elements included the timing and frequency of quit conversations, use of electronic records, pharmacotherapy including extended use of varenicline, increased counselling sessions and a service embedded in oncology departments. More studies are required to ensure tailored smoking cessation pathways are co-developed for smokers with a diagnosis of cancer to support this population.
Collapse
|
4
|
Feuer Z, Michael J, Morton E, Matulewicz RS, Sheeran P, Shoenbill K, Goldstein A, Sherman S, Bjurlin MA. Systematic review of smoking relapse rates among cancer survivors who quit at the time of cancer diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 80:102237. [PMID: 35988307 PMCID: PMC10363369 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco cessation, at the time of cancer diagnosis, has been associated with better oncologic outcomes. Cancer diagnosis has been shown to serves as a "teachable moment," inspiring tobacco cessation. However, the sustainability of abstinence from smoking is understudied. Similarly, there is a paucity of data regarding the utility of behavioral/pharmacologic intervention to support continued smoking cessation. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted in August 2021 with no date limits. Relevant studies that reported tobacco smoking relapse rates for patients who quit at the time of cancer diagnosis were included. Our literature search identified 1620 articles and 29 met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint of the study was smoking relapse rate. Secondary outcome was a descriptive assessment of behavioral and pharmacologic interventions to promote continued cessation. Exploratory outcomes included a regression analysis to examine associations between study factors and relapse rates. RESULTS There were 3021 smokers who quit at the time of cancer diagnosis. Weighted overall relapse rate for the study population was 44 % (range 5-57 %). Interventions to support smoking cessation were employed in 17 of the 29 included studies and protocols were heterogenous, including behavioral, pharmacologic, or mixed intervention strategies. Exploratory analysis demonstrated no association between relapse rates and publication year, gender, or study type. Relapse rates were indirectly associated with age (p = .003), suggesting that younger patients were more likely to relapse. CONCLUSION The sustainability of smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis is understudied, and existing literature is difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity. Relapse rates remain significant and, although many studies have included the employment of an intervention to promote continued cessation, few studies have measured the effect of a protocolized intervention to support abstinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Feuer
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jamie Michael
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Morton
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Richard S Matulewicz
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Paschal Sheeran
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kimberly Shoenbill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Program on Health and Clinical Informatics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Adam Goldstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Scott Sherman
- Section on Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use, Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith J, Togawa K, Dresler C, Hawari F, Zain ZM, Stewart B, Warren GW, Sitas F. Smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis: Commentary on special supplement in Cancer Epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102210. [PMID: 35785684 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Smith
- Townsville University Hospital & College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Kayo Togawa
- Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, France; Division of Surveillance and Policy Evaluation, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Japan
| | - Carolyn Dresler
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Montrose, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Bernard Stewart
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales - Sydney, Australia
| | - Graham W Warren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Freddy Sitas
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Population Health, University of New South Wales-Sydney, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, and Cancer Epidemiology, Elsevier Press, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cylindrical and button battery ingestion in children: a single-center experience. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37:1461-1466. [PMID: 34191051 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-04953-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to perform a comparative analysis of the examination and treatment outcomes of children with cylindrical and button batteries (BB) ingestion depending on their size and anatomical locations. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of 124 children aged from 1 month to 18 years who ingested batteries and were treated in a tertiary care center from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2019. The data studied included age, sex, presenting symptoms at the time of evaluation, type and size of battery and modality of management. RESULTS Twenty-three (18.5%) patients ingested cylindrical batteries (CBs), and 101 (81.5%) ingested BBs. The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer (p = 0.004) in the group of children who ingested BBs larger than 20 mm. Endoscopic removal was performed in 75 (60.5%) children, 46 (37.1%) were followed up and three (2.4%) underwent open surgeries. Children with CBs ingestion, in 55% of cases, had gastric mucosal injuries. Children with BBs impacted in the esophagus in 96% cases had visible severe mucosal damage, whereas patients with gastric BB ingestion 19.5% had superficial gastric mucosal damage. CONCLUSION Performing timely endoscopic retrieval in children who are admitted early to the hospital will reduce the risk of damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa, especially in the stomach. Unlike BBs, CBs, despite their large size, have advantageous shapes, uneventfully pass the esophagus and are more often retained in the stomach; thus, mucosal injuries are more often observed in the stomach. Consequently, endoscopic extraction is the treatment of choice for children with BB ingestion.
