Organ preservation with chemoradiation in advanced laryngeal cancer: The problem of generalizing results from randomized controlled trials

Utility of bioselection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in patients with T4 laryngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for induction selection of definitive treatment (IS) protocols have shown excellent outcomes for organ preservation and survival in patients with T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). We seek to evaluate survival and organ preservation outcomes in T4 LSCC patients treated with IS protocols.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of advanced T3 and T4 LSCC patients who underwent IS protocols based upon potential for preserving a functional larynx. Patients received one neoadjuvant cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy with either 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel or with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy with docetaxel and a Bcl-2 inhibitor. Patients who achieved ≥ 50 % response as determined by radiographic review and/or endoscopic evaluation received definitive chemoradiation. Patients who had < 50 % response after IS underwent total laryngectomy (TL) followed by post-operative radiation +/- chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Amongst T4 patients, 114 met inclusion criteria including 89 who underwent IS protocols and 25 who received an upfront TL. In total, 76.0 % of T3 patients and 71.9 % of T4 patients responded to IS and underwent definitive chemoradiation. There was no significant difference in hazard of death between T4 IS and T4 TL patients (HR: 0.9, p = 0.86). Among responders, there was no significant difference in 5-year laryngectomy-free survival (T3 - 59.6 %, T4 44.3 %, p = 0.15) or laryngeal preservation by T stage (T3 - 72.8 %, T4 - 73.0 %, p = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Select T4 patients may benefit from organ preservation using IS protocols with similar response rates to patients with T3 tumors, without compromising survival when compared to upfront TL.

Oncological and functional outcomes in T3 and T4 laryngeal cancer patients: choice for larynx preservation or total laryngectomy based on expected laryngeal function

OBJECTIVE

To determine oncological and functional outcomes in patients with T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma, in which choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function and not T classification.

METHODS

Oncological outcomes (disease-specific survival and overall survival) as well as functional outcomes (larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation) were analysed.

RESULTS

In 130 T3 and 59 T4 patients, there was no difference in disease-specific survival or overall survival rates after radiotherapy (RT) (107 patients), chemoradiotherapy (36 patients) and total laryngectomy (46 patients). The five-year disease-specific survival rates were 83 per cent after RT, 78 per cent after chemoradiotherapy and 69 per cent after total laryngectomy, whereas overall survival rates were 62, 54 and 60 per cent, respectively. Five-year larynx preservation and functional larynx preservation rates were comparable for RT (79 and 66 per cent, respectively) and chemoradiotherapy (86 and 62 per cent, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in oncological outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy or total laryngectomy in T3 and T4 laryngeal carcinoma patients whose choice of treatment was based on expected laryngeal function.

The relation between hypoxia and proliferation biomarkers with radiosensitivity in locally advanced laryngeal cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment decision-making in advanced-stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is difficult due to the high recurrence rates and the desire to preserve laryngeal functions. New predictive markers for radiosensitivity are needed to facilitate treatment choices. In early stage glottic LSCC treated with primary radiotherapy, expression of hypoxia (HIF-1α and CA-IX) and proliferation (Ki-67) tumour markers showed prognostic value for local control. The objective of this study is to examine the prognostic value of tumour markers for hypoxia and proliferation on locoregional recurrent disease and disease-specific mortality in a well-defined cohort of patients with locally advanced LSCC treated with primary, curatively intended radiotherapy.

METHODS

In pre-treatment biopsy tissues from a homogeneous cohort of 61 patients with advanced stage (T3-T4, M0) LSCC primarily treated with radiotherapy, expression of HIF-1α, CA-IX and Ki-67 was evaluated with immunohistochemistry. Demographic data (age and sex) and clinical data (T- and N-status) were retrospectively collected from the medical records. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the relation between marker expression, demographic and clinical data, and locoregional recurrence and disease-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Patients with high expression of HIF-1α developed significantly more often a locoregional recurrence (39%) compared to patients with a low expression (21%) (p = 0.002). The expression of CA-IX and Ki-67 showed no association with locoregional recurrent disease. HIF-1α, CA-IX and Ki-67 were not significantly related to disease-specific mortality. Clinical N-status was an independent predictor of recurrent disease (p < 0.001) and disease-specific mortality (p = 0.003). Age, sex and T-status were not related to locoregional recurrent disease or disease-specific mortality.

