Prevention strategies differentially modulate the impact of cytomegalovirus replication on CD8(+) T-cell differentiation in high-risk solid organ transplant patients

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Optimized CMV Preemptive Therapy and Antiviral Prophylaxis for CMV Disease Prevention in CMV High-Risk (D+R-) Kidney Transplant Recipients

The optimal strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in CMV donor/recipient kidney transplant recipients remains uncertain. Conclusions of prior meta-analyses that CMV disease rates with preemptive therapy (PET) and universal prophylaxis (UP) were comparable may have been affected by inclusion of studies lacking key determinants of efficacy of the respective strategies.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PET with weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction monitoring for ≥3 mo and UP with 6 mo of valganciclovir. PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010, to April 1, 2022. Risk of bias was assessed with 3 instruments (Cochrane RoB, Cochrane RoBINS-I, and an instrument for assessing risk in observational studies). The primary outcome was CMV disease incidence by 1-y posttransplant. Secondary outcomes by 1-y were graft loss, acute allograft rejection, and mortality. Results were synthesized using generalized linear mixed model meta-analysis. PET studies were stratified into low-threshold (LT) and high-threshold (HT) PET based on the viral load threshold for initiation of antiviral therapy.

Results

Twenty-five studies met inclusion criteria (6 PET, 19 UP). CMV disease incidence was significantly higher in HT (0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.39]) versus LT PET (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]). LT PET was associated with a significantly lower CMV disease incidence (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]) versus UP (0.21 [95% CI, 0.17-0.27]). Incidence of graft loss, acute allograft rejection, or mortality was not significantly different between LT PET and UP (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Receipt of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies was not associated with a significant difference in CMV disease incidence (odds ratio = 1.34 [95% CI, 0.80-2.25]).

Conclusions

LT PET is associated with a significantly lower incidence of CMV disease compared to UP with similar rates of other clinical outcomes. These findings provide rationale and preliminary data for a randomized superiority trial of optimized LT-PET versus UP in donor seropositive recipient seronegative kidney transplant recipients.

Utility of CMV-Specific Immune Monitoring for the Management of CMV in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Clinical Update

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most important opportunistic infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, current techniques used to predict risk for CMV infection fall short. CMV-specific cell mediated immunity (CMI) plays an important role in protecting against CMV infection. There is evidence that assays measuring CMV-CMI might better identify SOT recipients at risk of complications from CMV compared to anti-CMV IgG, which is our current standard of care. Here, we review recently published studies that utilize CMV-CMI, at various points before and after transplantation, to help predict risk and guide the management of CMV infection following organ transplantation. The evidence supports the use of these novel assays to help identify SOT recipients at increased risk and highlights the need for larger prospective trials evaluating these modalities in this high-risk population.

Monitoring of CMV-Specific Cell-Mediated Immunity in Kidney Transplant Recipients With a High Risk of CMV Disease (D+/R-): A Case Series

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and CMV disease impacts patient and graft survivals. CMV-specific CD8 T cell mediated-immunity (CMI) may help to assess the risk of CMV disease and to adapt preventive treatment strategies. High-risk KTRs with CMV seropositive donors/seronegative recipients (D+/R-) were prospectively monitored after CMV prophylaxis discontinuation and during the first year post transplant for CMV viremia (World Health Organization standardization) and CMI (QuantiFERON-CMV). We analyzed the ability of CMI test to predict either subsequent spontaneous viral clearance or CMV disease after prophylaxis discontinuation in patients with asymptomatic viremia. We enrolled 12 consecutive (D+/R-) KTRs. Eleven patients developed a viremia during follow-up, but 7 of them (64%) exhibited a spontaneous viral clearance. At viremia onset, 6 of 11 patients (55%) had a positive CMI test, and all of them (6 of 6, 100%) had subsequent spontaneous viral clearance, compared with only 1 of 5 patients (20%) displaying a nonreactive CMI (P = .02). This latter patient exhibited a positive CMI test 15 days after viremia onset. Four of the 11 patients (36%) developed a CMV disease, and their CMI either remained nonreactive or became positive only after antiviral treatment. We conclude that D+/R- KTRs with asymptomatic viremia after prophylaxis discontinuation may benefit from QuantiFERON-CMV to predict when positive for the spontaneous viral clearance or when persistently negative or the development of a CMV disease.

Immune Monitoring of Infectious Complications in Transplant Patients: an Important Step towards Improved Clinical Management

Immune reconstitution following organ transplantation is absolutely critical in preventing infectious complications. However, understanding the kinetics of immune reconstitution and its potential impact on the clinical management of transplant patients remains a significant challenge. Over the last decade, various platform technologies have emerged which have provided important insights into the immune reconstitution kinetics in transplant patients. However, many of these technologies are too complicated and cumbersome to implement in a clinical setting. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Chiereghin et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 56:e01040-17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01040-17) report the results of their evaluation of the QuantiFERON-CMV (QFN-CMV) assay to assess human cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8⁺ T-cell immunity in heart transplant recipients as a prognostic tool. These studies showed that patients with absence of global immune reactivity in the QFN-CMV assay were at a higher risk of developing CMV after discontinuing antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, failure to reconstitute CMV-specific immunity after resolution of the first episode of viremia was associated with viral relapse. These observations, along with other recent clinical studies utilizing the QFN-CMV assay, demonstrate that systematic monitoring of antiviral immunity can be successfully used as a prognostic tool and also to guide changes to the clinical management of transplant patients.