Threats to rural surgery

The Impact of Surgical Telementoring on Reducing the Complication Rate in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of the Skull Base

BACKGROUND

Pituitary adenomas represent the most common pituitary disorder, with an estimated prevalence as high as 20%, and they can manifest with hormone hypersecretion or deficiency, neurological symptoms from mass effect, or incidental findings on imaging. Transsphenoidal surgery, performed either microscopically or endoscopically, allows for a better extent of resection while minimising the associated risk in comparison to the transcranial approach. Endoscopy allows for better visualisation and improvement in tumour resection with an improved working angle and less nasal morbidity, making it likely to become the preferred surgical treatment for pituitary neoplasms. The learning curve can be aided by telementoring.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the clinical records of 94 patients who underwent an endoscopic endonasal resection of a pituitary neoplasm between the years 2011 and 2023 at Maribor University Medical Centre in Slovenia. Remote surgical telementoring over 3 years assisted with the learning curve.

RESULTS

The proportion of complication-free patients significantly increased over the observed period (60% vs. 79%). A gradual but insignificant increase in the percentage of patients with improved endocrine function was observed. Patients' vision improved significantly over the observed period. By gaining experience, the extent of gross total tumour resection increased insignificantly (67% vs. 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Telementoring for the endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary neoplasms enables low-volume centres to achieve efficiency, decreasing rates of postoperative complications and increasing the extent of tumour resection.

Use of Innovative Technology in Surgical Training in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

There has been a rapid growth in interest in global surgery. This increased commitment to improving global surgical care, however, has not translated into an equal exchange of surgical information between high-income countries (HICs) and low-income countries (LMICs). In recent years, a greater emphasis has been placed on training local medical personnel in order to increase surgical capacity while simultaneously decreasing reliance on expatriate visitors. Virtual curricular models, simulators, and immersive technologies have been developed and implemented in order to maximize training opportunities in low-resource settings. This study aims to assess and summarize innovative technologies used for surgical training in low-resource settings.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature from 2000 to 2021. We included both academic and grey literature on surgical education technologies. Searches were performed on Medline and Embase as well as on Google, iOS, and Android app stores.

RESULTS

Four main categories of surgical training platforms were identified: web-based platforms, app-based platforms, virtual and augmented reality, and simulation. The platforms were analyzed based on their content, effectiveness, cost, accessibility, and barriers to use.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual learning platforms show potential in surgical training as they are easily accessible, not limited by geography, continuously updated, and evaluated for effectiveness. In order to provide access to educational resources for surgical trainees all around the world, particularly in low-resource settings, increased effort and resources should be dedicated to developing free, open-access surgical training programs . Doing so will promote sustainable and equitable development in global surgical care.

Socioeconomic Challenges in the Rural Patient Population in Need of Total Joint Arthroplasty

Many challenges exist for the rural patient in need of joint arthroplasty. Optimization for surgery is more difficult due to factors such as deprivation, education, employment, household income, and access to proper surgical institutions. Rural individuals have less access to primary care and even less access to surgical specialists, creating a distinct subset of patients who endure higher costs, poorer outcomes, and lack of care. Reducing socioeconomic disparities in rural communities will require policy initiatives addressing the components of socioeconomic status (income, education, and occupation). Hopefully remote patient technologies can help with access and timely addressing of modifiable risk factors.

Demographics and medical school exposures to rural health influence future practice

BACKGROUND

One-fifth of the US population lives in rural areas. A record number of rural hospitals have closed, creating increased burdens on regional centers and delays in care. This study aimed to assess medical student perceptions of rural surgery and health care, and to elucidate influential factors for future practice.

METHODS

We administered a survey to medical schools throughout Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. The survey was designed and evaluated by a survey content expert and piloted among a group of students. Student and faculty liaisons disseminated the survey between February and May 2021. Descriptive analysis of data was completed using Stata v.16.1 (StataCorp, LLC, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

The respondents included 700 medical students; 59.5% were female, with an equal distribution across medical school classes. More than 98% of students believe we "lack" or "are in great need of" rural health care providers, as well as rural surgeons; however, more than half of the students did not agree that the rural workforce is declining. Only 15.7% of students reported an interest in "pursuing a future career in a rural setting." Students with exposure to rural health care, coming from a rural hometown, or having a dependent had a positive association with interest in pursuing rural practice.

CONCLUSION

Although students are aware of the lack of rural surgeons and health care providers, there remains an educational deficit. Expanding exposure to rural health care and surgery while in medical school may increase the number of students interested in pursuing a career in a rural setting, potentially shrinking the rural workforce gap.

