Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue

INTRODUCTION

Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences.

METHODS

TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment.

RESULTS

FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4).

CONCLUSION

Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.

The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit

BACKGROUND

The optimal anastomotic techniques in esophagectomy to minimize rates of anastomotic leakage and conduit necrosis are not known. The aim of this study was to assess whether the anastomotic technique was associated with anastomotic failure after esophagectomy in the international Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit cohort.

METHODS

This prospective observational multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer over 9 months during 2018. The primary exposure was the anastomotic technique, classified as handsewn, linear stapled, or circular stapled. The primary outcome was anastomotic failure, namely a composite of anastomotic leakage and conduit necrosis, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify the association between anastomotic techniques and anastomotic failure, after adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 2238 esophagectomies, the anastomosis was handsewn in 27.1%, linear stapled in 21.0%, and circular stapled in 51.9%. Anastomotic techniques differed significantly by the anastomosis sites (P < .001), with the majority of neck anastomoses being handsewn (69.9%), whereas most chest anastomoses were stapled (66.3% circular stapled and 19.3% linear stapled). Rates of anastomotic failure differed significantly among the anastomotic techniques (P < .001), from 19.3% in handsewn anastomoses, to 14.0% in linear stapled anastomoses, and 12.1% in circular stapled anastomoses. This effect remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors on multivariable analysis, with an odds ratio of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = .004) for circular stapled versus handsewn anastomosis. However, subgroup analysis by anastomosis site suggested that this effect was predominantly present in neck anastomoses, with anastomotic failure rates of 23.2% versus 14.6% versus 5.9% for handsewn versus linear stapled anastomoses versus circular stapled neck anastomoses, compared with 13.7% versus 13.8% versus 12.2% for chest anastomoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Handsewn anastomoses appear to be independently associated with higher rates of anastomotic failure compared with stapled anastomoses. However, this effect seems to be largely confined to neck anastomoses, with minimal differences between techniques observed for chest anastomoses. Further research into standardization of anastomotic approach and techniques may further improve outcomes.

Systematic review of sarcopenia in chronic pancreatitis: prevalence, impact on surgical outcomes, and survival

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterized by progressive inflammatory changes to the pancreas, leading to loss of endocrine and exocrine function. Emerging literature suggests sarcopenia may adversely affect outcomes for chronic pancreatitis patients. This systematic review examines the evidence surrounding the impact of sarcopenia on patients with CP.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE (via PUBMED), Cochrane and EMBASE databases was undertaken to identify articles describing body composition assessment in patients with CP. Data collected included definitions of sarcopenia, sarcopenia assessment methodology, baseline demographics, surgical outcomes, and short- and long-term outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

In total, nine studies reported on 977 patients with a sarcopenia prevalence of 32.3% (95% CI 22.9-42.6%). CT remains the primary modality to assess for sarcopenia, due to ease of access. None of the studies reporting on post-operative outcomes for patients with chronic pancreatitis found a significant increase in complications among those with sarcopenia. Mortality within 1 year in the outpatient setting from one study of patients with CP was 16% in sarcopenic patients versus 3% (HR: 6.69 (95% CI: 1.79-24.9), p < 0.001) in those with no sarcopenia.Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with CP occurring in approximately a third of patients. Sarcopenia is associated with an adverse impact on long-term survival.

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

Background

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.

Methods

This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.

Results

Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.

Conclusion

The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.

Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study

Background

Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting.

Methods

Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.).

Results

Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter ‘no major postoperative complication’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P &lt; 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome.

Conclusion

Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.

Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.).

RESULTS

Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome.

CONCLUSION

Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.

O-OGC08 The Impact of Anastomotic Techniques on Post-operative Anastomotic Complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA)

Background

The optimal anastomotic techniques in esophagectomy to minimize rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) are not known. The aim of this study was to assess whether anastomotic technique is associated with anastomotic failure after esophagectomy in the international Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) cohort.

