Opioid Crisis Along Mexico's Northern Border: Treatment Needs Mexican Opioid Crisis

Implementing a decentralized opioid overdose prevention strategy in Mexico, a pending public policy issue

The public health crisis due to opioid overdose is worsening in Mexico's northern region due to the introduction of illicitly manufactured fentanyl into the local drug supply. Though there is an increase in overdose deaths, there is no accurate report of overdoses by Mexican government agencies and no comprehensive opioid overdose prevention strategy. There is currently only an anti-drug marketing strategy which is likely insufficient to mitigate the growing epidemic. In order to address the growing opioid overdose crisis in the country, it is necessary to create and implement a decentralized prevention strategy, that includes naloxone distribution, expanded treatment services in regions most in need, and create active dialogue with community organisations already implementing harm reduction actions. Decisive action must be taken by the Mexican government to ensure the health and wellbeing of the Mexican citizens, especially those at high risk for opioid overdose.

A scoping review of the opioid epidemic among U.S. Immigrants: Implications for treatment practices

The purpose of this review was to identify knowledge gaps within the literature regarding the impact of opioid use disorder, specific to immigrants in the United States, by addressing the following questions: 1) What is presented in the literature about the impact of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the opioid epidemic on immigrants in the United States?; and 2) What role does culture play in the opioid use disorder experiences of immigrants in the United States? Nineteen research articles were uncovered that addressed immigrants in the U.S. and opioid use disorder. The following themes prevailed: 1) OUD comparisons, 2) OUD comorbidities, 3) disparate OUD treatment engagement, and 4) the role of country of origin. Limited review findings support the need for future research on the topic of opioid misuse among immigrants in the United States. The authors elaborated on additional issues that influence OUD rates and warrant further exploration. Matters related to the potential positive roles of religion and faith leaders, cultural perceptions and expectations about gender roles, immigration status, ethnically diverse needs among sub-groups of immigrants, the role of geographic location within the U.S., and the implications of COVID-19 on OUD among immigrants need to be addressed to alleviate the deleterious impact of opioid misuse among immigrants.

Sodium chloride injection to treat opioid overdose; Does it work? A preclinical study

Opioid overdoses (ODs) are increasing in Mexico's northern border. Because naloxone is usually not available, witnesses inject common salt (NaCl) into a vein of OD victims in an attempt to help them regain consciousness. Despite this widespread practice, no preclinical studies have addressed the efficacy of NaCl as an opioid antidote. Here we tested saline solutions at different concentrations. Because the highest (31.6 %) caused tail necrosis, we selected 17.7 % as a hypertonic saline solution (HSS) to determine if it could prevent the lethal effect of morphine (Mor), fentanyl (Fen), or Mor + Fen in adult Wistar male rats. We also evaluated if NaCl could modify the opioid antagonist effect of naloxone. Our results show that HSS: a) sensitizes animals to thermal but not mechanical stimuli; b) does not prevent mortality caused by high morphine or fentanyl doses; c) decreases the latency to recovery from the sedative effects caused by low doses of morphine or fentanyl; and d) increases naloxone's efficacy to prevent the lethality produced by Mor or Fen, but not by Mor + Fen. These results suggest that HSS is marginally effective in shortening the recovery time from nonfatal opioid ODs and increases naloxone's efficacy to counteract opioid-induced ODs.

Geographical and socioeconomic disparities in opioid access in Mexico, 2015-19: a retrospective analysis of surveillance data

Background

In 2015, Mexico implemented regulatory changes and an electronic system to improve access to prescription opioids. We aimed to investigate trends in opioid dispensing after the implementation of these changes and assess how opioid dispensing varied geographically and by socioeconomic status.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of prescription medication surveillance data, we analysed dispensing data for group 1 medications (all opioids, including morphine, methadone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, tapentadol, fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil) obtained from the Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risk database for 32 states and six large metropolitan areas in Mexico. We calculated crude annual opioid prescriptions per 10 000 people at the national, state, and municipal levels. Adapting methods from the report of the Lancet Commission on Palliative Care and Pain Relief, we calculated the need for palliative opioids by state, and then assessed the observed opioid dispensing rates as a percentage of expected need by geographical socioeconomic status. Within the six major metropolitan areas, we mapped the geocoded location of opioid prescriptions and assessed the association between opioid dispensing and socioeconomic status as well as the association between opioid dispensing and time to US border crossing for areas on the US–Mexico border.

Findings

Between June 25, 2015, and Oct 7, 2019, opioid dispensing rates increased by an average of 13% (95% CI 6·8–19·6) per quarter (3 months). The overall national opioid dispensing rate during the study period was 26·3 prescriptions per 10 000 inhabitants. States with a higher socioeconomic status had higher opioid dispensing rates than states with lower socioeconomic status (rate ratio [RR] 1·88, 95% CI 1·33–2·58, p=0·00016) after controlling for the estimated opioid requirement per state, the presence of methadone clinics, and the presence of tertiary hospitals and cancer centres. The same association between opioid dispensing and socioeconomic status was observed in the metropolitan areas, and in those metropolitan areas on the US–Mexico border a 20% decrease (RR 0·80, 95% CI 0·75–0·86) in opioid dispensation was observed per each SD increase (SD 17·1 min) in travel time to the border.

Interpretation

Measures introduced by the Mexican federal Government to increase opioid access for patients with palliative care needs were only marginally successful in raising opioid prescription rates. Opioid access should be improved for patients with palliative care needs who live in geographical areas of lower socioeconomic status.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health.