Intraoperative assessment of the curative potential to predict survival after gastric cancer resection: A national cohort study

BACKGROUND

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of tumor resection following gastrectomy adds new information that could help clinicians and patients by predicting survival.

METHODS

All patients in Sweden undergoing gastric cancer resection between 2006 and 2018 were grouped according to a prospectively registered variable; the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of surgery: curative, borderline curative, or palliative. Factors affecting group allocation were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression, while survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 2341 patients undergoing gastric cancer resection, 1547 (71%) were deemed curative, 340 (15%) borderline curative, and 314 (14%) palliative (140 missing assessments). Advanced stage increased the risk of borderline curative resection (Stage III, odds ratio (OR) = 6.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.92-9.31), as did emergency surgery OR = 3.31 (1.74-6.31) and blood loss >500 mL; OR = 1.63 (1.06-2.49). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion both decreased the risk of borderline curative resection, OR = 0.58 (0.39-0.87) and 0.57 (0.40-0.80), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the surgeon's assessment independently predicted worse survival for borderline curative (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.29-1.83) and palliative resections (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.45-2.19), compared to curative resections. The sensitivity of the surgeon's assessment of long-term survival was 96.7%. The PPV was 50.7% and the NPV was 92.1%.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the curative potential of gastric cancer surgery may independently aid survival prediction and is analogous to prognostication by pathologic Staging. Advanced disease, emergency surgery, and a high intraoperative blood loss, increases the risk of a borderline curative or palliative resection. Conversely, neoadjuvant treatment and MDT discussion reduce the risk of borderline curative or palliative resection.

Textbook outcomes for oesophagectomy: A valid composite measure assessment tool for surgical performance in a specialist unit

INTRODUCTION

In 2017 the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit Group proposed a ten-item composite measure for a 'textbook outcome' (TBO) following oesophago-gastric resection. Studies have shown associations between TBO and improved conditional and overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of TBO to assess the outcomes from a single specialist unit in a country, with low incidence of disease, allowing comparisons with international specialist centres.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected oesophageal cancer surgery data at a single centre, in Australia, between 2013 and 2018. Multivariable logistical regression assessed association between baseline factors and TBO. Post-operative complications were analysed in two separate groups as Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (CD ≥ 2) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 (CD ≥ 3). Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis determined the association between TBO and survival.

RESULTS

246 patients were analysed, with 50.8% (n = 125) achieving a TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2 and 58.9% (n = 145) when using CD ≥ 3. Patients aged ≥75, and those with a pre-operative respiratory co-morbidity were less likely to achieve a TBO. Overall survival was not influenced by TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2, however it was higher when a TBO was achieved, and complications were defined as CD ≥ 3 (HR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

TBO is a multi-parameter metric that allowed benchmarking of the quality of oesophageal cancer surgery in our unit, providing favourable outcomes compared with other published data. There was an association between TBO and improved overall survival when the definition of severe complications was CD ≥ 3.

Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue

INTRODUCTION

Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences.

METHODS

TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment.

RESULTS

FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4).

CONCLUSION

Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.

Improving the working environment for the delivery of safe surgical care in the UK: a qualitative cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify current problems and potential solutions to improve the working environment for the delivery of safe surgical care in the UK.

DESIGN

Prospective, questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Following validation, an electronic questionnaire was distributed to postgraduate local education and training board distribution lists, the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (RCSEd) mailing lists and trainee organisations. This consisted of a single open-ended question inviting five open-ended responses. Throughout the 13-week study period, the survey was also published on a number of social media platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 505 responders completed the survey, of which 35% were consultants, 30% foundation doctors, 17% specialty trainees, 11% specialty doctors, 5% core trainees and <1% surgical nurse practitioners. A total of 2238 free-text answers detailed specific actions to improve the working environment. These responses were individually coded and then grouped into nine categories (staff resources, non-staff resources, support, working conditions, communication and team work, systems improvement, patient centred, training and education, and miscellaneous).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have identified a number of key areas that, if addressed, may improve the environment for the delivery of safer surgical care. Common themes that emerged across all grades included: increased front-line staff; a return to a 'firm' structure to improve team continuity; greater senior support; and improved hospital facilities to help staff rest and recuperate. While unlimited funding remains unrealistic, many of the suggestions could be implemented in a cost-neutral fashion and include insightful ideas for remodelling or restructuring the workforce to improve the efficiency of the surgical team. The findings of this study formed the basis of a set of recommendations published by the RCSEd as a discussion paper.

