[Effectiveness of interventions based on telemedicine on health outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in Primary Care: A systematic review]

The Experiences and Perceptions of Older Adults with Multimorbidity Toward E-Health Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Background: Given the growing population of older adults globally, e-Health plays an indispensable role in the chronic disease management of multimorbidity. However, qualitative evidence that synthesizes the experiences of older adults with multimorbidity using e-Health service is currently lacking. The objective was to explore the experiences and perceptions of e-Health care in community-based settings among the older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: Seven electronic databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese BioMedical Literature were searched, and the search was limited to studies from inception to September 1, 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis methodology was applied to synthesize the original themes. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, and the confidence of synthesized themes was evaluated by the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approaches. Results: Ten studies with moderate methodological quality met eligibility criteria and were included finally. Studies were conducted in four countries with 235 participants who were living with multiple chronic conditions. Among the 10 included studies, 37 credible findings were extracted and interpreted into 3 synthesized themes and 12 subthemes: (1) advantages and benefits perceived during e-Health service, (2) multidimensional challenges and negative experience posed by e-Health service, and (3) preferences, suggestions, and expectations for future e-Health improvement. The confidence in the majority of the three final synthesized themes was rated between "low" and "moderate" scales. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide new insights into implementing tailored e-Health care for older adults with multimorbidity. Further research should emphasize on realizing the potential value of e-Health service based on users' needs and perspectives to promote age-friendliness in geriatric practice.

Protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a goal-oriented care approach for multimorbidity patients supported by a digital platform

INTRODUCTION

Health information systems represent an opportunity to improve the care provided to people with multimorbidity. There is a pressing need to assess their impact on clinical outcomes to validate this intervention. Our study will determine whether using a digital platform (Multimorbidity Management Health Information System, METHIS) to manage multimorbidity improves health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A superiority, cluster randomised trial will be conducted at primary healthcare practices (1:1 allocation ratio). All public practices in the Lisbon and Tagus Valley (LVT) Region, Portugal, not involved in a previous pilot trial, will be eligible. At the participant level, eligible patients will be people with complex multimorbidity, aged 50 years or older, with access to an internet connection and a communication technology device. Participants who cannot sign/read/write and who do not have access to an email account will not be included in the study. The intervention combines a training programme and a customised information system (METHIS). Both are designed to help clinicians adopt a goal-oriented care model approach and to encourage patients and carers to play a more active role in autonomous healthcare. The primary outcome is HR-QoL, measured at 12 months with the physical component scale of the 12-item Short Form questionnaire (SF-12). Secondary outcomes will also be measured at 12 months and include mental health (mental component Scale SF-12, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). We will also assess serious adverse events during the trial, including hospitalisation and emergency services. Finally, at 18 months, we will ask the general practitioners for any potentially missed diagnoses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Research and Ethics Committee (LVT Region) approved the trial protocol. Clinicians and patients will sign an informed consent. A data management officer will handle all data, and the publication of several scientific papers and presentations at relevant conferences/workshops is envisaged.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05593835.

[Evaluation of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care: A cross-sectional study]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perceptions and preferences of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with a telephone survey of users and a face-to-face survey of professionals carried out at 2021.

SETTING

Urban primary health care.

PARTICIPANTS

Random sample of users with teleconsultations in the last year, stratified by sex and age, and doctors and nurses from participating centres.

MEASUREMENTS

Likert variables assessing teleconsultation according to consultation motives, preferences and related aspects. Descriptive analysis and comparison of proportions and means.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients and 48 professionals answered the questionnaire. Both groups value positively the teleconsultation for the management of the electronic prescription (EP) (83% and 83%, respectively), sick leave (SL) (80% and 64%) and issues related to COVID-19 (71% and 58%). The positive assessment of teleconsultation decreases for the treatment of acute pathologies (47% and 25%) and chronic diseases (49% and 33%). Globally, people <70 years value teleconsultation more highly (P<.001), without differences between sexes. Users and professionals prefer face-to-face consultation for chronic diseases (82% and 83%) and acute pathologies (82% and 94%), and teleconsultation for EP (68.7% and 88.6%). 52% of users prefer face-to-face visits for SL compared to 29% of professionals (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Teleconsultation implementation has been well valued by both patients and professionals. The face-to-face visit is preferred for chronic and acute pathologies, especially in the elderly. It will be necessary to define in which cases teleconsultation is the best tool according to the characteristics of each population.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digitization of routine pediatric practice in Spain: A nationwide survey study

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a change in the working dynamics of all healthcare professionals, leading to the sudden introduction of telemedicine. Although until that moment telemedicine applications had been described in the paediatric age, their use was anecdotal.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the experience of Spanish paediatricians after the forced digitization of consultations due to the pandemic.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey-type study was designed to obtain information from Spanish paediatricians about the changes that took place in the usual clinical practice.

