Management of achalasia in the UK, do we need new guidelines?

Achalasia

Achalasia is a rare disorder of the oesophageal smooth muscle characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and absent or spastic contractions in the oesophageal body. The key pathophysiological mechanism is loss of inhibitory nerve function that probably results from an autoimmune attack targeting oesophageal myenteric nerves through cell-mediated and, possibly, antibody-mediated mechanisms. Achalasia incidence and prevalence increase with age, but the disorder can affect all ages and both sexes. Cardinal symptoms consist of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain and weight loss. Several years can pass between symptom onset and an achalasia diagnosis. Evaluation starts with endoscopy to rule out structural causes, followed by high-resolution manometry and/or barium radiography. Functional lumen imaging probe can provide complementary evidence. Achalasia subtypes have management and prognostic implications. Although symptom questionnaires are not useful for diagnosis, the Eckardt score is a simple symptom scoring scale that helps to quantify symptom response to therapy. Oral pharmacotherapy is not particularly effective. Botulinum toxin injection into the LES can temporize symptoms and function as a bridge to definitive therapy. Pneumatic dilation, per-oral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic Heller myotomy can provide durable symptom benefit. End-stage achalasia with a dilated, non-functioning oesophagus may require oesophagectomy or enteral feeding into the stomach. Long-term complications can, rarely, include oesophageal cancer, but surveillance recommendations have not been established.

The level of impaired esophageal bolus transit measured by multichannel intraluminal impedance: Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are often diagnosed manometrically, yet the underlying pathology is not always clear. Esophageal function testing (EFT), which incorporates manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII), is considered a useful tool in the assessment of EMDs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the most likely level of impaired bolus transit within the esophagus which may help further localize and characterize EMDs.

METHODS

In a retrospective study design, we reviewed consecutive EFTs over a period of 12 months. Data included diagnosis, presenting symptoms, and EFT results of liquid and viscous swallows. Each patient underwent 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows, and bolus transit is measured at 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm above the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). We recorded the initial level of impaired bolus transit for each swallow.

RESULTS

A total of 2358 swallows in 118 patients was included for analysis. Of these, 837 swallows (35.5%) were incompletely transmitted. The proportions of impaired bolus transit were 39%, 41%, 15.6%, 4.4% at 20 cm, 15 cm, 10 cm, and 5 cm above the GEJ, respectively. The common symptoms at presentation were dysphagia (47%), heartburn (44%), chest pain (24.6%) and regurgitation (18%). The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was 24 ± 13.9 mmHg whereas the mean contraction amplitude was 84 ± 46.6 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

In patients with abnormal esophageal clearance, the most likely levels of impaired bolus transit are 15 and 20 cm above the GEJ. These levels of the esophagus should be a focus of attention in future studies evaluating the pathophysiology of esophageal dysmotility.

The caged bird sign of achalasia: A case series describing a new radiologic sign that can be reliably used in a resource-poor setting to diagnose achalasia

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is an uncommon oesophageal motility disorder caused by failed relaxation of a hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter in response to swallowing. It often manifests clinically with symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, and weight loss. Manometry is considered the gold standard diagnostic test in diagnosing this condition. However, it is not always accessible, especially in the resource-limited setting. Other radiological adjuncts, such as barium oesophagram, often show features that are highly suggestive of achalasia: the bird-beak appearance of the distal oesophagus, and a dilated oesophagus (megaoesophagus) containing food residue, which may then progress to become tortuous (sigmoid) or aperistaltic. Thus, the use of these tests play a significant role in the identification of this condition.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three patients were diagnosed with achalasia at the San Fernando General Hospital, Trinidad and Tobago. Together with characteristic symptoms, barium oesophagrams demonstrated features of achalasia, bearing a close resemblance to those of a caged bird. The barium oesophagrams were scrutinized by a fellowship trained, upper GI advanced laparoscopic surgeon, and the consistent features described were noted.

CONCLUSION

In the setting where manometry is not accessible, barium oesophagram plays an important role. We propose that recognition of easily identifiable features such as the "caged bird sign of achalasia" on this imaging modality can assist in the diagnosis of this entity.

Clinical Management of Pediatric Achalasia: A Survey of Current Practice

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative disorder of the esophagus that requires treatment. Different diagnostic and treatment modalities are available, but there are no data that show how children can best be diagnosed and treated. We aimed to identify current practices regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach toward children with achalasia.

METHODS

Information on the current practice regarding the management of pediatric achalasia was collected by an online-based survey sent to members of the European and North American Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition involved in pediatric achalasia care.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 38 centers from 24 countries. Within these centers, 108 children were diagnosed with achalasia in the last year (median 2, range 0-15). Achalasia was primarily managed by a pediatric gastroenterologist (76%) and involved a multidisciplinary team in 84% of centers, also including a surgeon (87%), radiologist (61%), dietician (37%), speech pathologist (8%), and psychologist (5%). Medical history taking and physical examination were considered most important to establish the diagnosis (50%), followed by (a combination of) manometry (45%) or contrast swallow (21%). Treatment of first choice was Heller myotomy (58%), followed by pneumatic dilation (46%) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (29%).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a great heterogeneity in the management of pediatric achalasia amongst different centers worldwide. These findings stress the need for well-designed intervention trials in children with achalasia. Given the rarity of this disease, we recommend that achalasia care should be managed in centers with access to appropriate diagnostic and treatment modalities.

The influence of hospital volume upon clinical management and outcomes of esophageal achalasia: an English national population-based cohort study

Management of achalasia is potentially complex. Previous studies have identified equivalence between pneumatic dilatation and surgical cardiomyotomy in terms of clinical outcomes. However, previous research has not investigated whether a management strategies and outcomes are different in high-volume achalasia centers. This national population-based cohort study aimed to identify the treatment modalities utilized in centers, which regularly manage achalasia and those which manage it infrequently. This study also assessed rates of re-intervention and complications to establish if a volume-outcome relationship exists for the management of achalasia in England. In this study, the Hospitals Episode Statistics database was used to identify all patients treated for achalasia in England from 2002 to 2012. Primary treatment was defined as surgical cardiomyotomy, sequential pneumatic dilatation, or botulinum toxin therapy. Primary outcome measure was reintervention. Centers were divided into regular achalasia centers (≥5.7 cases per annum) and infrequent achalasia centers (<5.7 cases per annum), and were analyzed according to tertiary cancer center status. In total, there were 7,487 patients treated for achalasia. Out of 1,947 cases (26%) were treated in regular achalasia centers, with 5,540 (74%) treated in infrequent centers. In binary logistic regression modeling regular centers treated a similar proportion of patients with primary surgical cardiomyotomy (OR: 1.11 (95% CI 0.98-1.27)) and had similar rates of re-intervention to infrequent achalasia centers (HR: 1.03 (0.94-1.12)). RA-CUSUM analysis demonstrated no relationship between total hospital volume and reintervention rates. Tertiary cancer centers treated more achalasia patients with primary surgical cardiomyotomy (OR: 1.51 (95% CI 1.31-1.73)) but there was no significant difference in reintervention rates (OR: 1.05 (95% CI 0.95-1.16)). In conclusion, this analysis failed to demonstrate a volume-outcome relationship in the management of achalasia in England. This study highlights that achalasia is treated infrequently by the majority of centers.