Scientific Presentation Award. Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

Factors Influencing Recurrence in Medial Breast Cancer Tumors After Skin Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been established as a safe option for curative-intent surgical resection. Prior studies have shown that medial location of the primary tumor is associated with increased risk of local recurrence. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors associated with recurrence and survival in individuals with breast cancers located in the inner quadrants (medial) who underwent SSM with IBR.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done on individuals with medial breast cancer who received SSM with IBR in British Columbia between 1980 and 2012.

RESULTS

Of 136 individuals with medial breast cancer undergoing SSM with IBR, 27.9% experienced local recurrence and 42.6% overall recurrence. Factors associated with recurrence were T-stage (44.8 vs. 22.4% with T2 disease, P = .02), transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap reconstruction (48.3 vs. 29.5%, P = .00395), prior breast surgery (87.9 vs. 63%, P = .002), and prior radiation therapy (74.1 vs. 38.5%, P < .0001). LR was associated with higher mortality (OR 2.78, 95% CI: 1.26-6.09).

CONCLUSION

For patients with medial tumors undergoing SSM with IBR, potential risk factors for recurrence are T-stage, TRAM flap reconstruction, prior breast surgery, and prior radiation therapy. Local recurrence is associated with poor survival.

Pregnancy-Associated Breast Changes after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Women of reproductive age are chronically underrepresented in breast cancer studies. Recent studies suggest that almost 40% of patients diagnosed with breast cancer who are of reproductive age want to have children after completing treatment. In this study, the authors evaluated patients of reproductive age who had undergone nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and implant-based reconstruction. The authors compared those who became pregnant with those who did not with respect to clinical and radiologic changes that are reported at follow-up.

METHODS

Any patient 45 years of age or younger at the time of NSM was determined to be of reproductive age, selected for evaluation, and followed prospectively. The presence or absence of breast examination changes in the setting of pregnancy after NSM was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients became pregnant after NSM, and 158 patients did not become pregnant after NSM. Of those who became pregnant, nearly half reported some clinical change just before or immediately after delivery. These changes included color change and discharge at the residual nipple-areola complex and palpable nodularity elsewhere. For those with palpable changes, an ultrasound was performed and hypoechoic lesions with variable vascularity were identified. For those who went on to excision, lactational hyperplasia was the most common diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound is an appropriate first-line investigation of breast changes, which can include hyperplasia of remaining ductal and glandular tissue. Patients who became pregnant after NSM commonly had clinical breast examination changes, but the majority of these changes were found to be benign on further evaluation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluating Residual Breast Tissue After Robotic-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women With Early Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Prospective studies on postoperative residual breast tissue (RBT) after robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) for breast cancer are limited. RBT presents an unknown risk of local recurrence or the development of new cancer after curative or risk-reducing mastectomies. This study investigated the technical feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate RBT after R-NSM in women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, 105 patients, who underwent R-NSM for breast cancer at Changhua Christian Hospital between March 2017 and May 2022, were subjected to postoperative breast MRI to evaluate the presence and location of RBT. The postoperative MRI scans of 43 patients (age, 47.8 ± 8.5 years), with existing preoperative MRI scans, were evaluated for the presence and location of RBT. In total, 54 R-NSM procedures were performed. In parallel, we reviewed the literature on RBT after nipple-sparing mastectomy, considering its prevalence.

RESULTS

RBT was detected in 7 (13.0%) of the 54 mastectomies (6 of the 48 therapeutic mastectomies and 1 of the 6 prophylactic mastectomies). The most common location for RBT was behind the nipple-areolar complex (5 of 7 [71.4%]). Another RBT was found in the upper inner quadrant (2 of 7 [28.6%]). Among the six patients who underwent RBT after therapeutic mastectomies, one patient developed a local recurrence of the skin flap. The other five patients with RBT after therapeutic mastectomies remained disease-free.

CONCLUSION

R-NSM, a surgical innovation, does not seem to increase the prevalence of RBT, and breast MRI showed feasibility as a noninvasive imaging tool for evaluating the presence and location of RBT.

Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery

This article provides an overview of the principles and techniques of oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Oncoplastic breast surgery (OPBS) with partial breast reconstruction is a natural evolution in the application of breast conserving surgery and permits wide surgical resection of tumours that might otherwise mandate mastectomy and whole breast reconstruction. These reconstructive techniques must be optimally selected and integrated with ablative breast surgery together with non-surgical treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy that may be variably sequenced with each other. A multidisciplinary approach with shared decision-making is essential to ensure optimal clinical and patient-reported outcomes that address oncological, aesthetic, functional and psychosocial domains. Future practice of OPBS must incorporate routine audit and comprehensive evaluation of outcomes.

Survival outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A matched case-control study

Background

Due to the lack of strong evidence-based medical evidence, the relationship between autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) after mastectomy and long-term prognosis is unclear. This study aims to explore if ABR after mastectomy is associated with the prognosis of breast cancer (BC) patients based on the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

We collected data for all cases diagnosed with BC who underwent or did not undergo ABR after mastectomy from 2010-2015 in the SEER database. The primary outcome of our study was overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). The Propensity Score-Matched (PSM) analysis was used to eliminate the effects of non-random statistics, setting the caliper as 0.0001 to balance the baseline variables within the groups. Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis were used to analyze the data and subgroup analysis was performed to find the subgroups of people who might benefit from ABR.

Result

Of 27893 eligible patients, 11038 patients were matched. The cohort consisted of 5519 (50%) ABR patients and 5519 (50%) non-ABR patients after PSM. After PSM, on multivariate cox regression analysis, ABR still exerted a significant influence on the OS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.83, P< 0.05). However, no statistical difference was shown on CSS (HR, 0.93, P = 0.31). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed ABR group had better OS (P = 0.001), but similar CSS (P = 0.174) between ARB and mastectomy groups. Subgroup analysis showed that after matching, those with 50-59 years old, earlier stages of disease, without a marital partner and living in urban areas had better OS after ABR.

Conclusions

ABR after mastectomy was associated with better OS, but not affect CSS.

