1
|
Lind CM. A Rapid Review on the Effectiveness and Use of Wearable Biofeedback Motion Capture Systems in Ergonomics to Mitigate Adverse Postures and Movements of the Upper Body. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:3345. [PMID: 38894134 PMCID: PMC11175029 DOI: 10.3390/s24113345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Work-related diseases and disorders remain a significant global health concern, necessitating multifaceted measures for mitigation. One potential measure is work technique training utilizing augmented feedback through wearable motion capture systems. However, there exists a research gap regarding its current effectiveness in both real work environments and controlled settings, as well as its ability to reduce postural exposure and retention effects over short, medium, and long durations. A rapid review was conducted, utilizing two databases and three previous literature reviews to identify relevant studies published within the last twenty years, including recent literature up to the end of 2023. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 were of high or moderate quality. These studies were summarized descriptively, and the strength of evidence was assessed. Among the included studies, six were rated as high quality, while eight were considered moderate quality. Notably, the reporting of participation rates, blinding of assessors, and a-priori power calculations were infrequently performed. Four studies were conducted in real work environments, while ten were conducted in controlled settings. Vibration feedback was the most common feedback type utilized (n = 9), followed by auditory (n = 7) and visual feedback (n = 1). All studies employed corrective feedback initiated by the system. In controlled environments, evidence regarding the effectiveness of augmented feedback from wearable motion capture systems to reduce postural exposure ranged from strong evidence to no evidence, depending on the time elapsed after feedback administration. Conversely, for studies conducted in real work environments, the evidence ranged from very limited evidence to no evidence. Future reach needs are identified and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl M Lind
- IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greig MA, Village J, Salustri FA, Neumann WP. Examining human factors and ergonomics aspects in a manufacturing organisation's metrics system: measuring up to stakeholder needs. ERGONOMICS 2023; 66:1868-1883. [PMID: 36661049 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2168065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This research examines the status of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) metrics in the case context of product realisation in an electronics manufacturing company. Interactions with 100+ stakeholders over a five year period were thematically analysed for metrics-related views and content. A disconnect between engineering metrics and HF/E metrics was evident. Engineers and HF/E specialists expressed different understandings of the gap between the disciplines and how to generate HF/E metrics that would fit the organisation. Other emerging themes provided insight for metrics development including improving indicator relatability, considerations for communication of information, and barriers to implementation of metrics. The results led to seven recommendations to help guide practitioners in developing and refining HF/E metrics as part of an organisation's metrics system. This macroergonomic case study provides key points for consideration when developing HF/E focussed metrics to support organisations being more proactive with HF/E in work system design. Practitioner summary: Metrics' presence, stakeholder views on metrics, and metrics-related content in a case organisation were thematically analysed with a macroergonomics focus. Human factors and ergonomics metrics (HF/E) were disconnected from engineering metrics thus limiting the design team's ability to handle human factors in design. Factors influencing HF/E metrics creation and integration were identified, resulting in seven recommendations for developing HF/E metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Greig
- Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, Canada
| | - Judy Village
- Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, Canada
| | - Filippo A Salustri
- Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, Canada
| | - W Patrick Neumann
- Toronto Metropolitan University (Formerly Ryerson University), Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim S, Yang X. Real-time vibrotactile feedback system for reducing trunk flexion exposure during construction tasks. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2023; 110:104019. [PMID: 36948048 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Workplaces are increasingly evaluating the use of wearables for ergonomic assessment and providing biofeedback as a real-time postural intervention to improve workers' posture. However, the effectiveness of such intervention systems has yet to be thoroughly investigated in different types of industrial tasks. This study tested the immediate effects of using vibrotactile feedback in simulated construction work tasks including lifting-lowering, shoveling, and tying rebar, to investigate the potential for such an intervention as a way to instruct workers in reducing excessive trunk flexion exposures. Fourteen male participants completed simulated work tasks with three different feedback locations, namely, no feedback, back, and wrist. The results demonstrate that the 95th, 90th, and 50th percentiles of trunk flexion angles are significantly lower for lifting-lowering and shoveling tasks when the feedback system is used. No significant postural changes were observed for the rebar tying task at any combination of percentile and feedback location. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for each task did not differ significantly between feedback conditions. Productivity remained the same with the feedback for lifting-lowering and rebar tying, while it was significantly reduced (4.5% of working rate reduction) in shoveling. Participants rated the wrist as the most preferred feedback location. The results of this study suggest that vibrotactile feedback has potential as an effective postural intervention for ergonomic risk factors in selected construction work tasks. Implications for the future design of real-time wearable, sensor-based vibrotactile feedback systems for postural control intervention during dynamic work tasks are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sol Lim
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
| | - Xiang Yang
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lind CM, Abtahi F, Forsman M. Wearable Motion Capture Devices for the Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Ergonomics-An Overview of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:s23094259. [PMID: 37177463 PMCID: PMC10181376 DOI: 10.3390/s23094259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a major contributor to disability worldwide and substantial societal costs. The use of wearable motion capture instruments has a role in preventing WMSDs by contributing to improvements in exposure and risk assessment and potentially improved effectiveness in work technique training. Given the versatile potential for wearables, this article aims to provide an overview of their application related to the prevention of WMSDs of the trunk and upper limbs and discusses challenges for the technology to support prevention measures and future opportunities, including future research needs. The relevant literature was identified from a screening of recent systematic literature reviews and overviews, and more recent studies were identified by a literature search using the Web of Science platform. Wearable technology enables continuous measurements of multiple body segments of superior accuracy and precision compared to observational tools. The technology also enables real-time visualization of exposures, automatic analyses, and real-time feedback to the user. While miniaturization and improved usability and wearability can expand the use also to more occupational settings and increase use among occupational safety and health practitioners, several fundamental challenges remain to be resolved. The future opportunities of increased usage of wearable motion capture devices for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders may require more international collaborations for creating common standards for measurements, analyses, and exposure metrics, which can be related to epidemiologically based risk categories for work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Mikael Lind
- IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Farhad Abtahi
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Mikael Forsman
- IMM Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lind CM, De Clercq B, Forsman M, Grootaers A, Verbrugghe M, Van Dyck L, Yang L. Effectiveness and usability of real-time vibrotactile feedback training to reduce postural exposure in real manual sorting work. ERGONOMICS 2023; 66:198-216. [PMID: 35466852 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2069869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Vibrotactile feedback training may be used as a complementary strategy to reduce time in demanding postures in manual handling. This study evaluated the short- and medium-term effects of concurrent posture-correction vibrotactile feedback training on trunk inclination exposure in real manual sorting work. Fifteen warehouse workers completed the training and the follow-up sessions. Trunk inclination angles were recorded using the ambulatory Smart Workwear System. Questionnaires were used for assessing system usability, perceived physical exertion, and work ability. The results showed reduced time in trunk inclination >30°, >45°, and >60°, and reductions in the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile trunk inclination angles, when receiving feedback and immediately after feedback withdrawal. No significant reduction was retained after one and three weeks. The wearer's comfort was scored high, and the feedback did not increase the perceived cognitive demands. No significant effects attributed to changed trunk inclination exposure were observed for perceived physical exertion or work ability. The training program has the potential of contributing to reduced trunk inclination exposure in the short term. Future studies are needed to evaluate if improvements in the feedback training can transfer the short-term results to retained median- and long-term effects.Practitioner summary: A two-day training program with concurrent posture-correction vibrotactile feedback can contribute to reduced exposure of trunk inclination in real manual sorting work in the short term. More research is needed on how to design the feedback training programs in order to be effective in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Mikael Lind
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Mikael Forsman