CONCLUSION

HIF-1α overexpression and the presence of regional lymph node metastases at diagnosis were independent predictors of locoregional recurrent disease after primary treatment with curatively intended radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced LSCC.

Survival Outcomes in T3 Laryngeal Cancers: Primary Total Laryngectomy vs. Concurrent Chemoradiation or Radiation Therapy-A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of cT3 laryngeal cancers remains controversial, with studies recommending surgical or non-surgical approaches. Despite the many papers that have been published on the subject, there is a lack of studies showing which treatment has better results in terms of survival.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in survival outcomes following total laryngectomy (TL), concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation therapy (RT) alone in T3 laryngeal cancers.

METHODS

Search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from 1995 to 2023 employing specific keywords and Boolean operators to retrieve relevant articles. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q-test and I2 statistic. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed using rank correlation and regression tests.

RESULTS

The qualitative data synthesis comprised 10,940 patients from 16 included studies. TL was performed in 2149 (19.4%), CRT in 6723 (61.5%), RT in 295 (2.7%), while non-surgical treatment was not specified in 1773 (16.2%) patients. The pooled 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were TL = 73%, CRT = 74.7%, RT = 57.9%, 3-year OS rates were TL = 64.3%, CRT = 62.9%, RT = 52.4%, and 5-year OS rates were TL = 54.2%, CRT = 52.7%, RT = 40.8%. There was a significant heterogeneity in the included studies. There was no statistically significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.99 to 0.23), p = 0.12), 3-year OS (logOR = -0.6 (95% CI: -1.34 to 0.15), p = 0.11), and 5-year OS (logOR = -0.54 (95% CI: -1.29 to 0.21), p = 0.16) between TL and CRT. Instead, there was significant difference in 2-year OS (logOR= -1.2383 (95% CI: -2.1679 to -0.3087), p = 0.009), 3-year OS (-1.1262 (95% CI: -1.6166 to -0.6358), p < 0.001), and 5-year OS (-0.99 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.53)), p < 0.001) between TL and RT alone.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

TL followed with adjuvant (chemo)radiation on indication and CRT with salvage surgery in reserve appear to have similar OS outcomes. Both resulted in better OS outcomes compared to RT alone in the treatment of T3 laryngeal cancers. If patients are unfit for chemotherapy, making CRT impossible, surgery may become the choice of treatment.

Risk Factors for Functional Outcomes in Advanced Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation for patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may achieve organ preservation, but appropriate patient selection remains unknown. This study investigates pre-treatment risk factors associated with functional and survival outcomes after radiation-based therapy in patients with advanced laryngeal SCC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 75 adult patients with stage III or IV laryngeal SCC receiving definitive radiation-based therapy from 1997 to 2016 at a tertiary care center. Tracheostomy and gastrostomy dependence were the primary functional outcomes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between pre-treatment factors and tracheostomy and gastrostomy dependence. Time-to-event analyses were performed to determine risk factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 75 patients included in the analysis, 30 (40%) patients were tracheostomy dependent and 31 (41%) were gastrostomy tube dependent. The median length of follow-up was 31 months (range = 1 to 142 months). Pre-treatment tracheostomy was a significant predictor of post-treatment tracheostomy (aOR = 13.9, 95% CI = 3.35 to 57.5) and moderate-severe comorbidity was a significant predictor of post-treatment gastrostomy dependence (aOR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.04 to 8.43). The five-year overall survival was 51% (95% CI = 38 to 64%). Pre-treatment gastrostomy tube dependence was associated with an increased risk of death (aHR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.09 to 5.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline laryngeal functional status and overall health in advanced laryngeal SCC are associated with poor functional outcomes after radiation-based therapy, highlighting the importance of patient selection when deciding between surgical and non-surgical treatment plans. Laryngoscope, 133:594-600, 2023.

