[Development And Validation Of A Breastfeeding Knowledge And Skills Questionnaire]

English Translation of the Breastfeeding Knowledge Survey for Pediatricians

Pediatricians need to be knowledgeable to adequately carry out their role in the support of breastfeeding, so assessing their knowledge of breastfeeding is vitally important. There are not English language validated questionnaires for pediatricians in the literature; however, in Spanish and Portuguese, there is the Breastfeeding Knowledge Survey (ECoLa, derived from Encuesta de Conocimientos en Lactancia). Our goal is to translate the ECoLa into English. The original survey consisted of true/false questions, including one with an image of a breastfeeding baby, multiple-choice questions featuring clinical cases, and two open-ended short questions. We used a translation approach that incorporated both forward and backward translations and a multidisciplinary committee to evaluate the translation process. During translation, four Spanish versions and seven English versions were considered prior to consensus approval of the final survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the English questionnaire and the original Spanish version was 0.85 (95% CI [0.60, 0.95]). A sample of 51 participants completed the survey, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 for the English version (95% CI [0.70, 0.86]). The Breastfeeding Knowledge Survey is now accessible under a Creative Commons license, permitting its free re-use.

An Educational Intervention to Explore and Overcome Nursing Students' Breastfeeding Barriers: A Mixed-Methods Quasi-experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Nursing and midwifery students do not feel adequately prepared during their clinical training to support women who breastfeed, demanding more effective communication skills and knowledge.

AIM

The aim was to evaluate changes in students' breastfeeding knowledge.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design. Forty students voluntarily participated. Using a 1:1 ratio, 2 groups were randomly created and completed the validated questionnaire ECoLaE (pre-post). The educational program consisted of focus groups, a clinical simulation, and a visit to the local breastfeeding association.

FINDINGS

The control group's posttest scores ranged from 6 to 20 (mean = 13.1, standard deviation [SD] = 3.0). The intervention group ranged from 12 to 20 (mean = 17.3, SD = 2.3). A Student's t test for independence samples was calculated ( P < .005, t = 4.5, median = 4.2). The intervention group had a mean difference of 10 points in improvement (mean =10.53, SD = 2.20, min = 7, max = 14), whereas the control group had a mean of 6 points (mean = 6.80, SD = 3.03, min = 3, max = 13). The multiple linear regression explained the intervention's effect. The regression model had statistical significance ( F = 4.87, P = 0.004), with an adjusted R2 = 0.31. The linear regression between the posttest scores and group variables after adjusting by age showed an increment of 4.1 points in the intervention posttest scores ( P < .005, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-6.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The educational program "Engage in breaking the barriers to breastfeeding" improved nursing students' knowledge.

Female hospital workers in Morocco: factors influencing breastfeeding duration with self-reported experiences

Health workers (HW) could be at risk of early weaning because of working conditions. Our aim was to determine factors influencing the duration of breastfeeding among Moroccan hospital workers, and to explore their breastfeeding (BF) experiences. A cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals in Rabat/Morocco (from November 2015 to April 2016), including each woman working in the hospital, with at least one living child and who accepted to be interviewed. Data of 203 hospital workers were analyzed. The median age was 39. The median duration of any breastfeeding was 8 months. Among different categories of HW, physicians had the lowest duration of breastfeeding. Factors significantly correlated to longer duration of breastfeeding were infant rank (p = 0.003), early initiation of breastfeeding (p < 0.001), access to milk storage generally (p = 0.04), husband's opinion on breastfeeding (p < 0.001) and category of hospital worker (p = 0.01). Three central themes emerged from the analysis of qualitative data: "Breastfeeding health worker has to assume her work duties as any other health worker", "the expression of need for support", and "the lack of knowledge on breastfeeding". In light of these results, we believe that physicians are a high-risk group of premature complete weaning; many actions should be taken for all HW to enhance their knowledge and giving them support.

[ECoLaE: Validation of a questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills for Nursing]

Objetivo

Validar en enfermeras el cuestionario «Encuesta sobre conocimientos en lactancia» (ECoLa).