Methods

This prospective observational multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer over nine months in 2018. The primary exposure was the anastomotic technique, classified as handsewn, linear stapled or circular stapled. The primary outcome was a composite of AL and CN, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify the strength of association between anastomotic techniques and anastomotic failure.

Results

Of the 2238 esophagectomies, the anastomosis was handsewn in 27.1%, linear stapled in 21.0% and circular stapled in 51.9%. Anastomotic techniques differed significantly between the anastomosis site (p &lt; 0.001), with the majority of neck anastomoses being handsewn (69.9%), whilst most chest anastomoses were stapled (66.3% circular stapled, 19.3% linear stapled). Rates of AL/CN differed significantly between the anastomotic techniques (p &lt; 0.001), from 19.3% in handsewn anastomoses, to 14.0% in linear stapled, and 12.1% in circular stapled. This was confirmed by multivariable analysis (Odds ratio (OR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.86) for circular stapled vs. handsewn anastomosis. However, subgroup analysis by anastomosis site suggested that this effect was predominantly present in neck anastomoses, with AL/CN rates of 23.2% vs. 14.6% vs 5.9% for handsewn vs. linear stapled anastomoses vs circular stapled, compared to 13.7% vs. 13.8% vs 12.2% in chest anastomoses.

Conclusions

Handsewn anastomoses appear to be associated with higher rates of anastomotic failure for anastomoses in the neck. However, anastomotic failure rates in the chest were similar across techniques and there was no significant difference on multivariable analysis. Further research into standardization of approach and techniques may further improve outcomes.

P-BN40 Fundoplication following lung transplant: A retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in patients receiving a lung transplant has been associated with worsened graft function and decreased survival. This analysis aimed to identify whether fundoplication following lung transplant can improve graft function and overall survival.

Methods

patients undergoing lung transplantation between January 1993 and January 2020 were included. Data on oesophageal pH, manometry testing, post-transplant lung function testing and overall survival were collected. Cox-regression testing was used to analyse associations between oesophageal manometry and pH testing, fundoplication and overall survival.

Results

Of 345 patients who underwent a lung transplant, 20 patients also received fundoplication. 84 patients received oesopageal pH and manometry testing. Abnormal manometry was recorded in 41 patients. Average Demeester score was 28.45 for patients not receiving fundoplication and 37.28 for those receiving fundoplication. Average pre-operative reflux time was 8.6% for those not receiving fundoplication and 10.3% for those receiving fundoplication.

Of 20 fundoplications, 4 were carried out within 1 year of transplant and 12 within 2 years. 1 patient had a post-operative complication following fundoplication. 13 of 20 patients had a positive response to fundoplication, defined as a less than 10% decrease in FEV1 lung function at 2 years. Receiving fundoplication was associated with better overall survival (p = 0.024) as was total reflux time &lt;7% (p = 0.21).

Conclusions

Fundoplication is a safe operation after lung transplant with good outcomes. Fundoplication was associated with better overall survival on cox-regression analysis.

P-P41 Systematic review of Sarcopenia in Chronic Pancreatitis: prevalence, impact on surgical outcomes and survival

Background

Chronic pancreatitis(CP) is characterised by progressive inflammatory changes to the pancreas, leading to loss of endocrine and exocrine function. Emerging literature suggests sarcopenia may adversely affect outcomes for chronic pancreatitis patients. This systematic review examines the evidence surrounding the impact of sarcopenia on patients with CP.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases identified articles describing body composition assessment in patients with CP. Data collected included definitions of sarcopenia, assessment methodology, baseline demographics, surgery related data and short- and long-term outcomes.

Results

9 studies, including 977 patients and a sarcopenia prevalence of 32.3% were included. Alcohol was the predominant aetiology. There was significant heterogeneity in definitions of sarcopenia used. CT was the main modality to assess for sarcopenia in 7 papers, MRI in 2 papers and clinical measurements in 2 papers. 2 papers included patients undergoing total pancreatectomy and Islet cell transplantation. None of the studies found a significant increase in complications with sarcopenia. 1 Year mortality in outpatients from one study of patients with CP was 16% in sarcopenic patients versus 3% (HR:6.69(95%CI:1.79–24.9),p&lt;0.001).

