[Lower lymphocyte response in severe cases of acute bronchiolitis due to respiratory syncytial virus]

Cytogenomic description of a Mexican cohort with differences in sex development

BACKGROUND

Differences in Sex Development (DSD) is a heterogeneous group of congenital alterations that affect inner and/or outer primary sex characters. Although these conditions do not represent a mortality risk, they can have a severe psycho-emotional impact if not appropriately managed. The genetic changes that can give rise to DSD are diverse, from chromosomal alterations to single base variants involved in the sexual development network. Epidemiological studies about DSD indicate a global frequency of 1:4500-5500, which can increase to 1:200-300, including isolated anatomical defects. To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe epidemiological and genetic features of DSD in a cohort of Mexican patients of a third-level care hospital.

METHODS

Descriptive and retrospective cross-sectional study that analyzed DSD patients from 2015 to 2021 attended a Paediatric Hospital from Mexico City.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients diagnosed with DSD were registered and grouped into different entities according to the Chicago consensus statement and the diagnosis defined by the multidisciplinary group. Of the total, 54% of them belong to the chromosomal DSD classification, 16% belongs to 46, XX and 30% of them belongs to the 46, XY classification.

CONCLUSION

The frequency for chromosomal DSDs was consistent with the literature; however, we found that DSD 46, XY is more frequent in our cohort, which may be due to the age of the patients captured, the characteristics of our study population, or other causes that depend on the sample size.

Age and respiratory syncytial virus etiology in bronchiolitis clinical outcomes

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most frequent cause of bronchiolitis. Precise and updated information about demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and risk factors for severe disease are needed for optimal implementation of upcoming new therapeutic and preventive interventions.

Objectives

The main goals of this study were to define the epidemiology of acute bronchiolitis in hospitalized young children during 5 calendar years in Spain; evaluate the differences in clinical manifestations between children hospitalized with RSV infection and those hospitalized with non-RSV infection; and identify demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, and risk factors associated with disease severity.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of children younger than 2 years who were hospitalized with bronchiolitis between January 2015 and December 2019. We constructed multivariable models to identify independent predictors of disease severity defined as length of hospital stay (LOS), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, and need for a high-flow-nasal canula (HFNC).

Results

From January 2015 to December 2019, 1437 children were hospitalized with bronchiolitis and met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis caused by RSV increased significantly during the study period, from 60% to 65% (P = .03). The children with RSV bronchiolitis were younger than those with non-RSV bronchiolitis (median age = 3 months [interquartile range = 1.5-6.5 months] vs 4 months [interquartile range = 2-7.5 months], respectively (P < .01). The children younger than 6 months with RSV bronchiolitis had enhanced disease severity compared with those with non-RSV bronchiolitis, as defined by an LOS of more than 4 days, severity scores, need for an HFNC, intravenous fluids, enteral feeding, and PICU admissions (P < .01). Age younger than 6 months and RSV-positive etiology were independently associated with greater odds of PICU admission, need for an HFNC, and longer LOS.

Conclusion

This study identified differences in disease severity between young children with RSV bronchiolitis and those with non-RSV bronchiolitis. These differences are particularly significant in children younger than 6 months, who comprise a group of infants with suboptimal innate immunity to RSV and may benefit from new preventive strategies.

A review of the essential concepts in diagnosis, therapy, and gender assignment in disorders of sexual development

Background

The aim of this article is to review the essential concepts, current terminologies and classification, management guidelines and the rationale of gender assignment in different types of differences/disorders of sexual development.

Main body

The basics of the present understanding of normal sexual differentiation and psychosexual development were reviewed. The current guidelines, consensus statements along with recommendations in management of DSD were critically analyzed to formulate the review. The classification of DSD that is presently in vogue is presented in detail, with reference to old nomenclature. The individual DSD has been tabulated based on various differential characteristics. Two schemes for analysis of DSD types, based on clinical presentation, karyotype and endocrine profile has been proposed here. The risk of gonadal malignancy in different types of DSD is analyzed. The rationale of gender assignment, therapeutic options, and ethical dimension of treatment in DSD is reviewed in detail.

Conclusion

The optimal management of different types of DSD in the present era requires the following considerations: (1) establishment of a precise diagnosis, employing the advances in genetic and endocrine evaluation. (2) A multidisciplinary team is required for the diagnosis, evaluation, gender assignment and follow-up of these children, and during their transition to adulthood. (3) Deeper understanding of the issues in psychosexual development in DSD is vital for therapy. (4) The patients and their families should be an integral part of the decision-making process. (5) Recommendations for gender assignment should be based upon the specific outcome data. (6) The relative rarity of DSD should prompt constitution of DSD registers, to record and share information, on national/international basis. (7) The formation of peer support groups is equally important. The recognition that each subject with DSD is unique and requires individualized therapy remains the most paramount.