The aging general surgeon of rural America

PURPOSE

Nonmetropolitan communities are faced with health care professional shortages and prior reports suggest that general surgeons are no exception. The purpose of this brief is to evaluate the age difference and distribution of rural versus urban general surgeons to highlight the growing need to recruit medical students and residents for rural practice.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of residency graduated general surgeon demographics at the county level was performed using data from the Area Health Resource File. General surgeon demographic data were compared between nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas.

FINDINGS

The number of general surgeons practicing in rural communities is decreasing by a rate of approximately 0.5%-1.0% annually. Moreover, the entry of younger (<35 years of age) general surgeons into rural counties (8.7%) was less than urban regions (12.1%). Rural general surgeons tended to be older than their urban peers, and on average, rural general surgeon age exhibits a negative skewed, platykurtic distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate action must be taken to generate more surgeons for rural practice. A failure to increase recruitment and retention of rural surgeons may have severe consequences on the health status of rural communities.

Workforce Issues in Urology

The future supply of urologists is not on pace to account for future demands of urologic care. This impending urologic shortage sits on a backdrop of multiple other workforce issues. In this review, we take an in-depth look at several pressing issues facing the urologic workforce, including the impending urology shortage, gender and diversity concerns, growing levels of burnout, and the effects of the coronavirus pandemic. In doing so, we highlight specific areas of clinical practice that may need to be addressed from a health care policy standpoint.

The Isolated Surgeon: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Surgeons in resource-limited environments often provide care outside the expected scope of current general surgery training. Geographically isolated patients may be unwilling or unable to travel for specialty care. These same patients also present with life-threatening emergencies beyond the typical breadth of a general surgeon's practice, in hospitals with limited professional and material support. This review characterizes the unique role of isolated surgeons, so individual surgeons and health care organizations may focus professional development resources more efficiently, with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the isolated surgeon, reviewing 25 years of literature regarding isolated US civilian and military surgeons. We examined emerging themes regarding the definition of an isolated surgeon, the scope of surgical practice beyond current training norms, and training gaps identified by surgeons in an isolated role.

RESULTS

From 904 articles identified, we included 91 for final review. No prior definition exists for the isolated surgeon, although multiple definitions describe rural surgeons, patients, or hospitals; we propose an initial definition from consistent themes in the literature. Isolated surgeons across varied practice settings consistently performed relatively large volumes of cases of, and identified training gaps in, orthopedic, obstetric and gynecologic, urologic, and vascular surgery subspecialties. Life-threatening, "rare-but-real" cases in the above and neurosurgical disciplines are uncommon, but consistent across practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

This review represents the largest examination of the isolated surgeon in the current literature. Clarifying the identity, practice components, and training gaps of the isolated surgeon represent the first step in formalizing support for this small but critical group of surgeons and their patients.

Analysis of palliative care treatment among head and neck patients with cancer: National perspective

BACKGROUND

To analyze the characteristics and survival patterns of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who received palliative treatment during their first course of treatment.

METHODS

Cohort analysis utilizing the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of patients with a diagnosis of oral cavity/oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal SCC. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression and Cox Hazard ratio modeling, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

165 081 patients were included, of which 2747 patients received palliative treatment. Patients who received palliative treatment tended to be ≥65 years old, black, Charlson/Deyo score ≥3, hypopharyngeal cancer, stage (III-IV), with Medicaid insurance (P < .05). Patients were more likely to be treated with palliative intent if they underwent chemotherapy/radiotherapy and declined surgery (P < .001) compared to patients who underwent surgery and declined chemotherapy/radiotherapy (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care use in head and neck oncology is associated with older patients, non-whites, Medicaid patients, and nonsurgically treated patients.

General surgery in Canada: current scope of practice and future needs

BACKGROUND

The scope of practice of general surgeons in Canada is highly variable. The objective of this study was to examine the demographic characteristics of general surgeons in Canada and compare surgical procedures performed across community sizes and specialties.

METHODS

Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's National Physician Database were used to analyze fee-for-service (FFS) care provided by general surgeons and other providers across Canada in 2015/16.

RESULTS

Across 8 Canadian provinces, 1669 general surgeons provided FFS care. The majority of the surgeons worked in communities with more than 100 000 residents (71%), were male (78%), were aged 35-54 years (56%) and were Canadian medical graduates (76%). Only 7% of general surgeons practised in rural areas and 14% in communities with between 10 000 and 50 000 residents. Rural communities were significantly more likely to have surgeons who were international medical graduates or who were older than 65 years. The surgical procedures most commonly performed by general surgeons were hernia repairs, gallbladder and biliary tree surgery, excision of skin tumours, colon and intestine resections and breast surgery. Many general surgeons performed procedures not listed in their Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada training objectives.

