PILOT STUDY OF ENHANCING CARDIORESPIRATORY EXERCISE RESPONSE IN PEOPLE WITH ADVANCED MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS WITH HYBRID FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION

Functional electrical stimulation combined with voluntary cycling accentuates VO2 response in people with severe multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Lower limb muscle weakness and reduced balance due to disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) may make robust aerobic exercise difficult. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling combined with voluntary cycling may allow people with severe MS to enhance the intensity of aerobic exercise. The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiorespiratory, power, and participant-reported perceptions during acute bouts of FES cycling, voluntary cycling, and FES cycling combined with voluntary cycling (FES assist cycling).

METHODS

Participants with severe MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] ≥ 6.0) undertook three exercise trials on a leg cycle ergometer. Trial 1 involved 30 min of FES cycling; Trial 2 involved two 10-minute bouts of voluntary cycling separated by 10 min rest; and Trial 3 was a combination of trials 1 and 2 (FES assist cycling). Outcome measures included VO2 (volume of oxygen consumption), cycle power output, heart rate, RPE, and post-exercise perceptions of pain and fatigue.

RESULTS

Ten people with severe MS participated (9 female; age 52.4 ± 9.98 y; EDSS 7.1 ± 0.6). The average VO2 during the 30-minute trials was significantly higher for FES assist cycling compared to voluntary cycling (429.7 ± 111.0 vs 388.5 ± 101.0 mL/min, 95% CI 23.4 to 113.0 mL/min, p = 0.01), with a large effect size (Hedges' g = 1.04). Participants reported similar rates of perceived exertion at the end of FES cycling (13 ± 2), voluntary cycling (14 ± 2), and FES assist cycling (15 ± 1); p = 0.14. Self-reported pain was higher during both FES cycling (5.4 vs 0.3; 95% CI 3.4 to 6.7, p = 0.01, Hedges' g = 2.07) and FES assist cycling (4.2 vs. 0.3; 95% CI 2.3 to 5.5, p = 0.01, Hedges' g = 1.71) than voluntary cycling, both with large effect sizes. There was no difference in self-reported fatigue at the end of each trial (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

This study found FES assist cycling produced significantly higher VO2 values than voluntary cycling, although the clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Participants performed FES assist cycling at a self-reported RPE consistent with moderate to vigorous intensity, however it was considered light-intensity exercise when expressed by METS. FES assist cycling was no more fatiguing post-exercise than the other modes.

The effects of hybrid functional electrical stimulation interval training on aerobic fitness and fatigue in people with advanced multiple sclerosis: An exploratory pilot training study

BACKGROUND

Improving aerobic fitness in people with advanced multiple sclerosis (MS) may reduce fatigue, and lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, as has been found for people with mild to moderate MS. Training targeting aerobic fitness can be challenging due to paresis, access to suitable equipment and fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether people with advanced multiple sclerosis could perform functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling combined with arm crank interval exercise (hybrid FES interval training) training, and its effects on aerobic fitness and fatigue.

METHODS

Hybrid FES interval training was performed 2 d/wk for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of 40 min of continuous FES cycling with arm crank intervals of 30 s work/30 s rest added concurrently for 20 min. The intensity target was a minimum of 60 % of arm crank power and 'hard' measured by rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Attendance, compliance to intensity and time targets, adverse events, and drop outs were measured. Aerobic fitness was assessed by an arm crank maximal test. Fatigue was measured via the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS).

RESULTS

Seven participants (6 female; age 57.1 ± 7.8y; Expanded Disability Status Scale 7.1 ± 0.8) with advanced MS attended 80 ± 10.4 % of the scheduled exercise sessions and there were no adverse events or drop outs. Average RPE at the end of each training session was 15.1 ± 2.1, representing vigorous intensity exercise. Aerobic fitness did not change pre- to post-intervention (14.2 ± 5.7 to 14.8 ± 6.0 mL/kg/min [p = 0.43]), and resulted in a small effect size (ES) (0.30). The reduction in fatigue during the intervention (31.0 ± 10.4 to 21.7 ± 11.4 [p = 0.10]), resulted in a moderate to large ES (-0.77).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid FES interval training could be performed 2 days per week for 12 weeks and represented vigorous intensity exercise, but there was no change in aerobic fitness. The reduction in participants' perceptions of fatigue represented a moderate to large ES, indicating hybrid FES interval training might be suitable for people with advanced MS who need exercise equipment appropriate for their condition.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (U1111-1194-2040).

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Combined With Arm Cranking Exercise on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in People With Central Nervous System Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the evidence regarding the potential of hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling for improving cardiorespiratory fitness for people with a mobility disability related to a central nervous system (CNS) disorder.

DATA SOURCES

Nine electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, Pedro, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Search terms included multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, synonyms of FES cycling, arm crank ergometry (ACE) or hybrid exercise, and V̇o2. All experimental studies, including randomized controlled trials that included an outcome measure related to peak or sub-maximal V̇o2 were eligible.

DATA EXTRACTION

From a total of 280 articles, 13 were studies included. The Downs and Black Checklist was used to assess study quality. Random effects (Hedges' g) meta-analyses were undertaken to determine whether there were differences in V̇o2peak during acute bouts of hybrid FES cycling vs other modes of exercise and changes resulting from longitudinal training.

DATA SYNTHESIS

During acute bouts of exercise, hybrid FES cycling was moderately more effective than ACE (effect size [ES] of 0.59 (95% CI 0.15-1.02, P=.008) in increasing V̇o2peak from rest. There was a large effect on the increase of V̇o2peak from rest for hybrid FES cycling compared with FES cycling (ES of 2.36 [95% CI 0.83-3.40, P=.003]). Longitudinal training with hybrid FES cycling showed a significant improvement in V̇o2peak from pre to post intervention with a large, pooled ES of 0.83 (95% CI 0.24-1.41, P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid FES cycling produced higher V̇o2peak compared with ACE or FES cycling during acute bouts of exercise. Hybrid FES cycling can improve cardiorespiratory fitness in people with SCI. Additionally, there is emerging evidence that hybrid FES cycling might increase aerobic fitness in people with mobility disability related to CNS disorders.