Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Comparison of survival between cemented vs cementless unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a case control study with propensity score matching

INTRODUCTION

The first results of cementless prosthesis were rather disappointing. However recent progress in methods of cementless fixation of prosthesis should lead to better results in terms of survival of these prostheses. The main objective is to compare the survival rate at last follow-up of UKA with cemented tibial or cementless.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that UKAs with uncemented tibial implants have better survival compared to UKAs with cemented tibial implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single center case-control study included 94 medial UKA with a cemented tibial component that were paired by propensity score matching to 94 medial UKA with a uncemented tibial component. The main evaluation criterion was the comparison of the survivorship of the UKA between a cemented tibial implant and those with a cementless tibial implant in terms of all-cause revision surgery at last follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the analysis of the causes of failure.

RESULTS

The mean final follow-up was 6.1years (2.3). The overall survival rate in our serie of medial UKA was 92.4% [88.7%-96.3%] at five years. The overall survival rate in cemented group was and 91.5% [86.0%-97.3%] at five years and at 93.2% [88.1%-98.7%] at five years, in the uncemented group. No differences significant were observed in the two groups (p.value = 0.6). Only the tibial preoperative deformity was a risk factor of failure (HR: 1.11 [1.02,1.20], value = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

The use of a cemented or a cementless tibial component in a medial UKA did not influence the survival rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case control study.

Reducing edge loading and alignment outliers with image-free robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study

BACKGROUND

Survivorship of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is technique-dependent. Correct femoral-tibial component positioning associates with improved survivorship. Image-free robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables preoperative and intraoperative planning of alignment and assessment of positioning prior to execution. This study aimed to compare the radiological outcomes between robotic-assisted UKA (R-UKA) and conventional UKA (C-UKA).

METHODS

This retrospective case control study involved 140 UKA (82 C-UKA and 58 R-UKA) performed at an academic institution between March 2016 to November 2020, with a mean follow-up of 3 years. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for mechanical axis and femoral-tibial component position. Component position was measured by two methods: (1) femoral-tibial component contact point with reference to four medial-to-lateral quadrants of the tibial tray and (2) femoral-tibial component contact point deviation from the center of the tibial tray as a percentage of the tibial tray width. Baseline demographics and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There was a higher mean component deviation in C-UKA compared with R-UKA using method 2 (17.2% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.007), but no difference in proportion of zonal outliers using method 1 (4 outliers in C-UKA, 5.1% vs. 1 outlier in R-UKA, 1.8%; P = 0.403). R-UKA showed no difference in mean mechanical alignment (C-UKA 5° vs. R-UKA 5°; P = 0.250). 2-year survivorship was 99% for C-UKA and 97% for R-UKA. Mean operative time was 18 min longer for R-UKA (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Image-free robotic-assisted UKA had improved component medio-lateral alignment compared with conventional technique.

The Length of Incision in Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Is More Affected by the Patient's Height Than Their Weight

Objective Obesity leads to osteoarthritis due to increased loading forces on joint cartilage and inflammatory agents released from adipose tissue. In patients with a high body mass index (BMI), during hip and total knee arthroplasty, surgical technical challenges such as longer incisions and wider exposure are encountered, resulting in increased postoperative complications (wound healing problems and infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE)- pulmonary embolism (PE), dislocation, early implant failure) and ultimately decreased patient satisfaction and implant survival. This study investigates whether BMI, height, weight, and patient age are associated with longer incisions in patients undergoing unicondylar knee prosthesis (UKP) placement. Method Between January 2017 and December 2018, 30 patients (29 females and 1 male) who underwent UKP surgery due to medial gonarthrosis were included in the study. The UKP used in the procedures was the Oxford Knee Phase III by Biomet Ltd., UK. The study comprised 43 knees, 13 being bilateral cases, 8 on the right, and 9 on the left. Data regarding the patient's height, weight, BMI, age, and the operated side were collected and compiled. The relationships between these variables and the surgical incision length were statistically analyzed. Results The average age of the patients was 66.3 years, with an average weight and height of 77.6 kg (ranging from 62 to 98 kg) and 167 cm (ranging from 150 to 184 cm), respectively. The lengths of the surgical incisions ranged from 70 mm to 160 mm, with an average length of 124.5 mm. When comparing the incision lengths between the right and left sides, it was observed that the incisions on the left side were longer. The average incision length on the right side was 122.09 mm, while on the left, it was 126.86 mm. Moreover, in the 13 patients who underwent bilateral surgery, this difference in incision length was even more pronounced. The average incision length on the right side was 117.15 mm, whereas on the left, it was 124.23 mm. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to examine the relationship between the length of the incision and BMI and age. However, no significant relationship was found between the incision length and BMI or age. On the other hand, there was a correlation between the patient's weight values and the incision length (p < 0.05, correlation 0.335). Furthermore, a higher correlation was observed between the patient's height and the incision length (p < 0.01, correlation 0.595). Conclusion The latest advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation have enabled surgeons to perform the procedure using a reliable mini-incision approach. Mid-term evaluation of UKP with mini-incision shows faster recovery and lower morbidity. The findings show that in UKP, the length of the surgical incision is more strongly related to the patient's height than their weight.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Mechanical Axis Alignment to Long-Leg Radiographs following Robotic-Arm-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Improper alignment and implant positioning following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to lead to postoperative pain and increase the incidence of revision procedures. The use of robotic-arm assistance for UKA (RAUKA) has become an area of interest to help overcome these challenges. The accuracy of intraoperative alignment compared with standing long-leg X-rays postoperatively following medial RAUKA has been in question. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) determine final mean intraoperative coronal alignment in extension utilizing an image based intraoperative navigation system, and (2) compare final intraoperative alignment to 6-week weight-bearing (WB) long-leg X-rays. Patients who underwent RAUKA for medial compartmental osteoarthritis were identified from January 1, 2018, to August 31, 2019, through our institution's joint registry. The query yielded 136 (72 right and 64 left) patients with a mean age of 72.02 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.65 kg/m2 who underwent RAUKA. Final intraoperative alignment was compared with WB long leg X-rays 6 weeks postoperatively by measuring the mechanical alignment. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between intraoperative alignment to 6-week alignment. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Mean intraoperative coronal alignment after resections and trialing was 4.39 varus ± 2.40 degrees for the right knee, and 4.81 varus ± 2.29 degrees for the left knee. WB long-leg X-rays 6 weeks postoperatively demonstrated mechanical axis alignment for the right and left knees to be 3.01 varus ± 2.10 and 3.7 varus ± 2.38 degrees, respectively. This resulted in a change in alignment of 1.36 ± 1.76 and 1.12 ± 1.84 degrees for the right and left knees, respectively (p < 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a correlation of 0.69 between intraoperative to long-leg-X-ray alignment. RAUKA demonstrates excellent consistency when comparing postoperative WB long-leg X-rays to final intraoperative image-based non-WB alignment.

