Drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: Determine the cause and prevention

Distinguishing DRESS syndrome from drug rash and eosinophilia: Beyond RegiSCAR criteria

Background

Diagnosing drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) can be challenging.

Objectives

We sought to identify clinical and laboratory features outside of the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria that distinguish patients with probable DRESS (RegiSCAR ≥ 4) from those with drug rash and eosinophilia (DRE).

Methods

Using international coding classifications of drug-induced fever, generalized skin eruption due to medications, and eosinophilia, a retrospective audit from 2008 to 2023 of hospitalized patients was performed.

Results

Forty-four cases of DRESS were compared to 80 cases of DRE. In addition to the RegiSCAR distinguishing factors for DRESS were longer drug latency before symptom onset (median 21 vs 5 days, P < .001) and higher alanine transaminase levels (increase by a factor of 2.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.56, 4.00; P = .009]). Follow-up (mean 5.67 years) revealed a low rate of statewide drug alert reporting (29.6%) and drug allergy testing in DRESS (20.5%). Inadvertent reexposure to a culprit or structurally related drug resulted in recurrent DRESS in 3 patients (7.5%), and tolerance of structurally related drugs occurred in 8 patients (17.5%).

Conclusion

In this large study evaluating DRE patients whose disease does not meet the RegiSCAR criteria for DRESS, we found that additional factors outside the RegiSCAR criteria may help clinicians differentiate DRESS, which is critical for optimal and timely patient management. Our study also highlights the need for development of local protocols to ensure appropriate allergy labeling and testing are performed to prevent recurrent DRESS.

Oral Antibiotics and Risk of Serious Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions

Importance

Serious cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) are potentially life-threatening drug hypersensitivity reactions involving the skin and internal organs. Antibiotics are a recognized cause of these reactions, but no studies have compared relative risks across antibiotic classes.

Objectives

To explore the risk of serious cADRs associated with commonly prescribed oral antibiotics, and to characterize outcomes of patients hospitalized for them.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Nested case-control study using population-based linked administrative datasets among adults aged 66 years or older who received at least 1 oral antibiotic between 2002 and 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were those who had an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for serious cADRs within 60 days of the prescription, and each case was matched with up to 4 controls who did not.

Exposure

Various classes of oral antibiotics.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Conditional logistic regression estimate of the association between different classes of oral antibiotics and serious cADRs, using macrolides as the reference group.

Results

During the 20-year study period, we identified 21 758 older adults (median age, 75 years; 64.1% female) who had an ED visit or hospitalization for serious cADRs following antibiotic therapy and 87 025 matched controls who did not. In the primary analysis, sulfonamide antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.7-3.1) and cephalosporins (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.5-2.8) were most strongly associated with serious cADRs relative to macrolides. Additional associations were evident with nitrofurantoin (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 2.1-2.4), penicillins (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5), and fluoroquinolones (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4). The crude rate of ED visits or hospitalization for cADRs was highest for cephalosporins (4.92 per 1000 prescriptions; 95% CI, 4.86-4.99) and sulfonamide antibiotics (3.22 per 1000 prescriptions; 95% CI, 3.15-3.28). Among the 2852 case patients hospitalized for cADRs, the median length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 3-13 days), 9.6% required transfer to a critical care unit, and 5.3% died in the hospital.

Conclusion and Relevance

Commonly prescribed oral antibiotics are associated with an increased risk of serious cADRs compared with macrolides, with sulfonamides and cephalosporins carrying the highest risk. Prescribers should preferentially use lower-risk antibiotics when clinically appropriate.

