Weekly e-mailed teaching tips and reading material influence teaching among general surgery residents

Effect of "Residents as Teachers" Workshop on Learner Perception of Trainee Teaching Skill

BACKGROUND

Surgical residencies use variable structures for formal training in education. We hypothesized that a one-day workshop intervention would improve resident teaching ability measured by self-assessment and learner evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Faculty educators delivered a Residents as Teachers (RAT) workshop to general surgery residents on setting expectations, positive learning environment, difficult feedback and the 1-min preceptor model. For three months before and after the workshop, junior residents and medical students evaluated their supervising residents' teaching skill monthly using a Likert scale questionnaire. Pre- and postworkshop surveys were administered to resident participants to assess their knowledge of the material and teaching confidence. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center with a large surgical residency program.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine PGY 1-5 residents participated in the Residents as Teachers workshop and were included in the study. Pre- and post- workshop survey results demonstrated significant improvements in participants' knowledge and teaching confidence. On monthly assessments of seniors by junior residents, significant improvements were noted in three domains. Medical student ratings did not reflect significant improvements in resident teaching skill.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study using learner evaluation of a comprehensive surgical RAT program. Despite a significant increase in surgery residents' self-assessment following participation in an education workshop, no improvement was seen in resident teaching skill as perceived by medical students.

"Residents as Teachers" Workshop Improves Knowledge, Confidence, and Feedback Skills for General Surgery Residents

OBJECTIVE

Surgical residents receive limited formal training in education, yet they are expected to teach medical students and one another. A "Residents as Teachers" curriculum was developed and implemented to improve residents' knowledge of educational strategies, confidence in teaching abilities, and quality of feedback given to learners.

DESIGN

A 6-hour workshop was delivered at an academic general surgery residency program. It included 3 interactive sessions: "Teaching on the wards", "How to give and receive feedback", and "Teaching in the operating room (OR)". Pre- and postsession surveys were administered to evaluate participants' knowledge and confidence regarding teaching skills. Standard statistical analyses were used to compare pre- and postcurriculum scores.

SETTING

General surgery residents at Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Program attended a 6-hour educational seminar entitled "Residents as Teachers". Three attending surgeons with expertise in surgical education administered the curriculum.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four residents completed the course and surveys (5 PGY-5s, 6 PGY-4s, 4 PGY-3s, 5 PGY-2s, and 4 PGY-1s).

RESULTS

On a 5-point Likert scale, residents' self-rating of teaching skills (pre = 1.8, post = 3.04, p < 0.001) and understanding of adult learning (pre = 1.88, post = 4.42, p < 0.001) improved significantly. The greatest gain was in describing effective strategies for teaching in the OR (pre = 1.75, post = 4.38, p < 0.001). Residents reported improved understanding of effective feedback characteristics (pre = 2.5, post = 4.33, p < 0.001), and felt more prepared to provide feedback to learners (pre = 2.73, post = 3.17, p = 0.01). Scores on 5 of 10 knowledge-based questions significantly improved following the intervention. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop improved the program's surgical education curriculum (mean score 4.42 of 5).

CONCLUSIONS

A "Residents as Teachers" workshop improved resident confidence in teaching and feedback skills, particularly for intraoperative instruction, and improved knowledge in the 3 specific educational domains included in the session.

Resident-as-teacher programs in general surgery residency - A review of published curricula

INTRODUCTION

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) requires that residents are trained to fulfill their educational duties toward medical students. This study reviews the literature on resident-as-teacher programs (RATPs) aimed at surgical residents.

METHODS

Literature search with MeSH terms internship, residency, general surgery, teaching, education, and curriculum was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ERIC. Curriculum components and how curricula's success was measured were extracted for each study. Quality was scored using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).

RESULTS

For the seven relevant publications the average MERSQI score was 9.9 (range 6.5-13.5). The RATPs were either lecture based (4/7) or content was distributed electronically (3/7). Change in attitude toward teaching was the most frequently assessed outcome. Highly rated curricular components were individualized feedback and iterative reminders to make teaching part of practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Few published RATPs in general surgery training exist. The literature suggests that pairing lectures with observation and feedback is successful. Distributing the content electronically is a feasible alternative to class-room based teaching in a busy surgical residency.

E-Mailed Conference Synopses as a Tool for Resident and Faculty Development

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the utility and success of daily conference synopses emails ("Daily Dispatches") sent to surgical attending physicians, fellows, and residents to foster resident and faculty development.

DESIGN

Emails were distributed by the surgical residency program director (PD), summarizing each day of a surgical conference. Two prospective electronic surveys were administered to surgical residents, fellows, and attending surgeons to evaluate the value of this Daily Dispatch method.

SETTING

Institutional; Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Washington, DC.

PARTICIPANTS

Email synopses were sent to surgical attendings, fellows and residents. Pilot survey was distributed to 60 participants, main survey sent to 74 participants.

RESULTS

The response rate for the pilot survey was 41.6% (25/60). When asked about the mode of delivery, 96% of respondents wanted to maintain the email medium when compared to a lecture, paper handout, or the use of social media. The response rate for the main survey was 31.1% (23/74). Almost all (91%) respondents reported reading the emails. Within this group, 70% "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the emails were useful. Furthermore, 90% reported learning "at least one new thing" and 80% confirmed these "emails provide meaningful content they would not otherwise obtain".

CONCLUSION

Individualized daily synopsis emails highlighting relevant content provided meaningful information from conferences to non-attendees. The emails were well received and useful. Daily Dispatches meet an important need in dissemination of information traditionally gathered only by the rate-limiting step of conference attendance.