Conclusions

Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with CP and has adverse impact on short- and long-term survival.

Postoperative outcomes in oesophagectomy with trainee involvement

BACKGROUND

The complexity of oesophageal surgery and the significant risk of morbidity necessitates that oesophagectomy is predominantly performed by a consultant surgeon, or a senior trainee under their supervision. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of trainee involvement in oesophagectomy on postoperative outcomes in an international multicentre setting.

METHODS

Data from the multicentre Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group (OGAA) cohort study were analysed, which comprised prospectively collected data from patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April 2018 and December 2018. Procedures were grouped by the level of trainee involvement, and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare patient outcomes across groups.

RESULTS

Of 2232 oesophagectomies from 137 centres in 41 countries, trainees were involved in 29.1 per cent of them (n = 650), performing only the abdominal phase in 230, only the chest and/or neck phases in 130, and all phases in 315 procedures. For procedures with a chest anastomosis, those with trainee involvement had similar 90-day mortality, complication and reoperation rates to consultant-performed oesophagectomies (P = 0.451, P = 0.318, and P = 0.382, respectively), while anastomotic leak rates were significantly lower in the trainee groups (P = 0.030). Procedures with a neck anastomosis had equivalent complication, anastomotic leak, and reoperation rates (P = 0.150, P = 0.430, and P = 0.632, respectively) in trainee-involved versus consultant-performed oesophagectomies, with significantly lower 90-day mortality in the trainee groups (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Trainee involvement was not found to be associated with significantly inferior postoperative outcomes for selected patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The results support continued supervised trainee involvement in oesophageal cancer surgery.

Mortality from esophagectomy for esophageal cancer across low, middle, and high-income countries: An international cohort study

BACKGROUND

No evidence currently exists characterising global outcomes following major cancer surgery, including esophageal cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise impact of high income countries (HIC) versus low and middle income countries (LMIC) on the outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

METHOD

This international multi-center prospective study across 137 hospitals in 41 countries included patients who underwent an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with 90-day follow-up. The main explanatory variable was country income, defined according to the World Bank Data classification. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality, and secondary outcomes were composite leaks (anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III - V). Multivariable generalized estimating equation models were used to produce adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI95%).

RESULTS

Between April 2018 to December 2018, 2247 patients were included. Patients from HIC were more significantly older, with higher ASA grade, and more advanced tumors. Patients from LMIC had almost three-fold increase in 90-day mortality, compared to HIC (9.4% vs 3.7%, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, LMIC were independently associated with higher 90-day mortality (OR: 2.31, CI95%: 1.17-4.55, p = 0.015). However, LMIC were not independently associated with higher rates of anastomotic leaks (OR: 1.06, CI95%: 0.57-1.99, p = 0.9) or major complications (OR: 0.85, CI95%: 0.54-1.32, p = 0.5), compared to HIC.

CONCLUSION

Resections in LMIC were independently associated with higher 90-day postoperative mortality, likely reflecting a failure to rescue of these patients following esophagectomy, despite similar composite anastomotic leaks and major complication rates to HIC. These findings warrant further research, to identify potential issues and solutions to improve global outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer.

The impact of postoperative radiological surveillance intensity on disease free and overall survival from primary retroperitoneal, abdominal and pelvic soft-tissue sarcoma

