Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio

Optimizing the Femoral Offset for Restoring Physiological Hip Muscle Function in Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective

Femoral offset (FO) restoration is significantly correlated with functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Accurately assessing the effects of FO changes on hip muscles following THA would help improve function and optimize functional outcomes. The present study aimed to (1) identify the impact of FO side difference on the hip muscle moment arms following unilateral THA during gait and (2) propose the optimal FO for a physiological hip muscle function.

Methods

In vivo hip kinematics from eighteen unilateral THA patients during gait were measured with a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system. The moment arms of thirteen hip muscles were calculated using CT-based 3D musculoskeletal models with the hip muscles’ lines of actions. The correlation coefficient (R) between FO and hip muscle moment arm changes compared with the non-implanted hip was calculated. We considered that the FO reconstruction was satisfactory when the abductor moment arms increased, while the extensor, adductor, and flexor moment arms decreased less than 5%.

Results

A decreased FO following THA was significantly correlated with a decrease of the abductor and external rotator moment arms during the whole gait (R > 0.5) and a decrease of extensor moment arms during the stance phase (R > 0.4). An increased FO following THA was significantly associated with shorter flexor moment arms throughout the gait (R < −0.5) and shorter adductor moment arms in the stance phase (R < −0.4). An increase in FO of 2.3–2.9 mm resulted in increased abductor moment arms while maintaining the maximum decrease of the hip muscles at less than 5.0%.

Conclusion

An increase of 2–3 mm in FO could improve the abductor and external rotator function following a THA. Accurate surgical planning with optimal FO reconstruction is essential to restoring normal hip muscle function in THA patients.

The association between anterior femoroacetabular impingement and femoral neck fractures: An observational study

The impact between acetabulum and femoral neck is another possible mechanism of femoral neck fracture.Direct trauma of the greater trochanter may not be able to fully explain the mechanism underlying femoral neck fracture. In this study, we sought to investigate whether anterior femoroacetabular impingement are associated with femoral neck fractures.A total of 36 patients with femoral neck fracture who had undergone total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty were included in this study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: labrum tear group and normal labrum group. Patients' age, gender, body mass index, muscle injury, injury pattern, trauma severity, femoral head-neck offset, femoral head-neck ratio, Cam deformity alpha angle, acetabular anteversion, femoral head diameter, acetabular index, cortical index, hip axis length, and neck stem angle were recorded and analyzed. SPSS 18.0 software was used for statistical analyses.According to intraoperative findings, 22 patients exhibited a labrum tear. Magnetic resonance imaging examination revealed bone contusion on the anterolateral margin of the acetabulum with muscle damage surrounding the hip. Among 14 cases without a labrum tear, no bone contusion and obvious muscle injury were found on the anterolateral margin of the acetabulum. Notably, muscle injury, injury pattern, trauma severity and femoral head-neck offset differed significantly (P < .05) between labrum tear and normal labrum groups.Previous studies have focused more on direct lateral trauma. In this study, the impact between acetabulum and femoral neck is another possible mechanism besides lateral impact. Specifically, the abnormal anatomy of the hip, such as femoral head-neck offset, may promote the fracturing process.

Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Surgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches? (2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?

METHODS

From 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Cup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.

CONCLUSION

There is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.

Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of dynamic radiography using a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) system after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). A total of 32 hips of 26 patients who underwent HRA were included. Sequential images of active abduction in the supine position and flexion in the 45° semilateral position were obtained using the FPD system. We examined the imaging findings of impingement between the acetabular component and femoral neck with cooperative motion at maximal exercise. Moreover, the central component coordinate of the acetabulum and femoral head sides was measured. For abduction motion, impingement was detected in two (6.3 %) hips between the superior portion of the femoral neck and acetabular component. For flexion motion, impingement was detected in 19 (59.4 %) hips. There were no findings of subluxation between the acetabular component and femoral neck after impingement, but cooperative motion of lumbar and pelvic flexion was observed. There was no significant difference in the center-to-center distance regardless of the presence or absence of impingement. Detailed postoperative kinematics of the hips after HRA showed that the proposed dynamic FPD system could reveal acquired impingement and cooperative motion as dynamic images and possibly reveal findings that would be unobservable using static images.

Does component alignment affect gait symmetry in unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients?