RESULTS

306 health professionals participated in the study Most of them agreed on the use of the internet and social networks during the pandemic, referring to mail or WhatsApp® as usual channels of communication with their patients' families. There was a great agreement among paediatricians that the evaluation of newborns after hospital discharge and establishing methodologies that allow childhood vaccination and the identification of subsidiary patients for face-to-face evaluation were necessary although the limitations of the lockdown. The idea that telephone and digital consultations have optimized the consultation time and that they will probably continue after the end of the pandemic was generally accepted. No changes in adherence to breastfeeding or the start of complementary feeding were referred to, but an increase in the duration of breastfeeding and the appearance of frequent hoaxes in social networks concerning infant feeding were found.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to analyse the impact of telemedicine in paediatric consultations during the pandemic to evaluate its effectiveness and quality to maintain it in routine paediatric practice.

Challenges of Telemonitoring Programs for Complex Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Study

Background

Despite the growing prevalence of people with complex conditions and evidence of the positive impact of telemonitoring for single conditions, little research exists on telemonitoring for this population.

Objective

This randomized controlled trial and embedded qualitative study aims to evaluate the impact on and experiences of patients and health care providers (HCPs) using a telemonitoring system with decision support to manage patients with complex conditions, including those with multiple chronic conditions, compared with the standard of care.

Methods

A pragmatic, unblinded, 6-month randomized controlled trial sought to recruit 146 patients with ≥1 diagnosis of heart failure (HF), uncontrolled hypertension (HT), and insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (DM) from outpatient specialty settings in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants were randomized into the control and telemonitoring groups, with the latter being instructed to take readings relevant to their conditions. The telemonitoring system contained an algorithm that generated decision support in the form of actionable self-care directives to patients and alerts to HCPs. The primary outcome was health status (36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included anxiety and depression, self-efficacy in chronic disease management, and self-reported health service use. HF-related quality of life and self-care measures were also collected from patients followed for HF. Within- and between-group change scores were analyzed for statistical significance (P<.05). A convenience sample of HCPs and patients in the intervention group was interviewed about their experiences.

Results

A total of 96 patients were recruited and randomized. Recruitment was terminated early because of implementation challenges and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant within- and between-group differences were found for the main primary and secondary outcomes. However, a within-group analysis of patients with HF found improvements in self-care maintenance (P=.04) and physical quality of life (P=.046). Opinions expressed by the 5 HCPs and 13 patients who were interviewed differed based on the monitored conditions. Although patients with HF reported benefitting from actionable self-care guidance and meaningful interactions with their HCPs, patient and HCP users of the DM and HT modules did not think telemonitoring improved the clinical management of those conditions to the same degree. These differing experiences were largely attributed to the siloed nature of specialty care and the design of the decision support, whereby fluctuations in the status of HT and DM typically required less urgent interventions compared with patients with HF.

Conclusions

We recommend that future research conceive telemonitoring as a program and that self-management and clinical decision support are necessary but not sufficient components of such programs for patients with complex conditions and lower acuity. We conclude that telemonitoring for patients with complex conditions or within multidisciplinary care settings may be best operationalized through nurse-led models of care.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03127852; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03127852

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/resprot.8367

[Telemedicine satisfaction of primary care patients during COVID-19 pandemics]

Objetivo

Evaluar el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes con la telemedicina durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 en la Unidad de Salud Familiar Vitrius. Este trabajo podría obtener información sobre la aceptación de la teleconsulta (TC).

Material y métodos

Estudio transversal con 253 individuos. Se realizó un cuestionario mediante escala Likert (entre 1-nada satisfecho a 5-totalmente satisfecho) en pacientes con diabetes, hipertensión y en sujetos con otras patologías, entre el primero de abril del 2020 y el primero de mayo de ese mismo año. Se recopilaron datos sociodemográficos, citas previas de telemedicina, niveles de satisfacción con la TC y de aclaración de dudas e interés en un mayor seguimiento de telemedicina. Además, se realizó un análisis comparativo entre los períodos de enero-febrero y abril-mayo de 2020 en relación con la edad, el sexo, la hipertensión arterial (HTA), la diabetes mellitus (DM) y el tipo de contacto (presencial o telemático). Las estadísticas se realizaron con el SPSS® y Excel®.

Resultados y discusión

Las consultas de seguimiento de diabetes representaron el 34,4% del total. Mayoritariamente hubo un alto nivel de satisfacción e interés en el seguimiento futuro con telemedicina. Sin embargo, los individuos diabéticos y mayores estaban menos interesados en este tipo de seguimiento. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en satisfacción para la edad, sexo y presencia/ausencia de diabetes. El 70,6% de los pacientes sanos prefirió el contacto por correo electrónico al teléfono. Ha sido analizado el número de consultas entre enero-febrero y abril-mayo de 2020 donde se destaca: una reducción significativa del número de consultas presenciales por diabetes (-50,1%) y por hipertensión (-94,1%). Las consultas presenciales por cualquier razón disminuyeron un 72,6% y las no presenciales aumentaron un 61,9%. Existe un sesgo de selección porque la muestra no fue aleatoria. La mayor prevalencia de consultas de diabetes y la falta de ajuste por factores de confusión también pueden afectar los resultados.

Conclusiones

Este estudio permitió confirmar la importancia de la telemedicina en atención primaria, sobre todo durante la pandemia. En general, los participantes se quedaron satisfechos con la telemedicina y reconocieron su utilidad en el acceso a los cuidados de salud.