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Huddinge, Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Liyun Yang
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazaheri A, Forsman M, Haettel R, Rose LM. Reaction force exposure for tightening tool users: A psychophysical based experimental study of electric right-angle nutrunners. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2022; 103:103776. [PMID: 35483120 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Reaction forces from nutrunner tools constitute a risk of developing MSDs. However, recommendations for sustainable reaction force levels are lacking. The aim of this study was to inform recommendations regarding reaction load exposures from right-angle nutrunners. Through a psychophysics approach, experienced assembly workers subjectively assessed reaction loads when using a nutrunner in six combinations of tool tightening strategy, work-pace and screw-joint stiffness. Electromyography, tool and joint parameters were measured. Regardless of tightening strategy, joint stiffness and work-pace combinations, no large differences in acceptable tightening torque, peak reaction force, and handle displacement were observed. However, acceptable jerk and impulse differed substantially between the TurboTight® (high-acceleration) and QuickStep® (conventional) tightening strategies. Although the TurboTight® strategy overall showed reduced peak muscular activities compared to the QuickStep®, the participant-rated acceptable torque levels were similar, plausibly due to TurboTights' high jerk levels. Jerk and impulse are hypothesized to influence the perception of reaction loads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mazaheri
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Division of Ergonomics, Hälsovägen 11C, 141 57, Huddinge, Sweden; Atlas Copco Industrial Technique AB, Sickla Industriväg 19, 105 23, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Forsman
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Division of Ergonomics, Hälsovägen 11C, 141 57, Huddinge, Sweden; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Haettel
- Atlas Copco Industrial Technique AB, Sickla Industriväg 19, 105 23, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L M Rose
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, Division of Ergonomics, Hälsovägen 11C, 141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oakman J, Weale V, Kinsman N, Nguyen H, Stuckey R. Workplace physical and psychosocial hazards: A systematic review of evidence informed hazard identification tools. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2022; 100:103614. [PMID: 34844149 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) requires the identification of physical and psychosocial hazards. This systematic review aimed to identify accessible and validated tools, for the assessment of workplace physical and psychosocial hazards, and consolidate the results into a matrix for use by work health and safety (WHS) professionals. Web of Science, Medline, ProQuest Central, and PsychInfo electronic databases, along with grey literature, were searched (Jan 1990 to July 2020). Studies that included tools with evidence of validity for the identification of physical hazards, psychosocial hazards, or both were included. A total of 83 tools were identified and then reviewed to ensure the tools were accessible. The final matrix included a total of 26 tools (16 physical, 4 psychosocial, and 6 comprehensive [physical and psychosocial]). Evidence on best practice for MSD mitigation supports the need for a comprehensive approach; however, the current review identified limitations in the availability of such tools to support WHS professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Oakman
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
| | - Victoria Weale
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Natasha Kinsman
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| | - Ha Nguyen
- Centre for Work Health and Safety, NSW, Australia
| | - Rwth Stuckey
- Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kee D. Development and evaluation of the novel postural loading on the entire body assessment. ERGONOMICS 2021; 64:1555-1568. [PMID: 33724153 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1903084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel observational technique for postural Loading on the Entire Body Assessment (LEBA). The technique was developed based on discomfort and epidemiological data from previous research, from which posture classification and scoring systems of representative observational methods were adopted and modified. The LEBA score reflected the effects of posture, external load, motion repetition, static loading, and coupling. The LEBA score for a given posture was obtained by summing the scores for these factors (except coupling) and multiplying the sum by the coupling multiplier. LEBA scores were classified into four action categories, depending on the urgency of corrective actions. Correlation analyses between LEBA scores and postural load criteria yielded confirmative results, with correlation coefficients of >0.60. Application to epidemiological cases of work-related musculoskeletal disorders indicated that LEBA action categories aided in determining whether musculoskeletal disorders were work-related. Acceptable reliability and usability were also observed. Practitioner summary: This study developed and evaluated a novel observational technique for postural loading on the entire body assessment (LEBA), based on perceived discomfort and epidemiological data from previous studies. LEBA scores aided in determining risk levels and urgent indications for more detailed assessments and/or interventions and the work-relatedness of musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dohyung Kee
