Shoulder muscle loading and task performance for overhead work on ladders versus Mobile Elevated Work Platforms

Identification of generic drilling task phases and height effect: Coupling of kinematic and kinetic data

BACKGROUND

The prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is an important issue for the health of operators, especially when the workload is heavy, such as in drilling activities.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to propose an objective identification and description of the different phases that comprise a drilling task as well as a biomechanical and ergonomic evaluation of the subjects' overall posture during its effective part.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy subjects performed three successive drillings at two different heights, 130 (H130) and 170 cm (H170) from the ground, of a 3 mm thick steel plate. Kinematic and kinetic data were simultaneously acquired using a Qualisys motion capture system and a force platform. The speed profiles of each body segments and the evolution of the force exerted were analysed to identify the different phases. Then, the average joint angles of the whole body were calculated during the drilling phase for the two heights considered and compared. Finally, the measured postures were qualified through the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) score in order to assess the risk of developing MSDs for each condition.

RESULTS

The drilling task could be divided into five phases whatever the condition: transport, aiming, repositioning, drilling, and return. The increase in height has doubled the duration of the drilling phase while reducing the force exerted by about 30 %. Similarly, height variation significantly influenced the subjects' posture, mainly in the head, trunk and upper limbs, and the RULA scores obtained for conditions H130 and H170 were 6 and 7 respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results indicate, on the one hand, the relevance of coupling kinematic and kinetic data in order to analyse the drilling task and, on the other hand, that operators are exposed to considerable risk of developing MSDs, even at intermediate heights, which increase as the height increases.

Kinematic and kinetic functional requirements for industrial exoskeletons for lifting tasks and overhead lifting

The aim of this study was to sample human kinematics and kinetics during simulated tasks to aid the design of industrial exoskeletons. Twelve participants performed two dynamic tasks; a simulated lifting task and an overhead lifting task. Based on the current data, to completely assist a worker with lifting loads up to 15 kg, hip actuators would need to supply up to 111 Nm of extensor torque at speeds up to 139°/s of extension velocity and 26°/s of flexion velocity. The actuators should allow the hip to extend to 11° and flex to 95°, and supply a power of 212 W. To completely assist workers lifting a 3 kg load overhead, actuators assisting shoulder flexion would need to supply up to 20 Nm of flexor torque at speeds up to 21°/s of extension velocity and 116°/s of flexion velocity. The actuators should also allow 67° of shoulder flexion and supply a power of 27 W. Practitioner summary: There is increasing interest in developing exoskeletons for industrial applications. This study details relevant kinetic and kinematic exposures for common production tasks, which can be used to inform functional requirements of industrial exoskeletons.AbbreviationsWMSD(s)work-related musculoskeletal disordersMMHmanual materials handlingDOFdegrees of freedomBLEEXBerkeley lower extremity exoskeletonLED(s)light emitting diodeRelrelativeHighlightsThis study sampled joint kinematic and kinetic activity to inform design of industrial exoskeletons.The study presents sample values to two types of common industrial tasks across the major joints as are often assisted.We also indicate considerations on which joints should be considered to be actively assisted.

A feasibility study comparing objective and subjective field-based physical exposure measurements during apple harvesting with ladders and mobile platforms

Although mobile orchardplatforms have been developed to improve apple harvesting productivity in the US, the physical exposures of workers usingthe mobile platforms have not been well characterized, partlydue to the lack of assessment tools specific to the tree fruitorchard environment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and utility of different subjective and objective methods for characterizing apple harvesting workers' posture, armrepetition, heart rate, and perceived exertion during platform- and conventional ladder-based harvesting. During a regular full shiftwork (8 hours), the objective physical exposure measures (armelevation, torso inclination, and heart rate) of 6 platform, 6 ground, and 8 ladder workers were measured with tri-axial accelerometersand heart rate monitor; and subjective perceived exertion wascollected using standardized Borg RPE and CR-10 scales, translated into Spanish. The results showed that the arm elevation, torso forward bending, repetitiveness, heart rates, and perceived exertions were lower for the platform-based workers than forthe ladder-based workers. The subjective measures (Borg RPE and Borg CR-10) appeared to be similar and mirror the general trends of the objective heart rate and posture measures.These results indicate the potential benefit of these low-cost subjective measures when direct measurements are too costly,complicated, or not permitted. This study determined that field measurements of objective and subjective physical exposures were feasible for evaluating apple harvesting work. In summary, all themethods used appear to be feasible for field use in orchard-based environments..

Evaluation of a passive exoskeleton for static upper limb activities

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a passive upper body exoskeleton on muscle activity, perceived musculoskeletal effort, local perceived pressure and subjective usability for a static overhead task. Eight participants (4 male, 4 female) held a load (0 kg and 2 kg) three times overhead for a duration of 30 s each, both with and without the exoskeleton. Muscle activity was significantly reduced for the Biceps Brachii (49%) and Medial Deltoid (62%) by the device for the 2 kg load. Perceived effort of the arms was significantly lower with the device for the 2 kg load (41%). The device did not have a significant effect on trunk or leg muscle activity (for the 2 kg load) or perceived effort. Local perceived pressure was rated below 2 (low pressure levels) for all contact areas assessed. Half of the participants rated the device usability as acceptable. The exoskeleton reduced muscle activity and perceived effort by the arms, and had no significant negative effect on the trunk and lower body with regards to muscle activity, perceived effort and localised discomfort.