Subsidence of All-Polyethylene Tibial Components Used in Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental designs and techniques have been developed to preserve bone stock and minimize soft tissue trauma. Early modern designs and techniques have been introduced with little support in the peer-reviewed literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From October 2002 to May 2004, 64 consecutive DePuy Preservation unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKAs) were performed in 56 patients. Two patients died of unrelated consequences, leaving 62 UKAs for review (55 medial, 7 lateral). All procedures were performed through a quadriceps-sparing approach. All components were cemented, including an all polyethylene tibial component. Clinical and radiographic follow-up data were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

At an average follow-up of 2.5 years, six (11%) of the medial tibial components have subsided. Of these, four had moderate-to-severe pain, one did require a revision to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and another did stabilize. An additional two patients continued to have knee pain (one requiring conversion to TKA), leaving a total of 55 UKAs (89%) functioning well at early follow-up. Additional complications have included four deep vein thromboses, three cardiac issues following the index procedure, one surgical site infection, one intraoperative medial femoral condyle fracture, and one reoperation for loose cement fragments.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a high rate of subsidence for all-polyethylene tibial components used in UKA, resulting in pain and failure of the arthroplasty. Despite the less invasive approach, we found complications that are usually associated with TKA surgery as well as those unique to UKA.

How reproducible are clinical measurements in robotic knee surgery?

PURPOSE

Robotic-assisted surgery has been recently introduced to improve biomechanical restoration, and thus better clinical and functional outcomes, after knee joint arthroplasty operations. Robotic-assisted uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims indeed to improve surgical bone resection and alignment accuracy, optimized component positioning and knee balancing, relying on a series of calibration measurements performed during the surgery. These advantages focus therefore on improving the reproducibility of UKA surgeries, reducing (if not eliminating) eventual differences among high- and low-volume surgeons. The purpose of this study is to investigate and quantify the reproducibility of in-vivo measurements performed with a robotic system: the intra- and inter-observer variability of a series of measurements was therefore analyzed and compared among differently experienced operators.

METHODS

Five patients were analyzed and underwent robotic-assisted UKA using a semi-active robotic system. Three different observers with different experience levels were involved to independently perform the measurements of two parameters of the preoperative knee (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle [HKAa], Internal-External Rotation) at different degrees of knee flexion. Inter-observer and intra-observer comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

The average variability in the measurements obtained from the intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were always < 0.68° for HKAa and < 2.59° for internal-external rotation, and the ICCs showed excellent agreement (> 0.75) for most cases and good agreement (> 0.60) in the remaining ones.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated high reproducibility of the measurements obtainable in clinical environment with the robotic system. The inter-observer results furthermore showed that the level of confidence with the robotic system is not significantly influencing the measurement.

Referencing the Tibial Plateau With a Probe Improves the Accuracy of the Posterior Slope in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Background

There is currently no consensus on intraoperative references for determining the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The medial tibial plateau could serve as a direct reference for determining the native PTS through the placement of a hook probe in the anteroposterior direction of the medial tibial plateau. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of this new referencing method.

Methods

We consecutively performed 55 medial UKAs using our new method (study group), and the preoperative and postoperative PTS on lateral knee radiographs were examined. These outcomes were then compared with those of consecutive 50 medial UKAs performed using the conventional method (control group), which immediately preceded the start of the use of the new method.

Results

The correlation coefficient between the preoperative and postoperative PTS of the study group was larger than that of the control group (0.887 and 0.482, respectively). The mean implantation error of the PTS in the study group was smaller than that of the control group (-1.1° ± 1.3° and -3.0° ± 3.2°, respectively; P < .0001). The percentages of knees within 2° of implantation error were 73% and 34% in the study and control groups, respectively (P < .0001). The root mean square errors in the study and control groups were 1.7° and 4.3°, respectively.

Conclusions

The direct referencing method with a probe can significantly improve the accuracy of tibial sagittal alignment.

Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) remains unclear. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been shown to accurately reflect true resource utilization. This study aimed to compare true facility costs between RA-UKA and conventional UKA.

METHODS

We identified 265 consecutive UKAs (133 RA, 132 conventional) performed at a specialty hospital in 2016-2020. Itemized facility costs were calculated using TDABC. Separate analyses including and excluding implant costs were performed. Multiple regression was performed to determine the independent effect of robotic assistance on facility costs.

RESULTS

Due to longer operative time, RA-UKA patients had higher personnel costs and total facility costs ($2,270 vs $1,854, P < .001). Controlling for demographics and comorbidities, robotic assistance was associated with an increase in personnel costs of $399.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] $343.75-$454.74, P < .001), reduction in supply costs of $55.03 (95% CI $0.56-$109.50, P = .048), and increase in total facility costs of $344.27 (95% CI $265.24-$423.31, P < .001) per case. However, after factoring in implant costs, robotic assistance was associated with a reduction in total facility costs of $235.87 (95% CI $40.88-$430.85, P < .001) per case.

CONCLUSION

Using TDABC, overall facility costs were lower in RA-UKA despite a longer operative time. To facilitate wider adoption of this technology, implant manufacturers may negotiate lower implant costs based on volume commitments when robotic assistance is used. These supply cost savings appear to offset a portion of the increased costs. Nonetheless, further research is needed to determine if RA-UKA can improve clinical outcomes and create value in arthroplasty.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Early lessons from the first 100 consecutive knees in 85 patients

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is associated with improved component positioning and comparable short- and mid-term implant survivorship with manual UKA. This study aims to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes following robotic-assisted UKA as well as any potential learning-curves associated with the introduction of such new technology.

METHODS

Prospective study of patients undergoing robotic-assisted UKA. Outcome measures were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), complications, implant survivorship, component positioning and learning curve.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients comprising 100 knees were recruited and followed up for 21.0 ± 4.3 months. At two years, there were significant and sustained improvements in PROMs and 100% implant survivorship rate. A high degree of implant accuracy was achieved with the robotic system. A cumulative learning curve of 20 cases was noted.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted UKA achieves excellent implant accuracy and clinical outcomes in the short-term. Long-term follow up is needed to evaluate this relationship.

Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

(I) To determine the incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and (II) to summarize the existing evidence on characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic fractures in UKA.

METHODS

Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases were comprehensively searched. Any clinical, laboratory or case report study describing information on proportion, characteristics or risk factors of periprosthetic tibial fractures in UKA was included. Proportion meta-analysis was performed to estimate the incidence of fractures only using data from clinical studies. Information on characteristics and risk factors was evaluated and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies were considered to be eligible for inclusion. Based on 41 clinical studies, incidences of fractures were 1.24% (95%CI 0.64-2.41) for cementless and 1.58% (95%CI 1.06-2.36) for cemented UKAs (9451 UKAs). The majority of fractures in the current literature occurred during surgery or presented within 3 months postoperatively (91 of 127; 72%) and were non-traumatic (95 of 113; 84%). Six different fracture types were observed in 21 available radiographs. Laboratory studies revealed that an excessive interference fit (press fit), excessive tibial bone resection, a sagittal cut too deep posteriorly and low bone mineral density (BMD) reduce the force required for a periprosthetic tibial fracture to occur. Clinical studies showed that periprosthetic tibial fractures were associated with increased body mass index and postoperative alignment angles, advanced age, decreased BMD, female gender, and a very overhanging medial tibial condyle.