AIM

This observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of intensity of radiological surveillance on survival following resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary resection of soft tissue sarcoma arising in the retroperitoneum, abdomen or pelvis at a single, high-volume sarcoma centre. Intensity of follow-up regimes up to 5 postoperative years were categorized as 'European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) compliant' (intense), or 'non-ESMO compliant' (less-intense). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measures were disease-free survival (DFS) and reoperation rate. Analyses were stratified by high (grade 2 or 3) or low (grade 1) tumour grade.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, 67.1% had high-grade and 32.9% had low-grade disease. Overall, 40.0% of patients had ESMO-compliant radiological follow-up (high-grade:25.7%, low-grade:66.7%). 41.7% of patients died and 48.2% suffered local or distant recurrence by cessation of follow up. Upon univariable analysis for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliance reduced DFS (p = 0.066) but had no impact on OS. There was no significant difference in the reoperation rate in patients with ESMO-compliant and non-compliant follow-up (p = 0.097). In low-grade tumours, ESMO compliance significantly reduced DFS (p < 0.001), but without effecting OS. In risk-adjusted models for high-grade tumours, ESMO compliant follow-up was associated with reduced OS (HR:3.47, 1.40-8.61, p = 0.007) and no difference in DFS. In low-grade tumours, there was no association between overall ESMO compliance and OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find a benefit for high-intensity radiological surveillance and overall survival in patients undergoing primary resection for high or low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic placement of oesophageal stents may be used in benign oesophageal perforation and oesophageal anastomotic leakage to control sepsis and reduce mortality and morbidity by avoiding thoracotomy. This updated systematic review aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of oesophageal stents in these two scenarios.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of all published studies reporting use of metallic and plastic stents in the management of post-operative anastomotic leaks, spontaneous and iatrogenic oesophageal perforations were identified. Primary outcomes were technical (deploying ≥ 1 stent to occlude site of leakage with no evidence of leakage of contrast within 24-48 h) and clinical success (complete healing of perforation or leakage by placement of single or multiple stents irrespective of whether the stent was left in situ or was removed). Secondary outcomes were stent migration, perforation and erosion, and mortality rates. Subgroup analysis was performed for plastic versus metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately.

RESULTS

A total of 66 studies (n = 1752 patients) were included. Technical and clinical success rates were 96% and 87%, respectively. Plastic stents had significantly higher migration rates (24% vs 16%, p = 0.001) and repositioning (11% vs 3%, p < 0.001) and lower technical success (91% vs 95%, p = 0.032) than metallic stents. In patients with anastomotic leaks, plastic stents were associated with higher stent migration (26% vs 15%, p = 0.034), perforation (2% vs 0%, p = 0.013), repositioning (10% vs 0%, p < 0.001), and lower technical success (95% vs 100%, p = p = 0.002). In patients with perforations only, plastic stents were associated with significantly lower technical success (85% vs 99%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Covered metallic oesophageal stents appear to be more effective than plastic stents in the management of oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage. However, quality of evidence of generally poor and high-quality randomised trial is needed to further evaluate best management option for oesophageal perforation and anastomotic leakage.

Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding adequacy of margins after mastectomy. To determine if pathological margin proximity is associated with local (LR) or distant recurrence after mastectomy for early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to 2019 and meta-analysis was conducted. Unpublished data were sought from authors (PROSPERO (CRD42019127541)). Thirty-four studies comprising 34,833 breast cancer patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eligible studies reported on patients undergoing curative mastectomy for cancer allowing estimation of outcomes in relation to margin status/width. The association between pathological margin status and local (LR) and distant recurrence was considered using random effects modelling. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Positive margins were associated with increased LR on multivariable analyses (HR, 2·64, (95%CI 2·01-3·46)) and LR was higher regardless of the distance of tumour from the margin defined as positive. After skin-sparing mastectomy, positive margins were associated with increased LR (HR 3·40, (95%CI 1·9-6·2)). In the 4 studies reporting distant recurrence, patients with involved margins had a higher risk (HR 1·53, (95%CI 1·03-2·25)).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to achieve clear margins after mastectomy may increase the risks of local and distant recurrence. Adequate margin clearance should be recommended to minimize recurrence after mastectomy in National and International Guidelines.

Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Theoretical advantages of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery include improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization, and better ergonomics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resections.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic liver resection. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate), oncological (R0 resection rates), and postoperative (bile leak, surgical site infection, pulmonary complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, 90-day readmission and reoperation rates) outcomes was performed using a random effects model.