CONCLUSION

Canadian general surgeons provide a wide array of surgical services, and practice patterns vary by community size. Surgeons practising in rural and small communities require proficiency in skills not routinely taught in general surgery residency. Opportunities to acquire these skills should be available in training to prepare surgeons to meet the care needs of Canadians.

Role of rural general surgeons in managing vascular surgical emergencies

BACKGROUND

A rural general surgeon has historically been required to perform a wide variety of subspecialist procedures. Increasingly sub-specialized training programs have restricted younger surgeons' experience in the general surgery-associated subspecialties. Time critical vascular surgical emergencies are frequently encountered by rural general surgeons. This study aims to audit the prevalence of vascular surgical emergencies at a geographically remote regional centre and define the role of the general surgeon in managing these patients.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective study was performed to analyse the outcomes of the patients who presented to Dubbo Base Hospital with an emergency vascular pathology or developed such a condition during admission, between October 2010 and June 2019. Patients were identified by relevant International classification of diseases (ICD) (10th revision) diagnostic codes for vascular emergencies. Acute complications following surgery for haemodialysis access were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were identified during the study period and the majority were transferred to a tertiary centre for surgical intervention. Sixteen patients underwent emergency vascular surgery locally due to concerns about potential loss of life or limb if intervention was delayed by transfer; 69% of patients who underwent surgery locally survived with limb salvation.

CONCLUSION

While most patients can safely be transferred to a tertiary centre, some require surgery locally in order to maximize chance of life or limb preservation. There is a strong argument for exposure of general surgical trainees with an interest in rural surgery to vascular surgery and other subspecialties.

Telementoring of Surgeons: A Systematic Review

Background. Telementoring is a technique that has shown potential as a surgical training aid. Previous studies have suggested that telementoring is a safe training modality. This review aimed to review both the technological capabilities of reported telementoring systems as well as its potential benefits as a mentoring modality. Methods. A systematic review of the literature, up to July 2017, was carried out in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Oxford Levels of Evidence proforma. Data were extracted regarding technical capabilities, bandwidth, latency, and costs. Additionally, the primary aim and key results were extracted from each study and analyzed. Results. A total of 66 studies were identified for inclusion. In all, 48% of studies were conducted in general surgery; 22 (33%), 24 (36%), and 20 (30%) of studies reported telementoring that occurred within the same hospital, outside the hospital, and outside the country, respectively. Sixty-four (98%) of studies employed video and audio and 38 (58%) used telestration. Twelve separate studies directly compared telementoring against on-site mentoring. Seven (58%) showed no difference in outcomes between telementoring and on-site mentoring. No study found telementoring to result in poorer postoperative outcomes. Conclusions. The results of this review suggest that telementoring has a similar safety and efficacy profile as on-site mentoring. Future analysis to determine the potential benefits and pitfalls to surgical education through telementoring are required to determine the exact role it shall play in the future. Technological advances to improve remote connectivity would also aid the uptake of telementoring on a larger scale.

Use of Telemedicine in Surgical Education: A Seven-Year Experience

Uniformity in surgical education is challenging because surgical experience is based on rotation assignments. With work hour restrictions, the likelihood of residents being exposed to rare or unusual cases is diminished. Telemedicine may create a new learning paradigm for surgical education and supplement exposure for rare or unusual cases. A retrospective review (2010–2016) of teleconferences involving trauma centers worldwide was conducted. Participating hospitals included centers from underdeveloped countries to first world nations. Trauma cases were discussed among surgeons with different levels of experience and resource availability. Data collected included types of cases, anatomic injury patterns, hospital location, and the number of telemedicine centers and viewers participating. Seventy-three hospitals in 64 cities, spanning 27 countries, participated in 276 telemedicine grand round conferences. Cases discussed included penetrating trauma (47%), blunt trauma (42%), and blast injury (4%). The anatomic regions included were the thorax (28%), abdomen (26%), thoracoabdominal region (13%), neck (7%), and pelvis (6%). The most common injury discussed was vascular in nature (18%), followed by the lung, liver, diaphragm, and heart. The most common vascular lesion was in the aorta (18%), followed by the iliac vessels (8%) and the vena cava (7%). Telemedicine is a valuable tool, allowing the dissemination of diverse experiences. Most cases presented evaluated rare injuries or complex surgical approaches, which are not commonly seen on trauma sites. Learning different approaches in the management of complex trauma will make surgeons more prepared to deal with challenging cases.