Suggestion for the omission of post-mastectomy chest wall radiation therapy in patients who underwent skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy

AIM

Both skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have been widely adopted. Although postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) can improve clinical outcomes, it can worsen cosmesis following reconstruction. Therefore, identifying risk factors of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) could help de-escalate PMRT after NSM/SSM in patients with pT1-2 disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with SSM (N = 400) and NSM (N = 156) in patients with pT1-2N0-1 disease between 2009 and 2016. Seventy-four patients received PMRT with 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of IBTR.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 66.2 months, 17 IBTR events were observed, with 5-year IBTR-free rate of 97.2%. Although only one IBTR was observed after PMRT, there was no statistical difference in the 5-year IBTR-free rate (PMRT vs. no PMRT, 98.6% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.360). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age ≤45 years and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were adverse features of IBTR. The low-risk group (0 risk factor) showed a better 5-year IBTR-free rate than the high-risk group (≥1 risk factor) (100.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.003). In the high-risk group, PMRT slightly improved 5-year IBTR-free rate compared with no PMRT (98.6% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.166). In addition, PMRT increased 5-year cumulative incidence of reconstruction failure (10.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified risk factors (age and LVI) related to IBTR following upfront SSM/NSM with pT1-2 disease. As a hypothesis-generating study, de-escalation of PMRT by omitting chest wall irradiation in selective patients could improve reconstruction-related complications without compromising oncologic outcomes.

The relationship between immediate postmastectomy reconstruction modalities and survival benefits in patients with triple negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction for breast cancer has been widely used due to its unique esthetic and psychological effects. However, no other population-based study has investigated the effects of different reconstruction types on the survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

We selected patients who met the eligibility criteria from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry (N = 9760). We then assessed the effect of different reconstructive surgical approaches (implant, autologous, implant and autologous combined reconstruction) on the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) by using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. The nomograms were used to predict OS and BCSS. And the competitive risk model was used to assess breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) and non-breast cancer-specific death (NBCSD).

RESULTS

Statistical analysis suggested that the three reconstruction methods had better OS and BCSS with lower hazard than mastectomy alone (log-rank test, p < 0.05). Multivariate stratified analysis showed that patients aged 40-60 years had the greatest improvement in OS (Adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.646; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.439-0.950; p = 0.026) with combined reconstruction. BCSS could be improved only by implant reconstruction (AHR, 0.672; 95% CI, 0.514-0.878; p = 0.004). In addition, autologous reconstruction (AHR, 0.570; 95% CI, 0.350-0.929; p = 0.024) and implant reconstruction (AHR, 0.538; 95% CI, 0.339-0.853; p = 0.008) improved OS in patients >60 years of age. The survival prediction model quantified the survival benefits of TNBC patients undergoing different surgeries. Moreover, the C-indexes showed the good predictive ability of the nomograms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that for TNBC patients, there is a survival benefit of immediate postmastectomy reconstruction compared with mastectomy alone. Among them, implant reconstruction has the most obvious advantage.

Impact of Local Breast Cancer Recurrence on Reconstructed Breast in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction

The impact of locally recurrent breast cancer on reconstructed breasts remains largely unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of reconstruction loss due to local recurrence in patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction for breast cancer and to identify potential recurrence-associated risk factors for loss of index reconstruction. The records of 1,696 patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction between March 2003 and December 2016 at a single institution were reviewed. Among them, 128 patients with local breast cancer recurrence as the first event were analyzed. The primary outcome was loss of reconstruction due to local breast cancer recurrence. Reconstruction loss was classified as partial flap loss with breast distortion, complete flap loss, or implant loss during salvage treatment of local recurrence. Reconstruction loss occurred in 21 of the 128 patients (16%). Reconstruction loss rates were 20% for autologous and 9.5% for implant-based reconstruction (P = 0.204). Multivariate analysis showed that recurrent tumor size > 2.0 cm and multifocal recurrence were independent factors associated with an increased risk of reconstruction loss. Moreover, age ≥ 50 years at the time of recurrence diagnosis, recurrent tumor size > 2.0 cm, and multifocal recurrence were independently associated with complete flap/implant loss in the multivariate analysis. The incidence of reconstruction loss due to local breast cancer recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction was low in this study. Age ≥ 50 years at recurrence diagnosis and the extent of local recurrence independently affected reconstruction loss. To detect recurrence early, careful follow-up through regular ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging at the reconstruction site is important.

Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Oncological safety of different types and timings of PMBR after breast cancer remains controversial. Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes current clinical and shared decision‐making complex. This is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate differences in oncological outcomes after immediate versus delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) for autologous and implant‐based PMBR separately.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and Meta‐analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were followed for data abstraction. Variability in point estimates attributable to heterogeneity was assessed using I²‐statistic. (Loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates, distant metastasis rates, and overall breast cancer recurrence rates were pooled in generalized linear mixed models using random effects.

Results

Fifty‐five studies, evaluating 14,217 patients, were included. When comparing immediate versus delayed autologous PMBR, weighted average proportions were: 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.03) versus 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.04), respectively, for local recurrences, 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.03) versus 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.03) for regional recurrences, and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.03–0.06) versus 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00–0.03) for locoregional recurrences. No statistically significant differences in weighted average proportions for local, regional and locoregional recurrence rates were observed between immediate and delayed autologous PMBR. Data did not allow comparing weighted average proportions of distant metastases and total breast cancer recurrences after autologous PMBR, and of all outcome measures after implant‐based PMBR.

Conclusions

Delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates compared to immediate autologous PMBR. This study highlights the paucity of strong evidence on breast cancer recurrence after specific types and timings of PMBR.

Lay summery

Oncologic safety of different types and timings of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) remains controversial.

Lack of stratified risk assessment in literature makes clinical and shared decision‐making complex.

This meta‐analysis showed that delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional recurrence rates as immediate autologous PMBR. Data did not allow comparing weighted average proportions of distant metastases and total breast cancer recurrence after autologous PMBR, and of all outcome measures after implant‐based PMBR.

Based on current evidence, oncological concerns do not seem a valid reason to withhold patients from certain reconstructive timings or techniques, and patients should equally be offered all reconstructive options they technically qualify for.

