Radiological assessment of mandibular invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx

Clinical, Radiological, and Pathological Correlation of Mandibular Invasion in Carcinoma Bucco-alveolar Complex

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to correlate clinically, radiologically, and pathologically the mandibular invasion in carcinoma bucco-alveolar complex. All biopsy-proven oral cavity cancer cases (64 patients) were assessed clinically and radiologically for involvement of the mandible. Preoperative clinicoradiological findings were compared with postoperative histopathological findings. In our study, oral cancer was 4 times more prevalent in males as compared to females and clinical evaluation was found to be highly sensitive in predicting mandibular invasion. Orthopantomogram showed sensitivity of 66.6% and specificity of 100%. CT scan showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 46% whereas MRI showed sensitivity of 54.5% and a specificity of 96%. MRI correlates well with final histopathology in predicting size of tumor. Prevalence of bony invasion in carcinoma oral cavity was 18%. We noted an inverse relation with tumor differentiation and mandibular invasion, and none of the verrucous carcinoma lesions showed mandibular invasion. Association of clinical T and N staging with postoperative histopathology was found to be statistically significant. Despite recent advances in molecular biology, radiological techniques, and newer modalities like visual surgical planning, exact measurement of bone invasion is still challenging. At present, CT scan and MRI along with clinical evaluation are widely used to evaluate mandibular invasion in carcinoma oral cavity, and all these are complementary to each other. The recent progress in tissue engineering technologies and stem cell biology has significantly promoted the development of regenerative reconstruction of jawbone defects.

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing bone invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting bone invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and to explore clinicopathological factors associated with its reliability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

417 patients underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT followed by radical surgery. The presence or absence of bone invasion served as the outcome variable, with histopathologic examination of the resection specimen considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses, comprising correlation analyses and the determination of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were conducted.

RESULTS

CT exhibited 76.85% sensitivity, 82.20% specificity, 47.14% PPV, and 89.67% NPV. False-positive and false-negative rates were 11.27% and 5.99%, respectively. Artifacts affected assessment in 44 patients, but not in those with bone invasion. Tumor size, depth of invasion (DOI), tumor localization at the upper jaw, lymphatic invasion, and perineural invasion correlated with incorrect identification of bone invasion (Chi-square, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite utilizing thin-section CT, notable false-positive and false-negative results persisted. Patients with T3 tumors, DOI ≥ 10 mm, or upper jaw tumors are at higher risk for misidentification of bone invasion. Combining multiple methods may enhance diagnostic accuracy, and the integration of artificial intelligence or tracking electrolyte disturbances by tumor depth profiling shows promise for further assessment of bone invasion before histopathology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons should consider these insights when planning tumor resection. Supplementary imaging may be warranted in cases with high risk factors for misidentification. Further methodological advancements are crucial for enhancing diagnostic precision.

Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for mandibular boundary invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma assessment

BACKGROUND

The range of mandibular invasion by a tumour needs to be determined accurately to minimize unnecessary damage to the mandible. This study aimed to compare tumour boundary lines on computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) images with those from pathological findings during the preoperative assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). By comparing the methods, the potential of CT/MR for this application could be further elucidated.

METHODS

Eight patients with OSCC were imaged with CT/MR, mandibular specimens were collected, and the material site was measured. Haematoxylin-eosin staining was used for histopathological assessment. The presence and boundaries of bone invasion were evaluated. The CT/MR and histopathological boundaries of bone invasion were delineated and merged to compare and calculate the deviation of CT/MR and histopathological boundaries using the Fréchet distance.

RESULTS

The mean Fréchet distance between the CT and pathological tumour boundaries was 2.69 mm (standard error 0.46 mm), with a minimum of 1.18 mm, maximum of 3.64 mm, median of 3.10 mm, and 95% confidence interval of 1.40-3.97 mm. The mean Fréchet distance between the tumour boundaries on the MR and pathological images was 3.07 mm (standard error 0.56 mm), with a minimum of 1.53 mm, maximum of 4.74 mm, median of 2.90 mm, and 95% confidence interval of 1.53-4.61 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

CT/MR imaging can provide an effective preoperative assessment of mandibular invasion of OSCC. Pathology images can be positioned on CT/MR scans with the help of computer software to improve the accuracy of the findings. The introduction of the Fréchet distance to compare tumour boundary lines is conducive to computer image diagnosis of tumour invasion of jaw boundaries.