Survival Analysis in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The worldwide incidence rate of laryngeal cancer is declining. However, the 5-year survival for these patients has decreased in recent years from 66% to 63%. This may be due to changes in the treatment of the disease. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival rate of patients with LC according to the stage of the disease and the treatment applied. For this purpose, surgical versus organ preservation protocols (OPP) based on chemoradiotherapy were evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The study included adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary LC. Patients with LC and systemic metastases and those with synchronous tumors at diagnosis were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between exposure to LC treatment and the time to event (death). Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients with advanced tumors (stages III and IV) had almost three times the risk of LC death than those in the initial tumor stages (I and II) [HR CCS = 2.89 (95%CI 1.30-6.39)]; [HR OS = 2.01 (95%CI 1.35-2.98)]. Patients who underwent surgical treatment had a higher chance of survival than those who were treated according to OPP [HR = 0.62; 95%CI (0.38-1.02)] in CSS, 0.74 [95%CI (0.50-1.90)] in OS, and 0.61 [95%CI (0.40-0.91)] in DFS.

DISCUSSION

OPP changed the management of patients with advanced stages of LC, establishing CRT as an alternative to surgery. Our data did not reveal clinically relevant differences in OS between patients treated with OPP and those who underwent surgery; however, we reported differences in the DFS rate after five years of follow-up in favor of the surgery-treated group of patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment improves CSS and DFS at five years in patients with initial LC with respect to radiation therapy alone. Furthermore, surgical treatment associated with complementary radiation therapy offers better CSS and DFS in patients with advanced LC.

Defining targets to improve care delivery for T4 larynx squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

United States oncology trends consistently demonstrate that nearly half of T4a larynx carcinoma patients are treated with larynx preservation, despite national guidelines favoring laryngectomy. This study identifies clinical decision-making drivers and defines patient subsets that should become targets for care improvement.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients with cT4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx from US National Cancer Database 2005-2016. Demographic data and survival rates between clinical pathways were compared. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method with statistical comparisons assessed by log-rank test.

Results

Of 11,556 patients with cT4 disease, laryngectomy (TL) was the initial treatment for 4627 (40%) patients. Larynx preservation via chemoradiation (CRT) occurred for 4307 patients. TL and CRT patients had similar Charlson-Deyo comorbidity indices and insurance status. TL patients had higher total tumor size, lower N3 rates and were more often seen at academic institutions (p < .0001). N0 surgery patients with adjuvant treatment demonstrated superior median survival (MS) compared to CRT (surgery + radiation MS: 69 months, surgery + chemoradiation MS: 66, CRT MS: 37.7), p < .0001. MS for N1/N2 disease patients was 56.5 months for surgery + radiation and 35.5 months for surgery + CRT, superior to CRT, MS 30.8 months, p < .0001. Tri-modality N3 patients with up front surgery had similar MS compared to CRT (surgery + chemoradiation 21.3 months vs. CRT 16.1), p = .95.

Conclusion

National quality improvement initiatives are needed to promote guideline adherence and improve survival in advanced larynx cancer. Targets for such initiatives should be patients with limited or no nodal disease burden, that meet clear T4a imaging criteria.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, non-randomized controlled cohort.

[Larynx preservation up to T4 laryngeal cancer?]

