SEPAR Guidelines for Lung Cancer Staging

Canadian Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Operable Stage II/III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Modified Delphi Process

The treatment paradigm for patients with stage II/III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. We performed a modified Delphi process culminating at the Early-stage Lung cancer International eXpert Retreat (ELIXR23) meeting held in Montreal, Canada, in June 2023. Participants included medical and radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons and pathologists from across Quebec. Statements relating to diagnosis and treatment paradigms in the preoperative, operative and postoperative time periods were generated and modified until all held a high level of consensus. These statements are aimed to help guide clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with stage II/III NSCLC.

Predictors of mediastinal staging and usefulness of pet in patients with stage IIIA (N2) or IIIB (N3) lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze which factors predict mediastinal N2/N3 lymph node staging and diagnostic accuracy of PET and CT to determine it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data collected prospectively in a database that included patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent EBUS-TBNA. Prior to EBUS-TBNA, CT and PET were used to define the radiographic N stage and lymph nodes with short axis ≥ 1 cm by CT or with ratio between maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV), by PET, of lymph node and primary tumor greater than 0.56, were considered pathological. Definitive lymph node staging was established through EBUS-TBNA, mediastinoscopy or surgical lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty four patients were included, in 88 of whom (65.6%), definitive lymph node staging was N2 or N3. Primary tumor of central location, lymph node size, maxSUV of lymph node and radiographic N stage by CT or PET were associated with N2/N3 in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression model it was only independently related with N stage by CT or PET. Negative predictive value and positive predictive value of CT were 0.81 and 0.74, respectively, and for PET 0.78 and 0.68.

CONCLUSION

In NSCLC, in locoregional disease radiographic staging by CT or PET predict the existence of N2/N3 mediastinal disease, but negative and positive predictive values of both imaging techniques are not adequate, so EBUS-TBNA samples should be taken in all lymph nodes with a diameter greater than 5 mm, regardless of PET findings.

Excellence in non-small cell lung cancer staging by endobronchial-TBNA: Comparison with PET-CT and surgery

Objective: To determine the correlation and/or discrepancies between positron emission tomography (PET-CT) findings, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and surgery in the staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Material and methods: Data were evaluated retrospectively from a prospective interventional endoscopy database. Positive results with EBUS-TBNA was the first end point and all cytology negatives were confirmed with mediastinoscopy/surgery. Results: Four hundred and eighty three patients were included and 1017 lymph nodes (LNs) were sampled in the study. One hundred and twenty eight LNs were excluded (positive with EBUS-TBNA). Four hundred and sixty five LN (52.3%) were found benign with EBUS-TBNA; however, only 15 of these were confirmed to be malignant by surgery (1.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were 96.5, 100, 100, 96.7 and 98.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of PET-CT for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 2.5 were 90.1, 29.2, 55.3, 75.4, 59.2%, respectively. A cut-off SUVmax of 5.2 was detected with 74.8% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 82.0% PPV, 77.5% NPV and 79.5% accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818, 95% CI 0.791-0.843, p<.001). Conclusion: EBUS is a reliable, repeatable and safe technique with a high diagnostic accuracy and should be performed quickly to avoid superfluous time loss in the staging of lung cancer. Abbreviations PET-CT F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer EBUS-TBNA Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value LNs Lymph nodes TTF-1 Thyroid transcription factor-1 H&E Hematoxylin and eosin; Med: Mediastinoscopy VATS Video associated thoracic surgery AUC Area under curve OR Odds ratio CI Confidence intervals.

Impact of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Educational Program for Interdisciplinary Teams

BACKGROUND

Successful implementation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evidence-based guideline recommendations requires effective educational programs that target all clinicians from interdisciplinary teams. This study describes and evaluates the Engaging an Interdisciplinary Team for NSCLC (GAIN 3.0) experiential learning-based educational curriculum.