Rural surgeons would embrace surgical telementoring for help with difficult cases and acquisition of new skills

BACKGROUND

Surgical telementoring, consisting of an expert surgeon guiding a less experienced surgeon through advanced or novel cases from a remote location, is an evolving technology which has potential to become an integral part of surgical practice. This study sought to apprise the attitudes of rural general surgeons toward the possible benefits and applications of surgical telementoring in their practices.

METHODS

A survey assessing demographics and attitudes toward telementoring was e-mailed to members of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Advisory Council for Rural Surgery and posted to the ACS website in areas targeting rural surgeons. A link to a webpage with a description of surgical telementoring and brief demonstrative video were included with the survey.

RESULTS

There were 159 respondents, with 82.3 % of them practicing in communities smaller than 50,000 people. Overall, 78.6 % felt that telementoring would be useful to their practice, and 69.8 % thought it would benefit their hospitals. There was no correlation between years of practice and perceived usefulness of surgical telementoring. When asked the single most useful, or primary, application of surgical telementoring there was a split between learning new techniques (46.5 %) and intraoperative assistance with unexpected findings (39.0 %). When asked to select all applications in which they would be interested in using telementoring from a list of possible uses, surgeons most frequently selected: intraoperative consultation for unexpected findings (67.7 %), trauma consultation (32.9 %), and laparoscopic colectomy (32.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical telementoring is on the verge of widespread use but industry and surgical societies remain ambivalent about supporting its implementation due to concerns over lack of interest. This study demonstrates interest among rural surgeons. While there are differing opinions regarding compensation of the telementoring, the most common, single interest in the use of surgical telementoring was for learning new techniques or skill sets.

Meeting Increasing Demands for Rural General Surgeons

Dynamic assessment of the effective surgical workforce recommends 27,300 general surgeons in 2030; 2,525 more than are presently being trained. Rural shortages are already critical and there has been insufficient preparation for this need. A literature review of the factors influencing the choice of rural practice was performed. A systematic search was conducted of PubMed and the Web of Science to identify applicable studies in rural practice, surgical training, and rural general surgery. These articles were reviewed to identify the pertinent reports. The articles chosen for review are directed to four main objectives: 1) description of the challenges of rural practice, 2) factors associated with the choice of rural practice, 3) interventions to increase interest and preparation for rural practice, and 4) present successful rural surgical practice models. There is limited research on the factors influencing surgeons in the selection of rural surgery. The family practice literature suggests that physicians are primed for rural living through early experience, with reinforcement during medical school and residency, and retained through community involvement, and personal and professional satisfaction. However, more research into the factors drawing surgeons specifically to rural surgery, and keeping them in the community, is needed.

Rural Bypass for Elective Surgeries

PURPOSE

Rural bypass of Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) for elective inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures has not been studied. Residents choosing to have their elective surgeries elsewhere, when the local CAH provides those surgical services, erode their rural hospital's financial base. The purpose of this research is to describe the elective surgical bypass rate, the procedures most commonly bypassed by rural residents, the distribution of volume among CAHs that offer elective surgical services, and factors predictive of bypass.

METHODS

A sample of elective surgery discharges was created from the 2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for Colorado, North Carolina, Vermont, and Wisconsin. Frequencies of procedures bypassed and CAH volume distribution were performed. Logistic regression was used to model factors associated with rural bypass for elective surgical care.

FINDINGS

The rural bypass rate for elective surgical procedures is 48.4%. Procedures bypassed most are operations on the musculoskeletal system, eye, and digestive system. Annual volume distribution for elective surgical procedures among CAHs varied widely. Patients who are younger, medically complex, at higher surgical risk, and have private insurance are at higher odds of bypass. Patients are also more likely to bypass low-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Rural hospitals should consider developing surgical services that are performed electively and on an outpatient basis that are attractive to a broader rural population. CAHs that already offer elective surgical procedures and yet who are still bypassed must examine the mutable factors that drive bypass behavior.

Disparities in the Utilization of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer in Rural Nebraska: A Call for Placement and Training of Rural General Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical technology are changing surgical standards for colon cancer treatment. The laparoscopic colectomy is equivalent to the standard open colectomy while providing additional benefits. It is currently unknown what factors influence utilization of laparoscopic surgery in rural areas and if treatment disparities exist. The objectives of this study were to examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with receiving laparoscopic colectomy and to examine the differences between rural and urban patients who received either procedure.

METHODS

This study utilized a linked data set of Nebraska Cancer Registry and hospital discharge data on colon cancer patients diagnosed and treated in the entire state of Nebraska from 2008 to 2011 (N = 1,062). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving the laparoscopic treatment.