CONCLUSION

Comparable low incidences of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented UKA can be achieved. However, surgeons should be aware that an excessive interference fit in cementless UKAs in combination with an impaction technique may introduce an additional risk, and could therefore be less forgiving to surgical errors and patients who are at higher risk of periprosthetic tibial fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Miniature parallel robot with submillimeter positioning accuracy for minimally invasive laser osteotomy

To overcome the physical limitations of mechanical bone cutting in minimally invasive surgery, we are developing a miniature parallel robot that enables positioning of a pulsed laser with an accuracy below 0.25 mm and minimizes the required manipulation space above the target tissue. This paper presents the design, control, device characteristics, functional testing, and performance evaluation of the robot. The performance of the robot was evaluated within the scope of a path-following experiment. The required accuracy for continuous cuts was achieved and reached 0.176 mm on the test bench.

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Robotic technology has reduced the errors of implant alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), but its impact on functional recovery after UKA is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to compare early functional recovery, pain levels, and satisfaction in UKA performed with either robotic assistance or conventional methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 89 matched consecutive patients who underwent outpatient UKA by a single physician using either conventional instruments (n = 39) or robotic methods (n = 50), with otherwise identical perioperative protocols. Outcomes studied included Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), new Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR.), VR/SF-12, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and perioperative opioid consumption. Patients in the robotic cohort had superior early functional outcomes, with greater LEFS (conventional = 23; robotic = 31) at 1 week post-op (p=0.015) and KOOS-JR (conventional = 74; robotic = 81) at up to 6 months post-op (p=0.037); these two values remained statistically significant after mixed-model regression analysis (p=0.010; p=0.023), respectively. At 1 year post-op, expectations were more likely to be met in those who received robotic assistance (p=0.06). No differences were reported with respect to postoperative opioid usage (p=0.320), reoperations (p=1.00), and complications (p=0.628). Robotic-assisted UKA resulted in more rapid recovery and less early postoperative pain and were more likely to meet expectations than conventional UKA, although functional differences equilibrated by 1 year postoperatively. Further follow-up is necessary to determine if implant durability is impacted by robotics.

Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Early Functional Outcomes

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) aims to improve accuracy of component placement. Studies have shown improvement in radiographic positioning/alignment with RA-UKA but have not addressed clinical outcome measures (COMs). The purpose of this study was to determine if RA-UKA is associated with improved early revision rates and functional outcome scores (FOS) compared with manual UKA. A systematic review of all English language articles from 1999 to 2019 on RA-UKA using Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified 277 studies. Seven (three randomized controlled trials) met inclusion criteria. Revision rates/FOS were aggregated for RA-UKA and manual UKA; a forest plot was constructed utilizing inverse variance/Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects meta-analysis. The seven articles included a total of 363 RA-UKA patients and 425 manual UKA patients. Mean age was 66 ± 3.5 and 65 ± 4.0 years, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 2.1 and 27.1 ± 1.5 kg/m², respectively. Mean follow-up was 25.5 months (4.5-48) and 29.1 months (4.5-48) for RA-UKA and manual UKA, respectively. At latest follow-up, RA-UKA patients showed a 26% ± 12 improvement in COMs versus 24% ± 12 improvement for manual UKA patients (p = 0.6). The revision rate was 3% for both groups (p = 0.8); however, a meta-analysis of RCTs showed no difference. Robotic and manual UKAs offer comparable improvements in pain, FOS, and revision rates. The effects of follow-up duration, ceiling effects of COMs, and surgeon experience remain unknown. Future studies comparing robotic versus manual UKAs with longer term follow-up may inform further benefits of each, with respect to component durability, alignment, and functional improvement.

What is the evidence for clinical use of advanced technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

With an aim of improving prosthesis survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), use of computer-assisted technologies (CATs) such as robotics, has been on the rise to reduce intraoperative errors in surgical technique. In light of recent influx of CATs in the UKA, a review of these innovations will help providers to understand their clinical utility.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 19 studies comparing robot-assisted UKA with conventional UKA, only 32% were randomized control trials, 47% reported minimum mean follow-up of 2 years, and 21% evaluated prosthesis survival. Similar results were obtained for navigation-assisted UKA and UKA performed with patient-specific instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

While CATs seem to reduce the surgical errors in UKA, the evidence on the efficacy of any of the studied CATs to improve survivorship remains limited and there are issues related to cost-effectiveness, learning curve, and increase in operating time.

Risk of a complete exchange or failure in total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a nationwide population-based cohort study from South Korea

PURPOSE

Few large-scale studies using adjusted data from national registries have explored the risk factors of subsequent revision in patients with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to those with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We investigated the incidence rate and risk factors of subsequent revision in patients with UKA and TKA.

METHODS

We enrolled all patients who had undergone TKA or UKA as the primary surgical procedure without histories of having undergone either procedure during the preceding 2 years. Matched Cox regression models were used to compare the risks of revision between groups after propensity score matching. Revision was defined as conversion to revision TKA after primary TKA and conversion to TKA after UKA.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 418,806 TKA patients and 446,009 UKA patients. The risk of revision during the entire study period was higher for patients with UKA than for patients with TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.10-1.36). The Kaplan-Meier 8-year survival was 98.7% in the TKA group and 96.7% in the UKA group. Patients with UKA were at an increased risk of revision in cases of advanced age (70-79 years, HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.15-1.71), female sex (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16-1.49), the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.54), the presence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.61) compared to patients with TKA. In patients with hemiplegia, however, UKA were associated with a lower risk of subsequent revision (HR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The risk of a complete exchange or failure was higher for patients with UKA than for patients with TKA. The most significant independent risk factors for subsequent a complete exchange or failure in patients with UKA were advanced age (70-79 years), female sex, and the presence of comorbidities such as COPD and PUD.

Meniscal bearing dislocation following minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated with simple open reduction: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Dislocation of polyethylene insert is one of the most common complications of mobile bearing-medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MUKA). Bearing dislocation was diagnosed by radiograph examination in these cases upon trivial injury.

CASE PRESENTATION

We reported one case of meniscal bearing dislocation after an Oxford MUKA treated with a simple open reduction technique.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Simple open reduction surgery without change of the bearing and the use of knee brace for 6 months was effective in preventing re-dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Mobile bearing dislocation is one of the most common complications in mobile-bearing MUKA. Besides the prevention of technical errors, usage of UKA with a frequency of 10-15 per year is recommended to increase the surgeon's learning curve.

Quantitative Evaluation of the Thickness of the Available Manipulation Volume Inside the Knee Joint Capsule for Minimally Invasive Robotic Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Developing robotic tools that introduce substantial changes in the surgical workflow is challenging because quantitative requirements are missing. Experiments on cadavers can provide valuable information to derive workspace requirements, tool size, and surgical workflow. This work aimed to quantify the volume inside the knee joint available for manipulation of minimally invasive robotic surgical tools. In particular, we aim to develop a novel procedure for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic laser-cutting tool.

METHODS

Contrast solution was injected into nine cadaveric knees and computed tomography scans were performed to evaluate the tool manipulation volume inside the knee joints. The volume and distribution of the contrast solution inside the knee joints were analyzed with respect to the femur, tibia, and the anatomical locations that need to be reached by a laser-cutting tool to perform bone resection for a standard UKA implant.