METHODS

GAIN 3.0 was designed to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration for effective NSCLC diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. The program used a flipped classroom model that included an e-learning component prior to a live 6-hour interactive program. The interactive program included hands-on simulations, small group workshops, gamification, and case discussions. Participants included academic and community members of multidisciplinary lung cancer teams. Assessments included an online baseline survey, a pretest and posttest, a program evaluation, a long-term survey (LTS), and on-site faculty evaluation of participants.

RESULTS

Of 416 attendees to 13 live GAIN 3.0 programs (nine in the United States and four in Europe), 304 (73%) completed the pretest and 187 (45%) completed the posttest. Out of a perfect score of 12 points, program participants had a mean test score of 6.3 ± 2.1 on the pretest (52%) and 7.8 ± 2.1 on the posttest (65%) (P = .03). There was an overall knowledge increase of 13% from pretest to posttest. Most LTS respondents (65%) rated the GAIN 3.0 live programs as "high impact." On the LTS, the areas with the greatest gains in participants who had very high confidence were communication across disciplines, use of a team-based approach, and personalized treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GAIN 3.0 was a highly successful interdisciplinary activity that improved participants' knowledge, competence, and likely the clinical care provided to patients with NSCLC.

Enhancement of conventional TBNA outcome after EBUS Training

BACKGROUND

Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) is a well-established technique for the diagnosis and staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. Because of the implementation of the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), the C-TBNA is being used less frequently. Despite its proven diagnostic utility some of the pulmonary fellowship programs have chosen to eliminate training for C-TBNA from their curriculum. The objective our study was to compare the outcomes of C-TBNA before and after the implementation of EBUS in our unit.

METHODS

We compared the diagnostic performance of C-TBNA in 2 groups of non-small cell lung cancer patients with mediastinal lymph nodes >10 mm in short axis as seen on the computed tomography scan of the chest. Patients underwent C-TBNA before (group A, N=147) or after (group B, N=67) implementing EBUS technology in our unit. C-TBNA technique was performed by the same bronchoscopists before and after being proficient in EBUS.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy in group B was higher than in group A (23.9% vs. 9.5%, respectively; P=0.0001). Overall test accuracy and sensitivity of C-TBNA was 66% versus 86% and 63% versus 86% in groups A and B, respectively. The negative predictive values of C-TBNA improved after EBUS training (19% vs. 33%, P<0.001). Inadequate samples were less frequent in group B than in group A (31.1% vs. 49.7%, respectively; P=0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic performance of C-TBNA improves after EBUS training. C-TBNA should remain in the armamentarium of every bronchoscopist and on the curriculum of all pulmonary fellowship training programs even if EBUS technology is available.

Oxidative stress and inflammation in the normal airways and blood of patients with lung cancer and COPD

Respiratory conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with a greater risk for lung cancer (LC). Oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in LC pathophysiology. Studies conducted so far have focused solely on lung tumor parenchyma and not the airways. We explored levels of local and systemic oxidative stress and inflammation within normal bronchial epithelium and blood of patients with lung cancer (n=52), with and without COPD, and in control subjects (COPD and non-COPD, n=21). In normal bronchial epithelium specimens (bronchoscopy) and blood from patients with similar smoking history (LC-COPD and LC) and control subjects (both COPD and non-COPD), redox balance and inflammatory markers were measured (ELISA and immunoblotting). All subjects were clinically evaluated. Absence of malignant cells within the bronchial specimens was always pathologically confirmed. Bronchial levels of protein carbonylation, MDA-protein adducts, antioxidants, TNF-α, interferon-γ, TGF-β, and VEGF and blood levels of superoxide anion, oxidatively damaged DNA and proteins, TNF-α, interferon-γ, TGF-β, VEGF, and neutrophils were significantly greater in all LC patients compared to control subjects. Systemic levels of oxidatively damaged DNA, superoxide anion, and TNF-α and bronchial levels of TGF-β and TNF-α showed high sensitivity and specificity for LC among patients. Regardless of the presence of an underlying respiratory condition (COPD), protein oxidation, oxidatively damaged DNA, and inflammation were remarkably increased in the normal airways and blood of patients with LC. Furthermore, the potential predictive value for LC development of these molecular events warrants attention and should be explored in future larger longitudinal studies.