RESULTS

Rural colon cancer patients were 40% less likely to receive laparoscopic colectomy compared to urban patients. Independent predictors of receiving laparoscopic colectomy were younger age (<60), urban residence, ≥3 comorbidities, elective admission, smaller tumor size, and early stage at diagnosis. Additionally, rural patients varied demographically compared to urban patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the new standard of treatment for colon cancer and important disparities exist for rural cancer patients in accessing the specialized treatment. As cancer treatment becomes more specialized, the importance of training and placement of general surgeons in rural communities must be a priority for health care planning and professional training institutions.

Longitudinal urban-rural discrepancies in the US orthopaedic surgeon workforce

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the supply of orthopaedic surgeons can meet the needs of a growing and aging population. This may be especially concerning in rural areas where there are known disparities in overall healthcare provision.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore (1) determined urban-rural trends in the US physician and orthopaedic workforce (including the age of that workforce) from 1995 to 2010; (2) geographically mapped the physician and orthopaedic distribution; and (3) examined urban-rural changes in select nonorthopaedic musculoskeletal provider (chiropractor and podiatrist) workforces from 2000 to 2010.

METHODS

County-level provider data from 1995 to 2010 were obtained from the Department of Health and Human Services. This was aggregated to Hospital Referral Regions and ranked by Rural-Urban Continuum Code. Hospital Referral Region-level data were mapped to identify geographic trends. Total physician and orthopaedic surgeon workforce data were averaged across the most urban and rural regions for the study period.

RESULTS

There were urban-rural discrepancies in the physician and orthopaedic workforce from 1995 to 2010 with fewer orthopaedic surgeons in rural areas than urban areas (6.52 versus 8.73 per 100,000 in 2010; p=0.001). Furthermore, orthopaedic surgeons in rural areas were older than their urban counterparts, with a workforce age ratio (age>55: age<55 years) of 0.92 versus 0.65 in 2010 (p=0.024). From 2000 to 2010, the rural chiropractor and podiatrist workforces showed tremendous growth of 229.6% and 279.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant urban-rural orthopaedic surgeon workforce discrepancies from 1995 to 2010. Concurrent growth in chiropractor and podiatrist numbers shows significant trends in the musculoskeletal provider workforce that warrant continuing observation and analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, economic and decision analyses. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Financial debt of orthopedic residents

Many orthopedic residents accrue considerable debt by residency graduation. These debts for graduating medical students continue to increase due to the yearly increase of medical school tuition. The purpose of this study was to examine the causes of financial debt, as well the effects of debt on orthopedic residents.Orthopedic residents from postgraduate years 1 to 5 (N=27) completed an anonymous, optional financial survey. The survey asked questions regarding the characteristics of the residents' debt and their concern caused by their debt. All residents from our institute (N=27) voluntarily participated in the survey. The residents consisted of 4 (15%) women and 23 (85%) men, with 14 (56%) single residents and 12 (44%) married residents. No statistically significant difference existed in total debt >$100,000 between single and married residents or men and women. Forty-eight percent (n=13) of the residents had medical educational debt >$100,000, whereas 45% (n=12) had total debt >$200,000. Residents with total debt >$100,000 were concerned about their debt, whereas 1 of 4 residents with <$100,000 of total debt reported concern (P<.001).Debts affect orthopedic residents financially and may cause stress and hinder their medical training. Appropriate measures should be taken to help residents properly manage their debt and to provide supplemental assistance with their financial struggles.

A comparison of future recruitment needs in urban and rural hospitals: the rural imperative

BACKGROUND

The potential impact of shortages of the surgical workforce on both urban and rural hospitals is undefined. There is a predicted shortage of 30,000 surgeons by 2030 and the need to train and hire more than 100,000 surgeons. The aim of this study is to estimate the average recruitment needs in our nation's hospitals for 7 surgical specialties to ensure adequate access to surgical care as the U.S. population grows to 364 million by 2030.

METHODS

We used the census figure of 309 million in 2010 for U.S. population. Currently there are estimated to be 3,012 urban hospitals and 1,998 rural hospitals in the U.S. (American Hospital Association's Trend Watch report, 2009). At 253 million people (82 % of the population of 309 million in 2010) receive healthcare in urban hospitals; 56 million people receive healthcare in rural hospitals (18%). We assumed a work force model based on our previous publications, equal population growth in all geographic areas, recruitment by rural hospitals limited to Ob-Gyn, General Surgery, and Orthopedics, and that the percentage of the population receiving care at urban and rural hospitals will stay constant.

