Effects of Ranolazine on Vasomotor Responses of Rat Aortic Rings

Role of ranolazine in heart failure: From cellular to clinic perspective

Ranolazine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an antianginal drug in 2006, and has been used since in certain groups of patients with stable angina. The therapeutic action of ranolazine was initially attributed to inhibitory effects on fatty acids metabolism. As investigations went on, however, it developed that the main beneficial effects of ranolazine arise from its action on the late sodium current in the heart. Since late sodium currents were discovered to be involved in various heart pathologies such as ischemia, arrhythmias, systolic and diastolic dysfunctions, and all these conditions are associated with heart failure, ranolazine has in some way been tested either directly or indirectly on heart failure in numerous experimental and clinical studies. As the heart continuously remodels following any sort of severe injury, the inhibition by ranolazine of the underlying mechanisms of cardiac remodeling including ion disturbances, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis, metabolic dysregulation, and neurohormonal impairment are discussed, along with unresolved issues. A projection of pathologies targeted by ranolazine from cellular level to clinical is provided in this review.

Ranolazine: An Old Drug with Emerging Potential; Lessons from Pre-Clinical and Clinical Investigations for Possible Repositioning

Ischemic heart disease is a significant public health problem with high mortality and morbidity. Extensive scientific investigations from basic sciences to clinics revealed multilevel alterations from metabolic imbalance, altered electrophysiology, and defective Ca²⁺/Na⁺ homeostasis leading to lethal arrhythmias. Despite the recent identification of numerous molecular targets with potential therapeutic interest, a pragmatic observation on the current pharmacological R&D output confirms the lack of new therapeutic offers to patients. By contrast, from recent trials, molecules initially developed for other fields of application have shown cardiovascular benefits, as illustrated with some anti-diabetic agents, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes, emphasizing the clear advantage of “old” drug repositioning. Ranolazine is approved as an antianginal agent and has a favorable overall safety profile. This drug, developed initially as a metabolic modulator, was also identified as an inhibitor of the cardiac late Na⁺ current, although it also blocks other ionic currents, including the hERG/Ikr K⁺ current. The latter actions have been involved in this drug’s antiarrhythmic effects, both on supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, despite initial enthusiasm and promising development in the cardiovascular field, ranolazine is only authorized as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic angina pectoris, notwithstanding its antiarrhythmic properties. A plausible reason for this is the apparent difficulty in linking the clinical benefits to the multiple molecular actions of this drug. Here, we review ranolazine’s experimental and clinical knowledge on cardiac metabolism and arrhythmias. We also highlight advances in understanding novel effects on neurons, the vascular system, skeletal muscles, blood sugar control, and cancer, which may open the way to reposition this “old” drug alone or in combination with other medications.

Relaxant and antiadrenergic effects of ranolazine in human saphenous vein

OBJECTIVES

Ranolazine improves vascular function in animal models. We evaluate the effects of ranolazine on vascular function and adrenergic response in human saphenous vein.

METHODS

Rings from 53 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were mounted in organ baths. Concentration-response curves to ranolazine were constructed in rings precontracted with phenylephrine, endothelin-1, vasopressin, KCl and the thromboxane A2 analogue U-46619. In rings precontracted with phenylephrine, relaxation to ranolazine was tested in the absence and presence of endothelial factors inhibitors, K+ channel blockers and verapamil. The effects of ranolazine on frequency-response and concentration-response curves to phenylephrine were performed in the absence and presence of endothelial factors inhibitors and K+ channel blockers. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase, α1 adrenergic receptor and large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel protein expressions were measured by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Ranolazine (10-9-10-4 M) produced a concentration-dependent relaxation only in rings precontracted with phenylephrine that was reduced by endothelial denudation, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (10-4 M), charybdotoxin (10-7 M) and verapamil (10-6 M). Ranolazine diminished adrenergic contractions induced by electrical field stimulation (2-4 Hz) and phenylephrine (10-9-10-5 M) that were prevented by tetraethylammonium (10-3 M) and charybdotoxin (10-7 M). Ranolazine significantly decreased α1 adrenergic receptor and increased large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel protein expression in the saphenous vein.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranolazine diminishes the adrenergic vasoconstriction, acting as α1 antagonist, and by increasing large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel involvement. The relaxant effects of ranolazine are partially mediated by endothelial nitric oxide, large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and the blockade of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.

Effect of ranolazine on plasma arginine derivatives and urinary isoprostane 8-iso-PGF2α in patients with myocardial infarction in the randomized RIMINI-Trial

The purpose of the present study was to assess whether 6-week ranolazine application on top of guideline-based treatment impacts on the arginine/NO pathway and urinary isoprostane 8-iso-PGF_2α as marker of oxidative stress in patients directly after a myocardial infarction. 20 patients with unstable angina pectoris and proof of acute cardiac ischemia entered the study. 10 subjects received the study drug ranolazine in addition to standard treatment, the others received only standard treatment. Urine and venous blood were collected before and after treatment. At the end of the study and compared to baseline, homoarginine levels had increased in the control group. This was not the case in ranolazine-patients. Interestingly, in ranolazine-treated-patients arginine plasma levels were significantly higher at the end of the study than at baseline (difference +26 µmol/L, 95% CI 8.6 to 44 µmol/L). ADMA and SDMA levels were not different. Urine levels of the oxidative stress marker 8-iso-PGF_2α tended to be lower in ranolazine-treated patients (−144 pmol/mg creatinine). Findings of this hypothesis-driven study give evidence that ranolazine treatment enhances arginine plasma levels and lowers oxidative stress.

