Future biologic therapies in asthma

Th17 Lymphocytes in Children with Asthma: Do They Influence Control?

Background: Allergic asthma was considered as an inflammation mediated by specific CD4⁺ helper lymphocytes (Th2); however, this paradigm changed in 2005, when a third group of helper cells called Th17 cells were identified. Th17 lymphocytes are the main source of interleukin (IL)-17A-F, IL-21, and IL-22; however, their physiological role in children is unclear. This study aimed to determine the percentage of Th17 cells and IL-17A in pediatric patients diagnosed with asthma and to associate it with disease control using a validated questionnaire. Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective, comparative study included 92 asthma-diagnosed children 4-18 years of age. The Asthma Control Test was used as an assessment measure to classify patients as controlled (n = 30), partially controlled (n = 31), and uncontrolled (n = 31). Th17 cells and IL-17A were analyzed by flow cytometry. Patients receiving inhaled steroid therapy as monotherapy or associated with a long-acting bronchodilator were included. Results: The mean percentage of Th17 cells in the participants was 4.55 ± 7.34 (Controlled), 5.50 ± 8.09 (Partially Controlled), and 6.14 ± 7.11 (Uncontrolled). There was no significant difference between the 3 groups (P = 0.71). The mean percentage of IL-17A in all the participants was 9.84 ± 9.4 (Controlled), 10.10 ± 10.5 (Partially Controlled), and 11.42 ± 8.96 (Uncontrolled); no significant difference between the 3 groups (P = 0.79) was observed. Th17 lymphocyte levels were similar among the 3 groups and the same trend was observed with IL-17A. A significant correlation between Th17 or IL-17A and the degree of asthma control (Th17, P = 0.24; IL-17A, P = 0.23) was not found. Conclusions: The percentages of both Th17 lymphocytes and IL-17A found in children with asthma were not significantly different in the 3 groups, which suggests that they do not play an important role in asthma control. Our findings may contribute to the knowledge related to non-Th2 inflammation in children. Clinical-Trials.gov ID: 2015-2102-85.

Asthma: New Integrative Treatment Strategies for the Next Decades

Asthma is a chronic disease whose main anatomical-functional alterations are grouped into obstruction, nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity, inflammation and airway remodeling. Currently, the Global Initiative of Asthma 2020 (GINA 2020) suggests classifying it into intermittent cases, slightly persistent, moderately persistent and severely persistent, thus determining the correct guidelines for its therapy. In general, the drugs used for its management are divided into two groups, those with a potential bronchodilator and the controlling agents of inflammation. However, asthmatic treatments continue to evolve, and notable advances have been made possible in biological therapy with monoclonal antibodies and in the relationship between this disease and oxidative stress. This opens a new path to dietary and herbal strategies and the use of antioxidants as a possible therapy that supports conventional pharmacological treatments and reduces their doses and/or adverse effects. This review compiles information from different published research on risk factors, pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis and the main treatments; likewise, it synthesizes the current evidence of herbal medicine for its control. Studies on integrative medicine (IM) therapies for asthmatic control are critically reviewed. An integrative approach to the prevention and management of asthma warrants consideration in clinical practice. The intention is to encourage health professionals and scientists to expand the horizons of basic and clinical research (preclinical, clinical and integrative medicine) on asthma control.

The IL-4/IL-13 axis in skin fibrosis and scarring: mechanistic concepts and therapeutic targets

Skin fibrosis, characterized by excessive fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition in the dermis, is the histopathologic hallmark of dermatologic diseases such as systemic sclerosis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Effective anti-scarring therapeutics remain an unmet need, underscoring the complex pathophysiologic mechanisms of skin fibrosis. The Th2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 have been implicated as key mediators in the pathogenesis of fibroproliferative disorders. The goal of this article is to summarize the current understanding of the role of the IL-4/IL-13 axis in wound healing and skin fibrosis. We conducted a literature search to identify research studies investigating the roles of IL-4 and IL-13 in fibrotic skin diseases. While transforming growth factor-beta has long been regarded as the main driver of fibrotic processes, research into the cellular and molecular biology of wound healing has revealed other pathways that promote scar tissue formation. IL-4 and IL-13 are important mediators of skin fibrosis, supported by evidence from in vitro data, animal models of fibrosis, and clinical studies. Overactive signaling of the IL-4/IL-13 axis contributes to the initiation and perpetuation of fibrotic skin diseases. Further insights into the IL-4/IL-13 axis may reveal potential targets for the development of novel therapies that prevent or treat fibrotic skin diseases.

Economic impact of severe asthma in Spain: multicentre observational longitudinal study

Objective: Estimate the economic impact of severe asthma from the Spanish social perspective through the estimation of the associated annual direct and indirect costs. Methods: Observational, longitudinal, retrospective study carried out in 20 Spanish secondary settings (Pulmonology and Allergy Services) among patients aged ≥18, diagnosed with severe asthma according to European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society consensus and who have not experienced an exacerbation in the previous 2 months. Asthma-related healthcare resource utilization as well as asthma-related days off work were collected over a retrospective 12-month period from medical records review (inclusion period: June to November 2016). Total costs were calculated by multiplying the natural resource units used within 1 year by the corresponding unit cost. Costs were expressed in Euros for 2018. Results: A total of 303 patients were included, mean age was 54 years old and 67% were women. There were 5.7 physician visits per patient (3.3 in secondary care). The most common pharmacologic treatment was fixed dose combination of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-adrenergic agonists (96.7%), followed by leukotriene receptor antagonists (57.1%). 134 patients (44.2%) had at least one severe asthma exacerbation (mean: 1.9 exacerbation/patient), of whom 22 patients required hospitalization, with a mean hospital stay of 10.9 days/patient. Mean sick leave due to severe asthma was 9.1 days per patient per year. Mean annual direct cost (confidence interval 95%) was €7472/patient (€6578-8612). The cost per exacerbation was €1410/patient. When indirect costs were added (€1082/patient [€564-1987]), the total annual mean cost rose to €8554/patient (€7411-10199). Conclusions: Taking the social perspective, the economic impact of severe asthma in Spain was estimated to be €8554/patient/year.

