[Evaluation of referral process of the hypertensive patient in Spain: DERIVA study]

[Evaluation of virtual consultation by primary care professionals: quality dimensions and opportunities for improvement]

OBJECTIVE

To know the opinion of Aragon primary care physicians about virtual consultation and its impact on the different healthcare quality domains.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study through a self-developed survey. Data collection was enabled from April 14th to May 31st, 2023. SITE: Physicians with healthcare duties in primary care in Aragon.

PARTICIPANTS

Specialist physicians and resident interns in Family and Community Medicine.

MEANSUREMENTS

Job characteristics, Likert variables assessing virtual consultation as a tool and its impact on healthcare quality domains, identification of advantages and disadvantages, and free answer questions proposing improvement strategies.

RESULTS

202 responses. 90.1% of participants consider virtual consultation useful, while 67.8% believe that it improves the quality of referrals. The main advantages identified are its contribution to professional enrichment and the integral visión of the patient, and the improvement of communication between the primary and secondary levels of care; the main drawback is the role of Primary Care as an intermediary in patient information. Efficiency and equity were the most highly rated quality domains, with safety being the least valued.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual consultation can promote communication and coordination of care, and enhance the primary care resolution capacity. Its success relies on training and time for its use, as well as on reaching a consensus on protocols and to homogenize resource distribution. Nevertheless, there are still opportunities for improvement, mainly in the realm of safety.

SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation.

Non-systematic review: Correspondence quality and interoperability between family physicians and hospital clinicians

BACKGROUND

Medical correspondence between physicians working in the community and in hospital is paramount to provide continuity of care, but there is no agreement on what constitutes a good quality letter, not even interest by some clinicians on this interface. Information flow could be faster electronically rather than in paper, but is content improving? What defines a good letter?

AIM

(a) To assess what information should be shared between family doctors and hospital physicians and could it be shared better. (b) To assess the possibility of linking the sections of the letter to SNOMED-CT codes to improve interoperability.

RESULTS

Authors vary regarding what is to be included in communications, and as they also have different needs among services, it creates a very long list of possible items to consider. Standardised templates with their corresponding SNOMED-CT codes are presented.

CONCLUSION

Standardised correspondence could improve continuity of care. Appropriately coded it could facilitate the information sharing and the data manipulation required to provide an adequate provision of services among primary care or family physicians and hospitals or secondary care organisations. It could also serve as a tool to assess clinicians' performance.

Standards for global cardiovascular risk management arteriosclerosis

One of the main goals of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to a wider and greater knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and also lead to a high degree of disability and health expenditure. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease, this is why its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Thus, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and integrates recommendations and procedures to be followed for patients with established cardiovascular disease or high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or those in special situations. It also includes the estimation of vascular risk, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and presents general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not often mentioned in the literature, such as the organisation of a vascular risk consultation.

[Primary care evaluation of the hypertensive patient management in specialized care after derivation (DERIVA-2 Study)]

INTRODUCTION

To know the opinion/evaluation of the primary care physicians (PCPH) of the received information about patients that were attended in specialized care (SC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

LOCATION

Performed nationwide in primary care centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Researchers from the primary care network.

METHODS

We used the SEH-LELHA derivation criteria guidelines, plus an ad hoc survey that included demographic and anthropometric data, blood pressure levels, and the main reason for derivation to SC at the baseline and final (post-derivation) visit. In addition, time deployed for the study of every patient, changes in diagnosis and treatment, type of follow-up, issues throughout the derivation process and assessment of the medical referred to the PCPH were evaluated.

RESULTS

With participation of 578 researchers from primary, the study included 1715 patients aged 60.7±13.3years, 62.7% male. Patients were taking 2.3±1.2 (range 0-10) antihypertensive drugs pre-referral and 2.5±1.2 (0-9) after derivation. Blood pressure levels changed from 166±21.6 /97.7±12.6mmHg to 143±14.4 /85.5±10.5mmHg. The number of controlled patients (BP<140 and <90mmHg) increased from 5.8% to 32.2%. Time between pre- and post-derivation visit was 72±64days (median 57days, IQ26-99). The PCPH received a medical report in 80.3% of cases, 76.9% with an explanation of the results of the complementary tests, 75.8% with additional information or a reasoning of treatment and in 71% of cases information about the patient future management. 63% of PCPH were fully agreed with the management of the specialist, 29% agree and 2% strongly disagree. The derivation was evaluated as effective or very effective in 86% of patients and no effective in 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication between AE and SC in HTA is valued satisfactorily by MAP. However there is still room for improvement in the process.