1
|
Calpin GG, Davey MG, Whooley J, Ryan EJ, Ryan OK, Ponten JEH, Weiss A, Conneely JB, Robb WB, Donlon NE. Evaluating mesh fixation techniques for ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Am J Surg 2024; 228:62-69. [PMID: 37714741 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is uncertainty regarding the optimal mesh fixation techniques for laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. AIM To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCTs) to investigate the advantages and disadvantages associated with absorbable tacks, non-absorbable tacks, non-absorbable sutures, non-absorbable staples, absorbable synthetic glue, absorbable sutures and non-absorbable tacks, and non-absorbable sutures and non-absorbable tacks. METHODS A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were extracted to compare the efficacy of the surgical approaches. RESULTS Nine RCTs were included with 707 patients. Short-term pain was significantly reduced in non-absorbable staples (MD; -1.56, confidence interval (CI); -2.93 to -0.19) and non-absorbable sutures (MD; -1.00, CI; -1.60 to -0.40) relative to absorbable tacks. Recurrence, length of stay, operative time, conversion to open surgery, seroma and haematoma formation were unaffected by mesh fixation technique. CONCLUSION Short-term post-operative pain maybe reduced by the use of non-absorbable sutures and non-absorbable staples. There is clinical equipoise between each modality in relation to recurrence, length of stay, and operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin G Calpin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Matthew G Davey
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| | - Jack Whooley
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| | - Eanna J Ryan
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| | - Odhran K Ryan
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| | | | - Andreas Weiss
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - John B Conneely
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Republic of Ireland
| | - William B Robb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Whooley J, Weedle R, Breen D, Soo A. Lung Cancer resection in the absence of pre-operative histology: The Accuracy of Multidisciplinary Team Consensus. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:106907. [PMID: 37080864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung resection remains the gold-standard of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines recommends the pursuit of pre-operative histological diagnosis and staging where possible. In the absence of pre-operative histology, surgical treatment can be offered in conjunction with multidisciplinary team (MDT) and patient consensus. We undertook a single-centre analysis of the accuracy of the lung cancer MDT in recommending surgical resection for those with suspected lung malignancy in the absence of pre-operative histological diagnosis over a six-year period. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing any pulmonary oncological resection with therapeutic intent without pre-operative histological diagnosis at the recommendation of the lung cancer MDT in our unit between May 2016 and July 2022. RESULTS 270 consecutive patients underwent lung resection for a lung nodule of indeterminate significance. This accounted for 45% of the oncological resections performed over this period. The mean age of the cohort was 67.9 years, and 47.4% were male. Overall, 10% of resected specimens (n = 27) were benign on final histopathology. 93% of those undergoing a lobectomy received a malignant diagnosis. Across the study cohort, surgical resection was well tolerated with a low complication rate. CONCLUSIONS Lung cancer resection in the absence of pre-operative histological diagnosis is feasible in a select patient cohort. This approach requires an experienced multi-disciplinary team and careful patient counselling. Our study demonstrates this adapted approach to be a pragmatic solution to the management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in centres where biopsy is not routinely available due to existing constraints on the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Whooley
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Rebecca Weedle
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - David Breen
- Interventional Respiratory Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Alan Soo
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ubels S, Matthée E, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, van Esser S, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Siersema PD, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Heisterkamp J, Polat F, Schouten J, Singh P, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, Van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, Willem van den Berg J, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TC, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JW, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CM, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RP, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJ, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MA, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Koshy R, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Constantinoiu S, Birla R, Achim F, Rosianu CG, Hoara P, Castro RG, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Koshy R, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Ahmed HA, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AA, Wills V, Campbell C, Cerdeira MP, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Barbosa JA, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZ, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler M, Schofield W, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Fernández SL, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Ben Taher FA, Ekheel M, Msherghi AA. Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:974-982. [PMID: 36732207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences. METHODS TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment. RESULTS FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4). CONCLUSION Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Eric Matthée
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Esser
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Fatih Polat
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Schouten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siddiqui S, Whooley J, Miceli A, Bartolozzi F, Soo A. Endoscopic vein harvesting: a guide for approaching difficult cases and assessing patients preoperatively. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6595113. [PMID: 35640590 PMCID: PMC9486924 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. The long saphenous vein still presides as the first choice conduit as a second graft in multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Traditionally, the long saphenous vein has been harvested with an open approach which can potentially result in significant wound complications in certain circumstances. Endoscopic vein harvesting is a minimally invasive vein harvesting technique, which requires a single 2–3 cm incision and is associated with a quicker return to normal daily activities, decreased wound complications and better quality of life in the longer term. There is a learning curve associated with endoscopic vein harvesting adoption and there are certain patient factors that can prove to be challenging when adopting an endoscopic approach. This commentary aims to provide a concise guide of certain challenging patient factors that operators may encounter during endoscopic vein harvesting, and how to approach these patients in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings. We suggest that with appropriate planning and awareness of the challenging patient factors and problematic venous anatomy that exists, the operator can consistently formulate a strategy for ensuring a successful endoscopic harvest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadiq Siddiqui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway , Galway, Ireland