Could primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) possibly be viewed as an alternative standard therapy to upfront total laryngectomy (TL)? According to the new German S3 guideline, despite higher rates of local recurrence, there would be no survival disadvantage and salvage surgery would be a curative option. In several large database studies and case series, statistically significant survival disadvantages of more than 30% between pCRT and TL have been reported for T4 laryngeal cancer. According to the literature, the success rate of salvage TL for T4 laryngeal cancer is only about 25-50%. Larynx preservation (LP) studies which could qualify the recommendation of pCRT as an alternative standard therapy to TL in T4 carcinomas should 1) evaluate T4a cancers within the T4 category; 2) perform subgroup analysis of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers; 3) be sufficiently highly powered; 4) provide long-term outcomes of at least 5 years; 5) with oncological and 6) functional outcomes (duration of the need for tracheostomy and/or feeding tube dependency; necessity and success of salvage laryngectomies). 7) Specification of the criteria of the respective T4 classification (invasion through the outer cortex of the cartilage, or infiltration of which extralaryngeal structures) and 8) evaluation of pretreatment laryngeal function (at least: tracheostomy, feeding tube dependency). Collection of all the aforementioned data of T4 patients treated with pCRT in a large prospective observational cohort study in German-speaking countries is suggested. In case of rejection of TL by T4 laryngeal cancer patients, differentiation between primary spontaneous reluctance and a definitive, carefully considered decision is important. This distinction should be achieved by sensitive discussions. Not only oncological but also functional outcome probabilities should be included in the overall decision-making process.

Total lesion glycolysis as a predictor of clinical T3-4a laryngeal cancer with laryngectomy or nonlaryngectomy

The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake parameter is related to survival outcomes for patients with clinical T3-T4a laryngeal cancer with various definitive treatments including total laryngectomy (TL). Parameters of 18F-FDG uptake in the primary tumors of 46 cases which were assessed by positron emission tomography with computed tomography were enrolled in the present observation study. Monovariate or multivariate survival analyses were performed with log-rank test or Cox regression model, with the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. Cutoff values of the 18F-FDG uptake parameters were determined by the lowest P-value for monovariate overall survival. In the monovariate analysis, both metabolic tumor volume ≥13.1 and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) ≥46.5 were significantly associated with shorter overall survival, and TLG ≥46.5 was also related to a reduction in distant metastasis-free survival. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for clinical T classification (cT4/cT3) and treatment group (TL/non-TL), TLG (≥46.5/<46.5) was associated with both poorer overall (HR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.10-9.49) and distant metastasis-free (HR: 8.91, 95% CI: 1.93-62.6) survival. In conclusion, TLG is a predictor for survival in laryngeal cancer.

Survival analysis of patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer comparing patients who received primary surgery to those who received chemoradiation: An analysis of the NCDB

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to use the American College of Surgeons' National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine the association between primary treatment and overall survival (OS) among patients with locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.

METHODS

6,055 adult patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with stage III or IV, M0, hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were identified within the NCDB. Patients who received primary chemoradiation (CRT) were compared to those that received surgery with adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation (S + Adj). OS was compared between treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier analyses, propensity score adjustment, and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The median survival was 22.7 months (IQR 11.0-49.0). The S + Adj group had a significantly higher comorbidity score, higher grade disease, and more advanced stage disease than the CRT group. S + Adj was associated with significantly improved survival when compared to CRT (p < 0.0001). A propensity score adjusting for facility type, facility location, care at multiple facilities, histology, and T stage was developed. S + Adj was associated with longer survival (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64-0.80) when compared to CRT in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, insurance status, a comorbidity index, diagnosis year, treatment delay, N stage, and the propensity score). S + Adj was associated with significantly improved survival among those with T2 disease (p = 0.02), T3 disease (p = 0.02), and T4 disease (p < 0.0001) in sensitivity analyses examining these subcohorts independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer reported in NCDB, treatment with S + Adj was associated with longer survival compared to those treated with primary CRT.

