1
|
Smejka T, Verberne D, Schepers J, Wolfs C, Schepers V, Ponds R, Van Heugten C. Trajectories of fatigue and related outcomes following mild acquired brain injury: a multivariate latent class growth analysis. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56:jrm32394. [PMID: 38506428 PMCID: PMC10985494 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.32394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fatigue is a common symptom following acquired brain injury although the severity and course differs for many individuals. This longitudinal study aimed to identify latent trajectory classes of fatigue and associated outcomes following mild brain injury. METHODS 204 adults with mild traumatic brain injury (159; 78%) or minor stroke (45; 22%) were assessed 4 times over 1 year. Subjective measures of fatigue, anxiety, depression, cognitive complaints and societal participation were collected. Multivariate Latent Class Growth Analysis identified classes of participants with similar longitudinal patterns. Demographic and injury characteristics were used to predict class membership. RESULTS Analysis revealed four classes. Class 1 (53%) had mild, decreasing fatigue with no other problems. Class 2 (29%) experienced high persistent fatigue, moderate cognitive complaints and societal participation problems. Class 3 (11%) had high persistent fatigue with anxiety, depression, cognitive complaints and participation problems. Class 4 (7%) experienced decreasing fatigue with anxiety and depression but no cognitive or participation problems. Women and older individuals were more likely to be in class 2. CONCLUSION Half the participants had a favourable outcome while the remaining classes were characterised by persistent fatigue with cognitive complaints (class 2), decreasing fatigue with mood problems (class 4) or fatigue with both cognitive and mood problems (class 3). Fatigue treatment should target combinations of problems in such individual trajectories after mild brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Smejka
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Daan Verberne
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Schepers
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Claire Wolfs
- Limburg Brain Injury Centre, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Vera Schepers
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Ponds
- Limburg Brain Injury Centre, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Van Heugten
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Domensino AF, Tas J, Donners B, Kooyman J, van der Horst ICC, Haeren R, Ariës MJH, van Heugten C. Long-Term Follow-Up of Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: From Intensive Care Parameters to Patient and Caregiver-Reported Outcome. J Neurotrauma 2024; 41:123-134. [PMID: 37265152 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a high social and financial burden due to persisting (severe) disabilities. The consequences of TBI after intensive care unit (ICU) admission are generally measured with global disability screeners such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), which may lack precision. To improve outcome measurement after brain injury, a comprehensive clinical outcome assessment tool called the Minimal Dataset for Acquired Brain Injury (MDS-ABI) was recently developed. The MDS-ABI covers 12 life domains (demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, energy, mobility, self-care, communication, participation, social support, and quality of life), as well as informal caregiver capacity and strain. In this cross-sectional study, we used the MDS-ABI among formerly ICU admitted patients with TBI to explore the relationship between dichotomized severity of TBI and long-term outcome. Our objectives were to: 1) summarize demographics, clinical characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients and their informal caregivers, and 2) compare differences between long-term outcomes in patients with mild-moderate TBI and severe TBI based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at admission. Participants were former patients of a Dutch university hospital (total n = 52; mild-moderate TBI n = 23; severe TBI n = 29) and their informal caregivers (n = 45). Hospital records were evaluated, and the MDS-ABI was administered during a home visit. On average 3.2 years after their TBI, 62% of the patients were cognitively impaired, 62% reported elevated fatigue, and 69% experienced restrictions in ≥2 participation domains (most frequently work or education and going out). Informal caregivers generally felt competent to provide necessary care (81%), but 31% experienced a disproportionate caregiver burden. All but four patients lived at home independently, often together with their informal caregiver (81%). Although the mild-moderate TBI group and the severe TBI group had significantly different clinical trajectories, there were no persisting differences between the groups for patient or caregiver outcomes at follow-up. As a large proportion of the patients experienced long-lasting consequences beyond global disability or independent living, clinicians should implement a multi-domain outcome set such as the MDS-AB to follow up on their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Fleur Domensino
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanette Tas
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Babette Donners
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Kooyman
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Haeren
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J H Ariës
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Heugten