RESULTS

Quantitative information was determined about the tool manipulation volume inside these nine knee joints and its distribution around the cutting lines required for a standard implant.

CONCLUSION

Based on the volume distribution, we could suggest a possible workflow for minimally invasive UKA, which provides a large manipulation volume, and deducted that for the proposed workflow, an instrument with a thickness of 5-8 mm should be feasible.

SIGNIFICANCE

We present quantitative information on the three-dimensional distribution of the maximally available volume inside the knee joint. Such quantitative information lays the basis for developing surgical tools that introduce substantial changes in the surgical workflow.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone- and ligament-sparing alternative to total knee arthroplasty in the patients with end-stage single-compartment degeneration of the knee. Despite being a successful procedure, the multiple advantages of UKA do not correlate with its usage, most likely due to the concerns regarding prosthesis survivability, patient selection, ideal bearing design, and judicious use of advanced technology among many others. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and summarize the debated literature and discuss the controversies as “Ten Enigmas of UKA.”

Improved implant alignment accuracy with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the accuracy of tibial implant alignment using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

This retrospective matched case-control study reviewed 51 UKAs performed using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system, matched with 51 UKAs performed using conventional extramedullary rods. Coronal alignment and posterior slope of the tibial implant were measured on postoperative radiographs, and differences from preoperative planning were examined. Outliers and accuracy of tibial implant alignment were compared between the portable navigation and conventional groups using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively.

RESULTS

In the portable navigation group, 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. In the conventional group, 76.5% and 88.2% of the implants were within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. Statistical analysis revealed that outliers of coronal and sagittal alignment were significantly less in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). In addition, the absolute value difference between postoperative measurement and preoperative planning of both coronal and sagittal alignment was significantly smaller in the portable navigation group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The portable navigation system improved the accuracy of tibial implant alignment in UKA. We found that 100% of the implants were aligned within 3.0° of both target coronal and sagittal implant alignment. The portable navigation system decreased the outliers of tibial coronal and sagittal alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case-control study, Level III.

Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the 10-year survivorship and reasons for revision for a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) design. In addition, we report on patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction and compare results of medial vs lateral compartment UKA and cemented vs cementless UKA with the same design.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on a single-surgeon case series using a single fixed-bearing UKA design in 158 consecutive patients who underwent 177 UKA procedures between July 2000 and December 2010. Cases missing follow-up within the last year, clinically or via telephone, were excluded (n = 17, 10%). A cumulative incidence competing risk model was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of failure.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence of revision at a mean follow-up of 10 years was 13%. The majority of revisions (43%, 10/23) were for aseptic tibial component loosening, followed by progression of osteoarthritis (5/23, 22%). All Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures demonstrated mean T-scores within one standard deviation from the US population norm. The mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement was 96.9 (range, 40-100). The mean pain score was 3.8 (range, 0-8). Eighty-six percent of patients were satisfied with the UKA.

CONCLUSIONS

At 10-year follow-up, the most common causes for revision were aseptic tibial loosening and adjacent compartment knee arthroplasty, and similar results were found for medial vs lateral compartment and for cemented vs cementless UKA. Surgeons should consider these findings for future UKA designs, and this represents the first study reporting on survivorship and outcomes of this specific UKA design.

Biomechanical and Clinical Effect of Patient-Specific or Customized Knee Implants: A Review

(1) Background: Although knee arthroplasty or knee replacement is already an effective clinical treatment, it continues to undergo clinical and biomechanical improvements. For an increasing number of conditions, prosthesis based on an individual patient's anatomy is a promising treatment. The aims of this review were to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical efficacy of patient-specific knee prosthesis, explore its future direction, and summarize any published comparative studies. (2) Methods: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles published prior to February 1, 2020, with the keywords "customized knee prosthesis" and "patient-specific knee prosthesis". We excluded patient-specific instrument techniques. (3) Results: Fifty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. In general, clinical improvement was greater with a patient-specific knee prosthesis than with a conventional knee prosthesis. In addition, patient-specific prosthesis showed improved biomechanical effect than conventional prosthesis. However, in one study, patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty showed a relatively high rate of aseptic loosening, particularly femoral component loosening, in the short- to medium-term follow-up. (4) Conclusions: A patient-specific prosthesis provides a more accurate resection and fit of components, yields significant postoperative improvements, and exhibits a high level of patient satisfaction over the short to medium term compared with a conventional prosthesis. However, the tibial insert design of the current patient-specific knee prosthesis does not follow the tibial plateau curvature.

Rotational alignment errors can occur in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty if anatomical landmarks are misused: A preoperative CT scan analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate implant positioning, including rotation, is essential for successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study defined the rotational error that would result in medial UKA when using the medial edge of the tibial tubercle (TT) rather than the medial tibial spine for determining tibial component rotation, and in lateral UKA when aligning the anterior edge of the sagittal tibial cut with the lateral edge of the patellar tendon.

METHODS

Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed in 88 knees undergoing medial (n = 71) and lateral (n = 17) UKAs. In medial UKA, the angle between a line along the long axis of the medial tibial spine and a line drawn to the medial edge of the TT was measured. In lateral UKA, the angular relationship between the longitudinal axis of the lateral tibial spine and the lateral edge of the patellar tendon was measured.

RESULTS

In medial UKA, an average angular error of 9.6° of external rotation could result if the medial edge of the TT is used to set tibial implant rotation. In lateral UKA, the error of the sagittal tibial cut was an average of 7.1° of excessive external rotation if it is referenced on the lateral edge of the patellar tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative CT scan analysis showed that using the medial edge of the TT and lateral edge of the patellar tendon to set tibial implant rotation may result in excessive external rotation in medial and lateral UKAs, which could result in kinematic mismatch, suboptimal contact areas and rotational malalignment.

Biomechanical effects of posterior tibial slope on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The effects of the posterior slope of the tibial prosthesis on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have not been fully evaluated and controversies still exist.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effects of the posterior slope of the tibia on contact stresses in polyethylene inserts and articular cartilage using finite element analysis.

METHODS

We generated a computational model followed by the development of a posterior tibial slope (PTS) from -1° to 15° cases with increments of 2° PTS models. Using a validated finite element (FE) model, we investigated the influence of the changes in PTS on the contact stress in the medial polyethylene insert and lateral cartilage. The FE model's loading condition is level walking, a normal daily activity.

RESULTS

The contact stress increased on the lateral articular cartilage as the PTS increased. The contact stress on the polyethylene insert differed from the contact stress on the lateral articular cartilage, and it generally increased as the PTS decreased. However, in the initial stance phase when an axial force was exerted, it increased as the PTS increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that an offset of ±2° from the initial anatomical tibial slope does not biomechanically affect the outcome.

Low rate of iatrogenic complications during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with two semiautonomous robotic systems

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative complications due to utilization of robotic assistance during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have not been reported. While inadvertent soft tissue injury has been reported during total knee and hip arthroplasty with autonomous style robotic systems, the incidence of these problems with semiautonomous (i.e. surgeon-driven) systems is unknown.