Chemoradiotherapy but Not Radiotherapy Alone for Larynx Preservation in T3. Considerations from a German Observational Cohort Study

Simple Summary

For advanced laryngeal carcinoma, primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (pCRT or pRT) is used as an alternative to total laryngectomy (TL) to preserve a functional larynx. For advanced laryngeal cancer (T4), poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival in moderately advanced tumors (T3)? The outcomes after pRT, pCRT, or surgery were evaluated in 121 patients with T3 laryngeal cancers. pCRT and TL with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) yielded results without a significant survival difference. However, after pRT alone, survival was significantly poorer than after TL ± a(C)RT. Thus, according to our data and supported by the literature, pCRT instead of pRT alone is recommended for T3 laryngeal cancers. According to the literature, this recommendation also applies to bulky tumors (6–12 mm), vocal cord fixation, at least minimal cartilage infiltration, and advanced N stage. TL ± a(C)RT instead of larynx preservation should be considered if any of these factors is present and chemotherapy is prohibited; in cases with a tumor volume > 12 mm, severe forms of vocal cord fixation or cartilage infiltration; or when the patient needs a feeding tube or a tracheotomy before the onset of therapy.

Abstract

For advanced laryngeal cancers, after randomized prospective larynx preservation studies, nonsurgical therapy has been applied on a large scale as an alternative to laryngectomy. For T4 laryngeal cancer, poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival also in T3 tumors? The outcomes of 121 T3 cancers treated with pCRT, pRT alone, or surgery were evaluated in an observational cohort study in Germany. In a multivariate Cox regression of the T3 subgroup, no survival difference was noted between pCRT and total laryngectomy with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) (HR 1.20; 95%-CI: 0.57–2.53; p = 0.63). However, survival was significantly worse after pRT alone than after TL ± a(C)RT (HR 4.40; 95%-CI: 1.72–11.28, p = 0.002). A literature search shows that in cases of unfavorable prognostic markers (bulky tumors of 6–12 ccm, vocal cord fixation, minimal cartilage infiltration, or N2–3), pCRT instead of pRT is indicated. In cases of pretreatment dysphagia or aspiration requiring a feeding tube or tracheostomy, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration, or tumor volume > 12 ccm, outcomes after pCRT were significantly worse than those after TL. In these cases, and in cases where pCRT is indicated but the patient is not suitable for the addition of chemotherapy, upfront total laryngectomy with stage-appropriate aRT is recommended even in T3 laryngeal cancers.

Variation of treatment decision-making for laryngeal cancer in Japan a retrospective observational study using a claim- and electronic medical record-based database

BACKGROUND

Primary curative treatment of resectable laryngeal cancer includes surgery and chemoradiotherapy. Other treatment options include radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, partial laryngectomy, and total laryngectomy. Larynx-preserving treatments (partial laryngectomy, radiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy) are recommended in early stage cases, although total laryngectomy is needed in advanced cases. Here, we evaluated trends in treatment strategies and identified the factors that are important in decision making.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data acquired from electronic medical records in Japan. Hospitalized laryngeal cancer patients admitted between January 2014 and December 2018 were included in our analyses. The primary outcome was the initial treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients (mean age 71.8 ± 9.5, male/female = 333/30) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10.1% of the patients were treated with total laryngectomy, while 17.9% underwent partial resection, 65.8% received radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy), and 6.1% had no treatment. Larynx-preserving treatment was used in most T1-2 cases (96.9%), and 40% of the patients with T3 cancer underwent total laryngectomy (adjusted odds ratio 26.7 [95% CI, 9.29-91.6]). Of the T3 cancers that were treated, total laryngectomy was performed in only 26.7% of patients aged ≤65 years, but in more than 50% of those aged >65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study showed that larynx-preserving treatments were used in most T1-2 cases, and suggested that T stage is the most important factor affecting decision making in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Older patients with T3 disease tended to undergo total laryngectomy, and age is an important factor in the decision-making process for cases of T3 laryngeal cancer.

Total Laryngectomy-Still Cutting-Edge?

