Assessment of the value of carcinoembryonic antigen reduction ratio as a prognosis factor in rectal cancer

The carcinoembryonic antigen ratio is a potential predictor of survival in recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) "value" itself is often useless in patients with a normal CEA level at initial presentation and those with tumor-irrelevant elevated CEA. Although the unified marker using CEA has been desirable for recurrent tumor staging as well as for primary tumor staging, little is known concerning its relationship with the survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer in particular.

METHODS

This retrospective historical study included patients who experienced disease relapse after curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer between 2006 and 2018. A total of 129 patients with recurrent disease after curative surgery for colorectal cancer were included. We focused on the CEA "ratio" (CEA-R: the ratio of the CEA level at the time of recurrence to that measured 3 months before recurrence) and aimed to evaluate the correlation between CEA-R and survival in recurrent colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Patients with a high CEA-R (≥ 2) exhibited significantly worse 2 year survival than those with a low CEA-R (< 2) (88.1% vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001), irrespective of the CEA value before primary resection. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CEA-R (HR; 3.270, 95% CI 1.646-6.497, P = 0.001) was a significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

The CEA-R is a potential marker stratifying the survival of patients with disease relapse who exhibit aggressive biology at recurrent disease foci. As a novel marker, the CEA-R would serve as a clinical guide for tailoring treatment strategies at the time of disease relapse in patients with colorectal cancer.

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy MRI characteristics favouring pathologic complete response in patients with rectal cancer: Usefulness of MR T2-stage as an ancillary finding for predicting pathologic complete response

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to assess preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based findings according to a structured MRI report template for primary staging of rectal cancer, and to evaluate the prognostic relevance of the pre-CRT MRI-based findings in patients with rectal cancer after CRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated pre- and post-CRT MRI data of patients with pathologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma, between January 2008 and October 2019. Image interpretation was performed independently by two radiologists and each reviewer assessed the cancer characteristics on MRI, based on the structured MRI report for primary staging. MRI-based findings associated with pathologic complete tumour regression grade (TRG) after CRT were analysed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Significant factors from pre-CRT MRI were weighted to score mrTRG in post-CRT MRI.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, MR T-stage, tumour infiltration, mesorectal fascia involvement, extramural vascular invasion and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level correlated significantly with pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified that only MR T-stage was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio, 3.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.18-12.84; P = 0.0278). Adding MRI-based T2-stage as an ancillary finding to mrTRG statistically significantly improved the sensitivity as compared to using only mrTRG for considering a CR. T2_mrTRG was significantly different in terms of the time to tumour progression between the CR and non-CR group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MR T2-stage was independently associated with pCR after CRT in patients with rectal cancer and was helpful as ancillary predictive factor, adding to mrTRG for prediction of pCR.

Prognostic value of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer patients who smoke

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels can help predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Accordingly, high preoperative CEA levels that is not restored after surgery are indicative of a worse outcome. On the other hand, smoking can increase serum CEA levels independently of the disease status. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of smoking on the prognostic value of serum CEA levels. This retrospective cohort study included 273 patients who underwent curative resection for stage I–III colorectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution, between January 2010 and December 2017. Patients were grouped as follows: group A, normal preoperative and postoperative CEA levels (n = 152); group B, elevated preoperative CEA levels that returned to reference values after surgery (n = 69); and group C, elevated postoperative serum CEA levels (n = 52). Patients were also grouped according to their smoking history: group S (current smokers, n = 79) and group NS (never and former smokers, n = 194). Group A showed a higher 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (84.9%) than groups B (75.4%) and C (62.0%) (p < 0.001). Postoperative serum CEA levels were significantly higher in the S group than in the NS group (2.6 vs. 3.1 ng/mL, p = 0.009), whereas preoperative levels were similar (3.8 vs. 4.1, p = 0.182). Further, smokers showed higher 3 year-DFS rates than nonsmokers in group C (83.3% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.029). This suggests that while elevated postoperative CEA levels are associated with lower DFS rates in never and former smokers, they are not associated with lower DFS rates in current smokers. We conclude that persistent smoking alters the prognostic value of postoperative serum CEA levels in colorectal cancer patients and that, consequently, alternative surveillance strategies need to be developed for colon cancer patients with smoking habits.

Clinical Significances of Positive Postoperative Serum CEA and Post-preoperative CEA Increment in Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most common serum tumor marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Nevertheless, few previous studies demonstrated the impacts of postoperative CEA and post-preoperative CEA increment on prognosis of CRC.