Drugs and the skin: A concise review of cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Drug-induced skin disease or cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are terms that encompass the clinical manifestations of the skin, mucosae and adnexa induced by a drug or its metabolites. The skin is the organ most frequently affected by drug reactions, which may affect up to 10% of hospitalized patients and occur in 1-3% of multimedicated patients. Most CADRs are mild or self-resolving conditions; however, 2-6.7% of could develop into potentially life-threatening conditions. CADRs represent a heterogeneous field and can be diagnostically challenging as they may potentially mimic any dermatosis. Currently, there are between 29-35 different cutaneous drug-reaction patterns reported ranging from mild dermatitis to an extensively burnt patient. The most frequently reported are maculopapular rash, urticaria/angioedema, fixed drug eruption and erythema multiforme. Less common but more severe patterns include erythroderma, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis spectrum. Almost any drug can induce a CADR, but antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiepileptics are the most frequently involved. Different mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of CADRs, although in some cases, these remain still unknown. CADRs could be classified in different ways: (i) type A (augmented) or type B (bizarre); (ii) immediate or delayed; (iii) immune-mediated or nonimmune-mediated; (iv) nonsevere or life-threatening; and (v) by their phenotype, including exanthematous, urticarial, pustular and blistering morphology. Recognizing a specific CADR will mostly depend on the ability of the physician to perform a detailed clinical examination, the proper description of the morphology of the skin lesions and supporting laboratory and/or skin biopsy findings.

Antibiotic-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a single-center retrospective study over ten years

Objective

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but life-threatening, with antibiotics being the main cause. This retrospective study from a single center was designed to analyze the culprit drugs, clinical features and treatment outcomes of antibiotic-induced SCARs.

Methods

We analyzed cases of antibiotic-induced SCARs in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and January 2024, including Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) overlap, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Descriptive analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, treatment and prognosis were carried out.

Results

Among 354 cases of SCARs, 63 validated antibiotic-related cases were included. Cephalosporins (31.7%), penicillins (25.4%), and quinolones (19.0%) were the most common triggers for SCARs. Overall, liver (50.8%), lungs (31.7%), and kidneys (23.8%) were the most frequently affected organ in SCARs cases. Eight patients (28.6%) in the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group and 8 patients (80.0%) in the TEN group received combination therapy of corticosteroids and IVIG. Patients with SCARs caused by penicillins or cephalosporins could receive alternative treatments such as lincomamides, quinolones, and tetracyclines. The mortality rate in the TEN group was the highest at 20.0%, followed by the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group (7.1%), and no deaths were observed in the DRESS and AGEP groups.

Conclusion

The identification of the culprit antibiotics and the application of alternative antibiotic therapies are crucial for the management of antibiotic-induced SCARs. If complicated underlying conditions and complications like advanced age, cancer and pneumonia coexist with SCARs, patients might be more at risk for mortality.

Causes and Management of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: A Comprehensive Review

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are one of the most broadly studied and rigorously researched conditions in recent dermatological advancements. Also termed as "toxidermia," they are heavily involved and are of utmost importance to be understood and studied in the modern healthcare industry. In simple terms, they are dermatological manifestations which result from systemic drug administration to patients. Since allopathy is influenced by the medicines and drugs provided to the patients, cutaneous skin eruptions are a common occurrence in recent times. It is a need of the hour to understand the causative factors for such skin eruptions and the correct management and handling of such disorders to provide better healthcare to patients. The withdrawal of the causative drug which induces the reaction plays a key role in treatment. The risk factors are to be thoroughly studied, and dosages must be in accordance with the patient's situation. They are some of the common public health problems. The age group which is affected is highly variable as people from all age groups can be affected. Those who are affected comprise approximately 10% of all hospitalized patients, and it is also observed in about 1-4% of people who are on multiple medications.

Immunological Mechanisms in Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an inherent aspect of drug use. While approximately 80% of ADRs are predictable, immune system-mediated ADRs, often unpredictable, are a noteworthy subset. Skin-related ADRs, in particular, are frequently unpredictable. However, the wide spectrum of skin manifestations poses a formidable diagnostic challenge. Comprehending the pathomechanisms underlying ADRs is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management. The skin, being an active immune organ, plays a pivotal role in ADRs, although the precise cutaneous immunological mechanisms remain elusive. Fortunately, clinical manifestations of skin-related ADRs, irrespective of their severity, are frequently rooted in immunological processes. A comprehensive grasp of ADR morphology can aid in diagnosis. With the continuous development of new pharmaceuticals, it is noteworthy that certain drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors have gained notoriety for their association with ADRs. This paper offers an overview of immunological mechanisms involved in cutaneous ADRs with a focus on clinical features and frequently implicated drugs.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the duration of glucocorticoid therapy in the treatment of cutaneous adverse drug reactions