WT1 expression in vessels varies with histopathological grade in tumour-bearing and control tissue from patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The Wilms' tumour protein (WT1), which influences tumour development and angiogenesis, is a promising therapeutic target in breast cancer. We hypothesised that WT1 expression would vary in endothelial cells in distinct sub-classifications of breast cancer.

METHODS

WT1 expression and vascular density were quantified by immunohistochemical analysis of human (n = 57) and murine breast cancers. Human tumours were sub-classified by histopathological grade, ER status and HER2 enrichment.

RESULTS

WT1 was identified in endothelial (and epithelial and smooth muscle) cells in tumours and tumour-free tissues (controls) from patients and mice with breast cancer. WT1 expression was higher in tumours than in controls, but this was not due to increased endothelial WT1. Vascular WT1 in cancers decreased as histopathological grade increased. WT1 was higher in ER-positive versus ER-negative cancers. Strikingly, reduced WT1 expression in controls correlated with an increased Nottingham Prognostic Index score.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of WT1 is increased in breast cancers but this is not limited to the vascular compartment. The association between reduced WT1 in tumour-free tissue and poor prognosis suggests a protective role for WT1 in the healthy breast.

Level three evaluation of an education program designed to implement patient care redesign

Patient care redesign is a process of reorienting healthcare institutions to a more patient-centered process. Inova Health System, a large Northern Virginia system, recently instituted such a redesign. The System's department of education was charged with designing a curriculum to introduce the new concept to all staff. This article analyzes the results of a survey that evaluated self-reported behaviors and attitudes of staff following attendance at the mandatory classes and discusses methodological aspects of the evaluation. The approach to evaluation discussed in this article provides a practical model for staff development educators when confronted with the task of evaluating results of educational programs.

A precepted experience for senior nursing students

The author discusses an undergraduate course that provides students with a clinical experience focusing on setting priorities, managing time, and organizing assignments and responsibilities, with the support of, and under the direction of, an experienced RN preceptor. In addition to building confidence and making students more competitive during job interviews after graduation, the preceptorship course promotes collaboration between academia and service, provides students with the opportunity to implement their professional practitioner role, and promotes the personal and professional development of the preceptors and nursing staff.

Lung volume reduction surgery: a new breath of life for emphysema patients

Patients with emphysema suffer continuously with dyspnea which ultimately can affect their activities of daily living. Lung volume reduction is a surgical procedure that is effective in relieving the dyspnea and improving the patient's quality of life.

Novice to expert: an application of the Dreyfus model to management development in health care

It has been the intent of the authors to describe a management development method which has as its basis a way to differentiate methods for skill development based on levels of skill acquisition. The intent is to provide an efficient and effective framework within which management development can occur as well as to test the utility of the Drefus model in the critical arena of developing management talent in health care environments. Further work and experience with both the model and the skills identified will continue.

Advancing staff nurse competencies. From novice to expert

Staff nurses are responsible for providing care to acutely ill patients, therefore, educators and managers can no longer be comfortable with developing staff to a basic level of competence; they have the responsibility to develop expert practitioners. To achieve this goal, a program using the "novice-to-expert" model for developing educational programs for each level of proficiency is described.

A framework for developing staff competencies

Nursing science is progressing at such a rapid rate that it is difficult for nursing professionals to remain current with the knowledge and skills necessary to provide quality patient care. To assure that staff members demonstrate the required competencies, a framework composed of eight steps and a master plan for implementation is presented in this article. The framework offers staff development educators structure and direction in planning and conducting educational programs to achieve the goal of competency development.