A systematic review of the use of rifaximin for Clostridium difficile infections

Ribotypes and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinical Clostridioides difficile isolates: A multicenter, laboratory-based surveillance in Taiwan, 2019-2021

BACKGROUND

The clinical burden of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) remains substantial globally. This study aimed to investigate the ribotypes (RTs) and antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile isolates collected in Taiwan.

METHODS

C. difficile isolates were prospectively collected from four medical centers in Taiwan from 2019 to 2021. In a reference laboratory, in vitro susceptibility to clindamycin, moxifloxacin, metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, and rifaximin were tested, and ribotyping was conducted to determine their genetic diversity.

RESULTS

A total of 568 C. difficile isolates were included. Metronidazole resistance was not observed, and the susceptibility rate of vancomycin was 99.5 %. Clindamycin showed poor activity against these isolates, with a resistance rate of 74.8 %. Fidaxomicin exhibited potent activity and 97.4 % of isolates were inhibited at 0.25 μg/mL. Rifaximin MIC90 increased from 0.015 μg/mL in 2019 to 0.03 μg/mL in 2020 and 2021. Of 40 RTs identified, two predominant RTs were RT 078/126 (78, 14 %) and 014/020 (76, 13 %). RT 017, traditional harboring truncated tcdA, accounted for 3 % (20 isolates) and there was no isolate belonging to RT 027. The proportions of RT 078 increased from 11.2 % in 2019 to 17.1 % in 2021, and the predominance of RT 078/126 was more evident in central Taiwan.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin, fidaxomicin, and metronidazole remain in vitro effective against clinical C. difficile isolates in Taiwan. The reservoirs and genetic relatedness of two major RTs with zoonotic potentials, RT 078/126 and 014/020, warrant further investigations.

Inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridium difficile infection: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management

As a frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was confirmed to not only aggravate the symptoms of IBD but also result in unexpected outcomes, including death. With the increasing prevalence rate of IBD and the updating of CDI diagnosis, the incidence of CDI in IBD patients is also seen rising. Although a detection method consisting of glutamate dehydrogenase immunoassay or nucleic acid amplification test and then toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay was recommended and widely adopted, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD is still a challenge because of the overlap between the symptoms of CDI in IBD and CDI itself. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line therapy for CDI in IBD; however, the treatment has different effects due to the complexity of IBD patients' conditions and the choice of different treatment schemes. Although the use of fecal microbial transplantation is now in the ascendant for IBD management, the prospects are still uncertain and the prevention and treatment of the recurrence of CDI in IBD remain a clinical challenge. In this paper, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, prevention, and therapy of CDI in IBD were summarized and presented.

Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Scientific Society for the Clinical Study of Human Microbiome, of the Russian Gastroenterological Association and the Russian Society for the Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases on the Diagnosis and Treatment of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>)-associated Disease in Adults

Аim: the clinical practice guidelines intended for gastroenterologists, internal medicine specialists, infectious disease specialists, general practitioners (family doctors), coloproctologists, surgeons and endoscopists present modern methods of diagnosis, prevention and treatment of C. difficile-associated disease.

Key points. C. difficile-associated disease is a disease that develops when the diversity of the intestinal microbiota decreases and C. difficile excessively colonizes the colon, the toxins of which damage the intestinal muco-epithelial barrier, followed by the development of inflammation in the colon wall, with diarrhea being a characteristic clinical manifestation. The clinical presentation of the disease can vary from asymptomatic carriage, mild to moderate diarrhea that resolves on its own, to profuse watery diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis with development of life-threatening complications. The diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease is based on an assessment of the clinical presentation, medical history, an objective examination of the patient and laboratory stool tests. The disease severity is determined by clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. Additional diagnostic methods that are used according to indications and contribute to the assessment of severity include endoscopy of the colon and abdominal cavity imaging methods. Treatment should be initiated in cases of characteristic clinical presentation of C. difficile-associated disease and positive laboratory stool testing. The choice of drug and treatment regimen depends on the severity of the episode, the presence of complications, and whether the episode is initial, recurrent, or reinfection.

Conclusion. Determination of target groups of patients for the diagnosis of clostridial infection is important in preventing overdiagnosis and subsequent unnecessary treatment. Timely diagnosis and treatment of C. difficile-associated disease help avoiding the development of life-threatening complications and improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, and the North- West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists

   Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, and an important cause of nosocomial infection. Since the publication of the National Guidelines (2016, 2017), new data have been accumulated on the genetic structure and pathogenic properties of the most common causative agent of severe forms of antibiotic- associated diarrhea, which has led to the reclassifi cation of the pathogen, formerly known as Clostridium diffi cile, to Clostridioides difficile. Laboratory algorithms have been developed to diagnose CDI and determine the toxigenicity of strains reliably. New data on the effectiveness of antibacterials  have been published, monoclonal antibodies to toxin B (bezlotoxumab) have been introduced into clinical practice to prevent CDI recurrence, and fecal microbiota transplantation has been proposed. Over the past 5 years, many international guidelines on the management of adult patients with CDI have also been updated (USA, EU). In the last decade, including due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in CDI incidence. Considering therelevance of CDI, new data on the pathogen, and domestic features, the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, and the North-West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists developed these clinical guidelines.