| | - Jack Whooley
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway , Galway, Ireland
| | - Antonio Miceli
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway , Galway, Ireland
- Instituto Clinico Sant’Ambrogio, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato , Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Bartolozzi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway , Galway, Ireland
| | - Alan Soo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway , Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Matthée E, Slootmans CAM, Ultee G, Schouten J, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, van den Berg JW, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TCM, van Esser S, Dekker JWT, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JWA, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CMS, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RPR, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJE, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MAH, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Silviu C, Rodica B, Florin A, Cristian Gelu R, Petre H, Guevara Castro R, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Abdelkarem Ahmed H, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AAA, Wills V, Campbell C, Perez Cerdeira M, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Adelino Barbosa J, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZL, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler MI, Schofield WA, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Leturio Fernández S, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Abdullah Ben Taher F, Ekheel M, Msherghi AAA. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.
Methods
This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.
Results
Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.
Conclusion
The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ , Maastricht , the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital group , Almelo , the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital , Tilburg , the Netherlands
| | - Renol Koshy
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Coventry , UK
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham , UK
- Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Whooley J, Alazzawi M, Donlon NE, Bolger JC, Robb WB. PD-1 inhibitors in esophageal cancer: a systematic review of the oncological outcomes associated with PD-1 blockade and the evolving therapeutic paradigm. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6373272. [PMID: 34553222 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who fail to respond to chemoradiotherapy have a poor clinical prognosis. Recent clinical trials have investigated the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients. The use of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors has emerged as exciting therapeutic options in the curative and palliative setting of other solid tumors. We assessed the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in esophageal and GEJ cancers. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive electronic literature search from the EMBASE, Pubmed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to 25 July 2021. This review identified 11 eligible studies reporting outcomes of 3451 patients treated with PD-1 blockade compared with 2286 patients treated with either a placebo or the standard regimen of chemotherapy. Clinically significant improvements in median overall survival have been demonstrated in advanced and metastatic esophageal and GEJ cancer while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. Promising survival data have also recently emerged from PD-1 blockade in the adjuvant setting. PD-1 blockade in esophageal and GEJ cancer has delivered impressive survival benefit while remaining well tolerated. Its use in the adjuvant setting will further advance treatment options, and more advancements in this area of therapy are highly anticipated. However, further characterization of the PD-1/programmed death ligand-1 pathway and elucidation of biomarkers to predict response are required to optimize patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Whooley
- National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Ireland.,Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9 Co Dublin, Ireland.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Alazzawi
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9 Co Dublin, Ireland.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - N E Donlon
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - J C Bolger
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - W B Robb
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9 Co Dublin, Ireland.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Bronchogenic cysts are rare cystic malformations of the respiratory tract with prevalence that is largely unknown. They are most commonly diagnosed incidentally in asymptomatic patients. While surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for patients who are symptomatic, the treatment course for patients without symptoms is less clear. We describe the case of an initially asymptomatic elderly man who was found to have a bronchogenic cyst on routine surveillance imaging, culminating in the rapid enlargement and malignant transformation of the cyst, ultimately resulting in a technically difficult and challenging surgical resection. The malignant transformation of these bronchogenic cysts is exceedingly rare, with only a few well-documented cases reported in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a squamous cell carcinoma arising from a bronchogenic cyst in the paratracheal region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Whooley
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Alexandra White
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Alan Soo
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Whooley J, Azzawi MA, Donlon N, Bolger J, Robb W. O-OGC09 PD-1 inhibitors in Oesophageal Cancer: A systematic review of the oncological outcomes associated with PD-1 blockade and the evolving therapeutic landscape. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab429.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer that fail to respond to chemoradiotherapy have a poor clinical prognosis. Recent clinical trials have investigated the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients. The use of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have emerged as exciting therapeutic options in other solid tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in oesophageal and GOJ cancers.
