1
|
Vanneste T, Belba A, Kallewaard JW, van Kuijk SMJ, Gelissen M, Emans P, Bellemans J, Smeets K, Terwiel C, Van Boxem K, Sommer M, Van Zundert J. Comparison of cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized pilot trial (COCOGEN trial). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:197-204. [PMID: 36653065 PMCID: PMC10086476 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency (RF) treatment of the genicular nerves has the potential to reduce chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis or persistent postsurgical pain, however, a direct comparison between the two main modalities used, conventional and cooled, is lacking. METHODS This double blind, non-inferiority, pilot, randomized controlled trial compared the effects of cooled and conventional RF in chronic knee pain patients suffering from osteoarthritis or persistent postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty. Patients were randomized following a 1:1 rate. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ≥50% pain reduction at 3 months postintervention. Other outcomes were knee pain, functionality, quality of life, emotional health, and adverse events up to 6 months postintervention. Conventional RF treatment was tested for non-inferiority to cooled in reducing knee pain at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS Forty-nine of 70 patients were included, of which 47 completed a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was achieved in 4 of 23 patients treated with conventional RF (17%) vs in 8 of 24 with cooled (33%) (p=0,21). Results from the non-inferiority comparison were inconclusive in relation to the non-inferiority margin. There was no statistically significant difference between secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Both conventional and cooled RF treatment reduced pain in the osteoarthritis and persistent postsurgical pain population. This pilot study did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients experiencing ≥50% pain reduction between techniques. The non-inferiority analysis was inconclusive. These results warrant further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03865849.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaut Vanneste
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Amy Belba
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes Gelissen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Emans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bellemans
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- GRIT Belgian sports clinic, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristof Smeets
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, BIOMED REVAL Rehabilitation Research Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Chris Terwiel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Van Boxem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Micha Sommer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peluso R, Hesson J, Aikens J, Bullock M. An Update on Physical Therapy Adjuncts in Orthopedics. Arthroplast Today 2022; 14:163-169. [PMID: 35330664 PMCID: PMC8938198 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Physical therapy is a necessary part of the recovery process after most orthopedic procedures. Effective treatment, patient satisfaction, and financial reimbursement hinge on the successful implementation of both surgical and nonsurgical interventions. Evidence-based practice and open communication between therapists and orthopedic surgeons continue to form the foundation of patient care. The aim of this paper is to familiarize orthopedic surgeons with the relevant data behind some of the recent advances in rehabilitation adjuncts to better address the needs of our patients. Although each intervention has been found to be relatively safe, high-quality evidence is still sparse. Opportunities exist for improved outcomes with further well-designed studies to investigate the role of these therapy modalities among orthopedic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Peluso
- Department of Orthopaedics, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Jacob Hesson
- Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Jordan Aikens
- Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Matthew Bullock
- Department of Orthopaedics, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA
- Corresponding author. 1600 Medical Center Drive Suite G500, Huntington, WV 25701, USA. Tel.: +1 724 825 6766.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Total Knee Arthroplasty Complicated by Posterior Dislocation of a Polyethylene Insert and Neurovascular Compromise. Arthroplast Today 2022; 14:40-43. [PMID: 35198700 PMCID: PMC8850992 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Dislocation of the polyethylene insert is a rare complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which has only been described in a handful of case reports. Here, we describe a report of a 55-year-old woman presenting 13 months after the primary TKA with signs of neurovascular compromise. A magnetic resonance image showed posterior extrusion of her polyethylene insert causing a mass effect on the gastrocnemius muscle and the popliteal neurovascular bundle. A multidisciplinary team including a joint reconstruction surgeon, vascular surgeon, and nerve specialist performed a revision TKA with peroneal nerve decompression. The polyethylene insert was noted to be dislocated, rotated 90 degrees, and incarcerated in the posterior knee.