Frequency and severity of reactions to a 325-mg aspirin dose during desensitization

Demographic Variation in Chronic Rhinosinusitis by Subtype and Region: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) describes a heterogenous group of diseases including CRS with (CRSwNP) or without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). It affects 10 to 15% of the US population and is more common in women and White patients. However, these estimates are based on survey and database studies with innate diagnostic inaccuracy. Additionally, few studies report subtype-specific demographics. We explore the demographic differences of CRS in the U.S. by subtype and region.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize demographic differences between the CRS population and the overall US population, and also between different CRS subtype populations.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review for articles reporting on US demographics of adults with CRS. Study participants were required to have been diagnosed using consensus criteria. Data on demographics, geographic region, and CRS subtype were analyzed.

RESULTS

Our study analyzed 31 unique studies representing 8409 patients with 50.7% females and weighted mean age of 48.0 years. Compared to the overall US population, CRS patients were predominantly White (78.5%) and non-Hispanic (94.5%) with under-representation of other races. Grouped by subtype, CRSwNP affected a significantly higher proportion of men (59.8%). AFRS affected a significantly higher proportion of Black patients (53.8%) while CRSsNP was more prevalent in White patients (84.2%). When grouped by region, the South had a significantly higher proportion of female (53%) and Black (17.8%) CRS patients. The West had a significantly higher proportion of Asian (4.5%) and Hispanic (12.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant demographic differences exist in CRS patients based on subtype and region. These data provide an estimation of the demographic make-up of CRS, but further high-level demographic studies are needed.

The role of aspirin desensitization followed by oral aspirin therapy in managing patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: A Work Group Report from the Rhinitis, Rhinosinusitis and Ocular Allergy Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is characterized by the clinical triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and an intolerance to medications that inhibit the cycloxgenase-1 enzyme. Patients with AERD on average have more severe respiratory disease compared with patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and/or asthma alone. Although patients with AERD traditionally develop significant upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms on ingestion of cycloxgenase-1 inhibitors, most of these same patients report clinical benefit when desensitized to aspirin and maintained on daily aspirin therapy. This Work Group Report provides a comprehensive review of aspirin challenges, aspirin desensitizations, and maintenance aspirin therapy in patients with AERD. Identification of appropriate candidates, indications and contraindications, medical and surgical optimization strategies, protocols, medical management during the desensitization, and recommendations for maintenance aspirin therapy following desensitization are reviewed. Also included is a summary of studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of aspirin therapy after desensitization as well as a discussion on the possible cellular and molecular mechanisms explaining how this therapy provides unique benefit to patients with AERD.

Factors correlated with repeated aspirin dosing during aspirin desensitization

BACKGROUND

Aspirin desensitization is an appropriate procedure for many patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Patients can require aspirin re-dosing, which prolongs the desensitization process. The frequency of this is not widely reported, nor is it known which patients will require multiple re-dosing.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of and factors associated with repeat aspirin re-dosing during desensitization.

METHODS

Charts of aspirin desensitization procedures from 2011 to 2016 at the University of Michigan Allergy/Immunology Clinic were reviewed. Reactions with provoking doses and number of dose repetitions were characterized. Previous AERD history, medical history, medications, and baseline spirometry were also recorded. Bivariate correlation and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze associations between patient characteristics and need for repeated dosing of aspirin.

RESULTS

A total of 84 positive-reacting patients during desensitization were identified. Of these patients, 33% required 2 or more aspirin dose repetitions during desensitization. Requiring 2 or more repeat doses during desensitization was associated with male gender (odds ratio = 6.194, P = .008), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) decrease during desensitization (odds ratio = 1.075 per percent point drop, P = .021), and initial aspirin provoking dose during desensitization of 81 mg or lower (odds ratio = 11.111, P = .003). No association was found with pre-desensitization medications, asthma severity, AERD duration, or number/character of reported previous aspirin reactions.

CONCLUSION

During aspirin desensitization for AERD, approximately one third of our patients require multiple repeat doses. Risk factors for multiple repeated doses include male gender, drop in FEV₁, and lower aspirin provoking doses during desensitization. This information can help inform which patients may require multiple re-dosing for desensitization.

Aspirin challenge and desensitization: how, when and why

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To investigate the current approach to aspirin challenge (drug provocation) and/or desensitization in patients with histories of hypersensitivity reactions to it, particularly in those with cardiovascular diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

The literature indicates that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), including those with an acute coronary syndrome, may safely undergo low-dose aspirin challenge and/or desensitization. Recently, flowcharts regarding challenge/desensitization procedures with aspirin in patients with CAD and histories of aspirin hypersensitivity reactions have become available. Aspirin desensitization and continuous aspirin therapy constitute an effective option in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory diseases (NERD) who have suboptimally controlled asthma or rhinosinusitis, or require multiple revision polypectomies.

SUMMARY

The use of aspirin has proven to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with CAD. There is a general consensus on aspirin's effectiveness in secondary prevention of CAD. Therefore, aspirin desensitization is necessary in patients with CAD and histories of hypersensitivity reactions to it. The effectiveness of aspirin desensitization and continuous therapy in patients with NERD has been shown in numerous studies. However, shared selection criteria of candidates for aspirin challenge/desensitization procedures, and simple and homogeneous protocols are necessary. Moreover, preventive safety measures are still needed in order to reduce the potential risks of these procedures.