Methods
This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive electronic literature search from the EMBASE, Pubmed, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to April 1st 2021.
Results
This review identified nine eligible studies reporting outcomes of 2149 patients treated with PD-1 blockade compared with 1244 patients treated with either a placebo or the standard regimen of chemotherapy for oesophageal and GOJ cancer. Clinically significant improvements in median overall survival have been demonstrated in advanced and metastatic oesophageal and GOJ cancer while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. Promising survival data has also recently emerged from PD-1 blockade in the adjuvant setting.
Conclusions
PD-1 blockade in oesophageal and GOJ cancer has delivered impressive survival benefit whilst remaining well tolerated. Its use in the adjuvant setting may further advance our treatment options for this difficult-to-treat tumour, and more advancements in the immunotherapy landscape are highly anticipated. However, further characterization of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is required to optimise patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Whooley
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - William Robb
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al Azzawi M, Bolger JC, Bolger EM, Whooley J, Allen J, Trench L, Downey E, Arumugasamy M, Robb WB. O61: TEXTBOOK SURGICAL OUTCOMES IN OESOPHAGO-GASTRIC CANCER: THE INFLUENCE OF NATIONAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab117.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
High quality surgery remains the cornerstone of treating oesophago-gastric malignancy. Recent work from the Dutch Upper-gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have defined ten surgical and perioperative ‘textbook’ parameters that correlate with improved overall survival. The aim of this project was to examine the proportion of patients attaining ‘textbook’ outcomes for oesophagectomy and gastrectomy in our unit before and after the introduction of national key performance indicators (KPIs).
Method
A retrospective review of all oesophagectomies and gastrectomies from January 2010 until June 2019 was performed. Clinical, pathological, perioperative, morbidity and mortality outcomes were recorded. 10 ‘textbook’ parameters were studied pre- and post-KPI introduction.
Result
269 and 284 patients underwent oesophagectomy and gastrectomy respectively, 167 pre-KPI and 386 post-KPI. There were no significant differences in age (67.6 vs 66.4 years, p=0.6), gender (71% male, 29% female vs 68% male, 22% female, p=0.48), ASA grade (p=0.6) or tumour stage (p=0.37) pre- and post-KPI. In the pre-KPI era, 28/167 (17%) patients achieved all ten textbook parameters, compared with 157/386, (41%, p=0.001) post-KPI. This compares favourably to DUCA ‘textbook’ data. There was an improvement in adequate lymphadenectomy (56% vs 83%, p=0.002), a reduction in margin positivity (21% vs 7%, p= 0.001) and peri-operative mortality (6% vs 2%, p=0.03) post-KPI.
Conclusion
There has been a significant improvement in perioperative outcomes in esophagectomy following the introduction of national KPIs in our unit. The number of patients achieving ‘textbook’ outcomes is comparable with international standards. The identification of textbook parameters allows further focus for future quality improvement initiatives.