Prospects for Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Pediatric Asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The profile of biologic therapies for asthma is growing rapidly. We discuss how to match the proper pediatric patient with the most effective therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently available biologic therapies are most effective in patients with T2 high asthma. Newer drugs are currently being studied which target TSLP and interleukin 33. These newer drugs may provide options for asthmatics who do not respond to the current anti-IgE, anti-IL5, and anti-IL4/13 therapies. Asthma is a heterogeneous disease which can be driven by different inflammatory mediators in different patients. To select the most effective biologic therapy for a pediatric patient, the asthma phenotype must first be determined. The steep cost of biologics limits their use, which makes proper pairing of patient to therapy even more crucial. Presently, several therapies exist for T2 high asthma, but it is hoped in the future that development of drugs effective for T2 low asthmatics will be available as well.

Biologic response modifiers: Indications, implications, and insights

The field of biologic immune modulators is currently mushrooming at a dizzying pace. Although most of these biologics are tested and approved for one or a few indications, their unanticipated side effects and off-label use have contributed significantly to our understanding of basic immune mechanisms, the involvement of cytokines in several apparently nonimmunologic diseases, and the importance of compartmentalized immune responses. In this review we attempt to give a bird's-eye view of the major biologics and to highlight insights and implications derived from their secondary effects and adverse reactions.

A review of omalizumab for the management of severe asthma

Despite the expansion of the understanding in asthma pathophysiology and the continual advances in disease management, a small subgroup of patients remain partially controlled or refractory to standard treatments. Upon the identification of immunoglobulin E and other inflammatory mediators, investigations and developments of targeted agents have thrived. Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the circulating immunoglobulin E, which in turn impedes and reduces subsequent releases of the proinflammatory mediators. In the past decade, omalizumab has been proven to be efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma in both trials and real-life studies, most notably in reducing exacerbation rates and corticosteroid use. While growing evidence has demonstrated that omalizumab may be potentially beneficial in treating other allergic diseases, its indication remains confined to treating severe allergic asthma and chronic idiopathic urticaria. Future efforts may be focused on determining the optimal length of omalizumab treatment, seeking biomarkers that could better predict treatment response, as well as extending its indications.

Lebrikizumab in the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Severe asthma continues to be a major clinical problem despite the availability of effective asthma medications such as inhaled corticosteroids. Several targeted biologic therapies are emerging to treat patients with severe asthma. Areas Covered: This review provides an update of information on lebrikizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody that targets IL-13 and is currently in advanced stages of development. It describes the role of IL-13, a key effector cytokine in Type 2 (T2) airway inflammation in asthma and discusses the results of recent phase 2 trials investigating lebrikizumab's efficacy and safety in patients with severe asthma. Furthermore, it provides insight into the current ongoing trials with lebrikizumab and outlines future research needs. Expert Opinion: Several emerging therapeutic targets have been identified for patients with severe asthma. By specifically targeting IL-13, lebrikizumab has the potential to block several downstream signals that play a role in disease progression including airway inflammation, mucous hypersecretion and airway remodeling. The effects of lebrikizumab have been more marked in individuals with high serum periostin levels which reflect underlying IL-13 activity and T2 airway inflammation. Ongoing trials with lebrikizumab aim to further examine its long-term safety and efficacy in a larger population and explore its effects on airway inflammation and function.

Usefulness of noninvasive methods for the study of bronchial inflammation in the control of patients with asthma

Bronchial asthma is one of the most prevalent respiratory conditions. Although it is defined as an inflammatory disease, the current guidelines for both diagnosis and follow-up of patients are based only on clinical and lung function parameters. Current research is focused on finding markers that can accurately predict future risk, and on assessing the ability of these markers to guide medical treatment and thus improve prognosis. The use of noninvasive methods to study airway inflammation is gaining increasing support. The study of eosinophils in induced sputum has proved useful for the diagnosis of asthma; however, its clinical implementation is complex. Some studies have shown that the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may also be useful to establish disease phenotypes and improve control. Others have found that the measurement of pH and certain markers of oxidative stress, cytokines and prostanoids in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may also be useful as well as the measurement of the temperature of exhaled breath and the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In conclusion, since asthma is an inflammatory disease, it seems appropriate to try to control it through the study of airway inflammation using noninvasive methods. In this regard, the analysis of induced sputum cells has proved very useful, although the clinical implementation of this technique seems difficult. Other techniques such as temperature measurement, the analysis of FeNO, the analysis of the VOCs in exhaled breath, or the study of certain biomarkers in EBC require further study in order to determine their clinical applicability.