Oncologic safety of different types and timings of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) remains controversial. This meta‐analysis showed that delayed autologous PMBR leads to similar (loco)regional breast cancer recurrence rates compared to immediate autologous PMBR.

Satisfaction with Long-Term Aesthetic and 10 Years Oncologic Outcome following Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with or without Nipple Preservation

Incidence of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomies (RRMs) is increasing. The aim of this study was to compare satisfaction, aesthetic and oncological outcomes in women undergoing RRM with implant-based reconstruction comparing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) (sacrificing the nipple +/− nipple reconstruction). Women who had undergone bilateral RRM between 1997 and 2016 were invited. Aesthetic outcome and nipple symmetry were evaluated using standardized anthropometric measurements. The oncological outcome was assessed at last documented follow up. Ninety-three women (186 breasts) participated, 60 (64.5%) had NSM, 33 (35.5%) SSM. Median time between surgery and participation was 98.4 months (IQR: 61.7−133.9). Of the women, 23/33 (69.7%) who had SSM underwent nipple reconstruction. Nipple projection was shorter in the reconstructed SSM group than the maintained NSM group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall symmetry (p = 0.670), satisfaction regarding nipple preservation (p = 0.257) or overall nipple satisfaction (p = 0.074). There were no diagnoses of breast cancer at a median follow up of 129 months (IQR: 65−160.6). Women who undergo nipple-sparing RRM maintain long-term nipple symmetry. Nipple projection was less maintained after nipple reconstruction. Although satisfaction with the nipples was higher in the NSM group, this did not reach statistical significance. No breast cancers developed after RRM with long-term follow up.

Pregnancy induced hyperplasia of residual breast tissue following risk reducing contralateral mastectomy - simply interesting or a clinically important observation

After a diagnosis of breast cancer women with increased genetic risk often have a risk reducing contralateral mastectomy, and may opt for a nipple or skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. A variable amount of residual breast tissue remains which may substantially increase in volume during pregnancy. Whether this increases later risk of breast cancer is unknown. We describe the clinical details of 3 patients with a history of unilateral breast cancer, including 2 with a BRCA mutation, who developed hyperplasia of residual breast tissue in the 3rd trimester of a later pregnancy. They all had a delayed contralateral risk reducing skin sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Pregnancy occurred some years later. We summarise their management, review the literature and raise questions for discussion. All developed prominent hyperplasia of breast tissue in the 3rd trimester that was clinically obvious asymmetrical breast swelling in the reconstructed contralateral breast. MRI demonstrated substantial breast tissue. The risk of breast cancer, particularly in those at high genetic risk developing in the residual breast tissue is unknown but in view of the volume, breast tissue was excised postpartum. This phenomenon of pregnancy induced hyperplasia of breast tissue after risk reducing mastectomy is not well described .There is residual breast tissue following a risk reducing subcutaneous mastectomy. The risk factors include age and skin flap thickness. MRI can demonstrate the residual breast tissue. Pregnancy induced hyperplasia of residual breast tissue may occur after risk reducing mastectomy with a hypothetical increased risk of subsequent breast cancer.

From modified radical mastectomy to infra-radical mastectomy: a phase I study for surgical de-escalation focusing on pathological analyses

Background

Despite that breast conservative therapy became the standard of care in breast cancer, modified radical mastectomy, a large mutilating surgery, is still required for an important number of patients. In order to improve the quality of life and the psychological aspects of a surgery involving the femininity of woman, we developed a new less invasive procedure called infra-radical mastectomy. It aims to save the neckline of patients by the maintenance of the peripheral skin-fatty flap that constitutes the base for implantation of the breast. This phase I study analyzed the feasibility of this procedure using outcome of anatomo-pathological analyses as primary endpoint.

Methods

Between March 2015 and July 2017, all women with operable breast cancer without signs of lymph node invasion were invited to participate in the study in the 2 participating institutions. After a water-assisted dissection of the peri-glandular space, an enucleation of the breast was performed by a cold knife which represents the infra-radical mastectomy. A peri-glandular re-excision (PGR) of the skin and the fat tissue surrounding the gland was then achieved to obtain an MRM. This PGR underwent a careful pathological examination (10 samples per patient). Moreover, the tissue volume and the skin surface of the PGR were quantified.

Results

A total of 53 patients (median age: 60 years) were prospectively recruited. The pathological analysis of peri-glandular biopsies revealed none residual invasive carcinoma, 1% of biopsies contained focal ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 0.4% atypical hyperplasia corresponding to 4 and 2 patients respectively. These 4 patients with residual DCIS were preoperatively diagnosed with extensive DCIS. On average after an infra-radical mastectomy, 37% of the volume and 53% of the skin surface of a complete modified radical mastectomy were sparred.

Conclusions

The evaluation of biopsies from peri-glandular tissue suggests that infra-radical mastectomy should be further evaluated except for patients diagnosed with extensive DCIS which must be excluded of this infra-radical approach. Additional work is needed to evaluate cosmetic outcome and impact on quality of life, the need of radiotherapy and the oncological long-term outcome.

Pattern of local recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Background

This study aimed to describe the locations of local recurrences based on the mastectomy and reconstruction type in breast cancer patients.

Methods

In November 2020, a systematic literature review was performed through MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Centre Register of Controlled Trials. Publications that included skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction and described the location of local recurrences were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included salvage or prophylactic mastectomy, unclear distinction between local and regional recurrences, rare tumor types.

Results

From 19 publications, 272 local recurrences lesions were reported in a total of 4,787 patients. After autologous reconstruction (n=2,465), local recurrences were located in the skin in 45 (1.8%) patients, in the chest wall in 18 (0.7%), and in the nipple-areolar complex in 9 (0.4%). After implant reconstruction (n=1,917), local recurrences sites included the skin in 91 (4.7%) patients, chest wall in 8 (0.4%), and nipple-areolar complex in 8 (0.4%). Of the 70 lesions with reported in-breast location, 57 (81.4%) relapsed in the original tumor location.