BACKGROUND

Component malposition in total hip arthroplasty patients has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. However, whether the component alignment influences hip dynamic performance following total hip arthroplasty remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the component alignment and in vivo hip kinematics during gait.

METHODS

Nineteen unilateral total hip arthroplasty patients received CT scan for creation of 3D hip models. The component alignment between the non-implanted and implanted hips were measured and compared. Three-dimensional hip kinematics for both hips of the total hip arthroplasty patients during gait was quantified using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. The differences between the implanted and non-implanted hip kinematics during gait were calculated. A forward stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationships between the changes in implanted hip kinematics and the differences in component alignment with respect to the non-implanted hips.

FINDINGS

An average 5.1° (SD 6.5°; range -11.1° to 18.3°) increase in internal rotation was observed in the implanted hip than the contralateral non-implanted hip and significantly correlated with a linear combination of the increase of cup anteversion, cup medial translation and leg lengthening (R=0.81).

INTERPRETATION

Results suggested that the total hip arthroplasty patients compensated the changes in hip geometry by altering the dynamic movement during gait. Restoration of the native hip geometry, including acetabular cup anteversion, position and leg length could be one of the factors that influence the hip kinematics symmetry in total hip arthroplasty patients during gait.

Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Resurfacing as a percentage of total hip arthroplasty rose from 5.6 % in 2001 to 8.9 % in 2005 in Australia. During the same period the resurfacing to conventional prosthesis rose from 19.6 % to 29 % in the younger age group (less than 55 years). Long term (more than ten years) functional results of BHR are sparingly documented. Among the literatures available, the patient selection criteria vary from osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, and dysplastic hip to slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The objective of the current study is to evaluate long term survivorship and functional outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing surgery in osteoarthritic hip patients performed by a single surgeon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective clinical study, all patients who underwent hip resurfacing for osteoarthritis of hip between 1999 and 2004 are included. All surgeries were performed by single surgeon (SJM) and in all patients Smith & Nephew system (Midland Medical Technologies, Birmingham, United Kingdom)) was used. Revision surgery is considered the end point of survivorship. Means, standard deviations, and confidence interval were calculated for all continuous measures. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULT

The result is based on 222 patients (244 hips). This included 153 males and 69 females. Our mean follow up was 12.05 years and overall survival was 93.7 %. In terms of gender, survival in males was 95.43 % while in females it was 89.86 %. Failure was seen in 14 patients (16 hips), which included seven female (10.14 %) and seven male (4.57 %) patients. Failure of femoral components due to aseptic loosening and varus collapse was seen in eight patients after a mean 9.6 years. Metal allergy was seen in three patients (five hips), all of them were female of which two had bilateral resurfacing. Other complications included femoral neck stress fractures in two patients and acetabular component loosening in one patient. We observed that the failure rate is higher if the BHR femoral component size is 46 or less (ten out of 16 hips revised).

CONCLUSION

If patient selection is judiciously done and surgical technique is meticulously followed, hip resurfacing offers acceptable survivorship, satisfactory range of motion and enables patients to resume high demand activities including sports. Future improvements in the bearing surfaces, and possibly in the design, might alleviate concerns posed by high serum metal level and provide options that continue to benefit younger patients in future.

[Cement-free and cemented Excia hip shaft prosthesis: comparison of intermediate term results]

AIM OF THE STUDY

For fixation of total hip prostheses, cemented and cement-free techniques are available. Normally, anchoring techniques and the definitive endoprosthesis model are determined preoperatively based on the available information, such as the quality of bone. Some newer endoprosthesis models utilize the same instruments for both implantation techniques. In this way it is possible to decide on the final anchoring technique intraoperatively. Because such a combined endoprosthesis system has been used in our clinic for 10 years, we were interested in the clinical results at the intermediate stage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, non-randomized study 105 pairs from a continuing series were formed from 105 cases treated with cement-free prostheses and the latest cemented shaft implants from the same year. In this way a total of 210 hip shaft endoprostheses from the years 2002 to 2006 were included in the study. After an average time period of 6.3 years (range 4.5-8.2 years) the patients were recalled for a follow-up examination. The clinical results, early and late complications were analyzed. The immediately postoperative X-ray images and those from the follow-up examination were evaluated by an independent external expert with respect to primary positioning, migration and any signs of loosening.