Methods: Patients with stage II and III CRC were included from January 2009 to December 2015. All clinical and follow-up data were collected. Patients were divided into four different groups according to the levels of postoperative serum CEA and post-preoperative CEA trends. Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between clinical variables and categorized postoperative CEA and CEA increment. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for univariate and multivariable analyses. The log-rank test was performed to compare PFS and OS among groups.

Results: Patients, 1,008, who underwent radical surgery, were enrolled. Our results showed that positive postoperative CEA and CEA increment were related to clinical stage, T stage, N stage, tumor differentiation, and lymphatic invasion (p < 0.05). Univariate and multivariable analysis results suggested that positive postoperative CEA and CEA increment were independent prognostic factors for PFS (HR = 3.149, 95% CI, 2.426–4.088, p = 0.000 for postoperative CEA; HR = 2.708, 95% CI, 2.106–3.482, p = 0.000 for CEA increment) and OS (HR = 3.414, 95% CI, 2.549–4.574, p = 0.000 for postoperative CEA; HR = 2.373, 95% CI, 1.783–3.157, p = 0.000 for CEA increment). The survival analyses revealed positive postoperative CEA, and CEA increment predicted worse prognosis. Furthermore, our results indicated that the 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 86.6 and 78.4% in group A, but decreased to 25.3 and 7.2% in group D (p < 0.001). Similarly, the 3- and 5-year OS rates for group A were 92.5 and 83.9%, much higher than group D (p < 0.001). In other words, patients with both postoperative CEA elevation and CEA increment had the worst prognosis.

Conclusions: Positive postoperative CEA and CEA increment were independent prognostic factors for stage II and III CRC. Additionally, postoperative CEA and CEA increment had significant impacts on PFS and OS of CRC.

Pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen and outcome of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation and surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the relationship of the baseline serologic concentration of the carcinoembryonic antigen with the outcome. Data sources included MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. A systematic search of the databases by a predefined criterion has been conducted. Chemo-radiation followed by surgical resection of rectal tumors was the intervention of interest. From selected studies, the relationships between carcinoembryonic antigen and pathologic complete response, disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed. Carcinoembryonic antigen correlated significantly and inversely with the rate of pathologic complete responses (OR 2.00). Similar to this relationship, a low baseline carcinoembryonic antigen concentration was associated with a better disease-free survival (OR 1.88) and a better overall survival (OR 1.85). Heterogeneity of studies and publication bias were considerable in evaluating the relationship of baseline carcinoembryonic antigen and pathologic complete response. Baseline carcinoembryonic antigen should be regarded as a predictor of outcome of patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation. A calibration of the cutoff value from 5 to 3 ng/ml appears more appropriate to this patient population and should be evaluated in prospective trials.

Increased carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts poor prognosis in patients that undergo hepatectomy for liver-only colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND

The importance of preoperative chemotherapy in a multimodality management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been demonstrated. We analyse the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) changes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with CRLM who underwent liver resection.

METHODS

The final cohort included 107 eligible patients. Increased CEA levels following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were defined as the increase of baseline CEA level at diagnosis of CRLM compared with the CEA level after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS), post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using both Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression methods.

RESULTS

CEA increase was associated with decreased PRS and OS (HR 2.69; 95 % CI, 1.28-5.63; p = 0.009, and HR 2.50; 95 % CI, 1.12-5.56; p = 0.025, respectively) in multivariate analysis, but there was no association between CEA changes and DFS. CEA increase was only associated with disease progression during preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.014). Interestingly, this association was not absolute, as only 5 of the 11 patients with disease progression demonstrated CEA increase. Regarding the remaining 12 patients with CEA increase, according to RECIST criteria, eight patients demonstrated partial response and four patients stable disease.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated the CEA increase following neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an adverse prognostic factor for PRS, and OS but not for DFS in patients undergoing liver resection for liver-only colorectal metastases.