Discussion

Although meta-analysis was not conducted, present analysis demonstrated that most local recurrences after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy occurred within the skin or subcutaneous tissues. It was found that the original tumor location was the most frequent site of relapse. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the original tumor overlying the skin while planning postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Extensive Microsurgical Reconstruction of Chest Wall Defects for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A 10-Year Single-Unit Experience

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the early detection of breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) involving the chest wall exists in developing countries. Surgical resection remains a controversial management option. This study aims to demonstrate the value of chest wall reconstructive techniques for large LABC defects and report long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a 10-years single-unit experience in the reconstruction of large defects (>300 cm). From 2007 to 2017, all LABC cases managed with large surgical resection with immediate microsurgical chest wall reconstruction were included in this study. Herein, we present the demographics, comorbidities, clinicopathological LABC characteristics, surgical techniques (free flap choice, recipient vessels), and outcomes (survival, complication, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction).

RESULTS

Of the 104 LABC cases, free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap was performed in 41 (39.4%) cases, free anterolateral thigh flap in 5 (4.8%), free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator combined with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in 23 (22.1%), free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap in 30 (28.9%), and free transverse upper gracilis flap in 5 (4.8%). Complications were low. Over a median follow-up of 49.5 months, the 3-year local recurrence rate and distant metastasis-free survival were 13.9% and 84.9%, respectively. In addition, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 84.2% and 92.0%, respectively. The rate of excellent and good ratings by the esthetic assessment panel was 83.0%, and the patient satisfaction rate was 90.0%.

CONCLUSION

Wide resection and microvascular free tissue transfer is oncologically safe in LABC with huge tumors and provides versatile solutions for the reconstruction of extensive chest wall defects. With favorable long-term survival and cosmetic outcomes, surgical resection of LABC combined with flap reconstruction may offer a practical approach in difficult and complicated cases.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In this retrospective review, it was demonstrated that wide resection followed by distinct chest wall reconstructive free flaps transfer is oncologically safe in LABC with huge tumors and provides useful solutions for the reconstruction of extensive chest wall defects.

Latissimus Dorsi flap enhancement by lipofilling as an immediate breast reconstruction technique for skin-preserving mastectomy

AIM

To evaluate Latissimus Dorsi flap (LD) enhancement by lipofilling as an immediate breast reconstruction technique, for skin-preserving mastectomy regarding oncological safety, fat graft resorption after radiotherapy, and patients' satisfaction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study that included female patients complaining of breast cancer. Patients were subjected to skin-preserving mastectomy associated with Latissimus Dorsi flap enhancement by lipofilling using the multisite, and multilayer fat grafting technique of injection. Patients were followed up for early and late postoperative complications including recurrence. Volumetric CT was performed before and after the radiotherapy to detect the percentage of fat resorption. Postoperative patients' satisfaction was assessed using the Kyungpook National University Hospital (KNUH) Breast Reconstruction Satisfaction Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The study included 25 female patients with a mean age of 36.48 ± 5.87 years. The mean period of follow-up was 30.32 ± 5.82 months. Local recurrence was encountered in 1 patient (4%). The mean volume reduction of the injected fat graft was 27.36 ± 8.58%. Twenty-three patients (92%) declared their satisfaction after the operation, one of them was satisfied only after she underwent a second session of lipofilling.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin-preserving mastectomy with the enhancement of the LD by lipofilling for immediate reconstruction of the breast seems to be a safe and simple technique for the achievement of autologous breast reconstruction. It has an acceptance rate of locoregional recurrence and minor postoperative complications. The procedure showed high postoperative patients' satisfaction and a reasonable percentage of fat resorption as confirmed by volumetric CT imaging techniques.

Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding adequacy of margins after mastectomy. To determine if pathological margin proximity is associated with local (LR) or distant recurrence after mastectomy for early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to 2019 and meta-analysis was conducted. Unpublished data were sought from authors (PROSPERO (CRD42019127541)). Thirty-four studies comprising 34,833 breast cancer patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eligible studies reported on patients undergoing curative mastectomy for cancer allowing estimation of outcomes in relation to margin status/width. The association between pathological margin status and local (LR) and distant recurrence was considered using random effects modelling. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Positive margins were associated with increased LR on multivariable analyses (HR, 2·64, (95%CI 2·01-3·46)) and LR was higher regardless of the distance of tumour from the margin defined as positive. After skin-sparing mastectomy, positive margins were associated with increased LR (HR 3·40, (95%CI 1·9-6·2)). In the 4 studies reporting distant recurrence, patients with involved margins had a higher risk (HR 1·53, (95%CI 1·03-2·25)).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve clear margins after mastectomy may increase the risks of local and distant recurrence. Adequate margin clearance should be recommended to minimize recurrence after mastectomy in National and International Guidelines.

Location and Frequency of Residual Breast Tissue after Mastectomy

Introduction

Residual breast tissue after mastectomy is a problem since breast cancer can arise from it. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and location of residual breast tissue following modified radical mastectomy.

Methods

111 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy were enrolled in this study. During surgery, after removal of the breast tissue and before skin closure, a 1-cm² tissue sample was obtained from each quadrant under the skin flaps. These samples were evaluated histopathologically for the presence of any residual breast tissue.

Results

Residual breast tissue was detected in the tissue samples of 12/111 (10.8%) patients. 4 of these patients had residual breast tissue in all 4 quadrants. 6 patients had residual tissue in a single quadrant. With 9 positive biopsy results, the upper medial quadrant was the most frequently involved location. The other quadrants had 6 positive biopsy results each. At the end of a median of 20 months of follow-up, none of these patients developed breast cancer recurrences.

Conclusion

Mastectomy has a high probability of residual breast tissue being left behind. Physicians should be aware of this and act accordingly when planning surgical or follow-up treatment.

Breast cancer recurrence after reconstruction: know thine enemy

Breast reconstruction proceeding cancer treatment carries risk, regardless of the type of surgery. From fat grafting, to flap placement, to implants, there is no guarantee that reconstruction will not stimulate breast cancer recurrence. Research in this field is clearly divided into two parts: scientific interventional studies and clinical retrospective evidence. The reconstructive procedure offers hypoxia, a wound microenvironment, bacterial load, adipose derived stem cells; agents shown experimentally to cause increased cancer cell activity. This is compelling scientific evidence which serves to bring uncertainty and fear to the reconstructive procedure. In the absence of clinical evidence, this laboratory literature landscape is now informing surgical choices. Curiously, clinical studies have not shown a clear link between breast cancer recurrence and reconstructive surgery. Where does that leave us? This review aims to analyze the science and the surgery, thereby understanding the oncological fear which accompanies breast cancer reconstruction.