RESULTS

At the follow-up examination at an average of 6.3 years the quota was 73%. The indications for cement-free/cemented total hip endoprosthesis were: primary arthritis 87%/98%, secondary arthritis 10%/2% and others 3%/0%. At the time of the last follow-up examination 4 and 14 patients, respectively, had died. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was given as 0.72/0.78. The Harris hip score improved from 54/48 to 93/90 points. The implant-related survival rate was 99.5%. Due to a periprosthetic fracture one of the cemented shafts had to be removed. Luxation occurred in 3/2 cases, respectively, of which 4 could be conservatively treated. In one cement-free case a head elongation and a change to an inlay with an anti-luxation shoulder was necessary. A fracture of the trochanter major was conservatively treated and an intraoperative shaft fissure was stabilized with wire cerclage and titan banding. The radiological evaluation showed no implant loosening or statistically significant differences in the shaft positioning.

DISCUSSION

Short and intermediate clinical and radiological results showed no differences in patients of similar average age in the sixth decade of life. The significant improvements in the Harris hip score and the range of movement could be confirmed in the intermediate term and are comparable to other current implants. It can be concluded that an intraoperative decision on the fixation technique based on the macroscopically visible bone quality supports the reliably good results of both methods.

Patterns of changes in femoral bone mineral density up to five years after hip resurfacing

This is a prospective study of 26 patients (29 hips) on the patterns of change in the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in various zones of the femoral neck and proximal femur five years after hip resurfacing. We have found that BMD continues to positively change up to five years after hip resurfacing. This was observed primarily in the trochanteric and superior neck regions. In both these regions BMD had decreased by up to 10% at six-weeks and three-months after surgery and then had recovered to preoperative level by one year. A regression analysis to assess the influence of age, gender, BMI, preoperative BMD, component size and orientation revealed that the best predictor of change in BMD at five years in the trochanteric area was acetabular component inclination.

Strict component positioning is necessary in hip resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty has some advantages, including improved metal-on-metal articulation, a lower dislocation rate and preserved femoral bone. This procedure is a surgical option for younger and more active patients with osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Although there have been some reports about the efficacy of this technique, others report serious complications caused by metal debris. Additionally, femoral neck preservation adversely decreases the head-neck ratio and results in postoperative impingement.

METHODS

We evaluated the range of motion after hip resurfacing with various component orientations and optimal component orientations to avoid postoperative impingement using computer simulations in 10 male patients with osteonecrosis.

RESULTS

The mean ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and internal rotation at 90° of flexion were 92.4° ± 13.8°, 25.7° ± 13.8°, 38.0° ± 11.1°, 29.1° ± 10.0° and 20.9° ± 11.5°, respectively. The oscillation angle in flexion and extension motion was 118.1° ± 10.3°. More than 100° of flexion was acquired in 79 of 240 simulations (32.9 %), and more than 20° extension was acquired in 142 simulations (59.2 %). Combined anteversion was significantly correlated with maximal flexion and extension angles. The component safe zone to fulfill the range of motion criteria varied among patients, and 4 of 10 patients had no safe zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative impingement occurs relatively frequently in hip resurfacing because of preservation of the femoral neck and component malpositioning. The safe zone of the acetabular component to avoid postoperative impingement is very narrow. Greater care should be taken regarding patient selection, rigorous preoperative planning and accurate component positioning.

Flexion following hip resurfacing and factors that influence it

Flexion following arthroplasty of the hip is important for activities of daily living. Studies have highlighted a possible reduction in flexion following Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) but failed to account for inter-subject variability and the possible etiology for this reduction. This in vivo study aims to determine whether flexion is restored following MoMHRA and identify factors that influence it. Charnley Class A patients (n=112) that underwent MoMHRA were reviewed in a dedicated clinic assessing flexion (resurfaced and contra-lateral hips) and outcome. The difference in flexion between both hips was defined as flexion deficit (δflexion). Various patient (age, gender, BMI) and surgical (component orientation, size, head-neck-ratio, offset) factors were examined in terms of their effect on δflexion. MoMHRA-hips had significantly reduced flexion as compared to the native hips. This flexion-deficit correlated with contra-lateral maximum flexion, component size, head-neck-ratio and component orientation. The findings demonstrate that flexion following MoMHRA is strongly correlated to but is reduced in comparison to the native, disease-free, hip flexion. Surgical practice can minimise flexion-deficit and optimise function.

Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle

The oscillation angle (OsA), which is the sum of the impingement angles on the two sides when the prosthetic neck sways from the neutral axis of the acetabular cup to the liner rim, is one of the most important factors that can affect the range of motion of an artificial hip joint. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of total hip component design on the impingement angle. Our findings show that an increase in cup depth of the liner restricts the motion of the neck and results in a reduced impingement angle, while an increase in chamfer angle increases the impingement angle until it reaches a critical value when a further increase no longer results in an increase in impingement angle. The impingement angle is not only dependent on the head/neck ratio, but also on the head size itself. For most arbitrarily chosen cup depths and chamfer angles, the neck only impacts at one point on the liner. This study proposes a suitable combination of cup depth and chamfer angle and a preferred impact mode, which, if impingement does occur, enables the neck to impinge on the liner rim over a large area. Cup-neck combinations that have an adequate OsA with maximum femoral head coverage are presented.

Have the media influenced the use of hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A review of UK print media

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to look at the different claims made about hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the popular UK print media and how this relates to findings in the scientific literature.

METHODS

A review of UK popular print media from January 1992 to June 2011 was performed using the Lexis(®) Library online news database. Only articles discussing the clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty were included. After excluding duplicates, 49 newspaper articles were found suitable for this study. The main outcome measure was the claims made in popular UK print media about hip resurfacing. These were compared with the scientific publication. We reviewed the trend of use of hip resurfacing prostheses during the same period as reported in the National Joint Registry.

RESULTS

A disparity was found between the claims in the newspapers and published scientific literature. The initial newspaper articles highlighted only the positive aspects of hip resurfacing arthroplasty, without definitive contemporary evidence backing the claims. Most of these claims were refuted by future scientific publications. The initial positive media reports coincided with an increase in the use of hip resurfacing but the decline coincided with negative reports in the scientific literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The trend of the newspaper articles and that of the number of hip resurfacing prostheses implanted suggests that the media may have been partly responsible for the increased use of this prosthesis. The subsequent decrease was initiated by the scientific literature.

Resurfacing arthroplasty for hip dysplasia: a prospective randomised study

In this prospective study a total of 80 consecutive Chinese patients with Crowe type I or II developmental dysplasia of the hip were randomly assigned for hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) or total hip replacement (THR). Three patients assigned to HRA were converted to THR, and three HRA patients and two THR patients were lost to follow-up. This left a total of 34 patients (37 hips) who underwent HRA and 38 (39 hips) who underwent THR. The mean follow-up was 59.4 months (52 to 70) in the HRA group and 60.6 months (50 to 72) in the THR group. There was no failure of the prosthesis in either group. Flexion of the hip was significantly better after HRA, but there was no difference in the mean post-operative Harris hip scores between the groups. The mean size of the acetabular component in the HRA group was significantly larger than in the THR group (49.5 mm vs 46.1 mm, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the mean abduction angle of the acetabular component between the two groups. Although the patients in this series had risk factors for failure after HRA, such as low body weight, small femoral heads and dysplasia, the clinical results of resurfacing in those with Crowe type I or II hip dysplasia were satisfactory. Patients in the HRA group had a better range of movement, although neck-cup impingement was observed. However, more acetabular bone was sacrificed in HRA patients, and it is unclear whether this will have an adverse effect in the long term.

Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings

OBJECTIVES

An ongoing prospective study to investigate failing metal-on-metal hip prostheses was commenced at our centre in 2008. We report on the results of the analysis of the first consecutive 126 failed mated total hip prostheses from a single manufacturer.

METHODS

Analysis was carried out using highly accurate coordinate measuring to calculate volumetric and linear rates of the articular bearing surfaces and also the surfaces of the taper junctions. The relationship between taper wear rates and a number of variables, including bearing diameter and orientation of the acetabular component, was investigated.

RESULTS

The measured rates of wear and distribution of material loss from the taper surfaces appeared to show that the primary factor leading to taper failure is the increased lever arm acting on this junction in contemporary large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that varus stems, laterally engaging taper systems and larger head diameters all contribute to taper failure.

Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings

Objectives

An ongoing prospective study to investigate failing metal-on-metal hip prostheses was commenced at our centre in 2008. We report on the results of the analysis of the first consecutive 126 failed mated total hip prostheses from a single manufacturer.

