Jacquier-Bret J, Gorce P, Lestage T, Merbah J. Identification of generic drilling task phases and height effect: Coupling of kinematic and kinetic data.
Gait Posture 2021;
86:51-57. [PMID:
33677179 DOI:
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.021]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is an important issue for the health of operators, especially when the workload is heavy, such as in drilling activities.
RESEARCH QUESTION
This study aimed to propose an objective identification and description of the different phases that comprise a drilling task as well as a biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of the subjects' overall posture during its effective part.
METHODS
Fourteen healthy subjects performed three successive drillings at two different heights, 130 (H130) and 170 cm (H170) from the ground, of a 3 mm thick steel plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were simultaneously acquired using a Qualisys motion capture system and a force platform. The speed profiles of each body segments and the evolution of the force exerted were analysed to identify the different phases. Then, the average joint angles of the whole body were calculated during the drilling phase for the two heights considered and compared. Finally, the measured postures were qualified through the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) score in order to assess the risk of developing MSDs for each condition.
RESULTS
The drilling task could be divided into five phases whatever the condition: transport, aiming, repositioning, drilling, and return. The increase in height has doubled the duration of the drilling phase while reducing the force exerted by about 30 %. Similarly, height variation significantly influenced the subjects' posture, mainly in the head, trunk and upper limbs, and the RULA scores obtained for conditions H130 and H170 were 6 and 7 respectively.
SIGNIFICANCE
The results indicate, on the one hand, the relevance of coupling kinematic and kinetic data in order to analyse the drilling task and, on the other hand, that operators are exposed to considerable risk of developing MSDs, even at intermediate heights, which increase as the height increases.
Collapse