Changes of Microrna Levels in Plasma of Patients with Rectal Cancer during Chemoradiotherapy

Since the response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is heterogeneous, valid biomarkers are needed to monitor tumor response. Circulating microRNAs are promising candidates, however analyses of circulating microRNAs in rectal cancer are still rare. 111 patients with rectal cancer and 46 age-matched normal controls were enrolled. The expression levels of 30 microRNAs were analyzed in 17 pre-treatment patients’ plasma samples. Differentially regulated microRNAs were validated in 94 independent patients. For 52 of the 94 patients a paired comparison between pre-treatment and post-treatment samples was performed. miR-17, miR-18b, miR-20a, miR-31, and miR-193a_3p, were significantly downregulated in pre-treatment plasma samples of patients with rectal cancer (p < 0.05). miR-29c, miR-30c, and miR-195 showed a trend of differential regulation. After validation, miR-31 and miR-30c were significantly deregulated by a decrease of expression. In 52 patients expression analyses of the 8 microRNAs in matched pre-treatment and post-treatment samples showed a significant decrease for all microRNAs (p < 0.05) after treatment. Expression levels of miR-31 and miR-30c could serve as valid biomarkers if validated in a prospective study. Plasma microRNA expression levels do not necessarily represent miRNA expression levels in tumor tissue. Also, expression levels of microRNAs change during multimodal therapy.

Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of uric acid (UA) in assessing rectal cancer metastasis.There were 475 newly diagnosed patients with complete data in our study, a total of 475 cases were reviewed, and divided into patients with metastasis and without metastasis.There were several statistical differences in age, tumor diameter, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and C-reactive protein (CRP) between the 2 groups. Importantly, serum concentrations of UA in patients with lymphatic metastasis were found to be increased compared with patients without lymphatic metastasis (270.9 ± 52.99 vs 215.8 ± 43.55; P < 0.001). There were positive correlations of serum UA with creatinine (Cr), CRP, and CEA (r = 0.281, P = 0.023; r = 0.312, P = 0.001; r = 0.294, P = 0.017) in rectal cancer patients with metastasis. Multivariate analysis model revealed that elevated serum levels of UA were significant prognostic marker for lymphatic metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, independently of CRP, CEA, and tumor diameter (odds ratio 1.035, 95% CI 1.013-1.057, P = 0.002). In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of serum UA in assessing metastatic rectal cancer patients was 0.803, with sensitivity of 0.864 and specificity of 0.739.Our results suggest that serum UA may be a novel marker in assessing tumor metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Prognosis Can Be Predicted More Accurately Using Pre- and Postchemoradiotherapy Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Compared to Only Prechemoradiotherapy Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of a change in the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 110 patients with clinical T3/T4 or node-positive disease underwent nCRT and curative total mesorectal resection from February 2006 to December 2013. Serum CEA level was measured before nCRT, after nCRT, and then again after surgery. A cut-off value for CEA level to predict prognosis was determined using the maximally selected log-rank test. According to the test, patients were classified into 3 groups, based on their CEA levels (Group A: pre-CRT CEA ≤3.2; Group B: pre-CRT CEA level >3.2 and post-CRT CEA ≤2.8; and Group C: pre-CRT CEA >3.2 and post-CRT CEA >2.8). The median follow-up time was 31.1 months. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of Group A and Group B were similar, while Group C showed a significantly lower 3-year DFS rate (82.5% vs. 89.5% vs. 55.1%, respectively, P = 0.001). Other clinicopathological factors that showed statistical significance on univariate analysis were pre-CRT CEA, post-CRT CEA, tumor distance from the anal verge, surgery type, downstage, pathologic N stage, margin status and perineural invasion. The CEA group (P = 0.001) and tumor distance from the anal verge (P = 0.044) were significant prognostic factors for DFS on multivariate analysis. Post-CRT CEA level may be a useful prognostic factor in patients whose prognosis cannot be predicted exactly by pre-CRT CEA levels alone in the neoadjuvant treatment era. Combined pre-CRT CEA and post-CRT CEA levels enable us to predict prognosis more accurately and determine treatment and follow-up policies. Further large-scale studies are necessary to validate the prognostic value of CEA levels.

Biomarkers and Molecular Imaging as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Standard treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery. Tumor regression after NCRT varies substantially among individuals and pathological complete response is a known prognostic factor for LARC. The identification of a predictive model for response to chemoradiotherapy would help clinicians to identify patients who would probably benefit from multimodal treatment and to perform an early assessment of individual prognosis. Carcinoembryonic antigen has proven to be a good predictor of response in several clinical trials. Other widely studied predictive models in LARC include molecular biomarkers, analyzed at various levels and by different techniques, and molecular imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Although none of the studied markers have been approved in clinical practice, their evaluation in larger, prospective trials and in combined predictive models could be of use to define tailored therapeutic strategies.