RESULTS

Rural hospitals will have to recruit an average of 3.4 OBGYN's, and an average of 1.6 Orthos, and 2.0 GS for a total of 7 full-time equivalents in the period from 2011 to 2030. Urban hospitals which have to recruit surgical specialists will have to recruit ten Ob-Gyns, about 5 Orthos, 6 GS's, 5 ear, nose, and throat surgeons (ENT's), an average of 2.5 urologists, a neurosurgeon, and a thoracic surgeon to meet the recruiting goals for the surgical services for their hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Rural hospitals will be in competition with urban hospitals for hiring from a limited pool of surgeons. As urban hospitals have a socioeconomic advantage in hiring, surgical care in rural areas may be at risk. It is imperative that each rural hospital analyze local future healthcare needs and devise strategies that will enhance hiring and retention to optimize access to surgical care.

General Surgery at Rural Tennessee Hospitals: A Survey of Rural Tennessee Hospital Administrators

Rural communities face an impending surgical workforce crisis. The purpose of this study is to describe perceptions of rural Tennessee hospital administrators regarding the importance of surgical services to their hospitals. In collaboration with the Tennessee Hospital Association, we developed and administered a 13-item survey based on a recently published national survey to 80 rural Tennessee hospitals in August 2008. A total of 29 responses were received for an overall 36.3 per cent response rate. Over 44 per cent of rural surgeons were older than 50 years of age, and 27.6 per cent of hospitals reported they would lose at least one surgeon in the next 2 years. The responding hospitals reported losing 10.4 per cent of their surgical workforce in the preceding 2 years. Over 53 per cent were actively recruiting a general surgeon with an average time to recruit a surgeon of 11.8 months. Ninety-seven per cent stated that having a surgical program was very important to their financial viability with the mean and median reported revenue generated by a single general surgeon being $1.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Almost 11 per cent of the hospitals stated they would have to close if they lost surgical services. Although rural Tennessee hospitals face similar difficulties to national rural hospitals with regard to retaining and hiring surgeons, slightly more Tennessee hospitals (54 vs 36%) were actively attempting to recruit a general surgeon. The shortage of general surgeons is a threat to the accessibility of comprehensive hospital-based care for rural Tennesseans.

The Impact of Facility Volume/Size on Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcome

Recent studies have suggested that outcomes and survival from breast cancer are improved when definitive treatment is rendered at high-volume and/or teaching centers. Consolidation of such cases in tertiary centers, however, is often impractical and impossible. Patients often desire primary treatment of their breast cancer in their own communities. The current study was undertaken to examine the impact of treatment facility type on the treatment performed as well as on overall survival. Breast cancer treatment and survival data were available from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base. Only patients in whom no previous treatment had been rendered were included in the analysis. Data were stratified with regard to type and size of treatment facility/hospital; stage distribution; initial treatment performed; and 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival. A total of 665,409 patients were included in the current analysis. There were no significant differences in stage distribution between facility types nor was there a significant difference in the treatment performed (although there was a slight trend toward breast conservation at the larger centers). This was true overall and for each stage of cohort. There were also no significant differences in 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates overall and at any stage (although again, there was a slight trend toward a minimal survival advantage at the larger centers). There was no significant impact of facility size or type on either breast cancer treatment performed or overall survival. There was no evidence that more “advanced” treatments were offered at larger centers nor was there evidence of improved outcome/survival at larger centers. Care can be rendered safely, efficiently, and effectively in the community setting.

Characteristics of practice among rural and urban general surgeons in North Carolina

OBJECTIVE

To examine variation in the practice patterns of individual general surgeons and how they differ between rural and urban areas of North Carolina.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traditional physician supply analyses often rely on "head counts" and do not take into account how physicians' practice patterns differ. Practice characteristics including the volume and the breadth of services that a physician provides may be especially important in understanding the supply and distribution of specialists, such as general surgeons.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study using physician licensure data linked with administrative records on all inpatient hospital discharges and all surgeries performed at freestanding ambulatory surgery centers in North Carolina in 2004.

RESULTS

Total procedure volumes varied widely (interquartile range: 356-700). The average general surgeon in a rural county performed 54 different procedures at least once during the year, compared to 59 in counties with small urban areas and 62 in metropolitan counties. The 10 procedures that a general surgeon performed most frequently accounted for 72% of that surgeon's total annual procedures in rural counties, 67% in counties with small urban areas, and 66% in metropolitan counties. These rural metropolitan differences were smaller after controlling for secondary specialty and other surgeon characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variation in the volume and scope of procedures that North Carolina general surgeons performed in the year. Many general surgeons in metropolitan areas performed an array of procedures that was broader than those in rural areas.