Clostridioides Difficile Infection before and during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic-Similarities and Differences

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-COVID-19 era. CDI patients treated at the Clinic for Infectious Diseases, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Serbia during 2017-2019 (n = 304) were compared with COVID-19/CDI patients treated in period September 2021-September 2022 (n = 387). Groups were compared by age, gender, comorbidities, previous medications, laboratory findings, and outcome within 30 days. In the CDI/COVID-19 group, we found: greater percentage of males 59.8% vs. 42.6% (p ≤ 0.001), older age 72.8 ± 9.4 vs. 65.6 ± 11.7 (p ≤ 0.001), higher Charlson comorbidity score (CCS) (3.06 ± 1.54 vs. 2.33 ± 1.34 (p ≤ 0.001), greater percentage of chronic renal failure (33.9% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.003), malignances (24.3% vs. 13.5% (p ≤ 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (22.7% vs. 15.5% (p = 0.017), higher usage of macrolide (38.5% vs. 8.6% (p ≤ 0.001), greater percentage of patients with hypoalbuminemia ≤25 g/L (19.6% vs. 12.2% (p ≤ 0.001), lower percentage of patients with elevated creatinine (≥200 mmol/L) (31.5% vs. 43.8%) (p = 0.002), and greater percentage of lethal outcome 29.5% vs. 6.6% (p ≤ 0.001). In the prediction of lethal outcome multivariate regression analysis extracted as an independent predictor, only higher CRP values in the non-COVID-19 group and in the COVID-19 group: older age (p ≤ 0.001), CCS (p = 0.019) and CRP (p = 0.015). COVID-19 changes the disease course of CDI and should be taken into consideration when managing those patients.

Antibiotic Resistance Profile of RT 027/176 Versus Other Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Silesia, Southern Poland

Clostridioides difficile is an important health care-associated pathogen. The aim of this study was to analyze the antibiotic susceptibility of C. difficile isolates from feces of patients from 13 hospitals in Silesia, Poland. The incidence of CDI per 100.000 people in Silesia in 2018−2019 was higher than the average in Poland (39.3−38.7 vs. 30.2−29.5, respectively). The incidence doubled from 26.4 in 2020 to 55.1 in 2021. Two hundred and thirty stool samples tested positive for GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase) and toxins were cultured anaerobically for C. difficile. The isolates were characterized, typed, and tested for susceptibility to 11 antibiotics by E-test (EUCAST, 2021). The genes of toxins A/B and binary were detected by mPCR. Of 215 isolates, 166 (77.2%) were classified as RT 027 and 6 (2.8%) as related RT 176. Resistance to ciprofloxacin (96.7%), moxifloxacin (79.1%), imipenem (78.1%), penicillin (67%), and rifampicin (40.5%) was found. The ermB gene was detected in 79 (36.7%) strains. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was confirmed in 50 (23.3%) strains of RT 027 (94%). We concluded that a high prevalence of MDR among hypervirulent RT 027/176 C. difficile was found in the Silesian region of Poland, emphasizing the need to enhance regional infection control on CDI and antibiotic stewardships.

Rifaximin Therapy for Patients With Metronidazole-Unresponsive Clostridium difficile Infection

Background

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Rifaximin is an antibiotic that offers marginal resistance to C. difficile bacteria. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of rifaximin in metronidazole non-responsive CDI patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed from August 2019 to May 2020 at the Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 200 cases were included. Patients who developed diarrhea after receiving antibiotics for seven days and a positive C. difficile toxin stool test as detected by the enzyme immunoassay (BioCheck, Inc., CA) were diagnosed with CDI. Only patients who were unresponsive to metronidazole therapy were enrolled in our analysis. Two groups were formed. The intervention group was administered 200 mg tablets of rifaximin three times a day for 10 days. For patients in the control group, no new treatment was started. The efficacy of rifaximin was defined in terms of the resolution of diarrhea after two weeks of therapy and a negative stool test. All data were recorded in a predefined pro forma.