Late sodium channel blockade improves angina and myocardial perfusion in patients with severe coronary microvascular dysfunction: Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction ancillary study

BACKGROUND

In a prior trial of late sodium channel inhibition (ranolazine) among symptomatic subjects without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and limited myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), we observed no improvement in angina or MPRI, overall. Here we describe the clinical characteristics and myocardial perfusion responses of a pre-defined subgroup who had coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed invasively.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients without obstructive CAD and limited MPRI in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of ranolazine vs. placebo were subjects of this prespecified substudy. Because we had previously observed that adverse outcomes and beneficial treatment responses occurred in those with lower CFR, patients were subgrouped by CFR <2.5 vs ≥2.5. Symptoms were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the SAQ-7, and left-ventricular volume and MPRI were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Coronary angiograms, CFR, and MRI data were analyzed by core labs masked to treatment and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

During qualifying coronary angiography, 81 patients (mean age 55 years, 98% women) had invasively determined CFR 2.69 ± 0.65 (mean ± SD; range 1.4-5.5); 43% (n = 35) had CFR <2.5. Demographic and symptomatic findings did not differ comparing CFR subgroups. Those with low CFR had improved angina (p = 0.04) and midventricular MPRI (p = 0.03) with ranolazine vs placebo. Among patients with low CFR, reduced left-ventricular end-diastolic volume predicted a beneficial angina response.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients with CFR <2.5 and no obstructive CAD had improved angina and myocardial perfusion with ranolazine, supporting the hypothesis that the late sodium channel is important in management of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01342029.

Overview of Antagonists Used for Determining the Mechanisms of Action Employed by Potential Vasodilators with Their Suggested Signaling Pathways

This paper is a review on the types of antagonists and the signaling mechanism pathways that have been used to determine the mechanisms of action employed for vasodilation by test compounds. Thus, we exhaustively reviewed and analyzed reports related to this topic published in PubMed between the years of 2010 till 2015. The aim of this paperis to suggest the most appropriate type of antagonists that correspond to receptors that would be involved during the mechanistic studies, as well as the latest signaling pathways trends that are being studied in order to determine the route(s) that atest compound employs for inducing vasodilation. The methods to perform the mechanism studies were included. Fundamentally, the affinity, specificity and selectivity of the antagonists to their receptors or enzymes were clearly elaborated as well as the solubility and reversibility. All the signaling pathways on the mechanisms of action involved in the vascular tone regulation have been well described in previous review articles. However, the most appropriate antagonists that should be utilized have never been suggested and elaborated before, hence the reason for this review.

Antagonism of Nav channels and α1-adrenergic receptors contributes to vascular smooth muscle effects of ranolazine

Ranolazine is a recently developed drug used for the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina. It is a selective inhibitor of the persistent cardiac Na⁺ current (I_Na), and is known to reduce the Na⁺-dependent Ca²⁺ overload that occurs in cardiomyocytes during ischemia. Vascular effects of ranolazine, such as vasorelaxation,have been reported and may involve multiple pathways. As voltage-gated Na⁺ channels (Na_v) present in arteries play a role in contraction, we hypothesized that ranolazine could target these channels. We studied the effects of ranolazine in vitro on cultured aortic smooth muscle cells (SMC) and ex vivo on rat aortas in conditions known to specifically activate or promote I_Na. We observed that in the presence of the Na_v channel agonist veratridine, ranolazine inhibited I_Na and intracellular Ca²⁺ calcium increase in SMC, and arterial vasoconstriction. In arterial SMC, ranolazine inhibited the activity of tetrodotoxin-sensitive voltage-gated Na_v channels and thus antagonized contraction promoted by low KCl depolarization. Furthermore, the vasorelaxant effects of ranolazine, also observed in human arteries and independent of the endothelium, involved antagonization of the α₁-adrenergic receptor. Combined α₁-adrenergic antagonization and inhibition of SMCs Na_v channels could be involved in the vascular effects of ranolazine.

Synthesis of ranolazine derivatives containing the (1S,4S)-2,5-diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane moiety and their evaluation as vasodilating agents

Two diazabicyclic analogues of ranolazine, (S,S,S)-5 and (S,S,R)-5, and their epimeric mixture were synthesized. Furthermore, their vasomotor effects on rat aorta rings precontracted with phenylephrine were analyzed. These compounds showed vasodilating effects significantly greater than ranolazine. The vasodilating activities of these analogues have two components, one that depends on the endothelium, due to the release of NO, and another one due to a direct effect on the vascular smooth muscle. The compounds [(S,S,S)(S,S,R)]-5 and (S,S,R)-5 induce, in a manner similar to ranolazine, the release of a prostanoid from the cyclooxygenase pathway, whose vasoconstrictor effect is masked by the predominant vasodilation induced by these compounds.