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lind CM, Yang L, Abtahi F, Hanson L, Lindecrantz K, Lu K, Forsman M, Eklund J. Reducing postural load in order picking through a smart workwear system using real-time vibrotactile feedback. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2020; 89:103188. [PMID: 32854822 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Vibrotactile feedback training may be one possible method for interventions that target at learning better work techniques and improving postures in manual handling. This study aimed to evaluate the short term effect of real-time vibrotactile feedback on postural exposure using a smart workwear system for work postures intervention in simulated industrial order picking. Fifteen workers at an industrial manufacturing plant performed order-picking tasks, in which the vibrotactile feedback was used for postural training at work. The system recorded the trunk and upper arm postures. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted about the users' experience of the system. The results showed reduced time in trunk inclination ≥20°, ≥30° and ≥45° and dominant upper arm elevation ≥30° and ≥45° when the workers received feedback, and for trunk inclination ≥20°, ≥30° and ≥45° and dominant upper arm elevation ≥30°, after feedback withdrawal. The workers perceived the system as useable, comfortable, and supportive for learning. The system has the potential of contributing to improved postures in order picking through an automated short-term training program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Mikael Lind
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden.
| | - Liyun Yang
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Farhad Abtahi
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Lars Hanson
- The Virtual Systems Research Centre, School of Engineering Science, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden; User Centred Product Design, Global Industrial Development, Scania CV, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Kaj Lindecrantz
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden; Faculty of Textiles, University of Borås, SE-501 90, Borås, Sweden
| | - Ke Lu
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Mikael Forsman
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Eklund
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, SE-113 65, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Ergonomics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, SE-141 57, Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lind CM, Diaz-Olivares JA, Lindecrantz K, Eklund J. A Wearable Sensor System for Physical Ergonomics Interventions Using Haptic Feedback. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 20:E6010. [PMID: 33113922 PMCID: PMC7660182 DOI: 10.3390/s20216010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a major concern globally affecting societies, companies, and individuals. To address this, a new sensor-based system is presented: the Smart Workwear System, aimed at facilitating preventive measures by supporting risk assessments, work design, and work technique training. The system has a module-based platform that enables flexibility of sensor-type utilization, depending on the specific application. A module of the Smart Workwear System that utilizes haptic feedback for work technique training is further presented and evaluated in simulated mail sorting on sixteen novice participants for its potential to reduce adverse arm movements and postures in repetitive manual handling. Upper-arm postures were recorded, using an inertial measurement unit (IMU), perceived pain/discomfort with the Borg CR10-scale, and user experience with a semi-structured interview. This study shows that the use of haptic feedback for work technique training has the potential to significantly reduce the time in adverse upper-arm postures after short periods of training. The haptic feedback was experienced positive and usable by the participants and was effective in supporting learning of how to improve postures and movements. It is concluded that this type of sensorized system, using haptic feedback training, is promising for the future, especially when organizations are introducing newly employed staff, when teaching ergonomics to employees in physically demanding jobs, and when performing ergonomics interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Mikael Lind
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, 14157 Huddinge, Sweden; (J.A.D.-O.); (K.L.); (J.E.)
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jose Antonio Diaz-Olivares
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, 14157 Huddinge, Sweden; (J.A.D.-O.); (K.L.); (J.E.)
- Department of Biosystems, Biosystems Technology Cluster Campus Geel, KU Leuven, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel, Belgium
| | - Kaj Lindecrantz
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, 14157 Huddinge, Sweden; (J.A.D.-O.); (K.L.); (J.E.)
- Science Park Borås, University of Borås, SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Eklund
- Division of Ergonomics, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Hälsovägen 11C, 14157 Huddinge, Sweden; (J.A.D.-O.); (K.L.); (J.E.)
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 4, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|