Surgical removal of the larynx (total laryngectomy) offers a curative approach to patients with advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer without distant metastases. Particularly in T4a carcinoma, laryngectomy seems prognostically superior to primary radio(chemo)therapy. Further relevant indications for laryngectomy include massive laryngeal dysfunction associated with aspiration and recurrence after radio(chemo)therapy, resulting in salvage surgery. The surgical procedure including neck dissection is highly standardised and safe. The resulting aphonia can be compensated by functional rehabilitation (e.g., voice prosthesis) associated with a significant quality of life improvement. This article presents an overview of indications, preoperative diagnostics, surgical procedures, including new developments (robotics), possible complications, the choice of adjuvant treatment, alternative therapeutic approaches, rehabilitation and prognosis. In summary, total laryngectomy still represents a relevant surgical procedure in modern head and neck oncology.

[Laryngectomy-still state of the art?]

Total laryngectomy provides a curative approach for patients with advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer without distant metastasis. Especially in stage cT4a disease, laryngectomy is superior to primary radio(chemo)therapy in retrospective studies. Further relevant indications for the procedure are tumor-related laryngeal dysfunction such as dysphagia and aspiration, as well as cancer recurrence after primary radio(chemo)therapy. The surgical procedure is highly standardized, with an appropriate safety profile. The subsequent loss of voice must be compensated by voice rehabilitation (voice prosthesis, ructus). The current overview provides information about indications for laryngectomy, preoperative clinical diagnostics, the surgical procedure, complications, alternative treatment, rehabilitation, and prognosis. Total laryngectomy remains a standard procedure in modern head and neck oncology.

Treatment sequence and survival in locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to examine the association between modality of primary treatment and survival among patients with locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

METHODS

There were 2,328 adult patients diagnosed with stage III or IV, M0, hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry (years 2004-2015). Patients who received primary chemoradiation (CRT) were compared to those who received surgery with either adjuvant radiation therapy (S + RT), or surgery with adjuvant CRT (S + CRT). The latter primary surgery group (S + Adj) was also analyzed collectively. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models using a propensity score to adjust for factors associated with treatment allocation.

RESULTS

Median survival was 20 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 10-45) with CRT and 25 months (IQR = 10-47) with S + Adj (P < .001). S + Adj had higher-grade cancers and more advanced T staging (P < .001). S + CRT was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.84) and DSS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54-0.82) after adjusting for age, gender, race, subsite, grade, and stage. S + RT was associated with longer DSS than CRT (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99) but not OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.04). S + Adj was associated with longer DSS in T1/T2 disease (P = .04) and T4 disease (P = .0003), but did not reach significance among patients with T3 disease (P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer reported in the SEER database, treatment with S + Adj was associated with longer DSS and OS compared to those treated with primary CRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 130:2611-2621, 2020.

Organ Preservation Protocols in T4 Laryngeal Cancer: a Review of the Literature

Population-based studies indicate that chemoradiation has become the most popular treatment for advanced laryngeal cancers; however, by extrapolating trial results to the general population, several issues have emerged, such as reduced overall survival, non-functional laryngeal preservation, and poor response to treatment. Although included in these trials, T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers with cartilage invasion formed a small percentage of these patients and questions over whether they were appropriately staged remain unanswered. Literature on the use of chemoradiation in this set of patients, including the challenges, treatment considerations, and factors predicting response to treatment and outcomes, was reviewed. Current evidence indicates that all patients of T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer are not suitable candidates for organ preservation; this modality should be offered only to select patients with good performance status and access to rehabilitative care and regular follow-up in order to achieve good results.