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoid (GC) remains the mainstay of treatment for cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) but has been associated with side effects, emphasizing the importance of precisely managing the duration of high-dose GC treatment. Although the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has been proven to be closely related to inflammatory disorders, its ability to predict the timing of GC dose reduction (Tr) during cADRs treatment remains obscure.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients diagnosed with cADRs treated with glucocorticoids were analyzed in the present study to evaluate the association between PLR values and Tr values using linear, locally weighted scatter plot smoothing (LOWESS) and Poisson regression. Subgroup and ROC curve analyses were conducted to identify confounding variables and assess the predictive performance, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 47.0 (31.0-62.0) years old and a median incubation period of 4 days. Antibiotics (n = 113, 36.7%) were the most common cause of cADRs, followed by Chinese herbs (n = 76, 24.7%). PLR values were positively correlated with Tr values during linear regression (P < 0.001, r = 0.414) and LOWESS regression analyses. Poisson regression showed PLR was an independent risk factor for higher Tr values (the incidence rate ratio ranged from 1.016 to 1.070 and P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve of PLR for predicting Tr < 7 days was 0.917.

CONCLUSIONS

PLR is a simple and convenient parameter with huge prospects for application as a biomarker to assist clinicians in optimally managing patients treated with glucocorticoid therapy for cADRs.

Clinical aspects of severe cutaneous adverse reactions caused by beta-lactam antibiotics: A study from the Korea SCAR registry

Background

Although beta-lactams are 1 of the major causative agents of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), their epidemiology and clinical aspects have been poorly studied. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of SCAR caused by beta-lactams in the Korean SCAR registry.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed beta-lactam-induced SCAR cases collected from 28 tertiary university hospitals in Korea between 2010 and 2015. The SCAR phenotypes included Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), SJS-TEN overlap, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Beta-lactams were classified according to their chemical structures: penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. The causative beta-lactams, clinical and laboratory features, treatments, and outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Among the 275 antibiotic-induced SCAR cases, 170 patients developed SCAR induced by beta-lactams. Beta-lactam antibiotic-induced SCAR showed more frequent SJS/TEN compared to SCAR induced by non-beta-lactam antibiotics (SJS/TEN/SJS-TEN overlap/DRESS: 36.5/11.2/5.9/46.5% vs. 23.8/10.5/2.9/62.9%, P = 0.049). Cephalosporin was the most common culprit drug. Particularly, 91 and 79 patients presented with SJS/TEN and DRESS, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) for poor prognosis, such as sequelae and death, was significantly increased in subjects with SJS-TEN overlap and TEN and carbapenem as culprit drug in the multivariate analysis (OR, 35.61; P = 0.016, OR, 28.07; P = 0.006, OR 30.46; P = 0.027).

Conclusion

Among antibiotic-induced SCAR, clinical features were different depending on whether the culprit drug was a beta-lactam antibiotic or SCAR type. The poor prognosis was related to SJS-TEN overlap, TEN type, and carbapenem as the culprit drug.

Cephradine-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Case Report of Treatment With Etanercept