Methods

Analysis was carried out using highly accurate coordinate measuring to calculate volumetric and linear rates of the articular bearing surfaces and also the surfaces of the taper junctions. The relationship between taper wear rates and a number of variables, including bearing diameter and orientation of the acetabular component, was investigated.

Results

The measured rates of wear and distribution of material loss from the taper surfaces appeared to show that the primary factor leading to taper failure is the increased lever arm acting on this junction in contemporary large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Conclusions

Our analysis suggests that varus stems, laterally engaging taper systems and larger head diameters all contribute to taper failure.

Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion

BACKGROUND

Range of motion after hip arthroplasty may be limited by soft tissues around the hip, extra-articular contact and femoral stem-neck contact with the acetabular articular surface. Femoral head-neck diameter ratio is recognized as a major factor influencing hip range of motion. In hip resurfacing, range of motion is constrained by "cup component to femoral neck" contact. To avoid cup-to-bone contact or to increase the degree of flexion at which it occurs, anterior translation of the femoral component relative to the central femoral neck axis may improve anterior head-neck offset and hip flexion. We questioned whether low or high anterior femoral head to neck offset, cup inclination, stem anteversion, and component size influenced postoperative range of motion and hip flexion in patients who had undergone hip resurfacing.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 66 patients (68 hips) who underwent hip resurfacing at a mean age at operation of 46.4 years (range, 19-60 years). Mean follow-up was 37.5 months (range, 33-41 months). No patient was lost to follow-up. All patients were evaluated clinically and range of motion was precised. Radiological measurement evaluated the anterior femoral head-neck offset.

FINDINGS

Mean anterior neck-head offset was 7.5mm (range, 5-12 mm). We found significant linear regression correlation between anterior offset and flexion (R=0.66) and between anterior offset and global range of motion (R=0.51). One millimeter of anterior offset increased hip range of motion by 5° in flexion. No significant correlations were found between global range of motion or flexion arc of motion and component size, stem anteversion, cup inclination, gender ratio, preoperative arc of flexion or global range of motion.

INTERPRETATION

Restoring or improving deficient anterior femoral head-neck offset appears important for restoring postoperative range of motion and specifically hip flexion.

Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

PURPOSE

Determination of the cup orientation after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing may provide important information in the postoperative follow-up. We present a mathematical method based on a previously described approach to assess the version and inclination of the cup in the metal-on-metal bearing without a separate software computation from plain radiographs. The aim of the study was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of this method.

METHODS

Calculation of version and inclination were done twice for 20 hip resurfacings by four observers. Intra-observer reliability was estimated by mean error and correlation of the two sets of measurement for version and inclination. Bland-Altman plots, intra-class coefficient and mean error were used to assess the inter-observer reliability of the measurements.

RESULTS

Intra-observer correlation for version measurement ranged from 0.74 to 0.94. Correlation for inclination varied between 0.94 and 0.97. Upper and lower limits of agreement in Bland-Altman plots for version measurements between observers ranged from 4.1 to 7.2 degrees and from -3.2 to -8.3 degrees, respectively. For inclination measurements the upper and lower limits ranged from 3.1 to 5.3 degrees and from -2.7 to -6.0 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean errors, correlation coefficients and 95% limits of agreement were on an acceptable level. We believe that this method is applicable for clinical use.

Outcomes of hip resurfacing in a professional dancer: a case report

A new surgical option (hip resurfacing arthroplasty) is now available for younger patients with hip osteoarthritis. A more aggressive rehabilitation program than the typical total hip arthroplasty protocol is needed for active individuals. This case report describes interventions used to maximize function in a 46-year-old professional dancer after hip resurfacing with a progressive therapeutic exercise program. Exercise choices were selected to address dance-specific requirements while respecting healing of the posterior capsular incision. Strengthening focused on hip abduction, extension, and external rotation. Precautions included avoiding gluteal stretching until 6 months. Pelvic alignment and weight-bearing distribution were emphasized. The patient was able to return to rehearsal by 7 months, at which time strength was equivalent to the unaffected leg. Range of motion reached unaffected side values at week 8 for internal rotation, week 11 for extension, week 13 for adduction, and week 28 for flexion. External rotation and abduction were still limited at 1 year, which influenced pelvic alignment with resultant pain on the unaffected side. Functional and impairment outcomes are presented with timelines to provide a basis for postoperative benchmarks for active clients after hip resurfacing. Although this case report presents a dance-specific program, exercise progressions for other active individuals may benefit from similar exercise intensity and sports-specific focus. Future rehabilitation programs should take into account possible flexion and external rotation range limitations and the need for gluteal muscle strengthening along with symmetry and pelvic alignment correction. Long-term studies investigating intensity of rehabilitation are warranted for patients intending to participate in higher level athletic activity.

Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

This article determines the incidence and cause of the complications commonly associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants and the proposed methods to prevent these complications. The literature available in PubMed was reviewed. Complication rates after hip resurfacing are low, and the procedure has shown both safety and efficacy in the hands of surgeons trained in specialized centers. Proper surgical technique can further reduce the incidence of femoral neck fracture, component loosening, and abnormal wear of the prosthesis. A more systematic detection of adverse local tissue reactions is needed to provide accurate assessments of their prevalence.

Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear

We sought to establish the incidence of joint failure secondary to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in a large, three surgeon, multicentre study involving 4226 hips with a follow-up of 10 to 142 months. Three implants were studied: the Articular Surface Replacement; the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing; and the Conserve Plus. Retrieved implants underwent analysis using a co-ordinate measuring machine to determine volumetric wear. There were 58 failures associated with ARMD. The median chromium and cobalt concentrations in the failed group were significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed a failure rate in the patients with Articular Surface Replacement of 12.8% [corrected] at five years, compared with < 1% at five years for the Conserve Plus and 1.5% at ten years for the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Two ARMD patients had relatively low wear of the retrieved components. Increased wear from the metal-on-metal bearing surface was associated with an increased rate of failure secondary to ARMD. However, the extent of tissue destruction at revision surgery did not appear to be dose-related to the volumetric wear.

The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hip resurfacing (HRS) procedures have gained increasing popularity for younger, higher-demand patients with degenerative hip pathologies. However, with concerns regarding revision rates and possible adverse metal hypersensitivity reactions with metal-on-metal articulations, some authors have questioned the hypothesized superiority of hip resurfacing over total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this meta-analysis, we compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complication rates of these 2 procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of all published (Medline, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE) and unpublished or gray literature research databases up to January 2010. Clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications of HRS were compared to those of THA using risk ratio, mean difference, and standardized mean difference statistics. Studies were critically appraised using the CASP appraisal tool.

RESULTS

46 studies were identified from 1,124 citations. These included 3,799 HRSs and 3,282 THAs. On meta-analysis, functional outcomes for subjects following HRS were better than or the same as for subjects with a THA, but there were statistically significantly greater incidences of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery with HRS compared to THA. The evidence base showed a number of methodological inadequacies such as the limited use of power calculations and poor or absent blinding of both patients and assessors, possibly giving rise to assessor bias.

INTERPRETATION

On the basis of the current evidence base, HRS may have better functional outcomes than THA, but the increased risks of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery following HRS indicate that THA is superior in terms of implant survival.

Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing

There is limited morphological data on the sex differences between the commonly used pelvic parameters. This study analysed the CT scans of 100 consecutive Caucasian patients, 61 males and 39 females, undergoing hip resurfacing arthroplasty surgery for hip osteoarthritis in one institution.

There were no sex differences in femoral torsion/anteversion, femoral neck angle and acetabular inclination. Males had a mean femoral torsion/anteversion of 8 degrees (range -5 to 26 degrees), a mean femoral neck angle of 129 degrees (range 119 to 138 degrees) and a mean acetabular inclination of 55 degrees (range 40 to 86 degrees). Females had a mean femoral torsion/anteversion of 9 degrees (range -2 to 31 degrees), a mean femoral neck angle of 128 degrees (range 121 to 138) and a mean acetabular inclination of 57 degrees (range 44 to 80 degrees). Females had a significantly greater acetabular version of 23 degrees (range 10 to 53) compared with 18 degrees in males (range 7 to 46 degrees (p = 0.02) and males had a significantly greater femoral offset of 55 mm (range 42 to 68 mm) compared with 48 mm (range 37 to 57 mm) in females (p = 0.00). There were no significant differences between measurements taken from each patient's right and left hips.

These findings may be useful for the future design and the implantation of hip arthroplasty components.