Treatment package time predicts cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis in laryngeal cancer

We investigated whether treatment package time was significantly associated with survival outcomes of resectable locally-advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in patients who consecutively underwent various treatments, including surgery alone and salvage surgery for residual tumor. A total of 100 patients with clinical T3-T4 resectable laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study. The treatment package time was calculated in days between the start of any treatment and the end of all treatments, including postoperative radiotherapy and salvage surgery for residual tumors. Using a log-rank test, a treatment package time of ≥68 days showed significantly shorter cancer-specific (P=0.0013) and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.0017), compared with a treatment package time of <68 days. Multivariate survival analyses of two Cox's hazards proportional models was conducted. In both model-1, which adjusted for cT3/cT4, cN0-1/cN2-3 and total laryngectomy/non-total laryngectomy, and model-2, which adjusted for cT3/cT4, cN0-1/cN2-3 and induction therapy/non-induction therapy, the cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival, according to treatment package time, were significantly longer with <68 days compared with ≥68 days (P<0.01). The present study demonstrated that a prolonged treatment package time is a prognostic factor for shorter cancer-specific and distant metastasis-free survival after various treatments for resectable locally-advanced laryngeal cancer.

Decision making in advanced larynx cancer: An evidenced based review

Organ preservation versus total laryngectomy for advanced laryngeal cancer continues to be hotly debated. This review presents evidence-based decision making points for these patents.

Effect of voice rehabilitation training on the patients with laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy

This retrospective study examined the effect of voice rehabilitation training (VRT) for patients with laryngeal cancer (LC) after radiotherapy.Eighty-three eligible patients with LC were included. Forty-three patients were assigned to a treatment group, and underwent VRT, while the other 40 subjects were assigned to a control group, and were at waiting list. Primary outcome was measured by the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) scale. Secondary outcome was measured by Patient Perception Measures. All outcomes were measured before and 3 months after VRT intervention.Patients in the treatment group did not show better outcomes, measured by GRBAS scale (Grade, P = .78; Roughness, P = .61; Breathiness, P = .83; Ashenia, P = .89; and Strain, P = .41), and Patient Perception Measures (Vocal quality, P = .17; Acceptability, P = .35; Hoarseness, P = .23; Vocal fatigue, P = .39; and Ashamed, P = .51), compared with patients in the control group.The results of this study did not exert better outcomes in patients received VRT than those at waiting list.

Radiotherapy for locally advanced resectable T3-T4 laryngeal cancer-does laryngeal preservation strategy compromise survival?

With the advancement of chemotherapy, a laryngeal preservation (LP) strategy was explored with the aim of improving maintenance of quality of life. Induction chemotherapy (ICT) following radiotherapy (RT) was considered a viable option because of its high initial response rate without hampering of overall survival (OS). Subsequently, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using CDDP became the standard of care for LP, showing the best LP ratio. For enhancing treatment intensity, ICT with taxan + CDDP + 5-FU (TPF-ICT) followed by RT showed superiority over ICT with CDDP + 5-FU (PF-ICT) followed by RT. Given that almost all randomized controlled trials investigating ICT include not only operable (endpoint, LP) but also inoperable (endpoint, OS) cases, physicians are faced with a dilemma regarding application in daily practice. In addition, increased treatment intensity causes augmentation of adverse events, which might reduce compliance. Thereafter, cetuximab, an effective drug with fewer adverse effects [bioradiotherapy (BRT)], emerged as another option. However, little evidence has confirmed its superiority over RT (or CCRT) in laryngeal cancer subpopulations. In spite of these developments, the OS of patients with laryngeal cancer has not improved for several decades. In fact, several studies indicated a decrease in OS during the 1990s, probably due to overuse of CCRT. Fortunately, the latter was not the case in most institutions. Currently, no other treatment has better OS than surgery. The eligibility criteria for LP and/or surgery largely depend upon the available expertise and experience, which differ from one institution to another. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team is required for the treatment of LP.

A change in the study evaluation paradigm reveals that larynx preservation compromises survival in T4 laryngeal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Larynx preservation (LP) is recommended for up to low-volume T4 laryngeal cancer as an evidence-based treatment option that does not compromise survival. However, a reevaluation of the current literature raises questions regarding whether there is indeed reliable evidence to support larynx preservation for T4 tumor patients.