Take-home message
National KPIs improve peri-operative outcomes in oesophago-gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - JC Bolger
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | - EM Bolger
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | - J Whooley
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | - J Allen
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | - L Trench
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | - E Downey
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| | | | - WB Robb
- Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bolger JC, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Bolger EM, Trench L, Allen J, Kelly ME, Brosnan C, Arumugasamy M, Robb WB. Surgery by a minimally invasive approach is associated with improved textbook outcomes in oesophageal and gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2332-2339. [PMID: 33766456 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Textbook outcome (TBO) is a composite measure of a number of peri-operative and clinical outcomes in oesophagogastric malignancy. It has previously been shown that TBOs are associated with improved overall survival in both oesophageal and gastric cancer. The influence of a minimally invasive approach (MIA) on TBO is not well defined. The purpose of this study is to validate TBO in our population, examine the influence of a MIA on achieving a TBO, and the impact of TBO on long-term survival. METHODS 269 patients undergoing oesophagectomy and 258 patients undergoing subtotal or total gastrectomy were included in this study. Demographic, clinical and pathological differences between patients with and without a TBO were compared using univariable and multivariable analysis. Overall survival for those with and without a TBO was examined. The influence of MIA on overall survival and TBO was determined using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Patients undergoing oesophagectomy and gastrectomy were significantly more likely to achieve a TBO when MIA was used (p = 0.01 and 0.001 respectively). When MIA is included as an outcome measure patients achieving a TBO show improved overall survival in both oesophageal and gastric cancer. MIA, clear resection margins and no unplanned admission to critical care are the strongest predictors of overall survival from the putative bundle of TBO parameters. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved TBO. Completion of a minimally invasive approach should be considered for inclusion as a textbook parameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarlath C Bolger
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Mohammed Al Azzawi
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Jack Whooley
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Eamonn M Bolger
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Luke Trench
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Jack Allen
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Michael E Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Conor Brosnan
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | | | - William B Robb
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin 9, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Whooley J, Cunnane EM, Do Amaral R, Joyce M, MacCraith E, Flood HD, O'Brien FJ, Davis NF. Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Biologic Graft Materials Revisited. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2020; 26:475-483. [PMID: 32192400 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) refractory to conservative management with pelvic floor muscle training or vaginal pessaries may warrant surgical intervention with different forms of biologic or synthetic material. However, in recent years, several global regulatory agencies have issued health warnings and recalled several mesh products due to an increase in complications such as mesh erosion, infection, chronic pain, and perioperative bleeding. At present, current surgical treatment strategies for SUI and POP are aimed at developing biological graft materials with similar mechanical properties to established synthetic meshes, but with improved tissue integration and minimal host response. This narrative review aims to highlight recent studies related to the development of biomimetic and biologic graft materials as alternatives to traditional synthetic materials for SUI/POP repair in female patients. We also investigate complications and technical limitations associated with synthetic mesh and biological biomaterials in conventional SUI and POP surgery. Our findings demonstrate that newly developed biologic grafts have a lower incidence of adverse events compared to synthetic biomaterials. However there remains a significant disparity between success in preclinical trials and long-term clinical translation. Further characterization on the optimal structural, integrative, and mechanical properties of biological grafts is required before they can be reliably introduced into clinical practice for SUI and POP surgery. Impact statement Our review article aims to outline the clinical history of developments and controversies associated with the use of synthetic mesh materials in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, as well as highlighting recent advancements in the area of biological graft materials and their potential importance in an area that remains an enduring issue for patients and clinicians alike. This article aims to provide a concise summary of previous controversies in the field of urinary incontinence, while evaluating the future of potential biomaterials in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Whooley
- Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Co Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eoghan M Cunnane
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronaldo Do Amaral
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Joyce
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eoin MacCraith
- Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Co Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hugh D Flood
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fergal J O'Brien
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Co Dublin, Ireland.,Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Browne E, Whooley J, Wang J, Davis NF. Patient decision aids for urinary diversion after radical cystectomy: their potential and pitfalls. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 8:S507-S509. [PMID: 32042633 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Browne
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jack Whooley
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jianwei Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100096, China
| | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Whooley J, Ferede A, Smyth G, Little D. Venous anomalies in renal transplantation: an accessory left-sided IVC in a live kidney donor. BMJ Case Rep 2019; 12:12/12/e232695. [PMID: 31848141 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Duplication of the inferior vena cava (IVC) resulting in an accessory left-sided IVC is a relatively rare vascular anomaly with a reported prevalence of 0.7%. Radiologically, a duplicated left-sided IVC is usually seen as a continuation of the left common iliac vein, crossing anterior to the aorta at the level of the renal vein to join the right-sided IVC. We present a rare case in which an accessory left-sided IVC was discovered intraoperatively, in a 47-year-old living donor, posing significant intraoperative challenges regarding extraction and subsequent transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atakelet Ferede
- National Kidney Transplant Service (NKTS), Beaumont Hospital, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gordon Smyth
- National Kidney Transplant Service (NKTS), Beaumont Hospital, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dilly Little
- National Kidney Transplant Service (NKTS), Beaumont Hospital, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Whooley J. "Just surviving" as a student nurse--is there an option. N Z Nurs J 1979; 72:2. [PMID: 285383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|