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience (FPN), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cegarra B, Cattaneo G, Ribes A, Solana-Sánchez J, Saurí J. Independent living, emotional well-being, and quality of life in people with disabilities: the mediator role of self-determination and satisfaction with participation. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1279014. [PMID: 38187437 PMCID: PMC10768016 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In the field of disability and rehabilitation, participation in society has become an important therapeutic objective due to its potential impact on rehabilitation, prognosis, and patient's mid and long-term well-being. However, only a few studies have explored this issue in relation with the subjective perspective of individuals with disabilities about their decision-making capacity and satisfaction with the activities in which they participate. Objective Our aim is to analyze the relationship between participation in society of people with disabilities and both emotional well-being and quality of life, including variables about subjective perspective of participation (satisfaction) and the ability to decide and pursue their own preferences. Method The cross-sectional study presented here includes 424 participants with disabilities over 18-years-old from Spain. This research is part of a larger ongoing longitudinal cohort study called Participa (https://participa.guttmann.com/en/). Participants were asked to complete several on-line surveys to explore quality of life, emotional well-being, participation in society, self-determination, and independent living. Results The results revealed an association between the dimensions of participation satisfaction, self-determination, and levels of independent living with both quality of life and emotional well-being. Mediation models indicated that satisfaction and self-determination partially mediated the relationship between independent living and both quality of life and emotional well-being. Conclusion The level of independent living, self-determination, and satisfaction with participation are fundamental aspects for promoting a high quality of life and emotional well-being in people with disabilities. These findings carry significant implications for health and social services, as well as policies guidelines, highlighting the need to prioritize empowerment and self-determination in all interventions designed for people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blanca Cegarra
- Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Teoria i Història de l’Educació, Facultat d’Educació, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriele Cattaneo
- Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alina Ribes
- Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Javier Solana-Sánchez
- Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Joan Saurí
- Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fong A, Gemperli A, de Vries W. Association Between the Availability of Mobility Assistive Products and Participation Outcomes in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury in Switzerland. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2023; 29:96-107. [PMID: 38076498 PMCID: PMC10704211 DOI: 10.46292/sci22-00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Objectives This study investigated the association between the reported availability of mobility assistive products and the perceived frequency, restriction, and satisfaction of participation in individuals with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. Methods This study was based on a cross-sectional analysis based on questionnaire data collected from the Swiss SCI Cohort Study community survey in 2012 (N = 492). The availability of 12 mobility assistive products were analyzed as the main predictor variable. The outcomes of interest were the frequency, restriction, and satisfaction of participation scales as measured by the 32-item Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). The association between availability of mobility assistive products and participation was investigated using linear regressions analyses. All mobility assistive products were ranked in terms of relevance to improve participation by means of an importance performance plot. Results The availability of a sports wheelchair or a hand bike were both significant in reducing the restriction to participation. Having an adapted car increased the frequency of participation. Conclusion The availability of a sports wheelchair or a hand bike was significantly associated with less restriction in participation. With an unmet need of up to 36%, the known health benefits of regular physical activity and thereby cost-saving potential for the health care system, external support in the acquiring or use of these sports-related mobility assistive products could be an easy target for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelene Fong
- University of Lucerne, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, Switzerland
| | - Armin Gemperli
- University of Lucerne, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, Switzerland
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Wiebe de Vries
- University of Lucerne, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, Switzerland
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wiertz CMH, Hemmen B, Sep SJS, van Santen S, van Horn YY, van Kuijk SMJ, Verbunt JA. Life after COVID-19: the road from intensive care back to living - a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062332. [PMID: 36323469 PMCID: PMC9638746 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to evaluate recovery of participation in post-COVID-19 patients during the first year after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. The secondary aim was to identify the early determinants associated with recovery of participation. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING COVID-19 post-ICU inpatient rehabilitation in the Netherlands, during the first epidemic wave between April and July 2020, with 1-year follow-up. PARTICIPANTS COVID-19 ICU survivors ≥18 years of age needing inpatient rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participation in society was assessed by the 'Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation' (USER-P) restrictions scale. Secondary measures of body function impairments (muscle force, pulmonary function, fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), breathlessness (Medical Research Council (MRC) breathlessness scale), pain (Numerical Rating Scale)), activity limitations (6-minute walking test, Patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) 8b), personal factors (coping (Utrecht Proactive Coping Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), post-traumatic stress (Global Psychotrauma Screen-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), cognitive functioning (Checklist for Cognitive Consequences after an ICU-admission)) and social factors were used. STATISTICAL ANALYSES linear mixed-effects model, with recovery of participation levels as dependent variable. Patient characteristics in domains of body function, activity limitations, personal and social factors were added as independent variables. RESULTS This study included 67 COVID-19 ICU survivors (mean age 62 years, 78% male). Mean USER-P restrictions scores increased over time; mean participation levels increasing from 62.0, 76.5 to 86.1 at 1, 3 and 12 months, respectively. After 1 year, 50% had not fully resumed work and restrictions were reported in physical exercise (51%), household duties (46%) and leisure activities (29%). Self-reported complaints of breathlessness and fatigue, more perceived limitations in daily life, as well as personal factors (less proactive coping style and anxiety/depression complaints) were associated with delayed recovery of participation (all p value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study supports the view that an integral vision of health is important when looking at the long-term consequence of post-ICU COVID-19. Personal factors such as having a less proactive coping style or mental impairments early on contribute to delayed recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina M H Wiertz