METHODS

We report on a series of 1064 consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties performed by one surgeon with either one of two commercially available semiautonomous robotic systems.

RESULTS

There were no soft tissue, bone injuries or other complications related to the use of the robotic bone preparation method. Six complications related to the use of standard computer navigation pins occurred (0.6%) - one pseudoaneurysm of a branch of the tibialis anterior artery, one tibial metaphyseal stress fracture, and four areas of pin site irritation/superficial infection that resolved with a short course of oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Current semiautonomous robotic methods are safe, with few complications using meticulous surgical techniques.

The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model

Objectives

Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM).

Methods

A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest.

Results

Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants.

Conclusion

All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain.

Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2.

Infection After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A High Risk of Subsequent Complications

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores function and improves pain in appropriately selected patients. Scant evidence exists regarding the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What was the overall survivorship free from reinfection? (2) What is the survivorship free of all-cause revision? (3) What are the Knee Society scores (KSS) and complications after surgical treatment of UKA PJI?

METHODS

This retrospective study with data drawn from a longitudinally maintained institutional registry identified 15 UKA PJIs between 1992 and 2014. The median age at PJI diagnosis was 58 years (range, 41-82 years), nine of 15 were men, and the median body mass index was 29 kg/m (range, 23-36 kg/m). Ten patients (10 of 15) satisfied major Musculoskeletal Infection Society diagnostic criteria. There were five patients (five of 15) with early postoperative infections, five (five of 15) with acute hematogenous infections, and five (five of 15) with chronic PJIs. Two-stage exchange was performed in four patients with PJIs (four of 15), and débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) was performed in 11 patients (11 of 15) with PJIs. We performed Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis for reinfection and revision procedures. Thirteen patients had a minimum of 2 years' followup and were included in the clinical analysis. Median followup was 4 years (range, 2-6 years). We calculated KSS.

RESULTS

Infection-free survivorship was 71% at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-96%). Treatment success was higher for patients undergoing two-stage exchange (100% at 5 years; 95% CI, 100%-100%) versus DAIR (61% at 5 years; 95% CI, 31%-92%). Four of 11 patients undergoing DAIR had developed a reinfection at final followup. Survivorship free of any revision was 49% at 5 years (95% CI, 19%-79%). One patient from the two-stage exchange cohort underwent femoral component revision for aseptic loosening 5 years after PJI treatment, and two patients from the DAIR group were converted to TKA for disease progression at a mean of 4 years. In patients with a minimum of 2 years' followup, median KSS improved from 73 (range, 50-93) before index UKA to 94 (range, 55-100; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of UKA PJI with DAIR was associated with a lower infection-free survivorship at 5 years compared with two-stage exchange with conversion to TKA. Among those patients who were infection-free, a number needed reoperations for disease progression (in the DAIR group) or component loosening (in both groups). UKA PJI results in substantial morbidity, and patients with these infections should be followed closely for aseptic causes of failure in addition to infection recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: State-of-the Art and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a successful treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis that has lower complication rates, faster recovery, and a more natural feeling knee compared to total knee arthroplasty. However, long-term survival has been a persistent concern. As more surgeon-controlled variables have been linked to survival, interest in robotic-assisted surgery has continued to grow.

METHODS

A review and synthesis of the literature on the subject of robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was performed.

RESULTS

We present the driving factors behind the development of robotic-assisted techniques in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the current state-of-the art. The ability of surgeons to achieve intraoperative targets with robotic assistance and the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery are also described.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, as it allows surgeons to more accurately and reproducibly plan and achieve operative targets during surgery. Cost remains a concern, and it remains to be seen whether robotic-assisted surgery will improve long-term survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Robotic-Arm-Assisted vs Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis has potential benefits over total knee arthroplasty but UKA has a higher revision rate. Robotic-assisted UKA is increasingly common and offers more accurate implant positioning and limb alignment, lower early postoperative pain but evidence of functional outcome is lacking. The aim was to assess the clinical outcomes of a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial, comparing robotic-arm-assisted UKA with conventional surgery.

METHODS

A total of 139 participants were recruited and underwent robotic-arm-assisted (fixed bearing) or conventional (mobile bearing) UKA. Fifty-eight patients in the robotic-arm-assisted group and 54 in the manual group at 2 years. The main outcome measures were the Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score and revision rate.

RESULTS

At 2 years, there were no significant differences for any of the outcome measures. Sub-group analysis (n = 35) of participants with a preoperative University of California Los Angeles Activity Scale >5 (more active) was performed. In this sub-group, the median Oxford Knee Score at 2 years was 46 (IQR 42.0-48.0) for robotic-arm-assisted and 41 (IQR 38.5-44.0) for the manual group (P = .036). The median American Knee Society Score was 193.5 (IQR 184.0-198.0) for the robotic-arm-assisted group and 174.0 (IQR 166.0-188.5) for the manual group (P = .017). Survivorship was 100% in robotic-arm-assisted group and 96.3% in the manual group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, participants achieved an outcome equivalent to the most widely implanted UKA in the United Kingdom. Sub-group analysis suggests that more active patients may benefit from robotic-arm- assisted surgery. Long term follow-up is required to evaluate differences in survivorship.

Pros and Cons: A Balanced View of Robotics in Knee Arthroplasty

In both unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), compared with conventional techniques robotic technology has been shown to optimize the precision of bone preparation and component alignment, reducing outliers and increasing the percentage of components aligned within 2° or 3° of the target goal. In addition, soft tissue balance can be quantified through a range of motion in UKA and TKA using the various robotic technologies available. Although the presumption has been that the improved alignment associated with robotics will improve function and implant durability, there are limited data to support that notion. Based on recent and emerging data, it may be unreasonable to presume that robotics is necessary for both UKA and TKA. In fact, despite improvements in various proxy measures, the precision of robotics may be more important for UKA than TKA, although if system costs and surgical efficiencies continue to improve, streamlining perioperative processes, reducing instrument inventory, and achieving comparable outcomes in TKA may be a reasonable goal of robotic surgery.

Midterm Survivorship and Patient Satisfaction of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Studies have showed improved accuracy of lower leg alignment, precise component position, and soft-tissue balance with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). No studies, however, have assessed the effect on midterm survivorship. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective, multicenter study was to determine midtem survivorship, modes of failure, and satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial UKA.

METHODS

A total of 473 consecutive patients (528 knees) underwent robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA surgery at 4 separate institutions between March 2009 and December 2011. All patients received a fixed-bearing, metal-backed onlay tibial component. Each patient was contacted at minimum 5-year follow-up and asked a series of questions to determine survival and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survivorship.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 384 patients (432 knees) with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years (5.0-7.7). The follow-up rate was 81.2%. In total, 13 revisions were performed, of which 11 knees were converted to total knee arthroplasty and in 2 cases 1 UKA component was revised, resulting in 97% survivorship. The mean time to revision was 2.27 years. The most common failure mode was aseptic loosening (7/13). Fourteen reoperations were reported. Of all unrevised patients, 91% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA showed high survivorship and satisfaction at midterm follow-up in this prospective, multicenter study. However, in spite of the robotic technique, early fixation failure remains the primary cause for revision with cemented implants. Comparative studies are necessary to confirm these findings and compare to conventional implanted UKA and total knee arthroplasty.

