The evolution of allergy immunotherapy

Clinical characteristics in Japanese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery

OBJECTIVE

There is heterogeneity in the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Obtaining a detailed understanding of patient profiles in specific regions can provide valuable information not only for clinical practice but also future research plans. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study examined the features of 453 patients with CRS who underwent ESS in the Tokyo area of Japan. The study evaluated various factors in patients with CRS including sex and age, the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) score, the recurrence rate of CRS, comorbidities of asthma and/or allergic diseases, and IgE sensitization to 12 inhaled allergens.

RESULTS

Age-related declines in the sensitization rate to inhaled allergens were observed, and the most notable age-related decrease in specific IgE antibodies was observed for house dust mites (HDM) (p = 8.3 × 10-7). Sensitization to HDM, cat dander, and various types of fungi, including Aspergillus, was frequently observed in the CRS with asthma group, with rates of 54%, 17%, and 17%, respectively. We found that 23% of the patients had recurrence. In the recurrence group, the positive rates of specific IgE antibodies for birch and cat dander were significantly higher than in the no recurrence group. Bronchial asthma was identified as an important factor for recurrence. Among male patients, the recurrence group was younger than the no-recurrence group (p = 0.0032). Severe eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) showed early recurrence after surgery, with over the half of the patients experiencing at least one recurrence within 2 years post-surgery. Among patients with ECRS, the recurrence rate for females was 1.92 times higher than for males.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed the influences of age and sex on various clinical phenotypes of CRS patients undergoing ESS. There was a high sensitization rate to cat dander in both the recurrence and asthma groups. Further research on diverse disease etiologies is necessary to improve therapeutic strategies for patients with CRS.

The Art of Dosing for Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in North America

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is a long-established treatment option for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Proper dosing of the allergens is critical for the efficacy and safety of SCIT. Of the hundreds of liquid allergen extracts in the United States, effective and well-tolerated SCIT dosing has only been established for a small number. Thus, SCIT dosing remains largely empiric and continues to be, by necessity, an art. To highlight the complexity of SCIT dosing, this review summarizes the historical and current landscape of U.S. allergen extracts, differences among U.S. and European allergen extracts, allergen selection for SCIT, considerations for compounding of allergen extract mixtures, and recommended dosing. As of 2021, 18 standardized allergen extracts are available in the United States; all other extracts remain unstandardized without characterization of allergen content or potency. U.S. allergen extracts differ from European extracts in formulation and potency characterization. There is no standardized methodology for SCIT allergen selection, and interpretation of allergen sensitization is not straightforward. Compounding of SCIT mixtures requires consideration of potential dilution effects, allergen cross-reactivity, proteolytic activity, and additives. Probable effective dose ranges for SCIT are recommended in U.S. allergy immunotherapy practice parameters, although there are few studies using U.S. extracts supporting these doses as therapeutic. In contrast, optimized doses of sublingual immunotherapy tablets have been confirmed in North American phase 3 trials. The SCIT dosing for each patient remains an art that requires clinical experience and consideration of polysensitization, tolerability, compounding of allergen extract mixtures, and the range of recommended doses within the context of extract potency variability.

A brief history of allergen immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy has its roots in the immunologic treatment of contagious disease. The idea, beginning in the 18th century, that one could be protected against certain illnesses was successfully extended to the field of allergy in 1911. This review presents highlights of the advances by some of the individuals who have contributed to the science of allergen immunotherapy.

How important is proper dosing for subcutaneous and sublingual allergy immunotherapy?

Background: Results of surveys report that allergists use a wide range of doses for allergy immunotherapy; however, results of randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies suggest that the range of the optimum effective dosing is relatively narrow. Objective: To review studies that established effective or less than fully effective doses for allergy immunotherapy. Methods: Studies were reviewed that established effective and ineffective subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy doses. Only those studies that expressed dosing in terms of the content of a major allergen in the maintenance doses were included in defining effective and ineffective doses. Results: Studies were identified that showed effective doses for subcutaneous injection, established in randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials, for short ragweed, timothy grass, house-dust mites, cat and dog dander, birch, and Alternaria. For short ragweed, timothy grass, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and cat and dog dander, less-effective doses were determined, along with effective doses; the less-effective doses were only one-fifth to one-tenth less in allergen content than were the effective doses. Effective doses of cockroach and all fungal extracts except Alternaria have not been established. Information is available on the mean major allergen content of U.S. standardized and a few nonstandardized extracts, which allows the information on effective and ineffective dosing to be used in prescribing subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy. With sublingual allergy immunotherapy, all the approved tablets had multidose studies that determined the optimal dose. For the U.S. liquid extracts, to my knowledge, there are no studies to define effective doses except for ragweed. Conclusions: Although a wide range of doses are prescribed by U.S. allergists, analysis of available data suggests that effective doses fall within a narrow range and that use of doses one-fifth or one-tenth of the effective doses may sacrifice most or all of the potential efficacy of the treatment.