Use of locum tenens surgeons to provide surgical care in small rural hospitals

BACKGROUND

Too few general surgeons practice in rural American communities, and many hospitals in the smallest rural areas do not have a surgeon. Therefore, it is likely that some small rural hospitals are using alternative arrangements to provide surgical care, including hiring locum tenens surgeons. We describe the degree to which small rural hospitals are using locum tenens surgeons to provide surgical services.

METHODS

Administrators at 129 small rural hospitals were surveyed by telephone. The survey instrument was comprised of questions asking whether the hospital provides surgical services, if the hospital has recruited a surgeon, whether the hospital uses locum tenens surgeons and if so for what purposes.

RESULTS

A total of 76% of surveyed rural hospitals have offered surgical services during the past 5 years. In all, 56% of hospitals providing surgical care have recruited a surgeon during the past 5 years. Of those who have been unsuccessful in their search, 30% have considered using a locum tenens surgeon, and 20% have done so.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the difficulty of recruiting surgeons to practice in rural America, it is critical to develop strategies to address this problem. Although using locum tenens surgeons may allow rural hospitals to offer surgical services, the quality of surgical care could be compromised. Other means for delivering surgical services at rural hospitals that cannot recruit or retain a surgeon should be explored to ensure that rural residents have access to high quality surgical care.

Rural versus urban colorectal and lung cancer patients: differences in stage at presentation

BACKGROUND

Rural surgeons are often uneasy when their outcomes are compared with those of urban surgeons because they perceive that rural patients typically present with worse disease. Rural patients with cancer are commonly thought to present at a later stage of disease, although this is based largely on anecdotal evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive analysis of cancer stage at presentation of rural versus urban patients with two common cancers (lung, colorectal) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from the National Cancer Institute. Rural versus urban designations were based on rural-urban continuum codes from the US Department of Agriculture. We constructed an ordinal logistic regression model to compare stage at presentation between rural and urban colorectal and lung cancer patients, while controlling for other factors that might be associated with late stage at presentation, including age, race, gender, marital status, income level, and level of education.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with colorectal and lung cancer from rural areas were not more likely to present at later stage. The ordinal logistic regression model indicated that urban patients are more likely to present with late-stage colorectal and lung cancer, compared with rural patients (p < 0.001). For colon cancer, other factors notably associated with stage IV disease were low-income, African-American race, age younger than 65 years, divorce, male gender, and language isolation. For lung cancer, factors notably associated with stage IV disease were African-American race, divorce, male gender, and language isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Urban rather than rural residence appears to be associated with later stages of lung and colorectal cancer at presentation. This finding is contrary to the common assumption that rural patients present at later stages of disease.

Surgical management of blunt thoracic and abdominal injuries in Quebec: a limited volume

BACKGROUND

Trauma care of thoracic and abdominal injuries is currently in turmoil because of both a decrease in the number of these injuries and a concomitant increase in their nonsurgical management. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of thoracic and abdominal injuries in the province of Quebec and the number of associated surgical procedures.

METHODS

Patients with blunt thoracic or abdominal injuries taken to a tertiary trauma center in the province of Quebec from April 1, 1998 to March 31, 2002 were identified. Patients who were dead on arrival were excluded. Only patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2 for the thoracic or abdominal regions were included.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 16,430 blunt trauma patients were admitted to one of the four trauma centers. A total of 2,660 (16.2%) patients sustained thoracic and/or abdominal injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score >1. Among these, the median Injury Severity Score was 24 (range: 4-75) and the in-hospital mortality rate was 11.0%. There were 2,196 patients (82.5%) with thoracic injuries, 977 patients (36.7%) with abdominal injuries, and 520 patients (19.5%) with injuries to both regions. A surgical intervention was undertaken in 76 patients with thoracic injuries (3.5%) and in 414 patients with abdominal injuries (42.3%). On average, 4.7 thoracic and 28.8 abdominal trauma procedures were performed per center, yearly. Each trauma surgeon performed, on average, less than one thoracic and less than five abdominal trauma procedures yearly.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of blunt thoracic and abdominal injuries needing surgical intervention is low in Quebec tertiary trauma centers. The competence of general surgeons in trauma-related procedures might be compromised by such low patient volume unless they frequently perform non-trauma surgical procedures. We think that in Quebec, trauma care must be provided by surgeons who practice both acute emergency and elective surgical care in addition to trauma care. These findings should have an important impact on the development of on-going education and resident training programs.