A comparison of gait one year post operation in an RCT of robotic UKA versus traditional Oxford UKA

Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee surgery has been shown to improve the accuracy of implant alignment. However, little research has been conducted to ascertain if this results in a measureable improvement in knee function post operatively and a more normal gait. The kinematics of 70 OA knees were assessed using motion analysis in an RCT (31 receiving robotic-assisted surgery, and 39 receiving traditional manual surgery) and compared to healthy knees. Statistically significant kinematic differences were seen between the two surgical groups from foot-strike to mid-stance. The robotic-assisted group achieved a higher knee excursion (18.0°, SD 4.9°) compared to the manual group (15.7°, SD 4.1°). There were no significant difference between the healthy group and the robotic assisted group, however there was a significant difference between the healthy group and the manual group (p < 0.001). Hence robotically-assisted knee replacement with Mako Restoris Implants appears to lead not only to better implant alignment but also some kinematic benefits to the user during gait.

Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics

Recent advances and review of literature

Ten-year survival and patient-reported outcomes of a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component

INTRODUCTION

Biomechanical studies have suggested that proximal tibial strain is elevated in UKAs incorporating all-polyethylene tibial components with concern that this leads to premature failure. This study reports minimum 10-year outcomes for a UKA incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component to determine whether these concerns were realised.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

109 fixed bearing UKAs (97 patients, mean age 68 (range 48-87), 54/97 (56%) female) with all-polyethylene tibial components were followed up for ≥ 10 years with Oxford Knee Scores, Forgotten Joint Scores and Kaplan-Meier analysis. 106/109 implants were 7 mm, 3 were 9.5 mm.

RESULTS

Ten-year survival was 85.5% (78.6-92.4 95% CI) with the end-point failure for any reason. Unexplained pain was the commonest mode of failure (6/17) followed by lateral compartment osteoarthritis (5/17) and tibial subsidence/loosening (4/17). Revision rate was highest at 2-5 years due to revisions for unexplained pain. Ten-year survival was worse in patients < 65 years old (p = 0.035), in those with BMI > 30 (p = 0.017) and in those with postoperative increases in medial tibial sclerosis (p < 0.001 log-rank). Implant malalignment was not significantly associated with failure. Radioisotope bone scans in 16 patients all remained "hot" at mean 6.1 years (range 2.1-11.5). Relative risk of failure in patients < 65 years was 2.9 (1.2-7.0 95% CI) and when BMI > 30 was 2.9 (1.2-6.9 95% CI). In those with intact UKAs at 10 years, mean Oxford Knee Score was 34.8 ± 10.7, Forgotten Joint Score was 37.9 ± 26.7 and 96% were satisfied with their knee.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of early failure between 2 and 5 years in this all-polyethylene tibial component UKA did not persist in the long term. Though medial proximal tibial metabolic changes appear to persist they are not necessarily symptomatic. BMI > 30 and age < 65 years were significant risk factors for revision.

Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The exact indication for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains debated. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to decrease the surgical trauma related to the prosthesis implantation, and this technique is well fitted to UKA. However, there are concerns about loss of accuracy with minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, rapid recovery techniques have been developed in order to reduce the length of hospital stay. Again, UKA is well fitted to these new developments of postoperative care. We combine routinely a minimal invasive operative technique with navigation assistance to ensure proper positioning of the implants as well as an optimal ligamentous balance. Instruments have been adapted for use with a typical 6-cm skin incision with little change from the conventional navigated operating technique. A multimodal pain treatment is implemented immediately after the implantation, with special attention to a routine saphenous nerve blockade. Patients are instructed to stand up on the day of surgery with full weight bearing and to mobilize the knee joint without restriction. They may be discharged at least on the day following surgery, and the most favorable patients may be operated in our day-case surgery unit. These conclusions should be confirmed on a larger scale.

Robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

UKA has proven to be an effective surgical procedure, but its survivorship is still negatively affected by inaccuracy in component component positioning, implant and limb alignment. Robotic surgery has been introduced in order to minimize such technical errors. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes after a 3 years' experience of robotic assisted UKA with the Mako Robotic Arm.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients undergoing  UKA with robotic instrumentation (65 medial UKAs, 8 lateral UKAs) and with a clinical follow-up of 3 -37 months were included in the present study. A complete clinical evaluation with KOOS, FJS-12 and SF-12 was administered to all patients pre and post operatively. Post-operative HKA angle and surgical time were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean post-operative KOOS score was 81.32 (SD 17.19), while the mean FJS-12 score was 75.51 (SD 30.12) and the mean SF-12 Physical Score 42.25 (SD 9.97). 91% to 88% of post-operative results were considered satisfactory. Only 1 UKA failure was reported (1.3%) caused by peri-prosthetic infection. In medial UKAs mean postoperative HKA angle in extension was 3.9° varus (SD 2.5°), with no case of overcorrection; in lateral UKAs mean postoperative HKA angle in extension was 1.9° valgus (SD 1.9°) with 1 case (13%) of overcorrection. Mean skin to skin surgical time decreased from 83.2 minutes (SD 13.0) to 70.0 minutes (SD 10.9) along the learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic UKA has provided an improvement both in clinical and technical results, determining satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low risk of post-operative complications.

Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on lower limb alignment, soft tissue balance and component positioning, which can be difficult to control using manual instrumentation. Although robotic-assisted surgery more reliably controls these surgical factors, studies assessing outcomes of robotic-assisted UKA are lacking. Therefore, a prospective multicenter study was performed to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted UKA.

METHODS

A total of 1007 consecutive patients (1135 knees) underwent robotic-assisted medial UKA surgery from six surgeons at separate institutions between March 2009 and December 2011. All patients received a fixed-bearing metal-backed onlay implant as tibial component. Each patient was contacted at minimum two-year follow-up and asked a series of five questions to determine survivorship and patient satisfaction. Worst-case scenario analysis was performed whereby all patients were considered as revision when they declined participation in the study.

RESULTS

Data was collected for 797 patients (909 knees) with average follow-up of 29.6months (range: 22-52months). At 2.5-years of follow-up, 11 knees were reported as revised, which resulted in a survivorship of 98.8%. Thirty-five patients declined participation in the study yielding a worst-case survivorship of 96.0%. Of all patients without revision, 92% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter study, robotic-assisted UKA was found to have high survivorship and satisfaction rate at short-term follow-up. Prospective comparison studies with longer follow-up are necessary in order to compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA and total knee arthroplasty.

Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model

OBJECTIVES

Up to 40% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revisions are performed for unexplained pain which may be caused by elevated proximal tibial bone strain. This study investigates the effect of tibial component metal backing and polyethylene thickness on bone strain in a cemented fixed-bearing medial UKA using a finite element model (FEM) validated experimentally by digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of ten composite tibias implanted with all-polyethylene (AP) and metal-backed (MB) tibial components were loaded to 2500 N. Cortical strain was measured using DIC and cancellous microdamage using AE. FEMs were created and validated and polyethylene thickness varied from 6 mm to 10 mm. The volume of cancellous bone exposed to < -3000 µε (pathological loading) and < -7000 µε (yield point) minimum principal (compressive) microstrain and > 3000 µε and > 7000 µε maximum principal (tensile) microstrain was computed.