RESULT

Twenty-six non-randomized studies including 2630 patients (950 robotic and 1680 laparoscopic) were included, of which 20% had major robotic liver resection and 14% had major laparoscopic liver resection. Intraoperatively, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly less blood loss (mean: 286 vs 301 mL, p < 0.001) but longer operating time (mean: 281 vs 221 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion rates or transfusion rates between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in overall complications, bile leaks, and length of hospital stay between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. However, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly lower readmission rates than laparoscopic liver resection (odds ratio: 0.43, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Robotic liver resection appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomized trial comparing both techniques is needed.

Abstract P1-20-05: Surgical margin involvement (&lt;2mm) increases local and distant cancer recurrence

Background: Leaving involved margins after surgery for early breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence but the effect on distant recurrence is controversial. ASCO and ASTRO endorsed a policy that negative margins of no ink on tumour represented sufficient margin for local control and that the routine practice of obtaining a more widely negative margin was not indicated. We aimed to assess margin status (&lt;1mm, 1-2mm and clear margins &gt;2mm) on local and distant control of breast cancer in a consecutive UK patient audit of Breast Cancer Units.

Methods: Patients (n = 2795) undergoing surgery for early breast cancer (Tis, T1-3) in 3 Greater Manchester Breast Units had margin status prospectively recorded (reported by micrometer according to NHSBSP pathology guidelines) and local and distant recurrence recorded. All patients received adjuvant therapy according to local guidelines. Statistical analysis using cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify clinicopathological factors predicting recurrence in the multivariate analysis.

Results: Overall 575 women (19.3%) had involved (≤1mm clearance) and 235 (8.5%) close (≤2mm clearance) and 1895 clear surgical margins. 1652 patients underwent breast conserving surgery and 1143 mastectomy. Median follow-up is 63.7 months. Overall local recurrence rate was 3.8% and distant recurrence 4.9% by a median of 5 years follow-up. Local and distant recurrence was higher after mastectomy at 7% and 7.8%, respectively. Margin &lt;1mm was associated with increased local and distant recurrence compared to a clear margin &gt;2mm. In multivariate analysis, two factors: molecular phenotype (other phenotypes versus Luminal A HR 1.79) and close / involved margins less than 2mm clearance (versus clear &gt;2mm) [HR 1.76 (95% confidence intervals 1.06 - 2.92)], predicted local recurrence and the same factors together with mastectomy (compared to breast conservation), T and N stage predicted distant recurrence (see table 1).

Table 1. Multivariate analysis of factors predicting cancer recurrenceLocal Recurrence (HR)Distant Recurrence (HR)Margin categorical &lt;1mm vs &gt;2mm1.84 (1.05 - 3.22, p=0.031)1.82 (1.1 – 3.02, p= 0.019)Margin &lt;2mm (vs clear &gt;2mm)1.76 (1.06-2.92, p=0.027)1.86 (1.16-2.27, p=0.009)T Stage 2 vs 11.55 (0.88 – 2.73, p=0.129)4.35 (2.07 – 9.14, p&lt;0.001)T Stage 3 vs 11.66 (0.63 – 4.37, p=0.296)4.66 (1.85 – 11.72, p=0.001)N Stage 1 vs 01.74 (0.98 – 3.06, p=0.054)1.161 (0.97 – 2.87, p=0.06)N Stage 2 vs 01.69 (0.75 – 3.8, p=0.201)2.11 (1.07 - 4.17, p=0.03)N Stage 3 vs 02.07 (0.9 – 5.61, p=0.148)6.22 (3.32 – 11.68, p&lt;0.001)Mastectomy vs WLE1.57 (0.91 – 2.72, p=0.103)2.51 (1.41 – 4.17, p=0.002)Luminal A vs Basal-Like0.25 (0.13 – 0.49, p&lt;0.001)0.18 (0.09 – 0.37, p&lt;0.001)Luminal B vs Basal-Like0.37 (0.2 – 0.68, p=0.001)0.33 (0.18 – 0.59, p&lt;0.001)HER-2 vs Basal-Like0.1 (0.01 – 0.75, p=0.024)0.46 (0.19 – 1.15, p=0.095)