METHODS

In an observational cohort study of 810 laryngeal cancer patients, we evaluated the outcomes of all T4 tumor patients treated with primary chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) or primary radiotherapy alone (RT) compared with upfront total laryngectomy followed by adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL + a[C]RT). Additionally, we reevaluated the studies that form the evidence base for the recommendation of LP for patients with up to T4 tumors (Pfister et al., J Clin Oncol 24:3693-704, 2006).

RESULTS

The evaluation of all 288 stage III and IV patients together did not show a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between CRT-LP and TL + a(C)RT (hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.86; p = 0.31) using a multivariate proportional hazard model. However, a subgroup analysis of T4 tumor patients alone (N = 107; 13.9%) revealed significantly worse OS after CRT compared with TL + a(C)RT (HR 2.0; 95% CI: 1.04-3.7; p = 0.0369). A reevaluation of the subgroup of T4 patients in the 5 LP studies that led to the ASCO clinical practice guidelines revealed that only 21-45 T4 patients had differential data on survival outcome. These data, however, showed a markedly worse outcome for T4 patients after LP.

CONCLUSIONS

T4 laryngeal cancer patients who reject TL as a treatment option should be informed that their chance of organ preservation with primary conservative treatment is likely to result in a significantly worse outcome in terms of OS. Significant loss of survival in T4 patients after LP is also confirmed in recent literature.

Survival Rates Using Individualized Bioselection Treatment Methods in Patients With Advanced Laryngeal Cancer

Importance

Use of chemoradiotherapy for advanced laryngeal cancer led to a major shift in treatment as an alternative to laryngectomy. Despite widespread adoption of chemoradiotherapy, survival rates have not improved and the original premise of matching neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor response to determine subsequent treatment has not been followed.

Objective

To determine whether improved survival could be achieved by incorporating a single cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to select patients with advanced disease for either laryngectomy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

An unselected cohort of 247 patients with laryngeal cancer in an academic institution between 2002 and 2012 was evaluated. Patients with limited disease (stages I and II) underwent endoscopic resection, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy for deeply invasive T2 lesions. For patients with advanced disease (stages III and IV), neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or primary surgery was recommended. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 48 months. The study was conducted from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2012; data analysis was completed December 1, 2015.

Interventions

Endoscopic resection, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and primary surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival and DSS.

Results

Of the 247 patients, 191 (77.3%) were male; mean (SD) age was 59.6 (10.4) years. Of 94 patients with limited disease, 33 (35.1%) underwent endoscopic resection; 50 (53.2%), radiotherapy alone; and 11 (11.7%), chemoradiotherapy for deeply invasive T2 lesions. Of 153 patients with advanced disease, 71 (46.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 50 (32.7%), concurrent chemoradiotherapy; and 32 (20.9%), surgery. Five-year OS and DSS was 75% (95% CI, 68%-81%) and 83% (95% CI, 77%-88%), respectively, for the entire cohort. The DSS was 92% (95% CI, 83%-97%) for patients with stage I or II and 78% (95% CI, 69%-84%) for patients with stage III or IV disease. For patients with advanced disease, 5-year OS and DSS ranged from 78% (95% CI, 55%-90%) and 91% (95% CI, 67%-98%), respectively, for surgery; to 76% (95% CI, 63%-85%) and 79% (95% CI, 67%-88%), respectively, for neoadjuvant bioselection; and to 61% (95% CI, 44%-75%) and 66% (95% CI, 48%-79%), respectively, for primary chemoradiotherapy. Propensity-adjusted, multivariable controlling for known prognostic factors DSS was significantly improved in the neoadjuvant group compared with the chemoradiotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.80).

Conclusions and Relevance

Superior survival rates were achieved with a bioselective treatment approach using a single cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Good survival rates were also achieved in patients selected for primary surgery, and both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary surgery were better than survival rates with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, suggesting that the optimal individualized treatment approach for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer has not yet been defined.