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare yet life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) to various causative agents, including medications, vaccinations, infections, and malignancies, in addition to some other uncommon external stimuli. TEN is characterized by the sudden appearance of generalizeddusky erythematous targetoid macules with a purpuric center, which coalesces to form bullae and flaccid blisters, leading to an eventual sheet-like epidermal detachment of all necrotic areas. Extensive epidermal denudation in TEN is usually accompanied by thermoregulatory impairment, insensible fluid loss, and hemodynamic instability. The severity of presentation for TEN is calculated through the use of a "Severity-of-Illness Score for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis" (SCORTEN) score. Certain medications, including antibiotics, anticonvulsants, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are considered the primary cause of this dermatosis. In this report, we describe a case of TEN caused by Cephradine, a first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic drug, in a 43-year-old South Asian male who presented to the emergency department one day after receiving Cephradine for the treatment of cellulitis. At presentation, this patient had a calculated SCORTEN score of 4 according to the SCORTEN criteria found in the literature, placing his mortality rate at 58%. His treatment plan consisted of a single 50mg dose of Etanercept (ENBREL), a soluble anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody, as an emergent intervention at presentation, along with cyclosporine and hydrocortisone in tapered doses. This is the first reported case of severe TEN in the Kingdom of Bahrain successfully treated with a TNF-α inhibitor, Etanercept in this case, achieving complete healing and remission within 20 days of presentation, after initially showing a poor prognosis and a high risk of fatality.

The Use of Electronic Health Records to Study Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions from 2000 to 2021: A Systematic Review

Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized the field of drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) research. In this systematic review, we assessed 140 articles from 2000-2021, classifying them under six themes: observational studies (n=61), clinical documentation (n=27), case management (n=22), clinical decision support (CDS) (n=18), case identification (n=9), and genetic studies (n=3). EHRs provide convenient access to millions of medical records, facilitating epidemiological studies of DHRs. Though the goal of CDS is to promote safe drug prescribing, allergy alerts must be designed and used in a way that supports this effort. Ultimately, accurate allergy documentation is essential for DHR prevention.

Clinical characteristics of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: A single-center study

Background

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe adverse cutaneous reactions, most commonly triggered by medications, characterized by extensive necrosis and detachment of the epidermis.

Objective

We investigated the differences in clinical characteristics of drug-induced SJS/TEN depending on the type of drug in a single center.

Methods

The relevance of sex, age, culprit drugs, clinical features, courses, treatment options, and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated in patients diagnosed with drug-induced SJS/TEN at Pusan National University Hospital between 2008 and 2019.

Results

Ninety-two patients with a mean age of 58.7 ± 20.2 years (range, 10-93 years) were included in the study. Those aged 60-80 years accounted for the largest number of patients (42.4%). Patients with drug-induced SJS/TEN comprised 40 women (43.5%) and 52 men (56.5%). We categorized drug-induced SJS/TEN cases by culprit drugs into 6 groups: antibiotics, allopurinol, antiepileptic (AED), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and other drugs. The rate of NSAID-induced disease significantly increased from SJS to TEN (p = 0.016). Among the patients in the NSAID group, the proportion of TEN (40%) was higher than that in the other groups (p = 0.021). The mean body surface area was significantly lower in the AED group than in the non-AED groups (7.1 ± 9.8 vs. 23.1 ± 27.3, p = 0.020) and higher in the NSAID group than in the non-NSAID groups (47.5 ± 39.5 vs. 15.7 ± 20.0, p = 0.010).

Conclusion

This study showed that the clinical characteristics of each causative drug group may be different in drug-induced SJS/TEN. Our findings may help clinicians better understand drug-induced SJS/TEN.

Drug Triggers and Clinic of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP): A Literature Case Series of 297 Patients

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare skin reaction, commonly caused by drugs. Available evidence mostly relies on small studies or case reports. We collected published AGEP case reports and, subsequently, described the patient characteristics, suspect and concomitant drugs, time to onset, disease management, and clinical prognosis. This study included 297 AGEP patients (64.3% women) obtained from 250 published case reports or case series with individual patient data. AGEP affected patients of all ages, but the majority of patients (88.2%) were ≥25 years old. The most frequently reported suspect drugs were anti-infectives for systemic use (36.5%), particularly antibacterials for systemic use (31.0%), and especially beta-lactam antibacterials (18.3%) and macrolides (4.3%). Other frequent suspect drugs were antineoplastics (12.2%), and anti-inflammatory/anti-rheumatic products (5.2%) plus hydroxychloroquine (12.8%). Mean time to onset was 9.1 days (standard deviation SD 13.94). Some patients developed fever (64.3%) and systemic involvement (18.9%), and most patients (76.4%) received pharmacological treatment for AGEP. Seven patients died, although five of them were already critically ill prior to AGEP. In conclusion, antibiotics remain the most common suspected cause of AGEP. While case mortality rate may be up to 2.5%, disentangling the role of AGEP on the fatal outcome from the role of the preexisting health conditions remains challenging.