Diseño

Estudio de validación, con una adaptación lingüística previa, acorde a las competencias y formación de las enfermeras.

Emplazamiento

Cantabria.

Participantes

Enfermeras generalistas, especialistas en pediatría y matronas del Servicio Cántabro de Salud, con responsabilidad en el cuidado madre-hijo.

Mediciones principales

Se evaluaron las propiedades psicométricas de la versión para enfermería del ECoLa. Consistencia interna: mediante α-Cronbach para las preguntas de respuesta múltiple y para el global, y la fórmula de Kuder-Richardson (KR20) para las preguntas con respuestas dicotómicas. Concordancia interobservadores: mediante el coeficiente kappa en los ítems 18 y 21. Fiabilidad test-retest: con 11 sujetos mediante el coeficiente de correlación intraclase.

Resultados

La puntuación media del cuestionario fue de 21,15 ± 4,67 puntos. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas con respecto al sexo, ni al número de hijos. Hubo asociación entre la puntuación obtenida en el cuestionario y la experiencia previa en lactancia y con el perfil profesional (matrona 24,23 puntos, enfermera especialista en pediatría 21,20 puntos, enfermera 20 puntos; p < 0,01). Consistencia interna: KR20 de 0,802. El α-Cronbach para preguntas de respuesta múltiple fue de 0,719, y para la totalidad fue de 0,866. Concordancia interobservadores: ítem 18 (kappa = 0,6), ítem 30 (kappa = 0,825), puntuación total (kappa = 0,856). Fiabilidad test-retest: puntuación global (CCI = 0,856; IC 95% 0,55-0,96), pregunta 30 (CCI = 0,93; IC 95% 0,75-0,98).

Conclusiones

La escala posee propiedades psicométricas que hacen válido y fiable su uso en la evaluación de la formación de los profesionales de enfermería.

Breast feeding basic competence in primary care: Development and validation of the CAPA questionnaire

BACKGROUND

validated and reliable tools measuring the level of competence about breastfeeding amongst health professionals who attend mothers in primary care are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

to develop and validate a self-administered online questionnaire to assess basic competence about breastfeeding in the full range of health professionals attending lactating mothers in primary care.

DESIGN

methodological study.

SETTINGS

the study was conducted in 33 primary care centers administered by the Catalan Health Institute (Institut Català de la Salut) in the Girona Region (northeast Spain).

PARTICIPANTS

the questionnaire was sent to 398 health professionals who were likely to be in contact with breast feeding mothers. We included midwives, general practitioners, pediatric nurses (who provide care for children from birth to 14 years old), non-pediatric nurses (who provide care for patients older than 14 year), pediatricians, and gynecologists. The random sampling was stratified by discipline to ensure representativeness.

METHODS

the development and validation of the self-administered online questionnaire had five phases: (1) literature review, preparation of a draft for evaluation by an expert panel and pilot study; (2) design of a questionnaire based on observations from Phase 1; (3) questionnaire administration to a random sample of 398 health professionals, stratified by discipline; (4) re-testing after four weeks; and (5) assessment of construct validity using factor analysis and hypothesis-testing, comparing scores between professional groups and estimating effect size. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha and reproducibility by the intraclass correlation coefficient.

FINDINGS

The response rate was 69.3%. The final version of the questionnaire has 24 items. The uni-dimensionality of the questionnaire was confirmed by the factor analysis. The score differed significantly between professional groups (F=12.904; p<0.001), among whom midwives achieved the highest score (129±10 points) and non-pediatric nurses the lowest (111±14 points).The effect sized values ranged from 0.6 and 1.5. Cronbach alpha was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.891) and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.856 (95%CI: 0.817, 0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

this is a valid and reliable questionnaire to assess a basic level of competence about breast feeding among primary care professionals involved in supporting breast-feeding mothers. This questionnaire may help to identify health professionals who require support to improve their capability to manage women who are breast feeding.