Collapse
|
7
|
Smoking: Pathogenetic Mechanisms, Possibilities of Medical Correction (Literature Review). Fam Med 2021. [DOI: 10.30841/2307-5112.2-3.2021.240774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The smoking epidemic is one of the greatest threats to human health, as it is the leading cause of death worldwide, as well as many preventable diseases. Diseases associated with smoking include cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, chronic pancreatitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, osteoporosis and others.
The aim is to analyze information on the pathogenetic mechanisms of tobacco exposure and methods of its drug correction.
Among the 4,000 chemicals identified in tobacco smoke, nicotine is the main active ingredient in tobacco products. It is highly toxic and potentially lethal.
Nicotine affects many systems, including the neurological, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, respiratory, immunological and gastrointestinal systems. Therefore, nicotine-containing drugs reduce the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal in regular smokers who abstain from smoking. The presence of different types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, their regulation and desensitization affect these complex physiological effects.
Nicotine replacement drugs contain pure nicotine, in order to reduce the patient’s propensity to use tobacco, physiological and psychomotor withdrawal symptoms. They increase the level of nicotine in the blood, thus facilitating the transition from cigarette smoking to complete abstinence. Smokers can quit without using nicotine-containing drugs, but most those who try do not succeed on the first try. Nicotine replacement drugs only affect physical dependence.
Nicotine is the main factor responsible for dependence on cigarette smoking, and its rate of absorption and entry into the brain are considered key factors responsible for the high potential for abuse of this drug. The advantage of nicotine-containing drugs is the patient’s independence from the method of administration, determination of abstinence, duration of treatment, level of supportive counseling, place of treatment (hospital, clinic or support group), as well as fixed, variable or reduced doses. There are a number of nicotine-containing drugs in various forms that effectively promote smoking cessation in adults.
Collapse
|
8
|
Castello LM, Airoldi C, Baldrighi M, Bortoluzzi S, Cammarata LM, Franchetti Pardo L, Gardino CA, Payedimarri AB, Giorchino M, Pistone G, Stampini V, Avanzi GC, Faggiano F. Effectiveness and feasibility of smoking counselling: a randomized controlled trial in an Italian emergency department. Eur J Public Health 2021; 32:119-125. [PMID: 34252178 PMCID: PMC8807080 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5A's counselling is recommended for screening and treating patients with smoking addiction. The emergency department (ED) setting might be a suitable environment for conducting interventions for smoking cessation. The present study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness on smoking cessation of 5A's counselling administered to ED patients by nurses. METHODS Parallel group randomized trial assessing 5A's counselling for smoking cessation vs. usual care at a University Hospital in the North of Italy. The primary end-point was prevalence of tobacco-free patients. The secondary outcomes at 6- and 12-month follow-up were (i) consecutive past 30-day smoking abstinence; (ii) past 7-day 50%, or more, decrease in daily tobacco consumption over baseline; and (iii) number of attempts to quit smoking. RESULTS A total of 480 patients were randomized to intervention (n = 262) or usual care (n = 218). Intention to treat analysis displayed no differences in primary and secondary outcomes between groups. A slight but not statistically significant enhancement in cessation was recorded in the intervention group [relative risk (RR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-1.87] at 6 months, whereas a reversed observation at 12 months (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.50-1.47). Similar results were obtained for the secondary outcomes. Per protocol analysis increased the size of the results. Of the 126 smokers receiving counselling, 18 were visited and treated at the local smoking cessation centre, with 12 of them successfully completing the treatment. CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that the ED is not a suited environment for 5A's counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Mario Castello
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.,Emergency Department, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Chiara Airoldi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Baldrighi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.,Emergency Department, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Sara Bortoluzzi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Livia Franchetti Pardo
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Clara Ada Gardino
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.,Emergency Department, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Anil Babu Payedimarri
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Giorchino
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pistone
- Centro per il Trattamento del Tabagismo, Local Health Unit, Novara, Italy
| | - Viviana Stampini
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Avanzi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.,Emergency Department, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Faggiano
- Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|