Methods for Identifying Culprit Drugs in Cutaneous Drug Eruptions: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous drug eruptions are a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and cost to the healthcare system. Identifying the culprit drug is essential; however, despite numerous methods being published, there are no consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

Conduct a scoping review to identify all published methods of culprit drug identification for cutaneous drug eruptions, compare the methods, and generate hypotheses for future causality assessment studies.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed publications involving culprit drug identification methods.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

CHARTING METHODS

Registered PRISMA-ScR format protocol on Open Science Forum.

RESULTS

In total, 109 studies and 26 reviews were included comprising 656,635 adverse drug events, most of which were cutaneous. There were 54 methods of culprit drug identification published, categorized as algorithms, probabilistic approaches, and expert judgment. Algorithms had higher sensitivity and positive predictive value, but lower specificity and negative predictive value. Probabilistic approaches had lower sensitivity and positive predictive value, but higher specificity and negative predictive value. Expert judgment was subjective, less reproducible, but the most frequently used to validate other methods. Studies suggest that greater accuracy may be achieved by specifically assessing cutaneous drug eruptions and using combinations of causality assessment categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Culprit drug identification for adverse drug reactions remains a challenge. Many methods have been published, but there are no consensus guidelines. Using causality assessment methods specifically for cutaneous drug eruptions and combining aspects of the different causality assessment categories may improve efficacy. Further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.

Bullous Erythema Multiforme Secondary to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Use, Treated With Cyclosporine in a 91-Year-Old Male

Erythema multiforme is an acute, immune-mediated, mucocutaneous condition in which 90% of cases are triggered by infection. The second most common cause is drug-induced. It classically presents with itchy, burning targetoid lesions on the skin and mucous membranes. The lesions may be mistaken for other conditions, and thus, rapid and correct diagnosis is crucial. It is most often treated with corticosteroids, though non-responders or those with weakened immune systems may require immunomodulatory therapy. We present the case of a 91-year-old male who developed bullous erythema multiforme after treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole who was successfully treated with cyclosporine.

Exanthematous reactions to drugs in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The true exanthematous reactions to drugs in children are rare and overdiagnosed. Drugs may cause exanthema either due to inducing an immune response or because of their interaction with viruses, if drugs are taken in the course of a viral infection. Also, viral infections are very often in children and they can provoke an exanthema which is difficult to differentiate from exanthematous reactions to drugs. Consequently, the majority of children are incorrectly labeled as 'allergic'.

RECENT FINDINGS

The correct diagnosis of exanthematous drug reactions in children is still an important and hot topic. Most information about the approach and management of drug hypersensitivity in children is applied from available guidelines and consensus statement for adults. Recently, a systematic clinical approach for timely differential diagnosis and management of rashes in children who present a cutaneous exanthema while receiving a drug, is proposed.

SUMMARY

It is important to consider the detailed clinical history of appearing and developing exanthematous drug reaction, as well as physical examination which includes the description and the distribution of exanthema and at the end making the appropriate diagnosis. Thus, it could reduce overdiagnosis and promote appropriate procedures, that will prevent the overlabeling of drug hypersensitivity in children.