The role of PET and MRI in evaluating the feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy

Objective To investigate the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating the feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with locally-advanced breast cancer (LABC) who will undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of PET and MRI compared with skin biopsy results before and after NAC treatment. Methods Patients with LABC who were treated with NAC between November 2013 and November 2015 were included in this study. Demographic, clinical, radiological and histopathological features of the patients were recorded. Results A total of 30 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 52.6 years (range, 35-70 years). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting skin involvement in LABC was 100%/10% (62%/85%) with MRI and 60%/80% (12%/92%) with PET before (after) NAC, respectively. When radiological skin involvement was assessed in relation to the final histopathological results, the preNAC PET results and histopathological skin involvement were not significantly different; and there was no difference between postNAC MRI and histopathological skin involvement. Conclusions As preNAC PET and postNAC MRI more accurately determined skin involvement, it might be possible to use these two radiological evaluation methods together to assess patient suitability for skin-sparing mastectomy in selected patients.

Modern Approaches to the Surgical Management of Malignant Breast Disease: The Role of Breast Conservation, Complete Mastectomy, Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

The armamentarium of the modern breast surgeon includes the time-tested procedures of modified radical mastectomy and lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy with postoperative radiation, but has evolved to include several options that produce excellent oncologic endpoints and improved cosmesis. These options include skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction as well as oncoplastic procedures that allow larger excisions and better postoperative breast shape. This article provides an overview of these modern surgical approaches for breast cancer treatment.

Positive Margin Re-Excision Following Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Morbidity, Cosmetic Outcome, and Oncologic Significance

BACKGROUND

Acquisition of negative resection margins is paramount in the surgical management of operable breast cancer. Management of positive margins following mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction is presently poorly defined.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims at defining morbidity and cosmetic sequela of re-excision procedures aimed at clearing involved mastectomy margins in the setting of immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Oncologic outcomes are recorded.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients that underwent skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction was performed. Patients found to have positive mastectomy margins underwent margin re-excision during a separate procedure. Method of positive margin exposure and resection is described. Flap morbidity and cosmetic outcome following margin re-excision was compared between reconstructed breasts that underwent re-excision vs those reconstructed after prophylactic mastectomy (controls). Cancer recurrence was recorded during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (2.5%) out of 1443 patients were found to have positive mastectomy margins following immediate breast reconstruction between May 2007 and November 2012. Location of positive margins was evenly distributed in all breast regions. Although flap morbidity was similar, a trend (P > 0.05) toward higher seroma formation and fat necrosis was reported in breasts following re-excision vs controls. With a mean follow-up period of 28 months, cosmetic outcome between breasts that underwent re-excision vs controls were similar. Cancer recurrence was reported in 3 (8.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-excision of positive mastectomy margins following immediate autologous breast reconstruction requires a multidisciplinary approach and may be performed with minimal additional morbidity while preserving optimal cosmetic outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Intradermal invasive lobular carcinoma presenting: Not everything in the skin is benign

In this case report, the history and imaging of two patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in the skin are presented, followed by a discussion of both benign and malignant intradermal findings on breast ultrasound. Although the majority of dermal findings are benign, these cases are a reminder that malignancy can manifest within the skin. The purpose of presenting these cases together is to remind breast imagers of the importance of considering malignancy in the differential diagnosis of intradermal lesions on breast ultrasound, especially in special circumstances such as a personal history of breast cancer or associated clinical findings.

Trends in breast cancer surgery at Brazil's public health system

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To analyze time trend patterns in Breast Cancer (BC) surgeries performed at Brazil's Public Health System, known as SUS from 2008 to 2014.

METHODS

Ecological study of time series, based on the database system from SUS. Information on surgical procedures performed for BC treatment was collected. Analysis of the absolute number of surgeries was performed using Poisson Regression through Jointpoint Regression, and the trends were calculated through the annual percentage change (APC), with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%, and statistical significance when P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Data analysis from 193.596 breast surgeries revealed a reduced number of simple mastectomies (APC -4.4%; CI -7.4 to -1.4; P < 0.05); stable trends in radical mastectomy with lymphadenectomy (APC -1.0%; CI -2.4 to 0.5; P = 0.1) and breast conserving surgery (APC 0.4%; CI -1.6 to 2.4; P = 0.6). Also, we observed a reduced number of axillary lymphadenectomy dissection (APC -16.8%; CI -26.8 to -5.4; P < 0.05); increased trends in breast reconstruction with implants after 2011 (APC 9.1%; CI 0.1-18.8; P < 0.05) and with flaps after 2012 (APC 61.3%; CI 41.3-84.0; P < 0.05). The overall rate of patients with breast reconstruction increased from 15% in 2008 to 29.2% in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant increase in breast reconstruction in public health system in Brazil, and also a reduction in simple mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy.

Immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction is associated with improved cancer-specific survival in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study of stage III (locally advanced) breast cancer patients evaluated the survival improvement conferred by immediate breast reconstruction by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in comparison with MRM alone.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data for all women who had received TRAM immediately after unilateral modified radical mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer at a single institution from January 2002 to December 2009. The analysis included 192 patients divided into 2 groups: patients who had received MRM immediately followed by TRAM flap reconstruction (MRM-TRAM group, n=52) and patients who had received MRM alone (MRM group, n=140). Data collection included demographic characteristics, underlying comorbidities, and cancer characteristics. Postoperative adjuvant therapies, oncologic outcomes, and survival were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier plots, univariate log-rank test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, and t-test were used to evaluate potential predictors of cancer recurrence and patient survival.