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Adelante, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bena Hemmen
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Adelante, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Simone J S Sep
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Adelante, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van Santen
- Department of Intensice Care, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine A Verbunt
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Adelante, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Alphen GJ, Ketelaar M, Voorman JM, Scholten EW, Post MW. Assessing Participation in Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy: Comparison of Life-Habits and USER-Participation. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100240. [PMID: 36545524 PMCID: PMC9761302 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore and compare the contents and scores of the Assessment of Life Habits (Life-H) with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-Participation) in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Design Youth versions of both instruments were used for (1) content comparison and (2) analyses of relations between both instruments, based on cross-sectional data. Setting Clinic. Participants Participants were adolescents with cerebral palsy, aged 12-18 years; Gross Motor Function Classification System I-V; N=45. Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measures Assessment of Life Habits (Life-H) with USER-Participation. Results Both instruments measure independence in participation, called accomplishment (Life-H) and restrictions (USER-Participation), and satisfaction with participation. Life-H provides a profile of 6 domain scores and the USER-Participation a total score per dimension. Compared with the USER-Participation, the Life-H contains more specific items, more items not-applicable to many participants and more ceiling effects. Total scores on the accomplishment/restrictions and satisfaction scales between both instruments showed strong correlation coefficients (0.87 and 0.67, respectively). Correlations between domain scores were stronger within the accomplishment/restrictions scales (range 0.37-0.88) compared with the satisfaction scales (range 0.22-0.68). Conclusions Compared with the USER-Participation, the Life-H takes more effort to complete but provides a more comprehensive assessment of participation. Participation accomplishment/restrictions scores were more similar between the instruments compared with satisfaction scores. Researchers and clinicians should carefully compare participation instruments in selecting one that matches their purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marjolijn Ketelaar
- UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands,Corresponding author M. Ketelaar, PhD, University Medical Center Utrecht, Brain Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, Huispostnummer W01.121, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanine M. Voorman
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eline W.M. Scholten
- UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel W.M. Post
- UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands,University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Graaf JA, Volkers EJ, Schepers VPM, Visser-Meily JMA, Post MWM. Validity of the Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation restrictions scale in a hospital-based stroke population 3 months after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2021; 29:516-525. [PMID: 34315356 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1956047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Background:The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation Restrictions scale (USER-P-R) is a promising patient-reported outcome measure, but has currently not been validated in a hospital-based stroke population. Objective:To examine psychometric properties of the USER-P-R in a hospital-based stroke population 3 months after stroke onset. Methods:Cross-sectional study including 359 individuals with stroke recruited through 6 Dutch hospitals. The USER-P-R, EuroQol 5-dimensional 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Global Health Short Form (PROMIS-10), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and two items on perceived decrease in health and activities post-stroke were administered in a telephone interview 3 months after stroke. The internal consistency, distribution, floor/ceiling effects, convergent validity and discriminant ability of the USER-P-R were calculated. Results:Of all participants, 96.9% were living at home and 50.9% experienced no or minimal disabilities (mRS 0-1). The USER-P-R showed high internal consistency (α = 0.90) and a non-normal left-skewed distribution with a ceiling effect (21.4% maximum scores). A substantial proportion of participants with minimal disabilities (mRS 1) experienced restrictions on USER-P-R items (range 11.9-48.5%). The USER-P-R correlated strongly with the EQ-5D-5 L, PROMIS-10 and mRS. The USER-P-R showed excellent discriminant ability in more severely affected individuals with stroke, whereas its discriminant ability in less affected individuals was moderate. Conclusions:The USER-P-R shows good measurement properties and provides additional patient-reported information, proving its usefulness as an instrument to evaluate participation after 3 months in a hospital-based stroke population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris A de Graaf
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eline J Volkers
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vera P M Schepers
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel W M Post
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|