Results

The mean age of 45.41 ± 8.54 years was found in the intervention group. The majority of the patients were aged 35-50 years. The majority of the patients had watery diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and loss of appetite on presentation. Rifaximin was found to be significantly effective in the resolution of symptoms of CDI, which was previously unresponsive to metronidazole (p<0.00001). it was found that the duration of diarrhea of more than three weeks was significantly associated with failure of therapy (p=0.03).

Conclusion

We concluded that rifaximin therapy is effective for patients of CDI non-responsive to metronidazole in more than 65% of the cases. Even though several new developments are made to address the concerned subject, such as microbiota transplantation, antibiotics, and immunotherapy, rifaximin can be considered for patients with metronidazole non-responsive CDI.

Mechanisms and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile

The evolution of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile has markedly shaped its epidemiology and detrimentally impacted patient care. C. difficile exhibits resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials, due to accumulation of horizontally acquired resistance genes and de novo mutations to drug targets. Particularly worrying is that declines in clinical success of firstline CDI antimicrobials coincide with the spread of strains that are more resistant to these drugs. Yet, there is still much to learn regarding the prevalence of genetic elements in clinical isolates, their molecular mechanisms, and the extent to which this information can be translated to develop molecular diagnostics that improve antimicrobial prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship approaches for CDI. Thus, this perspective discusses current understanding and knowledge gaps of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in C. difficile, emphasizing on CDI therapies.

Danish national guideline for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection and use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)

Aim: This Danish national guideline describes the treatment of adult patients with Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile (CD) infection and the use of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). It suggests minimum standard for implementing an FMT service.Method: Four scientific societies appointed members for a working group which conducted a systematic literature review and agreed on the text and recommendations. All clinical recommendations were evalluated for evidence level and grade of recommendation.Results: In CD infection, the use of marketed and experimental antibiotics as well as microbiota-based therapies including FMT are described. An algorithm for evaluating treatment effect is suggested. The organisation of FMT, donor recruitment and screening, laboratory preparation, clinical application and follow-up are described.Conclusion: Updated evidence for the treatment of CD infection and the use of FMT is provided.

Add-on interventions for the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides Difficile infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive interventions for the prevention of Clostridioides difficile recurrence.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov up to May 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing interventions added to antibiotic therapy for prevention of CDI recurrence, to placebo or each other. Efficacy outcomes were CDI and diarrhea recurrence. Safety outcomes included the incidence of any adverse event (AE), serious AEs, and discontinuation due to AEs. We performed random-effects network meta-analysis. We ranked interventions based on SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) probabilities. We assessed confidence in estimates utilizing the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) framework.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials (3909 patients) assessed 9 interventions. Oligofructose (OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.46), NTCD-M3 (OR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68), rifaximin (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.93), RBX2660 (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.99), the combination bezlotoxumab/actoxumab (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.60), and bezlotoxumab (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.68) were associated with lower incidence of CDI recurrence than placebo (moderate confidence). Oligofructose was ranked highest, however data for oligofructose were derived solely from one small trial. Probiotics, actoxumab and SER-109 were not superior to placebo (low confidence). Probiotics were not well tolerated (low confidence) and actoxumab showed high rates of serious AEs (moderate confidence).

CONCLUSION

Add-on treatment with oligofructose, NTCD-M3 spores, rifaximin, RBX2660, and bezlotoxumab likely reduces the risk of CDI. Evidence on probiotics and SER-109 are uncertain, thus adequately powered trials are warranted.

ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections

Clostridioides difficile infection occurs when the bacterium produces toxin that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon. These guidelines indicate the preferred approach to the management of adults with C. difficile infection and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process. In instances where the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation but there was consensus of significant clinical merit, key concept statements were developed using expert consensus. These guidelines are meant to be broadly applicable and should be viewed as the preferred, but not the only, approach to clinical scenarios.

Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is an important pathogen of healthcare- associated diarrhea, however, an increase in the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) outside hospital settings has been reported. The accumulation of antimicrobial resistance in C. difficile can increase the risk of CDI development and/or its spread. The limited number of antimicrobials for the treatment of CDI is matter of some concern.

Objectives

In order to summarize the data on antimicrobial resistance to C. difficile derived from humans, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed.

Methods

We searched five bibliographic databases: (MEDLINE [PubMed], Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) for studies that focused on antimicrobial susceptibility testing in C. difficile and were published between 1992 and 2019. The weighted pooled resistance (WPR) for each antimicrobial agent was calculated using a random- effects model.