Conclusion: Clearing surgical margins improves recurrence free survival (both local and distant). Leaving margins ≤2mm increases distant cancer recurrence and clearance of margins should be essential surgical management, particularly in oestrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancer. Current guidelines accepting margins ≤1mm will increase distant recurrence and deaths from breast cancer.

Citation Format: Sarah Michael, Sarah Bowers, Jane Ooi, Mo Absar, James Bundred, Nigel Bundred. Surgical margin involvement (&lt;2mm) increases local and distant cancer recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-20-05.

Abstract P1-20-07: Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A meta-analysis of 37,738 breast cancer patients in 33 studies

Background: Leaving involved margins after mastectomy for breast cancer has been associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. Current guidelines endorse a policy that negative margins of no ink on tumour represent sufficient margin for local control and that the routine practice of obtaining a more widely negative margin is not indicated. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies analysing the impact of margin involvement after mastectomy on subsequent local recurrence.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out searching MedLine, EmBase and ProQuest databases using the terms ‘mastectomy’, ‘resection margin’, ‘deep margin’, ‘margin status’ ‘fascia’ and ‘muscle invasion or infiltration’ from 1980 - 2019. In total 2,199 papers were screened and 33 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis.

Statistical Methods: Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects modelling, pooling hazard ratios (HR), and odds ratios (OR) from binary outcome data. The associations between positive margins and local recurrence were stratified by positive margin distance and analysed according to use of adjuvant radiotherapy and follow up duration.

Results: In total 37,738 patients, with a median age of 54.5 years, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Positive margins were associated with increased local recurrence on univariable analyses (HR 2.99, 95%CI: 2.99, 2.15 - 4.15), multivariable adjusted analyses (HR, 2.61, (95%CI 2.03-3.35) (which included Molecular Phenotype, Stage and Node status) as well as binary outcome data (OR, 95%CI: 2.75, 1.94-3.88). Positive margins were consistently associated with increased local recurrence, regardless of the distance of the tumour from the margin defined as positive (HR, 95%CI, tumour at ink: 2.39, 1.53-3.72; margin &lt;1mm: 3.08, 1.60-5.93; margin &lt;2mm: 2.63, 1.86-3.74; margin &lt;5mm: 7.09, 1.32-38). The odds ratio of local recurrence with positive margins increased with follow-up time of &gt;5 years compared to &lt;5 years (OR &lt;5years: OR 2.15, 1.14 - 3.27 to OR &gt;5 years OR 3.50, 2.13 - 5.75). Data were available from five studies for patients not receiving radiotherapy. In this subgroup positive margins were associated with a 3-fold risk of local recurrence (OR: 3.01, 1.96-4.61).

Conclusions: On meta-analysis the risk of local recurrence after mastectomy is associated with margin proximity. Most data on margin status has related to breast conserving surgery.

Adequate surgical margin clearance greater than 2mm margin after mastectomy is required to prevent local recurrence and International guidelines should reflect this finding.

Citation Format: James Bundred, Sarah Michael, Sarah Bowers, Nicola Barnes, David Dodwell, Yasmin Jauhari, Nigel Bundred. Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A meta-analysis of 37,738 breast cancer patients in 33 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-20-07.

Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA)

Esophagectomy is a mainstay in curative treatment for esophageal cancer; however, the reported techniques and outcomes can vary greatly. Thirty-day mortality of patients with an intact anastomosis is 2-3% as compared to 17-35% in patients who have an anastomotic leak. The subsequent management of leaks postesophagectomy has great global variability with little consensus on a gold standard of practice. The aim of this multicentre prospective audit is to analyze current techniques of esophagogastric anastomosis to determine the effect on the anastomotic leak rate. Leak rates and leak management will be assessed to determine their impact on patient outcomes. A 12-month international multicentre prospective audit started in April 2018 and is coordinated by a team from the West Midlands Research Collaborative. This will include patients undergoing esophagectomy over 9 months and encompassing a 90-day follow-up period. A pilot data collection period occurred at four UK centers in 2017 to trial the data collection form. The audit standards will include anastomotic leak and the conduit necrosis rate should be less than 13% and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more) should be less than 35%. The 30-day mortality rate should be less than 5% and the 90-day mortality rate should be less than 8%. This will be a trainee-led international audit of esophagectomy practice. Key support will be given by consultant colleagues and anesthetists. Individualized unit data will be distributed to the respective contributing sites. An overall anonymized report will be made available to contributing units. Results of the audit will be published in peer-reviewed journals with all collaborators fully acknowledged. The key information and results from the audit will be disseminated at relevant scientific meetings.

Validation of the NUn score as a predictor of anastomotic leak and major complications after Esophagectomy

Predicting major anastomotic leak (AL) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-5) following esophagectomy improves postoperative management of patients. The role of the NUn score in their prediction is controversial. This study aims to evaluate the predictive ability of this simple score. Data were retrospectively collected for consecutive esophagectomies over a 10-year period, and NUn scores were retrospectively calculated for each patient from informatics data. A standardized definition of major AL was used, excluding minor asymptomatic, radiologically detected leaks. The predictive accuracy of the NUn score and its constituent parts, for major AL and major complications, was assessed using area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs). Of 382 patients, 48 (13%) developed major AL and 123 (32%) developed major complications. The NUn score calculated on postoperative day 4 was significantly predictive of both outcomes, with AUROCs of 0.77 and 0.71, respectively (both P < 0.001). A NUn score cut-off of 10 had a negative predictive value of 95% for major AL. The NUn score was predictive of major complications on multivariable analysis. The NUn score was found to be a significant predictor of major AL, suggesting that this is a useful early warning score for major AL. The score may also be useful in identifying patients that are the most likely to benefit from enhanced recovery protocols.

Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have suggested an association between sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer and adverse outcomes. This systematic review examines the evidence for the impact of sarcopenia on post-operative complications and survival METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomised and non-randomised studies of sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer. Meta-analyses of intra- and post-operative outcomes were performed (operating time, all complications, major complications, pancreatic fistulae, peri-operative mortality, overall survival).

RESULTS

Forty-two studies reported the assessment of body composition in 7619 patients. Methods used to assess body composition in patients with pancreatic cancers were computerized tomography (n = 34), bioelectrical impedance analysis (n = 7), and dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry (n = 1). Only 10 studies reported the impact of pre-operative sarcopenia upon post-operative outcomes. Sarcopenia was associated with increased peri-operative mortality (OR: 2.40, CI_95%:1.19-4.85, p < 0.01) and decreased overall survival by univariable (HR: 1.95, CI_95%:1.35-2.81, p < 0.001) and multivariable analysis (HR: 1.78, CI_95%:1.54-2.05). Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with all complications (OR: 0.96, CI_95%:0.78-1.19) or pancreatic fistula (OR: 0.95, CI_95%: 0.59-1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer provides prognostic value but, more importantly, may provide a basis for therapeutic intervention. However, variation in the methods of assessing and reporting sarcopenia in this patient group limits the assessment of post-operative outcomes currently.

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes comparing patients having either robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy or laparoscopic (LPD) equivalent.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy either robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic. Meta-analysis of intra-operative (blood loss, operating times, conversion and R0 resections) and postoperative outcomes (overall complications, pancreatic fistula, length of hospital stay) was performed using a random effects model.

