Pre-operative factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes in the patient with inguinal hernia: What does the current evidence say?

Biomechanical stability of hernia-damaged abdominal walls

Hernia occurs when the peritoneum and/or internal organs penetrate through a defect in the abdominal wall. Implanting mesh fabrics is a common way to reinforce the repair of hernia-damaged tissues, despite the risks of infection and failure associated with them. However, there is neither consensus on the optimum mesh placement within the abdominal muscles complex nor on the minimum size of hernia defect that requires surgical correction. Here we show that the optimum position of the mesh depends on the hernia location; placing the mesh on the transversus abdominis muscles reduces the equivalent stresses in the damaged zone and represents the optimum reinforcement solution for incisional hernia. However, retrorectus reinforcement of the linea alba is more effective than preperitoneal, anterectus, and onlay implantations in the case of paraumbilical hernia. Using the principles of fracture mechanics, we found that the critical size of a hernia damage zone becomes severe at 4.1 cm in the rectus abdominis and at larger sizes (5.2-8.2 cm) in other anterior abdominal muscles. Furthermore, we found that the hernia defect size must reach 7.8 mm in the rectus abdominis before it influences the failure stress. In other anterior abdominal muscles, hernia starts to influence the failure stress at sizes ranging from 1.5 to 3.4 mm. Our results provide objective criteria to decide when a hernia damage zone becomes severe and requires repair. They demonstrate where mesh should be implanted for a mechanically stable reinforcement, depending on the type of hernia. We anticipate our contribution to be a starting point for sophisticated models of damage and fracture biomechanics. For example, the apparent fracture toughness is an important physical property that should be determined for patients living with different obesity levels. Furthermore, relevant mechanical properties of abdominal muscles at various ages and health conditions would be significant to generate patient specific results.

Postoperative outcomes using Lichtenstein open hernioplasty versus Nyhus preperitoneal hernioplasty in inguinal hernia: A comparative analysis with 1-year follow-up

Background and Aim

Inguinal hernia is the most common defect of the abdominal wall in 75% and their treatment consists of surgical repair. The technique of choice is laparoscopic because of its overall benefits. However, when this is not available, open approaches may be a viable option. Currently, the most commonly used open techniques are Lichtenstein and Nyhus. However, there are few medium- or long-term studies that have compared outcomes between these two techniques.

Methods

This is a retrospective comparative study that included patients undergoing open inguinal hernia correction with mesh, using Lichtenstein open hernioplasty versus Nyhus preperitoneal hernioplasty, in two tertiary referral centers in Bogota, Colombia, during a period of 2 years. A bivariate analysis was performed to compare groups, according to the complications presented between the two techniques.

Results

A total of 193 patients were included, of whom 53.36% were men and 112 (58.03%) were approached with the Nyhus technique versus 81 patients with the Lichtenstein technique. Nonabsorbable suture fixation was performed in 100% of patients. Among the main complications, seroma (5.18%), pain (4.14%), bleeding (2.07%), recurrence (10.88%), and reoperation (0.51%) were observed, of which only recurrence showed a statistically significant difference, which is lower in the Nyhus approach (3.57% vs. 20.67%; p < 0.001). No patients died.

Conclusions

Both Nyhus and Lichtenstein hernioplasty techniques were shown to cause a low incidence of postoperative complications, with significantly lower recurrence using the Nyhus technique up to 1 year postoperatively.