RESULTS

Experimental AE data and the FEM volume of cancellous bone with compressive strain < -3000 µε correlated strongly: R = 0.947, R2 = 0.847, percentage error 12.5% (p < 0.001). DIC and FEM data correlated: R = 0.838, R2 = 0.702, percentage error 4.5% (p < 0.001). FEM strain patterns included MB lateral edge concentrations; AP concentrations at keel, peg and at the region of load application. Cancellous strains were higher in AP implants at all loads: 2.2- (10 mm) to 3.2-times (6 mm) the volume of cancellous bone compressively strained < -7000 µε.

CONCLUSION

AP tibial components display greater volumes of pathologically overstrained cancellous bone than MB implants of the same geometry. Increasing AP thickness does not overcome these pathological forces and comes at the cost of greater bone resection.Cite this article: C. E. H. Scott, M. J. Eaton, R. W. Nutton, F. A. Wade, S. L. Evans, P. Pankaj. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:22-30. DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0142.R1.

High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the medium-term implant survivorship, the clinical results and the failure mechanisms of a novel unicompartmental arthroplasty for uncemented resurfacing of the medial tibio-femoral compartment.

METHODS

Seventy-six consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated with a mean final follow-up of 6 years (SD 5.3 months). In 44 patients, the diagnosis was osteoarthritis, and in 32 patients, it was avascular necrosis of the medial femoral condyle. The Hospital for Special Surgery Score was used for objective clinical evaluation, and a self-administered visual analogue scale was used to quantify residual pain at each observation point. Implant survivorship was determined assuming revision for any reason as endpoint.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were revised (6 with osteoarthritis and 13 with avascular necrosis of the medial femoral condyle). The mean interval time from index surgery to revision was 11.2 months (SD 4.66 months). Implant survivorship was higher in patients with osteoarthritis with respect to those with avascular necrosis of the medial femoral condyle (p = 0.018). Aseptic loosening was the most frequent failure mechanism. Femoral component loosening was reported in five patients and tibial component loosening was reported in other six patients. Assuming revision for any reason as endpoint, an implant survivorship of 74.3 % at 6-year follow-up was determined. In the remaining 57 patients, satisfactory clinical results were obtained. Hospital for Special Surgery Score and visual analogue scale for residual pain showed significant improvements (p < 0.03 and p < 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

At the present time, the standard cemented implants and the conventional designs for unicompartmental knee replacement still represent the optimal solution. The authors do not recommend the widespread use of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparative Fixation and Subsidence Profiles of Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Implants

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is the primary cause of failure for both cemented and cementless unicondylar knee replacements (UKRs). Micromotion and subsidence of tibial baseplate are two causes of failure, due to poor fixation and misalignment, respectively.

METHODS

Stair ascent activity profiles from Bergmann et al and Li et al were used. Biphasic Sawbones models were prepared according to the surgical techniques of traditional and novel cementless UKRs. Implants were tested for 10,000 cycles representing post-operative bone interdigitation period, and micromotion was observed using speckle pattern measurements, which demonstrated sufficient resolution. Additionally, the test method proposed by Liddle et al was used to measure subsidence with pressure sensors under increasingly lateralized loading.

RESULTS

Mean displacement due to micromotion for mediolateral and anteroposterior plane was consistently greater for traditional cementless UKR. Mean displacement for axial micromotion was significantly higher for traditional UKR at the anterior aspect of the implant; however, values were lower for the medial periphery of the implant. Subsidence was significantly lower for the novel design with increasingly lateralized loading, and indentation was not observed on the test substrate, when compared to the traditional design.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that the novel cementless design is capable of fixation and elimination of subsidence in laboratory test settings. Both designs limit micromotion to below the established loosening micromotion value of 150 μm. The L-shaped keel design resists both micromotion and subsidence and may prevent failure modes that can lead to aseptic loosening for UKRs. These findings are highly relevant for clinical application.

Analysis and Treatment of Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

To analyze the causes and types of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and determine proper prevention and treatment methods.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1,576 UKAs were performed for osteoarthritis of the knee from January 2002 to December 2014 at one institution. We analyzed complications after UKA retrospectively and investigated proper methods of treatment.

Results

A total of 89 complications (5.6%) occurred after UKA. Regarding the type of complications after UKA, there were 42 cases of dislocation of the mobile bearing, 23 cases of loosening of the prosthesis, 6 cases of periprosthetic fracture, 3 cases of polyethylene wear, 3 cases of progression of arthritis in the contralateral compartment, 2 cases of medial collateral ligament injury, 2 cases of impingement, 5 cases of infection, 1 case of arthrofibrosis, and 2 cases of failure due to unexplained pain. The most common complication after UKA was mobile bearing dislocation in the mobile-bearing knees and loosening of the prosthesis in the fixed-bearing knees, but polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis were relatively rare. The complications were treated with conversion to total knee arthroplasty in 58 cases and simple bearing change in 21 cases.

Conclusions

The most common complication after UKA was dislocation of the mobile bearing. When a complication occurs after UKA, appropriate treatment should be performed after accurate analysis of the cause of complication.

Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up

PURPOSES

To determine the long-term survival rate of an all-polyethylene tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a large series of consecutive patients and to investigate the possible factors that could influence the outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 273 patients at 6-13 years of follow-up was performed. Clinical evaluation was based on KSS and WOMAC scores. Subjective evaluation was based on a visual analogue scale for pain self-assessment. Radiographic evaluation was performed to assess femoral-tibial angle (FTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and tibial plateau angle (TPA). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed assuming revision for any reason as primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The 10-year implant survivorship was 87.6%. Twenty-five revisions (9.2%) were performed, and aseptic loosening of the tibial component was the most common failure mode (11 cases, 4%). The comparison of survival rate according to age at surgery did not show significant difference. Age at surgery, FTA, TPA and PTS were not related to higher risk of revision. No correlations were found between BMI, age at surgery and clinical scores. Finally, no statistical differences of radiographic measurements were found between revisions and non-revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has demonstrated on a large series of patients that UKA with an all-polyethylene tibial component, with an accurate technique and a proper patient selection, can provide a satisfactory clinical and functional outcome and a good overall survivorship of the implant at long-term follow-up. These advantages could be achieved at a lower cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Therapeutic Study, Level IV.

Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool

Although unicompartmental knee arthroplasty may pose a lower risk of perioperative complications and achieve better functional outcomes than total knee arthroplasty, a high degree of accuracy of implant positioning and soft tissue balance are required to optimize durability and implant survivorship. First-generation robotic technology improved implant position compared with conventional methods. This article reviews the next-generation robotic technology, an image-free handheld robotic sculpting tool, which offers an alternative method for optimizing implant positioning and soft tissue balance without the need for preoperative computed tomography scans and with price points that make it suitable for use in outpatient surgery centers.

Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Two design concepts are currently used for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) prostheses: fixed bearing (FB) and mobile bearing (MB). While MB prostheses have theoretical advantages over their FB counterparts, it is not clear whether they are associated with better outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to examine survivorship differences and differences in failure modes of between FB and MB designs.

METHODS

PubMed, Scirus and Cochrane library databases were searched for medial UKA outcome studies. A total of 44 papers, involving 9,463 knees, were eligible. Outcomes examined included knee function, survivorship and the reasons for, and incidence of, revision for FB and MB prostheses. Random effects meta-analysis was employed to obtain pooled revision rate estimates. Where available, cause-specific time to revision was extracted.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 8.7 years for FB and 5.9 years for MB prostheses. There were no other relevant baseline differences. The overall crude revision rate for FB and for MB prostheses was 0.90 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.21) and 1.51 (95 % CI 1.11-1.93) per 100 component years, respectively. After stratification on follow-up time and age, the revision rates were not substantially different, aside for younger patients in short term from studies with short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

No essential differences between the two designs were observed. MB and FB UKA designs have comparable revision rates. As our study is based on predominantly observational data, with large variations in reporting standards, inferences should be drawn with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Robotic Assisted Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA) is a favorable alternative to total knee arthroplasty for degenerative disease limited to two knee compartments. Recently developed robotic-assisted systems improved the clinical efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty by providing enhanced component positioning with dynamic ligament balancing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients, undergoing bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a single institution by a single surgeon using a robotic-assisted system. It was hypothesized that robotic assisted BiKA is a prevailing choice for degenerative disease limited to two knee compartments with good functional results. Methods. A search of the institution's joint registry was conducted to identify patients that underwent robotic-assisted BiKA of the patellofemoral compartment and the medial or lateral compartment. Results. A total number of 29 patients (30 BiKA) with a mean age of 63.6 years were identified who received a patellofemoral resurfacing in combination with medial or lateral compartment resurfacing. Twenty-four out of 29 patients had good to excellent outcome. Conclusion. Robotic assisted bicompartmental arthroplasty using broad indications and only excluding patients with severe deformity and those that have less than 4 mm of joint space in the surviving compartment demonstrated 83% good to excellent results.

High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Surgical robotics has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and soft tissue balance in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, although extensive data have emerged with regard to a CT scan-based haptically constrained robotic arm, little is known about the accuracy of a newer alternative, an imageless robotic system.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous freehand robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in UKA using cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

In this controlled study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 25 cadaveric specimens undergoing UKA using the new tool. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants.

RESULTS

The femoral implant rotational mean error was 1.04° to 1.88° and mean translational error was 0.72 to 1.29 mm across the three planes. The tibial implant rotational mean error was 1.48° to 1.98° and the mean translational error was 0.79 to 1.27 mm across the three planes.

CONCLUSIONS

The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. The next step will be to determine whether accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.

Assessment of the lateral patellar facet in varus arthritis of the knee

BACKGROUND

Lateral patellar arthritis has been associated with poor outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The current study correlates intraoperative findings with MRI imaging, skyline radiographs and the presence of anterior knee pain.

METHODS

In 92 consecutive knees with varus arthritis, the patellofemoral compartment was assessed during surgery, on skyline radiographs and on MRI. Anterior knee pain was recorded on a visual-analog-scale. Intraoperative assessment was based on the Outerbridge grading scale. Skyline radiographs were evaluated according to the Ahlbäck grading scale; MRIs were assessed according to a modified Outerbridge grading scale.

RESULTS

There was an excellent correlation (rs=0.833; p<0.001) in the cartilage assessment of the lateral patellar facet between MRI and surgery. A good correlation (rs=0.664; p<0.001) was seen between Ahlbäck Grades and macroscopic Outerbridge Grades of the lateral patella. Ahlbäck Grades and MRI modified Outerbridge Grades showed a good correlation (rs=0.643; p<0.001) for the lateral patella. Twelve percent of knees (seven out of 60) with Ahlbäck Grade 0 or 1 and mild to moderate anterior knee pain had a macroscopic Outerbridge Grade of 3 on the lateral patella. None of these 60 knees had a full-thickness cartilage defect on MRI.

CONCLUSION

Normal skyline radiographs in patients with mild to moderate anterior knee pain can rule out full-thickness cartilage defects of the lateral patellar facet as observed during surgery and on MRI. The MRI allows for the most accurate assessment of the patellofemoral joint and is warranted in all patients with radiographic abnormalities or severe anterior knee pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyse the accuracy of component placement during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a robotic-assisted system.

METHODS

Two hundred and six patients (232 knees) who underwent medial robotic-assisted UKA were retrospectively studied. Femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal alignments were measured in the post-operative radiographs and were compared with the equivalent measurements collected during the intra-operative period by the robotic system. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography was assessed against accuracy of the prosthesis insertion.

RESULTS

Robotic-assisted surgery for medial UKA resulted in an average difference of 2.2° ± 1.7° to 3.6° ± 3.3° depending on the component and radiographic view between the intra-operatively planned and post-operative measurements. Mismatch between pre-planning and post-operative radiography (inaccuracy) was related to improper cementing technique of the prosthesis in all measurements (except for tibial sagittal axis) rather than wrong bony cuts performed by the robotic arm.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted medial UKA results in accurate prosthesis position. Inaccuracy may be attributed to suboptimal cementing technique.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study

BACKGROUND

Balancing the relative advantages and disadvantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) against those for TKAs can be challenging. Survivorship is one important end point; arthroplasty registers repeatedly report inferior midterm survival rates, but longer-term data are sparse. Comparing survival directly by using arthroplasty register survival reports also may be inadequate because of differences in indications, implant designs, and patient demographics in patients having UKAs and TKAs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aims of this study were to assess the survivorship of UKA in the context of one large, northern European registry, and to compare the rates of survivorship with those of cemented TKAs performed for primary knee osteoarthritis during the same 27-year period.

METHODS

From the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, we obtained the data for 4713 patients undergoing UKAs for primary osteoarthritis (mean age, 63.5 years; minimum followup, 0 years; mean, 6.0 years; range, 0-24 years) who had surgical revision between 1985 and 2011. From this cohort, we calculated the Kaplan-Meier survivorship for revision performed for any reason and compared it with the survivorship of 83,511 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; minimum followup 0 years; mean, 6.4 years; range, 0-27 years) with TKAs treated for primary osteoarthritis during the same period. Data were adjusted for age and sex in a comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survivorship of UKAs was 89.4% at 5 years, 80.6% at 10 years, and 69.6% at 15 years; the corresponding rates for TKAs were 96.3%, 93.3%, and 88.7%, respectively. UKAs had inferior long-term survivorship compared with cemented TKAs, even after adjusting for the age and sex of the patients (hazard ratio 2.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A UKA offers tempting advantages compared with a TKA; however, the revision frequency for UKAs in widespread use, as measured in a large, national registry, was poorer than that of TKAs. When choosing between a UKA and a TKA, patients should be informed of advantages of both procedures, but they also should be advised about the generally higher revision risk after UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.