Results

A total of 111 studies were included. The WPR for metronidazole and vancomycin was 1.0% (95% CI 0–3%) and 1% (95% CI 0–2%) for the breakpoint > 2 mg/L and 0% (95% CI 0%) for breakpoint ≥32 μg/ml. Rifampin and tigecycline had a WPRs of 37.0% (95% CI 18–58%) and 1% (95% CI 0–3%), respectively. The WPRs for the other antimicrobials were as follows: ciprofloxacin 95% (95% CI 85–100%), moxifloxacin 32% (95% CI 25–40%), clindamycin 59% (95% CI 53–65%), amoxicillin/clavulanate 0% (0–0%), piperacillin/tazobactam 0% (0–0%) and ceftriaxone 47% (95% CI 29–65%). Tetracycline had a WPR 20% (95% CI 14–27%) and meropenem showed 0% (95% CI 0–1%); resistance to fidaxomicin was reported in one isolate (0.08%).

Conclusion

Resistance to metronidazole, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam is reported rarely. From the alternative CDI drug treatments, tigecycline had a lower resistance rate than rifampin. The high-risk antimicrobials for CDI development showed a high level of resistance, the highest was seen in the second generation of fluoroquinolones and clindamycin; amoxicillin/clavulanate showed almost no resistance. Tetracycline resistance was present in one fifth of human clinical C. difficile isolates.

Fecal bacteria can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Rifaximin for treating diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) by regulating intestinal microbiota has been studied and recommended. In this study, we tried to investigate the effect of rifaximin on different components of intestinal microbiota and explore which component of gut microbiota can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in IBS-D.

METHODS

Healthy controls (HC) and IBS-D patients meeting the Rome III criteria were recruited, and IBS-D patients were orally administered 400 mg rifaximin three times daily for 2 weeks. Subjects were tested for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), their symptoms were recorded, and fecal and rectal mucosal samples were collected before and after treatment. Fecal and rectal mucosal bacterial data were obtained via 16S rRNA sequencing, and fecal fungal data were obtained via ITS2 sequencing.

RESULTS

IBS-D patients were divided into two subgroups based on fecal bacterial composition, IBS1 (patients whose fecal bacterial composition were different from HC) and IBS0 (patients whose fecal bacterial profiles were similar to HC). Rifaximin increased fecal Bifidobacterium and decreased E. coli and Enterobacter in IBS1 patients. Although rectal mucosal bacteria and fecal fungi were not significantly altered in all patients after rifaximin intervention, rifaximin enhanced the connections among fecal bacteria, mucosal bacteria and fecal fungi in IBS1 patients. Compared with IBS0, we surprisingly found rifaximin ameliorated abdominal symptoms of IBS1 much better. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed patients whose fecal microbial dysbiosis indices (MDI) were higher than -3.006 could be diagnosed as IBS1.

CONCLUSION

Fecal bacterial dysbiosis could be a biomarker for rifaximin treatment for IBS-D.

Cytoskeletal Tropomyosin as a Biomarker in Clostridium difficile Infection

Background

Current diagnostics of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) heavily relies on detection of the disease-causing organism. The objective of this study was to investigate a cytoskeletal protein, tropomyosin (Tpm), as a CDI biomarker.

Methods

Fecal Tpm was tested by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in a 12-month prospective study. Remnant diarrheal clinical specimens and relevant clinical data were collected. The CDI positive (CDI⁺, n = 230) and CDI negative (CDI^-, n = 228) groups were composed of samples testing positive or negative by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Xpert^® C. difficile/Epi, Cepheid), respectively. The other enteric pathogen (OEP) group (n = 52) was composed of specimens tested for the presence of other enteric pathogens or parasites by routine testing methods. Extracted fecal Tpm was detected by Western blot and the results were correlated with CDI based on clinical and microbiology laboratory data.

Results

A total of 510 stool specimens were tested. Tpm is not stable in stool, suggesting the utility of fresh specimens. In the CDI⁺ group, specificity and sensitivity of Tpm detection in correlation with a CDI were 93.2% and 53.7%, respectively, when only "true CDI" and "not CDI" were analyzed (110 samples). For CDI⁺ samples, 23% did not satisfy CDI clinical signs. Tpm positives in the CDI^- group (8.3%) had inflammatory bowel diseases.

Conclusion

Tpm has a potential role as a CDI biomarker in combination with C. difficile PCR and an appropriate clinical evaluation. However, non-muscle Tpm, as a biomarker for CDI, suffers from a low sensitivity in our study. Therefore further investigation using larger cohorts is needed.

Management of Clostridioides difficile colitis: insights for the gastroenterologist

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of diarrhea in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The last few years have seen major changes in the treatment spectrum of CDI, most notably, recommendations against using metronidazole for initial CDI, the addition of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab, and emergence of microbial replacement therapies. Several other therapies are undergoing clinical trials. This narrative review focuses on the treatment of CDI with a summary of literature on the newer modalities and the treatment guidelines issued by Infectious Diseases Society of America and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.