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheppalli N, Bhandarkar AW, Sambandham S, Oloyede SF. Safety and Efficacy of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Management of Painful Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e19489. [PMID: 34912630 PMCID: PMC8665972 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Painful total knee replacement (TKR) without an obvious underlying identifiable pathology is not uncommon. Dissatisfaction after TKR can be up to 20%. Different treatment modalities, including non-operative and operative procedures, have been described in the literature. Radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (GNRFA) is emerging as a newer treatment modality for painful TKR without an obvious underlying identifiable pathology. Despite a modest number of publications demonstrating the usefulness of GNRFA in managing pain in knee osteoarthritis, the efficacy of GNRFA has not been completely established in the management of residual pain after TKR. This systematic review aimed to analyze all published studies (nine studies) on GNRFA as an option to manage residual pain after TKR. Based on this current systematic review, we noted that GNRFA is a modality to treat post residual pain and patients can anticipate improvement in pain up to three months with minimal complications. This article provides an overview of the currently available knowledge and techniques employed for this procedure, as well as the expected outcome and safety profile of GNRFA in painful TKR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naga Cheppalli
- Orthopaedics, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA
| | | | - Senthil Sambandham
- Orthopedics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Solomon F Oloyede
- Orthopaedics, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rainey J, Miller S, Conger A, Anderson L, McCormick Z. A Letter to the Editor regarding Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of the Painful Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 23:603-604. [PMID: 34850181 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Rainey
- University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Scott Miller
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Aaron Conger
- The University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lucas Anderson
- University of Utah Health Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Zachary McCormick
- The University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheppalli N, Singanamala N, Choi TJ, Anand A. Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection After Total Knee Replacement: Is it Safe? Cureus 2021; 13:e19700. [PMID: 34976478 PMCID: PMC8681887 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recalcitrant pain after total knee replacement (TKR) is sometimes treated with intra-articular steroid injections (IASI), with few studies reporting on the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This is a systematic review to evaluate the incidence and risk of PJI after IASI into a total knee replacement. We searched online databases using the keywords "total knee replacement," "total knee arthroplasty," "steroids" and "intra-articular injection." A total of 7386 articles (PubMed - 91, Embase - 70, Web of Science - 57, CINAHL - 8, and Google Scholar - 7160) were retrieved on the initial search. After applying exclusion criteria, four articles were included in this review for evaluation and statistical analysis. There were no level one or two studies. The incidence of infection after IASI at 12 months was 138/6499 or 2.1%, while the incidence of infection rate among controls at 12 months was 158/11256 or 1.4%. A chi-square test showed that the difference in infection rate was significant (p = 0.0002424). A caveat is that simple statistical test results are virtually guaranteed to be statistically significant with large sample size. IASI into a TKR is not a benign procedure and that may be associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection. We, therefore, recommend against IASI into a TKR until better studies can be performed to determine their safety and efficacy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Effects of Trigger Point Dry Needling for the Management of Knee Pain Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072044. [PMID: 32610659 PMCID: PMC7409136 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the effect of trigger point dry needling alone or as an adjunct with other interventions on pain and related disability in people with knee pain. Methods: Several electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials where at least one group received dry needling for knee pain. Studies had to include human subjects and collect outcomes on pain and pain-related disability in musculoskeletal knee pain. Data were extracted by two reviewers. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Guidelines, methodological quality was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) score, and the quality of evidence by using the GRADE approach. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated. Results: Ten studies (six patellofemoral pain, two knee osteoarthritis, two post-surgery knee pain) were included. The meta-analysis found moderate effect sizes of dry needling for reducing pain (SMD −0.53, 95% CI −0.87 to −0.19) and improving related disability (SMD −0.58, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.09) as compared to a comparison group at short-term. The main effect was observed for patellofemoral pain (SMD −0.64, 95% CI −1.17 to −0.11). No significant effects were observed at mid- or long-term follow-ups. The risk of bias was generally low, but the heterogenicity and the imprecision of the results downgraded the level of evidence. Conclusion: Low to moderate evidence suggests a positive effect of trigger point dry needling on pain and related disability in patellofemoral pain, but not knee osteoarthritis or post-surgery knee pain, at short-term. More high-quality trials investigating long-term effects are clearly needed.
Collapse
|