RESULT

This review identified 44 studies, of which six were non-randomised comparative studies including 3462 patients (1025 robotic and 2437 laparoscopic). Intraoperatively, RPD was associated with significantly lower conversion rates (OR 0.45, p < 0.001) and transfusion rates (OR: 0.60, p = 0.002) compared to LPD. However, no significant difference in blood loss (mean: 220 vs 287 mL, p = 0.1), operating time (mean: 405 vs 418 min, p = 0.3) was noted. Postoperatively RPD was associated with a shorter hospital stay (mean: 12 vs 11 days, p < 0.001) but no significant difference was noted in postoperative complications, incidence of pancreatic fistulae and R0 resection rates.

CONCLUSION

RPD appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to offer equivalent clinical outcomes. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques is needed.

Vascular calcification does not predict anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks (AL) and gastric conduit necrosis (CN) are serious complications following oesophagectomy. Some studies have suggested that vascular calcification may be associated with an increased AL rate, but this has not been validated in a United Kingdom population.

AIM

To investigate whether vascular calcification identified on the pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan is predictive of AL or CN.

METHODS

Routine pre-operative CT scans of 414 patients who underwent oesophagectomy for malignancy with oesophagogastric anastomosis at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Calcification of the proximal aorta, distal aorta, coeliac trunk and branches of the coeliac trunk was scored by two reviewers. The relationship between these calcification scores and occurrence of AL and CN was then analysed. The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definition of AL and CN was used.

RESULTS

Complication data were available in n = 411 patients, of whom 16.7% developed either AL (15.8%) or CN (3.4%). Rates of AL were significantly higher in female patients, at 23.0%, compared to 13.9% in males (P = 0.047). CN was significantly more common in females, (8.0% vs 2.2%, P = 0.014), patients with diabetes (10.6% vs 2.5%, P = 0.014), a history of smoking (10.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.008), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade (P = 0.024). Out of the 14 conduit necroses, only 4 occurred without a concomitant AL. No statistically significant association was found between calcification of any of the vessels studied and either of these outcomes. Multivariable analyses were then performed to identify whether a combination of the calcification scores could be identified that would be significantly predictive of any of the outcomes. However, the stepwise approach did not select any factors for inclusion in the final models. The analysis was repeated for composite outcomes of those patients with either AL or CN (n = 69, 16.7%) and for those with both AL and CN (n = 10, 2.4%) and again, no significant associations were detected. In the subset of patients that developed these outcomes, no significant associations were detected between calcification and the severity of the complication.

CONCLUSION

Calcification scoring was not significantly associated with Anastomotic Leak or CN in our study, therefore should not be used to identify patients who are high risk for these complications.

Correction to: Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In the original publication of this article, most of the reference citations in Tables 1 and 2 were published incorrectly. The corrected tables are given in this correction.

Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There has recently been increased interest in the assessment of body composition in patients with gastric cancer for the purpose of prognostication. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the current literature on body composition assessment in patients with gastric cancer and its impact on peri-operative outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting assessment of body composition in patients with gastric cancers. Meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes (overall and major complications, anastomotic leaks, pulmonary complications) and survival was performed using random effects models.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies reported the assessment of body composition in 8402 patients. Methods used to assess body composition in patients with gastric cancers were computerized tomography (n = 26), bioelectrical impedance analysis (n = 9), and dual-energy-X-ray-absorptiometry (n = 3). Only 21 studies reported the impact of pre-operative sarcopenia on post-operative outcomes. Sarcopenic patients have significantly higher rates of postoperative major complications (n = 12, OR 1.67, CI_95% 1.14-2.46, p = 0.009), and pulmonary (n = 8, OR 4.01, CI_95% 2.23-7.21, p < 0.001) complications after gastrectomy. Meta-analysis of nine studies reporting overall survival after gastrectomy identified significantly worse survival in patients with pre-operative sarcopenia (HR 2.12, CI_95% 1.89-2.38, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of body composition has the potential to become a clinically useful tool that could support decision-making in patients with gastric cancer. However, variation in methods of assessing and reporting body composition in this patient group limits assessment of current post-operative outcomes.