[Medical evaluation of suspected child and adolescent sexual abuse]

[Child sexual abuse: Description of a French population having consulted in a forensic medical service between 2011 and 2015]

BACKGROUND

When child sexual abuse (CSA) is suspected, the detection of anogenital anomalies is rare. In France, since 2011, most clinical examinations of children for whom CSA is suspected take place in the forensic medical service (FMS).

OBJECTIVES

To describe a population of children examined for suspected CSA in the FMS of the Nancy Regional University Hospital Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children under the age of 18 who consulted for suspected CSA in the Nancy FMS between 2011 and 2015 were included. Demographic data as well as data from questioning, the physical examination, any further examination, and the medical conclusions were collected.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-five girls and 79 boys were enrolled. The average age at the time the abuse was committed was 118.9 months. Two hundred sixty-nine (66.6%) children alleged fondling and 59 (14.6%) fellatio. Two hundred twelve victims (52.5%) described a penetration, 163 (76.9%) in the vagina and 73 (34.4%) in the anus. Significant bruises were found at the examination of 13 children, accounting for 2.5% of all victims. Thirty-four (11.7%) girls had lesions in the external genitalia and 28 (9.8%) lesions of the virginal membrane. One boy (1.3%) had a nonspecific lesion of the external genitalia. Six (8.2%) children alleging anal penetrations showed injury. The examiner concluded that clinical examinations were compatible with alleged facts for 253 (62.6%) victims. It was impossible to conclude for 116 (28.7%) children.

CONCLUSION

In the case of suspected CSA, the clinical examination is frequently normal. This examination must be performed by physicians trained in child abuse, under appropriate conditions. It is important not to jump to conclusions about the reality of the alleged facts. A multidisciplinary approach, with the cooperation of the medical, social, and forensics sector is necessary.

[Complementary exams in child abuse: A French national study in 2015]

INTRODUCTION

Even if there are HAS (French National Health Authority) guidelines on shaken baby syndrome, many other child abuse situations are not included in these recommendations. The aim of this study was to invent the complementary exams in cases of child abuse in France and compare the practice to existing guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a multicenter study by email to 128 French hospitals (35 university hospitals and 93 general hospitals) that receives children in emergency and hospitalization settings. Three child abuse clinical situations were included in a clinical case multiple-choice format concerning the further explorations. We described the main results and evaluated their adherence to the HAS protocol for case 1.

RESULTS

Of 128 hospitals surveyed, 104 responded, for an 81 % response rate, which corresponded to 274 doctors. Analysis of the results showed great heterogeneity in practices. The majority of physicians (99 %) performed systematic explorations in the situation of physical abuse, while only 27 % undertook such exams in situations of serious neglect. The situation of sexual abuse was the most consensual in terms of diagnostic tests for the detection of sexually transmitted diseases, but other types of associated abuse were not sought. In the first case, the HAS guidelines were respected in less than half of the cases for all complementary exams except the eye fundus exam. Abdominal imaging was insufficiently performed (40 % of cases). Examinations that were not indicated were still prescribed. Moreover, siblings under 2 years of age were examined in only one-third of cases (n=88/274; 32 %). Practices were not influenced by the age of the child.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the heterogeneity in the use of complementary exams in cases of child abuse in France. Common protocols throughout the country would be useful, standardizing the most relevant exams for potential medical-legal issues, and facilitating exchanges concerning practices between different centers.