Rural Surgery Training: A Survey of Program Directors

BACKGROUND

Differences have been established between rural and urban surgery with regard to surgeon supply, demographics, and practices. This study attempts to determine the importance and prevalence of rural surgery training in American general surgery residency programs.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey was electronically submitted to and completed by surgery program directors in the fall of 2004. Respondents were divided into research or nonresearch programs. Survey items measured attitudes toward the necessity and ideal components of a rural surgery curriculum and whether or not the program had such a curriculum in place.

RESULTS

There was a 24.0% survey response rate, with 17.2% of respondents being classified as research programs. Research programs were less likely to believe that it was their mission to train rural surgeons (2.50 versus 4.36, p < 0.001) and were less likely to believe that a shortage of rural surgeons exists. Just over 36% of programs reported having a rural surgery curriculum. Programs that believed training rural surgeons was part of their mission and that believed such a curriculum was necessary to train rural surgeons were more likely to have a rural surgery curriculum in place.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a curriculum to train rural surgeons is related to the belief that such a curriculum is necessary and that training rural surgeons is part of that residency program's mission. Residency programs have different attitudes and practices with regard to rural surgery training. Development of a rural surgery training designation can help trainees wishing to practice in a rural environment identify the programs best suited to equip them to do so.

The delivery of critical care services in US trauma centers: is the standard being met?

BACKGROUND

Although there is substantial evidence supporting the benefits of an intensivist model of critical care delivery, the extent to which this model has been adopted by trauma centers across the United States is unknown. We set out to evaluate how critical care is delivered in Level I and II trauma centers and the extent to which these centers implement evidence-based patient care practices known to improve outcome.

METHODS

All Level I and Level II trauma centers in the United States were surveyed using a previously validated questionnaire pertaining to the organizational characteristics of critical care units. Questions identifying the impediments to the implementation of an intensivist model of critical care delivery were added to the original survey. An intensivist model intensive care unit (ICU) was defined as one meeting all of the following criteria: a) the physician director was board certified in critical care; b) >50% of physicians responsible for care were board certified in critical care; c) an intensivist made daily rounds on the patients; and d) an intensive care team had the authority to write orders on the patients. The survey respondents were also queried regarding the extent to which they complied with evidence-based guidelines for care in the ICU.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 65% (295 centers). Only 61% of Level I centers and 22% of Level II centers provided an intensivist model of critical care delivery. Sixty-nine percent of centers had a form of collaborative care with an intensivist, but few centers had dedicated intensivists without responsibilities outside the ICU. The most common reason cited for not involving an intensivist in the delivery of critical care services was a concern regarding a loss of continuity of care. There was limited implementation of evidence-based practices in the ICU; the model of critical care delivery had no effect on rates of implementation of these practices.

CONCLUSION

The process of trauma center verification and designation should assure a high quality of trauma care. In keeping with these expectations of quality, the delivery of critical care services in trauma centers should evolve to a model that both includes the trauma surgeon in the care of the injured and allows for collaboration with a dedicated intensivist, who may or may not be a surgeon. The benefits of an intensivist model might be distinct from the utilization of evidence-based practices, suggesting that there might be incremental benefit in using these practices as markers of quality.

An analysis of clinical process measures for acute healthcare delivery in Appalachia: the Roane Medical Center experience

Objective

To survey management of selected emergency healthcare needs in a Tennessee community hospital.

Materials and methods

In this descriptive report, discharges and associated standard process measures were retrospectively studied for Roane Medical Center (RMC) in Harriman, Tennessee (pop. 6,757). Hospital data were extracted from a nationwide database of short-term acute care hospitals to measure 16 quality performance measures in myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and pneumonia during the 14 month interval ending March 2005. The data also permitted comparisons with state and national reference groups.

Results

Of RMC patients with myocardial infarction (MI), 94% received aspirin on arrival, a figure higher than both state (85%) and national (91%) averages. Assessment of left ventricular dysfunction among heart failure patients was also higher at RMC (98%) than the state (74%) or national (79%) average. For RMC pneumonia patients, 79% received antibiotics within 4 h of admission, which compared favorably with State (76%) and national (75%) average. RMC scored higher on 13 of 16 clinical process measures (p<0.01, sign test analysis, >95% CI) compared to state and national averages.

Discussion

Although acute health care needs are often met with limited resources in medically underserved regions, RMC performed above state and national average for most process measures assessed in this review. Our data were derived from one facility and the associated findings may not be applicable in other healthcare settings. Further studies are planned to track other parameters and specific clinical outcomes at RMC, as well as to identify specific institutional policies that facilitate attainment of target quality measures.