Marginal versus Segmental Mandibulectomy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction  Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity. Two types of mandibular resections have been described: the segmental mandibulectomy and the marginal mandibulectomy. Both may have a different impact over the quality of life, oncological prognosis, and functional or aesthetic result. Objectives  The aim of this study was to systematically explore the literature to determine the survival outcomes and disease control rates in patients who underwent segmental or marginal mandibulectomy for OCSCC with histological evidence of cortical and medullary bone invasion. Data Synthesis  This review involved a systematic search of the electronic databases MEDLINE/PUBMED, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus including articles from 1985 to 2019. Fifteen articles were included for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were considered for meta-analysis calculations. All of them correspond to retrospective cohort studies. Conclusion  This systematic review reveals the low-level evidence regarding the impact over local control or survival according to the type of mandibulectomy. Our results need to be considered with precaution according to the limited evidence available. We just found difference regarding the 5-year disease-free survival, and a tendency in favor of segmental mandibulectomy was confirmed when medullary invasion was evident.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of tumor depth of invasion and bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of radiological depth of invasion (rDOI) and bone invasion in patients with oral cavity cancer, and the prognostic value of preoperative rDOI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with surgically resected oral cavity cancer and preoperative MRI acquired within four weeks before surgery. Two readers evaluated the MRI to assess the superficial and deep bone invasion, preoperative T stage, and measured the rDOI. The rDOI was compared to the histopathological DOI (pDOI), used as reference standard. Prognostic value of preoperative features for the disease-specific survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

The final population included 80 patients (50 males, mean age 67.7 ± 13.6 years). There was a strong statistically significant correlation between the rDOI (median 10 mm) and the pDOI (median 9 mm) (ρ: 0.978, p < 0.001). The agreement between MRI and histopathological T stage was excellent (k = 0.93, 95% CI 0.86, 0.99). The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative MRI were 93.3% and 98.8% for deep bone invasion, while they were 75.0% and 95.8% for superficial bone invasion, respectively. The rDOI > 10 mm was associated with poorer disease-specific survival (log-rank p = 0.016). The rDOI remained the only independent preoperative predictor associated with poorer disease-specific survival at multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 5.5; 95% CI 1.14, 26.58; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative MRI is accurate for the assessment of DOI and bone invasion. The rDOI is an independent preoperative predictor of disease-specific survival in patients with oral cavity cancer.

Lip and Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Lip and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) develop from progressive dysplasia of these mucosal structures. The cancers are often preceded by premalignant lesions, and any nonhealing ulcers of the lip or oral cavity should be biopsied. Some risk factors for these 2 subsites overlap and include tobacco use, alcohol use, and an immunocompromised state. Lip and oral cavity SCC are clinically staged based on physical examination and imaging. The 5-year overall survival for early-stage lip and oral cavity SCC is around 70% to 90% but decreases to about 50% for late-stage disease.

Diagnostic efficacy of PET-CT, CT, and MRI in preoperative assessment of mandibular invasion caused by head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of PET-CT, CT, and MRI in diagnosing mandible invasion induced by head and neck cancer (HNC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, CNKI and CQVIP databases were searched from inception until August 1, 2020. Then, a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the combined diagnostic values with the corresponding 95% CIs. Two independent researchers completed the full text screening, data abstraction, and risk assessment.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 53 studies (N = 2 946 participants). For the pooled sensitivity (SEN), MRI (SEN: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.93) was found to have a significantly higher SEN (P = 0.0045), when compared to CT (SEN: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.82), while compared with PET-CT (SEN: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97), the SEN was approximately equal (P > 0.05). The analysis revealed that the combined specificity (SPE) of MRI (SPE: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.89) and PET-CT (SPE: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.57-0.93) was lower than that of CT (SPE: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.90), but there was no statistical significance among these (P > 0.05). The comparison of the area under curve (AUC) reflected that PET-CT, CT and MRI have approximately equal summary diagnostic power in detecting mandibular invasion (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that compared with CT, MRI is significantly superior for higher SEN in diagnosing mandibular invasion. The SEN of MRI and PET-CT were approximately equal. For the summary of diagnostic power, more prospective clinical trials that directly compare these three methods are needed in the future.