Skin eruptions in children: Drug hypersensitivity vs viral exanthema

Childhood rashes or exanthemas are common and are usually relatively benign. There are many causes of rash in children, including mainly viruses, and less often bacterial toxins, drugs, allergens and other diseases. Viral exanthema often appears while children are taking a medication in the course of a viral infection; it can mimic drug exanthema and is perceived as a drug allergy in 10% of cases. In the vast majority of cases, the distinction between virus-induced and drug-induced skin eruption during the acute phase is not possible. The drugs most commonly implicated are beta-lactams (BL) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Viruses, commonly Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the bacterium, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, may cause exanthema either from the infection itself (active or latent) or because of interaction with drugs that are taken simultaneously. Determination of the exact diagnosis requires a careful clinical history and thorough physical examination. Haematological and biochemical investigations and histology are not always helpful in differentiating between the two types of exanthema. Serological and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be helpful, although a concomitant acute infection does not exclude drug hypersensitivity. A drug provocation test (DPT) is although considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and is not preferred by the patients. Skin tests are not well tolerated, and in vitro tests, such as the basophil activation test and lymphocyte transformation, are of low sensitivity and specificity and their relevance is debatable. Based on current evidence, we propose a systematic clinical approach for timely differential diagnosis and management of rashes in children who present a cutaneous eruption while receiving a drug.

Hypersensitivity reactions to multiple anti-tuberculosis drugs

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate hypersensitivity reactions to anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of single and multiple drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs).

Results

Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with anti-TB DHRs using oral drug provocation tests. Of these 28 patients, 17 patients (60.7%) had DHRs to a single drug and 11 (39.3%) had multiple DHRs. The median age of patients was 57.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 39.2–73.2). Of the total patients, 18 patients (64.3%) were men. The median number of anti-TB drugs causing multiple DHRs was 2.0 (IQR 2.0–3.0). Rifampin was the most common drug that caused DHRs in both the single and multiple DHR groups (n = 8 [47.1%] and n = 9 [52.9%], respectively). The treatment success rate was lower in the multiple DHR group than in the single DHR group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (81.8% vs. 94.1%; P = 0.543).

Conclusions

Multiple anti-TB DHRs were common in all patients who experienced DHRs, and rifampin was the most common causative drug. The treatment outcomes appeared to be poorer in patients with multiple DHRs than in those with single DHRs.

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis in an African American Male Caused by Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare drug-induced autoimmune disease that presents with hundreds of sterile pustules and systemic symptoms. Genetic predisposition, race, and medications prescribed are all factors in AGEP’s frequency, which occurs most commonly in Caucasians and with the use of macrolides and aminopenicillins. Cases of AGEP with sulfonamides or in African American patients are rare. To our knowledge, this is the first documented example of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced AGEP in an African American male. In this article, we will further discuss our case and review the literature.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Allopurinol: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reporting System in Southern Italy

Background

Allopurinol can induce severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

Aims and Methods

We analyzed the Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) sent from January 2001 until April 2019 to the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance (Southern Italy) that reported allopurinol as suspected, with a focus on those reporting at least one serious cutaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR). This study was aimed to describe the main characteristics of all ADRs associated with allopurinol, analyze the proportion of serious cutaneous ADRs of total ICSRs related to allopurinol and to compare the main features (age, sex, seriousness and outcome) of ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs with those that did not.

Results

The Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance received 108 ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected. ADRs occurred more frequently in the elderly (median age: 71 years) and female patients (53.7%). Fifty-seven percent of all ADRs were classified as serious and 58% had a favorable outcome. Fifty-six ICSRs reported at least one serious cutaneous ADR; among these ICSRs, 37 cases of SCARs were found [DRESS syndrome (n = 3; 5.4%), SJS (n = 8; 14.3%) and TEN (n = 26; 46.4%)]. Serious cutaneous ADRs commonly occurred in the elderly (median age: 73 years) and female patients (62.5%). They frequently required hospitalization (75%) and had an unfavorable outcome (46%). No statistically significant differences were found between ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs and ICSRs that did not report serious cutaneous ADRs except for the seriousness degree “Hospitalization or its prolongation” and the outcome degrees “Unfavorable” and “Favorable”.

Conclusion

This study found that 52% (56/108) of all ICSRs having allopurinol as a suspected drug were serious cutaneous ADRs. Serious cutaneous ADRs associated with allopurinol frequently required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, and almost half had an unfavorable outcome.