RESULTS

In comparison with the MRM group, significant differences in the MRM-TRAM group included a younger mean age, a better overall health status, and a higher education level (all P<0.001). Severity of breast cancer disease did not significantly differ in terms of cancer characteristics. Additionally, there were no significant differences in local recurrence (P=0.326) and distant metastasis (P=0.338). Immediate breast reconstruction was not associated with delays in detection of local recurrence and initiation of adjuvant therapiesThe 5-year breast cancer-specific survival rate was significantly higher in the MRM-TRAM group (84.6%) compared with the MRM group (61.2%) (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that TRAM flap reconstruction is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer patients. The MRM-TRAM group had a significantly lower hazard of death (HR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.070-0.788; P=0.019) compared with the MRM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate TRAM flap reconstruction is oncologically safe and is unassociated with delayed adjuvant therapies or delayed detection of local recurrence. Patients with locally advanced breast cancer can be considered appropriate candidates for TRAM flap reconstruction because the procedure is an independent predictor of breast cancer survival and is associated with a 76.5% decrease (HR, 0.235) in the risk of cancer death.

Effect of delayed autologous breast reconstruction on breast cancer recurrence and survival

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the impact of delayed autologous breast reconstruction on disease relapse in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was based on 503 consecutive patients younger than 70 years of age who underwent mastectomy between January 2000 and December 2003. Overall, 391 (78 %) received mastectomy alone and 112 (22 %) underwent a delayed breast reconstruction. The median time from mastectomy to delayed breast reconstruction was 34 months. The median duration of follow-up was 102 months.

RESULTS

There were no locoregional recurrences (LRR) in patients who underwent delayed reconstruction (0.0 %); 21 LRR developed in patients treated with mastectomy only (5.4 %), P = 0.011. Distant metastases occurred less frequently in the reconstruction group (12.5 %) than in the patients who underwent mastectomy alone (21.5 %); P = 0.0343. The 8-year breast cancer specific survival in the reconstruction group was 98.2 and 85.7 % for the mastectomy only group, P = 0.000.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed autologous breast reconstruction does not appear to adversely influence disease progression when compared to patients treated with mastectomy only.

Effect of implant vs. tissue reconstruction on cancer specific survival varies by axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To compare the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between patients who underwent tissue or implant reconstruction after mastectomy.

METHOD

We used the database from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries and compared the BCSS between patients who underwent tissue and implant reconstruction after mastectomy. Cox-regression models were fitted, adjusting for known clinicopathological features. The interaction between the reconstruction types (tissue/implant) and nodal status (N-stage) was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 6,426 patients with a median age of 50 years were included. With a median follow up of 100 months, the 10-year cumulative BCSS and non-BCSS were 85.1% and 95.4%, respectively. Patients who underwent tissue reconstruction had tumors with a higher T-stage, N-stage, and tumor grade and tended to be ER/PR-negative compared to those who received implant reconstruction. In univariate analysis, implant-reconstruction was associated with a 2.4% increase (P = 0.003) in the BCSS compared with tissue-reconstruction. After adjusting for significant risk factors of the BCSS (suggested by univariate analysis) and stratifying based on the N-stage, there was only an association between the reconstruction type and the BCSS for the N2-3 patients (10-year BCSS of implant vs. tissue-reconstruction: 68.7% and 59.0%, P = 0.004). The 10-year BCSS rates of implant vs. tissue-reconstruction were 91.7% and 91.8% in N0 patients (P>0.05) and 84.5% and 84.4% in N1 patients (P>0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The implant (vs. tissue) reconstruction after mastectomy was associated with an improved BCSS in N2-3 breast cancer patients but not in N0-1 patients. A well-designed, prospective study is needed to further confirm these findings.

Cannula-Assisted Flap Elevation (CAFE): a novel technique for developing flaps during skin-sparing mastectomies

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging procedures in breast surgery is the skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). Various techniques and incisions have evolved that characterize this procedure; however, what is common in all of them is the smaller the incision, the more difficult it is to develop the skin flaps.

METHODS

A procedure was developed that incorporates the use of liposuction cannulas (without suction) to create the skin flaps. The technique and results are described in this manuscript.

RESULTS

From October of 2012 to April 2014, 289 mastectomies (171 patients) were performed using the CAFE procedure on women of all shapes and sizes. Postoperatively, no problems were experienced with flap viability using this technique. The main difference in side effects between the CAFE technique and other standard techniques for developing flaps in SSMs was more bruising than normal, but this resolved rapidly. The results for use of this technique were consistently impressive. The learning curve for this procedure is very short, especially for those who perform SSMs using sharp technique (scissors). Residents and fellows became proficient with the CAFE technique in a relatively short amount of time. Plastic surgeons were pleased with the cosmetic outcomes of their reconstructions that follow this type of mastectomy. Patients were extremely satisfied with their reconstructions as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating the use of liposuction cannulas (without suction) makes the creation of flaps for SSM a relatively simple and rapid method. It is especially useful to assist in developing skin flaps with even the smallest of skin incisions.

Fat grafting in immediate breast reconstruction. Avoiding breast sequelae

BACKGROUND

The remarkable increase that breast-conserving surgery has been experiencing throughout the last decades is as much undeniable as the imposition of the immediate reconstruction as the gold-standard treatment regarding breast reconstruction. Nevertheless, these trends conflict since we do not have a satisfactory immediate reconstruction method for breast-conserving surgery. This work shows the technique we have developed to solve this problem through autologous fat grafting ensuring the same oncological safety.

METHODS

We present the preliminary results of 37 immediate reconstructions of lumpectomies and quadrantectomies through autologous fat grafting of lumpectomies. Patients have been chosen by a multidisciplinary committee following special criteria based on their low-risk pathology, having undergone different diagnostic tests previous to the resection and 1 year postoperative monitoring by qualified observers. Also, a satisfaction survey has been performed.

RESULTS

In all cases studied, with a year follow-up, we found excellent aesthetic outcomes with no presence of the feared scar retractions and deformities, even after radiotherapy. According to patient surveys, the satisfaction rate was also very high. No important complications, either acute or chronic, have been observed from the implementation of this technique.

CONCLUSION

This is a useful, innovative technique, having good aesthetic results, decreasing the incidence of aesthetic sequelae, commonly seen in simple lumpectomies without reconstruction. The complication rate is low, and oncological safety is not compromised.

Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness

Background

There is a limited evidence base to guide surgeons on the ideal thickness of skin flaps during mastectomy. Here the literature relevant to optimizing mastectomy skin flap thickness is reviewed, including anatomical studies, oncological considerations, factors affecting viability, and the impact of surgical technique and adjuvant therapies.

Methods

A MEDLINE search was performed using the search terms ‘mastectomy’ and ‘skin flap’ or ‘flap thickness’. Titles and abstracts from peer-reviewed publications were screened for relevance.

Results

A subcutaneous layer of variable thickness that contains minimal breast epithelium lies between the dermis and breast tissue. The thickness of this layer may vary within and between breasts, and does not appear to be associated with obesity or age. The existence of a distinct layer of superficial fascia in the breast remains controversial and may be present in only up to 56 per cent of patients. When present, it may not be visible macroscopically, and can contain islands of breast tissue. As skin flap necrosis occurs in approximately 5 per cent of patients, a balance must be sought between removing all breast tissue at mastectomy and leaving reliably viable skin flaps.

Conclusion

The variable and unpredictable thickness of the breast subcutaneous layer means that a single specific universal thickness for mastectomy skin flaps cannot be recommended. It may be that the plane between the subdermal fat and breast parenchyma is a reasonable guide for mastectomy flap thickness, but this may not always correspond to a subcutaneous fascial layer.

Recurrent breast cancer in the subpectoral space after implant reconstruction

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is most commonly performed with a prosthetic implant placed beneath the pectoralis major. Recurrence may rarely be identified in the subpectoral space where the implant was placed. We report a case of recurrent breast cancer after implant-based reconstruction with isolated subpectoral recurrence discovered 5 years later during secondary revision of her reconstructed breast.

Surgical and oncological outcome after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

We present clinical outcomes after SSM in operable breast cancer especially in light of increased diagnoses of in situ disease after screening and increased usage of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in recent years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Case records of 81 patients who had SSM for cancer over 4 years (April 2006-July 2010) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (median age, 51.7 years; range, 31.5-66.1 years) had 82 SSMs with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) (59 implant-based; 23 latissimus dorsi flap). Median tumor size was 22 mm (range, 1-86 mm) including in situ disease, and tumor types were invasive (n = 48) and noninvasive (n = 34). Median clearance margin was 5 mm (range, 0-45 mm). Sentinel node was positive in 15 SSM (19.5%) excluding 5 in pure in situ disease. Median Nottingham prognostic index was 3.54 (range, 2.1-6.98), 84% were estrogen receptor-positive (pure in situ, 70.6%), and 8.5% were HER2-positive. Radiotherapy to breast was given to 17.1% of patients and 37.8% of patients received hormone therapy (tamoxifen, 24.4%; upfront AI, 4.9%; switch regime, 8.5% [ie, tamoxifen to exemestane at 2 years). Eight patients (9.6%) had infection/wound healing problems with loss of implant in 3 (3.6%). At median follow-up of 23.9 months (range, 9-64), there was 1 local with systemic (liver) and 1 SR only (brain and liver) after invasive disease with median disease-free survival of 24.4 months (range, 6.1-61.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite less use of AIs in our series, the local recurrence (2%) and SR (4%) rates were less than reported in the literature for invasive tumors. This suggests that SSM provides opportunity for enhanced esthetic outcome with IBR without compromise of the local oncological safety compared with conventional simple mastectomy.

[Oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction: rate and localization of recurrences, and impact of reconstruction techniques]

INTRODUCTION

Oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction is widely debated. Current evidence is relatively poor since it is based mostly on short-term follow-up data of highly selected patient populations.

AIM

Recurrence rates of a large cohort of non-selected patients, i. e. "all-comers" were analyzed during a 10-year follow up.

METHODS

Patient records and follow-up data of 253 consecutive cases treated with of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction between 1995 and 2000 were studied. During this time period "all-comers" policy was applied, which meant that all patients treated with mastectomy were offered immediate breast reconstruction regardless of tumour stage.

RESULTS

"All-comers" approach resulted in a large proportion of patients with more advanced disease. During the 112 months mean follow-up 8.2% locoregional, 2.9% local, 10.6% distal and 18.8% overall recurrence rates were detected. Breast cancer specific survival rate was 90.9%. Autologous breast reconstruction was applied more frequently in patients with higher tumour stage; therefore recurrence rate was higher compared to patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Based on these long-term follow-up data skin-sparing mastectomy combined with immediate breast reconstruction is an oncologically safe treatment option. Therefore, application of "all-comers" policy for breast cancer patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction is feasible.

Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a review

AIMS

Skin Sparing Mastectomy (SSM) is widely practised now in major centres which manage large numbers of breast cancer but anxiety still exists over the safety of SSM both from oncological and aesthetic points of view. We aim to review literature to date in SSM and summarise and discuss the current evidence.

METHODS

Studies were identified by an online search of the English language literature in the PubMed database till April 2012 followed by an extensive review of bibliographies from relevant articles.

RESULTS

There is abundance of evidence with regards to the safety of SSM both oncologically and aesthetically especially in immediate breast reconstruction. The use of SSM technique broadens the repertoire of oncoplastic techniques and at the same time facilitates such techniques by preserving patient's native skin and anatomical landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

SSM is a safe technique providing better cosmetic outcome without compromising oncological safety as per the current evidence. However, prospective data collection of its application in various newer types of reconstructions, and continuing long-term follow-up of current data series would be prudent to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

To identify risk factors of recurrence in a large series of patients with breast cancer who underwent a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Breast-related recurrences and local recurrences (LR) in the breast and the nipple areola complex (NAC) were studied. Cumulative incidences of events were estimated through competing risk analysis. Multivariate Cox regression models were also applied.

RESULTS

We identified 934 consecutive NSM patients during 2002-2007. Median follow-up was 50 months. In 772 invasive carcinoma patients, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. In the 162 patients with intraepithelial neoplasia, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 4.9% and 2.9%, respectively. The significant risk factors of LR in the breast for the group A were grade, overexpression/amplification of HER2/neu and breast cancer molecular subtype Luminal B. In group B, the risk factors of LR in the breast and in the NAC were age (<45 years), absence of estrogen receptors, grade, HER2/neu overexpression and high Ki-67.

CONCLUSIONS

The LR rate after NSM in our series was low. Biological features of disease and young age should be taken into account when considering NSM in breast cancer patients.

Surgical margins and the risk of local-regional recurrence after mastectomy without radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Although positive surgical margins are generally associated with a higher risk of local-regional recurrence (LRR) for most solid tumors, their significance after mastectomy remains unclear. We sought to clarify the influence of the mastectomy margin on the risk of LRR.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The retrospective cohort consisted of 397 women who underwent mastectomy and no radiation for newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer from 1998-2005. Time to isolated LRR and time to distant metastasis (DM) were evaluated by use of cumulative-incidence analysis and competing-risks regression analysis. DM was considered a competing event for analysis of isolated LRR.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 0.5-12.8 years). The superficial margin was positive in 41 patients (10%) and close (≤2 mm) in 56 (14%). The deep margin was positive in 23 patients (6%) and close in 34 (9%). The 5-year LRR and DM rates for all patients were 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.9-4.0) and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 1.6-5.3) respectively. Fourteen patients had an LRR. Margin status was significantly associated with time to isolated LRR (P=.04); patients with positive margins had a 5-year LRR of 6.2%, whereas patients with close margins and negative margins had 5-year LRRs of 1.5% and 1.9%, respectively. On univariate analysis, positive margins, positive nodes, lymphovascular invasion, grade 3 histology, and triple-negative subtype were associated with significantly higher rates of LRR. When these factors were included in a multivariate analysis, only positive margins and triple-negative subtype were associated with the risk of LRR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with positive mastectomy margins had a significantly higher rate of LRR than those with a close or negative margin. However, the absolute risk of LRR in patients with a positive surgical margin in this series was low, and therefore the benefit of postmastectomy radiation in this population with otherwise favorable features is likely to be small.

Compromised margins following mastectomy for stage I-III invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated factors associated with positive margins following mastectomy and the impact on outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 240 patients with stage I-III invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from 1999 to 2009. Data included patient and tumor characteristics, pathologic margin assessment, and outcomes. Margin positivity was defined as the presence of in situ or invasive malignancy at any margin. Descriptive statistics were used for data summary and were compared using χ(2).

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients, 132 (55%) had a simple mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy and 108 (45%) had a modified radical mastectomy. Overall, 21 patients (9%) had positive margins, including 12 (57%) with one positive margin, 3 (14%) with two positive margins, and 6 (29%) with three or more positive margins. The most commonly affected margin was the deep margin (48% of patients). Eight of the 21 patients (38%) received adjuvant chest wall irradiation. There were no differences between patients who had a positive margin and those who did not with respect to patient age, race, percentage of in situ component, tumor size, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, or immunostain profile (P > 0.05 for all). None of the patients with positive margins experienced a local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive margins following mastectomy occurred in nearly 10% of our patients. No specific patient or tumor characteristics predicted a risk for having a positive margin. Despite the finding that only approximately 40% of patients received adjuvant radiation in the setting of a positive margin, no local recurrences have been observed.

Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is debated owing to a presumed compromise in the completeness of mastectomy. Current evidence is poor as it is based mostly on short-term follow-up data from highly selected patients.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was searched to identify patients who underwent SSM and IBR between 1995 and 2000. A retrospective review of medical records was carried out, including only patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. During this time all patients treated with mastectomy were offered IBR regardless of tumour stage.

RESULTS

Follow-up data from 253 consecutive patients with IBR were reviewed. Patients with incomplete follow-up data and those undergoing SSM for recurrent disease following previous lumpectomy were disregarded, leaving 207 for analysis. Offering IBR to all women requiring mastectomy resulted in a large proportion of patients with advanced disease. During a median follow-up of 119 months, 17 (8·2 per cent) locoregional, six (2·9 per cent) local and 22 (10·6 per cent) distant recurrences were detected; the overall recurrence rate was 39 (18·8 per cent). Overall recurrence rate was associated with axillary lymph node metastasis (P = 0·009), higher stage (P < 0·001) and higher tumour grade (P = 0·031). The breast cancer-specific survival rate was 90·8 per cent (19 of 207 women died from recurrence).

CONCLUSION

Based on these long-term follow-up data, SSM combined with IBR is an oncologically safe treatment option regardless of tumour stage.

A single institution experience with skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Skin sparing mastectomies (SSMs) represent a surgical approach that preserves the natural skin envelope of the breast and, when combined with immediate reconstruction, offers a good cosmetic outcome. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the risk of local recurrence (LR) in this series with the known rate of recurrence following a conventional mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with breast cancer who underwent an SSM and immediate breast reconstruction over a 6-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

A follow-up of more than eight years showed that three patients (2.78%) had developed LR.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of LR is low with SSMs and is comparable to that seen with conventional mastectomies.

Lesions of the skin and superficial tissue at breast MR imaging

Although numerous studies have outlined the benefits of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of breast parenchymal findings, the assessment of lesions of the skin and superficial tissue at breast MR imaging has largely been overlooked. Such lesions, both benign and malignant, are commonly encountered at breast MR imaging, and their detection and diagnosis are often imperative. These lesions include superficial, locally extensive, inflammatory, and recurrent breast cancers; iatrogenic changes; sebaceous cysts; and less prevalent diseases such as granulomatous mastitis and angiosarcomas, among others. As MR imaging continues to be used with increasing frequency in both the screening and diagnostic settings, these lesions will be encountered more often; consequently, a better understanding of which lesions may be ignored and which require further evaluation will become increasingly important. Frequently, MR imaging alone may not clearly indicate the cause of lesions of the breast skin and superficial tissue. However, radiologists should thoroughly assess such lesions, taking into consideration the spectrum of possible causes. Mammography, ultrasonography, consultation with clinicians or dermatologists regarding physical examination findings, and, when necessary, correlation with pathologic findings in biopsy specimens may be used in conjunction with MR imaging to establish both the importance of these lesions and their definitive diagnoses.